Category: Opinion Piece

Posted on

AI in Naval Warfare – From Logistics to Combat Strategy

Introduction from Americans for a Stronger Navy:

Bill Cullifer

Hello, Bill Cullifer here with Americans for a Stronger Navy. Welcome to our inaugural episode of this enlightening series where we delve into transformative technologies reshaping naval operations. Throughout this series, we will explore various cutting-edge topics, including AI, unmanned systems, Directed Energy Weapons, cyber warfare, and more. Today, we begin with the crucial role of Artificial Intelligence in naval warfare.

Series Outline:

  1. AI in Naval Warfare – This episode.
  2. Uncrewed Systems – How drones and autonomous vehicles are changing naval tactics.
  3. Directed Energy Weapons – The future of combat with lasers and high-energy systems.
  4. Cyber and Electronic Warfare – Securing supremacy in digital battlefields.
  5. Future Naval Strategies – Integrating new tech into traditional naval doctrines.

Overview: The Strategic Importance of AI in Military Operations AI’s role in military operations extends from enhancing logistical support to refining combat strategies. Its integration into naval operations promises significant advancements in operational efficiency and tactical decision-making.

Interview Segment: Insights from Admiral James Stavridis

We feature key insights from Admiral Stavridis during his interview with Fareed Zakaria on GPS. His expertise illuminates AI’s potential in transforming naval capabilities.

  • Logistics and Maintenance: AI’s predictive capabilities ensure higher readiness and efficiency.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: AI’s ability to analyze historical data aids in crucial decision-making processes.
  • Advanced Threat Response: The evolving role of AI in managing drone swarms and other asymmetric threats.

Why It Matters: Understanding the integration of AI into naval operations is crucial for anticipating how future conflicts will be managed and fought. AI not only enhances current capabilities but also opens new avenues in warfare strategy.

Implications for the Navy: Admiral Stavridis’ insights lead into a broader discussion on:

  • The necessity for ongoing training and adaptation among naval personnel to leverage AI effectively.
  • The potential shifts in naval strategy as AI technologies mature, particularly in terms of autonomous decision-making and real-time strategy adjustments.
  • Ethical and security considerations as AI becomes a pivotal element in defense.

Interview: CNN ZAKARIA and ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER

