Blog

Posted on

Strategic Presence and Legacy: USS Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Arrival in the Eastern Mediterranean

Air craft carrier The aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) 

Bill Cullifer, founder

As the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) Carrier Strike Group (IKECSG) sailed into the Eastern Mediterranean on April 26, it not only marked another chapter in the illustrious history of one of America’s formidable Nimitz-class aircraft carriers but also underscored the strategic importance of the U.S. Navy’s presence in this crucial region. This entry comes after a significant tenure in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations, showcasing versatile naval power and robust maritime capabilities.

The Historical Significance of the Eisenhower

Named after the 34th President of the United States, Dwight D. Eisenhower, the carrier was commissioned on October 18, 1977. Throughout its service, the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower has been a cornerstone of American naval might, capable of projecting power and supporting peacekeeping operations across the globe. Its presence in the Mediterranean is not just a routine operation; it is a demonstration of enduring commitment to stability and security in the region.

Importance of the Mediterranean Theater

The Mediterranean Sea has been a strategic crossroads for centuries, serving as a critical passage for trade and military endeavors. Today, it remains a vital area for U.S. and allied operations, serving as a bridge between continents and cultures. The arrival of the IKECSG highlights ongoing efforts to foster security, support NATO allies, and deter regional threats. The carrier’s capabilities, coupled with those of accompanying ships like the USS Gravely (DDG 107) and USS Mason (DDG 87), enhance the U.S. 6th Fleet’s ability to maintain a vigilant and responsive presence.

Recent Operations and Impact

Prior to its current deployment, the IKECSG was active in the Red Sea, Bab Al-Mandeb Strait, Gulf of Aden, and Arabian Gulf, participating in Operation Prosperity Guardian and conducting defensive strikes against Iranian-backed Houthi targets in Yemen. These operations demonstrate the group’s flexible and immediate response capabilities, which are crucial in maintaining regional stability and protecting international waters.

Forward Operating in the 6th Fleet

Under the command of Rear Admiral Marc Miguez, the IKECSG’s transition to the 6th Fleet’s area of operations is a strategic move that enhances the U.S.’s ability to project power and engage with allies and partners. Based out of Naples, Italy, the U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has been pivotal in shaping naval diplomacy and enhancing cooperative strategies that benefit all parties involved in maintaining the peace and prosperity of the Mediterranean region.

As the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower and its accompanying assets adapt to new challenges and opportunities in the Eastern Mediterranean, their arrival is a testament to the Navy’s global reach and its pivotal role in promoting peace, stability, and cooperation among nations. The ongoing commitment of the U.S. Navy in such strategic waters continues to be a cornerstone of American defense policy and international relations, reminding us of the enduring value and capabilities of carrier strike groups in the modern geopolitical landscape.

 

Posted on

A Historic Milestone: Delivery of the First Coed Virginia-Class Submarine

. The Virginia and the rest of the ships of its class are designed specifically to incorporate emergent technologies that will provide new capabilities to meet new threats.î Virginia will be delivered to the U.S. Navy this fall. Electric Boat is a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics.
Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Dear Friends and Supporters of Americans for a Stronger Navy,

We are witnessing a significant moment in naval history with the delivery of the USS New Jersey, the first Virginia-class attack submarine built to include women among its crew members. This milestone, achieved by Newport News Shipbuilding in collaboration with General Dynamics Electric Boat, marks a new chapter in the evolution of naval operations and inclusivity.

Breaking New Ground

The USS New Jersey represents not just technological advancement but also a progressive approach to crew composition. Initiated in March 2016, its construction has culminated in a submarine that not only meets today’s rigorous defense needs but also embraces the future with its inclusive design. This approach aligns with the Navy’s 2011 decision to integrate women into the submarine community, enhancing diversity and operational effectiveness aboard one of the most advanced platforms in the naval arsenal.

Navigating Challenges

The journey to this point was not without its challenges. The USS New Jersey was delivered approximately two years behind schedule, a testament to the complexities inherent in cutting-edge shipbuilding and the high standards maintained throughout its construction. The delays in blocks four and five of the Virginia-class submarines highlight the intricate dance between innovation and the practical realities of engineering and logistics.

Operational Excellence and Future Commitments

The upcoming commissioning of the USS New Jersey in September is eagerly anticipated. It will serve as a powerful symbol of our commitment to evolving and improving our naval capabilities. Jason Ward, Vice President of Virginia-class submarine construction at Newport News Shipbuilding, emphasized the dual focus on delivering critical capabilities to the fleet while upholding the highest standards of safety and quality.

Why This Matters

This development is pivotal for several reasons. It not only showcases the technological prowess and innovative spirit of our naval shipbuilding industry but also reflects a broader commitment to equality and inclusion within the military. The integration of women into the submarine force is a step forward in leveraging the full potential of our talented service members, irrespective of gender.

Key Takeaways

  • The USS New Jersey is the 11th Virginia-class submarine delivered by Newport News Shipbuilding, highlighting ongoing excellence in naval engineering.
  • Its design to accommodate coed crews is a response to changing policies and an evolving understanding of diversity’s role in operational success.
  • The challenges and delays experienced underscore the complex nature of modern submarine construction and the importance of continuous improvement in our industrial processes.

Let’s celebrate this achievement as a testament to the hard work, dedication, and vision that continue to drive our naval forces forward. Your support fuels our commitment to ensuring that the Navy remains a powerful, inclusive, and innovative force.

Thank you for standing with us as we support and advocate for a stronger and more capable Navy.

Bill

Posted on

Navigational Freedom and National Security: The Importance of the U.S. Navy’s Taiwan Strait Transit

us navy plane

 

Introduction

The recent flight of a U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidon through the Taiwan Strait not only reaffirms America’s commitment to navigational freedoms but also highlights the strategic importance of U.S. military presence in key international waterways. This operation comes at a critical time, just a day after high-level defense talks between the United States and China, aiming to mitigate tensions in the region.

Why This Matters

The Taiwan Strait is a vital gateway between the South and East China Seas, making it a focal point of international trade and military strategy. Despite being international waters, China views the transit of foreign military vessels and aircraft through the strait as a challenge to its claims over Taiwan. The U.S. Navy’s actions demonstrate a clear stance on upholding international law and ensuring that these waters remain open to all, a principle that is fundamental to global security and economic stability.

Why America Should Care

As a global leader, the United States has a vested interest in maintaining free and open access to the world’s maritime routes. The freedom of navigation operations (FONOPs) conducted by the U.S. Navy in the Taiwan Strait serve as a deterrence against aggressive territorial claims that threaten to undermine international norms and the global order. These operations also reassure U.S. allies and partners in the region of America’s commitment to security and stability.

Implications for the Navy

Continued operations in the Taiwan Strait are essential for the U.S. Navy in several ways. Strategically, they provide vital reconnaissance and maintain a U.S. presence in key areas, potentially deterring hostile or militaristic actions. Operationally, these missions enhance the Navy’s ability to operate in contested environments, ensuring readiness and capability in response to any regional crises. Politically, they reinforce the U.S. stance on international laws governing maritime navigation, supporting global maritime security.

Conclusion

The transit of the U.S. Navy through the Taiwan Strait is a clear signal of America’s enduring commitment to protecting navigational rights and freedoms for all nations. This operation not only supports international law but also underscores the crucial role of naval power in achieving U.S. strategic objectives. As tensions continue to manifest in the Asia-Pacific, the strength and presence of the U.S. Navy remain key to maintaining a balance in the region, ensuring that the seas remain open and free for all. Through steadfast and visible actions like these, the U.S. Navy not only defends its own national security interests but also upholds those of the free world.

 

Posted on

Ensuring Naval Dominance in Uncertain Times

Recent developments reported by the Navy Secretary, Carlos Del Toro, to the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee illuminate the critical challenges and operational demands facing the U.S. Navy. Amid 130 direct attacks over six months and a significant munition shortfall, the testimony underscores the urgent need for enhanced naval capabilities and support.