  • CNN ZAKARIA: We humans have a lot to worry about these days, climate change and other pandemic, even the threat of World War Three. But the unregulated development of artificial intelligence might be as potent a threat as any, according to my next guest. He was NATO’s allied commander Eirope. And he’s now vice chair of global affairs at the Carlisle Group. His fascinating new book “2054 Novel,” which he co-wrote with Elliot Ackerman, very talented, is centered on the existential treat AI poses for the future of the world. Jim, pleasure to have you on. Fascinating how you’re writing these series of books. And this one is really about the A.I. race in military affairs. So first, I want to ask you, explain to us the power of A.I.
  • CNN ZAKARIA: So, you’re a — you’re a naval commander, what would A.I. allow you to do as a naval commander that you weren’t able to do when you were actually commanding ships?
  • ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER: Let me give you three very practical things. Number one — and it doesn’t sound sexy, but it’s logistics and maintenance. Artificial Intelligence has a capability to predict when a particular set of maintenance functions are needed, make sure that the spare parts are in train, all of that done in a way that is much more efficient, much more capable.
  • ZAKARIA: But that’s huge because it keeps the ships in permanent readiness.
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. We always say in the military, the amateurs are the ones talking about strategy. The professionals are focused on logistics. That’s what wins wars.
  • But number two, artificial intelligence will allow a commander — say I was the captain of a destroyer, which I was. If I had an A.I. advising me, plugged into my decision process, that A.I. will have access to every naval battle ever fought. It would be capable of scanning the horizon of history and whispering into the commander, you really ought to think about this.
  • And then third and finally, and we’re seeing the edges of this in Ukraine, drone, swarms, bringing them together in very lethal ways. We currently can’t quite do that. Artificial intelligence will make swarming drones the greatest threat by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: You talk a lot about the A.I. race and it’s really U.S. versus China.
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: Who’s ahead?
  • STAVRIDIS: U.S. marginally ahead. Our mutual friend, Eric Schmidt, did a marvelous set of research on this a couple of years ago, and he would have said then, we’re about a year ahead of China.
  • My sense from my sources, China is closing that gap. This is the foot race that will determine geopolitical superiority by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: Are we building the right kind of military for that kind of world?
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. And let me add another example in terms of drones versus naval. Look what’s happening in the Black Sea. The Russian Black Sea fleet a third of it is on the bottom of the Black Sea, drinking seawater as we would say in the business.
  • Why? Not because Ukraine has a Navy, they don’t. It’s because the Ukrainians have used both air and surface drones. So, to your question
  • ZAKARIA: Drones are amazing. The minister showed them to me. They looked like toy boats —
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: — and they are really highly lethal drones that can sink these hundred — hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of warships.
  • STAVRIDIS: Correct. And so, the question then becomes, are the carriers still viable? I think they are for the moment, for the tenure future, 15-year future. Boy, you get much beyond that. And the capacity of massive swarms of drones accompanied by cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, all linked together by artificial intelligence, it will make those crown jewels of the fleet, our aircraft carriers vulnerable.
  • ZAKARIA: So, you’ve — you’ve held very, very high military office. And you know that there are some people who worry that Donald Trump, where he to be elected again, would politicize the military. Do you worry about that?
  • STAVRIDIS: I do. And I think that the greatest aspect of our national security isn’t a political military. And we would edge in to politics into that force at great peril to the republic. At the moment, all of my contacts in the active-duty military reassure me that the military continues to regard itself as apolitical, followers of the constitution. Let’s hope it stays that way.
  • ZAKARIA: And when you look at NATO, you were the former supreme allied commander, great, great title, by the way, there are people in Europe who worry a lot about Trump and NATO. And what I’ve heard people say is it’s — he doesn’t have to pull out of NATO. He just has to say, I’m not going to defend Latvia, Lithuania —
  • STAVRIDIS: Estonia.
  • ZAKARIA: Right. Because it’s a sort of — in some ways the whole — NATO is basically — it’s a psychological game. It’s the thread is psychological that the U.S. will get involved. That’s what Putin has to be calculating. And if the president says something like that — the NATO — the building can continue, the meetings can continue, but the heart of it is lost.
  • STAVRIDIS: We always say deterrence is the combination of capability and credibility.
  • NATO is incredibly capable. The defense budget of the United States and the Europeans together is well over 10 times that of Russia. The population is well over five times the size of Russia.
  • So, the capability is not the problem. You’ve put your finger on it, it’s the credibility. And yes, I would be very concerned about a Trump presidency that did not actively support and, indeed, lead within NATO. That’s a real concern.
  • ZAKARIA: From the former supreme allied commander of NATO.
  • STAVRIDIS: My pleasure, Fareed.
  • ZAKARIA: Thank you, sir.
  • STAVRIDIS: Thank you.

Further Viewing

Carrie Council interview with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral Stavridis:

Outro

Thank you for joining us for the first episode of our series. Don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast on your favorite platform to ensure you don’t miss any of our discussions on the future of naval warfare. Together, we aim to keep you informed and engaged with the latest in naval defense technology.

 

 

Posted on

Rising Tides of Tension: The Strategic Standoff at Scarborough Shoal and Its Implications for U.S. Naval Power

China claims the Scarborough Shoal, although it is inside the Philippines’ 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone. An international arbitration tribunal in the Hague said in 2016 that China’s claims had no legal basis – a decision Beijing has rejected according to press reports by Reuters

Introduction

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In light of recent developments in the South China Sea, particularly the installation of a floating barrier at the entrance of Scarborough Shoal, our ongoing coverage seeks to delve deeper into the escalating maritime tensions between the Philippines and China. This strategic waterway, vital for international trade and rich in natural resources, continues to be a flashpoint in regional geopolitics, affecting not just the immediate stakeholders but also global maritime norms and security.

Following Our Coverage

Building on our previous discussions around the strengthening of maritime alliances and the pivotal role of the U.S. Navy in maintaining a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, today’s focus shifts to a more granular incident that epitomizes the complexities of sovereignty disputes in these waters.

The Scarborough Shoal is one of Asia’s most contested maritime features and a flashpoint for diplomatic flare-ups over sovereignty and fishing rights. Here is what you need to know about the hotly contested area.

The recent satellite imagery revealing a floating barrier, presumably installed by China, at a critical juncture of the Scarborough Shoal, underscores the tactical maneuvers being employed to assert territorial claims.

Why Should Americans Care

The South China Sea is a linchpin in global maritime trade, with a significant portion of the world’s commerce transiting through its waters. Any disruption or militarization in this region poses a direct threat to international shipping routes, potentially escalating into broader conflicts that could involve U.S. interests and allies. Moreover, the principles at stake, including freedom of navigation and adherence to international law, are foundational to the global maritime order that the United States has long championed.

Implications for the U.S. Navy

For the U.S. Navy, these developments represent both a challenge and a call to action. Ensuring freedom of navigation in the South China Sea requires not just a robust naval presence but also a nuanced strategy that balances deterrence with diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions. The situation at Scarborough Shoal, and the broader territorial disputes in the region, test the U.S. Navy’s capability to uphold international norms, support allies, and engage in a strategic competition with China.

This independent story not only continues our coverage of the critical issues at play in the South China Sea but also highlights why these developments matter to Americans and the implications for U.S. naval strategy. By focusing on a specific incident within the larger narrative, we aim to provide our readers with a clearer understanding of the stakes involved and the importance of sustained attention and engagement with maritime security issues.

Posted on

Strengthening Maritime Alliances: A Call to Action for American Advocates

Australia and the Philippines Courtesy of Wiki

In a significant move toward bolstering regional security, Australia and the Philippines have recently inked a pivotal agreement aimed at enhancing maritime collaboration. This accord, underscored by a shared commitment to uphold international law, marks a critical juncture in the face of China’s expanding military footprint in the South China Sea. As Americans, it’s essential to understand why this development matters and the consequential role of the U.S. Navy in ensuring a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region.

Why Americans Should Care

The South China Sea is not just a distant waterway; it’s a vital artery for global commerce, with a significant portion of the world’s trade passing through it. The freedom of navigation in this area is paramount, not only for the countries directly bordering it but also for major trading nations like the United States. The recent agreement between Australia and the Philippines signals a growing consensus among like-minded nations to safeguard these crucial sea lanes from unilateral claims and aggressive actions that threaten regional stability and, by extension, global economic security. Please subscribe, support and tell your friends.

Implications for the U.S. Navy

The U.S. Navy stands as a pivotal force in maintaining maritime freedom and deterring aggression in international waters. The strengthening of alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, as exemplified by the Australia-Philippines accord, is a testament to the collective resolve to maintain a free and open region. This collaborative stance not only enhances the operational capabilities of the U.S. Navy through joint patrols and exercises but also amplifies the strategic message to potential adversaries that the international community remains united in its defense of the rules-based order.

For the U.S. Navy, this evolving security landscape underscores the necessity for continued investment in naval capabilities and readiness. It also highlights the importance of diplomatic efforts in forging and reinforcing alliances that extend the Navy’s reach and effectiveness. In an era where strategic competition demands not just military might but also the strength of partnerships, the U.S. Navy’s role in ensuring a stable and secure Indo-Pacific is more crucial than ever.