Key Takeaway

* The U.S. Navy’s ability to defend against frequent hostile actions and its urgent need for funding to replenish critical munitions highlights the indispensable role of naval forces in maintaining national and global security.

* The recent combat use of Standard Missile 3s (SM-3) further underscores the Navy’s forefront position in technological defense advancements.

Facing Frequent Threats

Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro revealed that U.S. warships have fended off 130 direct attacks in the Middle East over the past six months, demonstrating the volatile environment in which our forces operate. This significant number of attacks highlights the constant threats our naval forces face and the critical role they play in deterrence and defense.

Financial Strain and Legislative Urgency

The Navy is currently experiencing a $1 billion shortfall in munitions essential for these defenses. Del Toro’s appeal for Congress to approve additional funding is a stark reminder of the financial strains on military readiness. The delay in passing the national security supplemental funding by the House represents a critical bottleneck in supporting our naval operations.

Technological Advancements in Combat

The first-ever combat use of the SM-3 missile during the recent Iranian assault on Israel marks a significant milestone. This event not only demonstrates the Navy’s advanced capabilities but also the effectiveness of our current investments in missile defense technology.

Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA guided missile

Del Toro’s confirmation of the SM-3’s deployment highlights the Navy’s capability to engage and neutralize threats from beyond the atmosphere.

Bipartisan Support for Global Security

Senator Patty Murray’s comments emphasize the bipartisan nature of national security and the global implications of a well-funded Navy. Her criticism of the House’s delay in passing the supplemental reflects the broader political dynamics that can impact military readiness and global stability.

Why This Matters

The ongoing operational challenges and financial needs of the U.S. Navy are not just matters of military preparedness but are essential to sustaining global peace and security. The capability to deploy advanced defensive technologies like the SM-3 in combat situations is critical to deterring aggressive actions by state and non-state actors, ensuring the safety of international waters and global trade routes.

Conclusion

The testimonies before Congress serve as a critical reminder of the stakes involved in maintaining a strong and responsive U.S. Navy. As we navigate these uncertain times, it is paramount that bipartisan support for naval funding is secured without delay. The strength and readiness of our naval forces are key to our national defense strategy and a cornerstone of our international security commitment.

 

 

Posted on

Strengthening Ties on the  High Seas The Trilateral Maritime Exercise

Introduction

In a display of naval camaraderie and strategic alignment, the U.S. Navy joined forces with the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) and the Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN) for a trilateral maritime exercise.

This event, held on April 11-12, 2024, underscores the unwavering commitment of these nations to regional security and stability in the Indo-Pacific.

Takeaways

• The exercise involved advanced maritime communication operations, maritime interdiction operations training, air warfare exercises, staff exchanges, and integration.

• Participating vessels included the USS Theodore Roosevelt and various guided missile destroyers from the U.S., Japan, and South Korea.

• The trilateral exercise is a testament to the coordinated capabilities and cooperation between the three nations.

Why This Matters

The Indo-Pacific region is a vital artery for global trade and a strategic focal point for geopolitical stability. Joint exercises like these not only enhance military readiness but also serve as a deterrent to potential threats, ensuring the freedom of navigation that is crucial for the global economy.

Enhancing Regional Security Commitment to a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Rear Adm. Christopher Alexander emphasized the readiness of the allied forces to respond to any contingency, highlighting the shared goal of a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Addressing Threats and Humanitarian Challenges Captain Baek Jun-cheol noted the importance of the exercise in increasing the ability to respond to advancing nuclear and WMD threats from the DPRK, as well as providing humanitarian support to ships in distress.

Deepenin Security Partnerships Building on Decades of Alliance 2024 marks over 70 years of U.S. partnership with both the Republic of Korea and Japan. These exercises build on the foundation of mutual defense treaties and security agreements that have long underpinned peace in the region.

Coordinated Capabilities for Peace and Stability The trilateral exercises are conducted regularly as part of a commitment made at the Camp David Summit in August 2023.

They aim to enhance ballistic missile defense cooperation and deepen security partnerships.

Conclusion

The recent trilateral maritime exercise is a clear demonstration of the enduring partnership and strategic cooperation among the U.S., Japan, and South Korea.

As these nations continue to work together, they reinforce the collective security and prosperity of the Indo-Pacific region.

Americans for a Stronger Navy proudly supports these efforts, recognizing that our nation’s security and economic interests are inextricably linked to the stability of these vital waters.

Posted on

A Stronger Navy for a Secure America: USS Constellation Marks New Era in Naval Power

Americans for a Stronger Navy applauds the recent keel laying of the future USS Constellation (FFG 62)! This momentous occasion signifies a critical step forward in modernizing our nation’s fleet and ensuring American dominance at sea.

Why the Constellation Class Matters

Despite concerns over recent reports of delays due to labor shortages, supply chain issues, and design changes, the keel laying of the future USS Constellation (FFG 62) marks a significant step forward in modernizing our nation’s fleet. The builder, Fincantieri Marinette Marine, remains hopeful of minimizing these challenges and delivering this next-generation frigate on a revised schedule. Americans for a Stronger Navy applauds this momentous occasion!

The USS Constellation is the first ship in a new generation of frigates – the Constellation Class. These agile, multi-mission vessels represent a significant leap forward in naval technology. They are designed to operate effectively in both deep ocean (blue water) and near-shore (littoral) environments, providing a crucial advantage in today’s complex maritime landscape.

Benefits for America

A robust and modern Navy is essential for safeguarding our nation’s interests. Here’s how the Constellation Class strengthens American security:

Standing with Our Navy

Americans for a Stronger Navy is committed to advocating for a powerful and well-equipped Navy. We urge all Americans to join us in supporting this critical national security asset.

Stay Connected!

Together, we can ensure the United States Navy remains a force for peace, security, and prosperity for generations to come.

 

Posted on

Can America Reclaim Its Shipbuilding Might? A Deep Dive into Delays and the Road Ahead

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

The backbone of American naval power, the U.S. Navy’s shipbuilding industry, is facing a critical juncture. Years of delays in key programs have raised concerns about the Navy’s ability to maintain its edge and keep pace with potential adversaries. But the path forward is a complex one, fraught with economic considerations, national security implications, and the very real question of what price tag comes with rebuilding domestic shipbuilding capacity.

This investigative series will delve into the issue, giving voice to a range of stakeholders and exploring the potential solutions. We, the American people, ultimately foot the bill and rely on a strong Navy. This series aims to provide transparency and spark conversation about how to best move forward.

The Problem: Delays and Mounting Concerns

Recent reports paint a concerning picture. The Navy acknowledges delays of up to three years in major shipbuilding programs, impacting vessels like the Columbia-class submarine and the Constellation-class frigate. These delays raise serious questions about the Navy’s ability to meet its operational needs and deter potential threats.

Stakeholders: Who Has a Say?

Understanding the issue requires hearing from all sides. We’ll be speaking with:

  • Navy Leadership: What are the Navy’s specific concerns with delays? What solutions are they exploring?
  • Shipbuilders: What challenges are they facing that contribute to delays?
  • Policy Experts: How do these delays impact national security on a global scale?
  • Taxpayers: What are the economic implications of various solutions, including potential cost increases for domestically-built ships?

A New Twist: The Secretary of the Navy Visits South Korea

Adding another wrinkle to the story, in February 2024, U.S. Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro visited shipyards in South Korea, a world leader in shipbuilding. This visit sparked speculation about whether the Navy might be considering partnerships or outsourcing some shipbuilding efforts to alleviate domestic delays.