Join The Club

For those who recognize the importance of a strong and vigilant maritime force, the recent developments in the South China Sea serve as a clarion call. The Americans for a Stronger Navy advocates for the indispensable role of naval power in securing America’s interests and upholding international norms. By joining this community, you align with a group dedicated to ensuring that the U.S. Navy remains capable, adaptable, and ready to face the challenges of tomorrow.

As we navigate through these turbulent waters, the unity and strength of our alliances stand as our best defense against threats to maritime freedom and regional peace. It’s time to rally behind our Navy and support the partnerships that keep our seas open and secure. Join us in this vital mission for a stronger, more resilient maritime future.

This blog post draws inspiration from recent developments in maritime security alliances and the pivotal role of the U.S. Navy in maintaining a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region. It serves as a call to action for Americans to support naval advocacy initiatives and understand the strategic importance of a robust naval presence in global affairs.

Posted on

Reinforcing America’s Pacific Defense through Strategic Partnerships

The First Island Chain, extending from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines and Borneo.
NOTE TO READER: The blue line should go between Taiwan and China because Taiwan is an integral component of the First Island Chain.

Introduction

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In an era where global dynamics are rapidly evolving, the strategic importance of the Pacific region in maintaining America’s defense capabilities cannot be overstressed. A key element, often overlooked even by the well-informed, is the mid-Pacific chain of islands. These islands are not just dots on the map but pivotal assets in the geopolitical chessboard, ensuring America’s military and strategic superiority in the Asia-Pacific.

Strategic Significance of the Compacts of Free Association

The First Island Chain’s Defense Backbone

The First Island Chain, extending from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines and Borneo, forms a natural barrier crucial for regional stability and security. However, its defense is untenable without a secure base of operations in the central Pacific, provided by the Compacts of Free Association (COFA) states: Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Marshall Islands.

Guardians of the Central Pacific

These nations, through COFA agreements with the U.S., offer more than just strategic locations; they ensure American military mobility and operational freedom across a vast east-west corridor. This not only deters potential adversaries but also fortifies America’s defense posture across the Pacific.

Financial and Diplomatic Dimensions

A Cost-Effective Investment

At a glance, the financial commitment to the COFA states—$2.3 billion over 20 years—may seem substantial. However, when contextualized within the broader U.S. defense budget and the strategic value it brings, this investment is not only prudent but also cost-effective. The COFA agreements represent a fraction of America’s defense expenditure but play a critical role in maintaining peace and stability in the region.

Reciprocal Benefits

Beyond financial aid, the COFA agreements encompass deeper ties, including the right for COFA citizens to work in the U.S., many of whom serve in the U.S. military at commendable rates. This reciprocal relationship strengthens cultural and economic bonds, enhancing the strategic partnership beyond mere financial transactions.

Why This Matters

In the current geopolitical climate, where the balance of power in the Pacific is increasingly contested, the role of the COFA states becomes even more critical. The strategic locations of these island nations offer unparalleled advantages for surveillance, rapid deployment, and logistical support, essential for deterring aggression and ensuring regional security. The renewal of the COFA agreements is not just a matter of policy but a cornerstone of America’s Pacific defense strategy.

Conclusion

“The strategic landscape of the Pacific is intricately defined by the mid-Pacific islands, which are essential for our defense strategy. Dale A Jenkins, a Senior Advisor to Americans for a Stronger Navy and the author of ‘Diplomats and Admirals,’ poignantly underscores the critical significance of these islands within our defense framework—a fact that often eludes even the well-informed.”

As we navigate the complexities of contemporary geopolitics, the renewal of our agreements with these islands transcends mere policy—it’s an essential investment in the bedrock of America’s security and its leadership stance in the Pacific.

For entities like the Americans for a Stronger Navy and all advocates for regional peace and stability, championing these agreements is not just strategic but an imperative.