New Details Emerge: A Look at the Press Release

An official U.S. Navy press release sheds light on Secretary Del Toro’s visit and reveals some key details:

  • Focus on Collaboration: The primary goal of the visit was to attract Korean investment in U.S. shipbuilding facilities. This suggests the Navy is exploring partnerships with South Korean companies to bolster domestic capacity and efficiency.
  • Advanced Technology: The press release highlights Secretary Del Toro’s interest in the advanced technology used by Korean shipbuilders. Collaboration could potentially lead to improvements in U.S. shipbuilding techniques.
  • Long-Term Vision: The press release emphasizes Secretary Del Toro’s vision for a revitalized U.S. shipbuilding industry that encompasses both commercial and naval vessels. This broader perspective suggests a long-term strategy for strengthening the entire maritime sector.

Looking Ahead: Building Here vs. Outsourcing

The debate hinges on two central options:

  • Domestic Shipbuilding: Renewed investment in American shipyards could create jobs and bolster domestic manufacturing. But it might come at a cost in terms of time and expense.
  • Outsourcing: Turning to foreign shipyards could expedite production and potentially reduce costs. However, this raises concerns about national security and dependence on foreign entities.

A Complex Calculus: Speed, Cost, and Security

The ideal solution likely lies somewhere between these extremes. We’ll explore:

  • The “cost” of outsourcing: Is it solely financial? What are the potential security risks of relying on foreign shipbuilders for critical naval vessels?
  • Maximizing Efficiency: Can domestic shipyards improve efficiency to compete with foreign options?
  • The Long-Term View: What does a sustainable shipbuilding strategy look like for the U.S.?

We Need Your Voice: Join the Conversation

This investigation is for the American people. We encourage your questions, comments, and insights. As we delve deeper into the issue, let’s have an open dialogue about the future of American shipbuilding.

Posted on

Navigating the Waters: The U.S. Navy’s Divest-to-Invest Strategy and Its Implications

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

As we continue charting the course of the U.S. Navy’s future, we set sail into a sea of critical decisions. Well, today we focus on – the contentious debated divest-to-invest strategy. The Navy proposes to decommission certain vessels to free up resources for advanced capabilities, but Congress has its own course to chart. Let’s navigate these turbulent waters and explore the implications for the Navy, potential challenges, and the long-term impact on U.S. naval power.

What You Need to Know

At the heart of the debate is the Navy’s proposal to decommission 19 ships, including 10 before reaching their expected service lives. These ships may include cruisers, dock landing ships, and littoral combat ships (specific details are still being verified with Navy contacts). The Navy argues that divesting from older vessels will free up resources for investments in newer technologies and capabilities, better positioning the Navy to address evolving global threats. This divest-to-invest strategy, however, has faced opposition from some members of Congress.

Several lawmakers have voiced concerns about specific aspects of the plan. For instance, Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT) expressed worries about reducing the number of Virginia-class attack submarines, emphasizing the need for a larger submarine fleet in the face of a growing Chinese navy. Sen. Angus King (I-ME) highlighted the importance of icebreakers for operating in the Arctic Ocean.

Lawmakers have also been critical of the proposed decommissioning of cruisers and other vessels, citing their combat capabilities and missile power. These concerns have sparked debates between Navy officials and Congress, highlighting the complexities of balancing fiscal constraints with the need for a modern and effective fleet.

We are reaching out to Navy contacts to verify the complete list of proposed decommissionings and will update this post with any further information.

Why This Matters

The divest-to-invest strategy is not merely a budgetary concern; it’s a reflection of the Navy’s vision for future warfare readiness. The Navy argues that investing in newer, more capable vessels is essential to address evolving global threats, particularly a rising China, effectively. While the Navy’s proposal is part of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget plan, Congress has yet to decide on its implementation.

Implications for the Navy

For the Navy, the proposed decommissioning represents a shift towards a leaner, more technologically advanced fleet. It’s a move that could enhance the Navy’s combat power and operational agility but also requires careful consideration of the costs associated with maintaining older ships versus investing in new ones. Additionally, recent reports indicate delays in the construction of new ships, which could further complicate the implementation of the divest-to-invest strategy.

Implications for Congress

Congress faces the challenge of balancing the strategic needs of a larger fleet with the economic impact of decommissioning on shipyards and communities. Lawmakers must weigh the Navy’s arguments against the potential loss of jobs and the broader economic repercussions.

Challenges in Implementing the Divest-to-Invest Strategy

While the divest-to-invest strategy offers a potential path towards a modernized fleet, challenges remain in its implementation. A recent article from Breaking Defense highlights concerns from Congress about the divestment of ships exceeding the number of new ships being built. This raises questions about the Navy’s ability to maintain a sufficiently sized fleet in the short term.

The article also mentions the Navy’s request for only one Virginia-class submarine in FY25, despite previously planned purchases of two. This points to broader challenges in shipbuilding, potentially impacting the Navy’s ability to deliver on its long-term goals.

Conclusion

The debate over the Navy’s divest-to-invest strategy is more than a fiscal discussion; it’s a strategic deliberation that will shape the future of U.S. naval power. As the Navy and Congress navigate these turbulent waters, the decisions made today will have long-lasting implications for national security, economic stability, and the Navy’s ability to fulfill its mission in an ever-changing global landscape.

Call to Action

We encourage our readers to stay informed about this important issue. Follow along for updates on the budget proposal and Congressional hearings as continue . We also invite you to share your thoughts and questions about the divest-to-invest strategy by joining the discussion on our social channels by clicking here for Facebook.

Posted on

Empowering the Future of America’s Navy through Science and Technology

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

In an era where technological innovation underpins maritime dominance, the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps are charting a course towards a future where scientific prowess and technological superiority define their operational capabilities. The unveiling of the 2024 Naval Science and Technology Strategy by the Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy, presents a visionary framework aimed at propelling the naval forces into a new era of technological advancements and strategic superiority.

As someone who served in the Navy during the 70s, this announcement resonates with me on a deeply personal level. I recall the thrill of working with Loran-C, a navigation system that, despite its limitations compared to today’s satellite technologies, was pretty cool for the time. It was a fascinating piece of technology that could triangulate radio signals from towers across the globe to provide a general location. Although it wasn’t perect, it was an aid in navigation and a marvel for a young man fascinated by gadgets. This early exposure to naval technology not only sparked my lifelong interest in innovation but also paved the way for my subsequent career in communications and technology.

Key Takeaways

The strategy emphasizes an accelerated path towards technological innovations, focusing on leveraging cutting-edge fields such as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and Biotechnology. It underscores the importance of maintaining maritime technological dominance, fostering a culture of S&T excellence, and enhancing naval scientific diplomacy.

Why This Matters

The ever-evolving global security dynamics demand a Navy and Marine Corps equipped for both traditional and modern conflicts. This strategy is pivotal in ensuring that the United States retains its edge in maritime competition by making technological advancement a core pillar of its maritime strategy.

Implications for the Navy

Adopting this strategy signifies a transformative shift towards a more integrated and innovative approach to technology within the Navy. It calls for enhanced collaboration with the scientific and engineering communities, industry, and academia to create an ecosystem where technological breakthroughs rapidly transition into operational capabilities.

Why America Should Care

America’s prosperity and security are deeply intertwined with its maritime supremacy. This strategy extends beyond equipping the Navy and Marine Corps with advanced technologies; it’s about securing America’s ability to maintain its global leadership and strategic advantages.

Conclusions

The 2024 Naval Science and Technology Strategy sets forth a bold vision for a future where the fusion of science, technology, and naval warfare forms an unbeatable force. It’s a call to action for all stakeholders to contribute towards a future where technological superiority is a reality that secures national interests and maintains America’s global standing.

Reflecting on my own naval experience, it’s clear that the most powerful and successful navies have always been those at the forefront of technological innovation. This strategy not only honors that tradition but also points towards an exciting future of endless possibilities. For young individuals considering a career in the Navy, this is a testament to the myriad opportunities that lie in military service – opportunities that not only serve the nation but also lay the groundwork for a fulfilling career. My time with the Loran-C system was just the beginning of a journey enriched by technological exploration, and I firmly believe this strategy will inspire many more to embark on similar paths.