These partnerships stand as a testament to our enduring commitment to our Pacific allies, underpinning the collective security that safeguards our nation’s interests and upholds the values we share with our friends across the vast expanse of the Pacific.

Posted on

Securing Global Trade: The Critical Role of Naval Power in the Red Sea

Introduction

The Importance of a Strong Maritime Presence

Bill Cullifer, Founder

The recent actions in the Red Sea underscore the indispensable role of naval power in ensuring the security of international waterways. The coalition’s efforts to disrupt Houthi capabilities demonstrate the importance of maintaining a formidable maritime presence to protect global trade routes and uphold international maritime law.

The Need for a Stronger Navy

The challenges faced in the Red Sea highlight the ongoing need for a stronger navy, capable of projecting power, deterring aggression, and safeguarding the principles of freedom of navigation upon which global commerce depends. A robust U.S. naval force is not just a pillar of national defense; it’s a cornerstone of global stability and economic prosperity.

Why This Matters

The Red Sea is a strategic chokepoint in global trade, connecting the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal to the Indian Ocean via the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Any disruption in this area can have significant repercussions on global trade, energy supplies, and economic stability. The recent increase in Houthi attacks on commercial and naval vessels not only poses a direct threat to those at sea but also undermines international maritime law and global security.

Joint International Response

In a concerted effort to protect shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, the U.S. and the U.K., alongside Australia, Bahrain, Denmark, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, executed precision strikes on 36 Houthi targets across 13 locations in Yemen. This action was a direct response to over 30 attacks by the Houthis on maritime vessels since mid-November.

Targeted Strikes for Maritime Security

The coalition’s strikes focused on degrading the Houthis’ ability to launch further attacks, targeting their weapons storage, missile systems, launchers, air defense systems, and radars. These measures are crucial for disrupting the Houthis’ capabilities, thereby ensuring the safety of international and commercial vessels traversing the Red Sea.

Ensuring Freedom of Navigation

The importance of these operations extends beyond immediate security concerns, aiming to preserve the principle of freedom of navigation. The recent actions, including the defensive strike against a Houthi anti-ship cruise missile and the engagement of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) by U.S. forces, underscore the coalition’s commitment to maintaining open and safe international waterways.

Why Americans Should Care

The security of the Red Sea affects not just regional stability but also has direct implications for the United States. A significant portion of global trade, including energy supplies, passes through this region. Ensuring its security directly supports the U.S. economy and global standing. Moreover, these operations highlight the value of international partnerships and the U.S.’s role in leading and supporting global security initiatives.

Conclusion

The recent coalition strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen represent a critical step in ensuring the security of the Red Sea and, by extension, the stability of global trade routes. It is a stark reminder of the importance of naval power and international cooperation in addressing global challenges. As Americans, recognizing and supporting our nation’s efforts in these endeavors is essential for our national and economic security.

Posted on

Strengthening Our Navy: A Path to Security and Stability

Seth Cropsey, Yorktown Institute

Opinion Piece

Dear Members and Friends of StrongerNavy.org,

In light of recent developments and insightful analyses, such as the compelling opinion piece by Seth Cropsey, it has become increasingly clear that the path to securing our national interests and ensuring global stability heavily relies on the strength and capability of our Navy.

Bill Cullifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I/we stand firmly with the views expressed by Cropsey, particularly regarding the critical need for a coherent strategy in the Middle East and the indispensable role of a formidable naval force in the eastern Mediterranean, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, and the Persian Gulf.

The Indispensable Role of Naval Power

Naval power has long been the cornerstone of our national defense and international influence. Our navy has been protecting free trade since the beginning of the republic during wars against the Barbary pirates, a quasi-state actor not unlike the Houthis attempting to close the Red Sea to commerce in the present day. Our Navy not only secures vital trade routes that underpin the global economy but also serves as a potent deterrent against adversaries who might seek to destabilize regions critical to our interests. The recent events in the Middle East, as highlighted by Cropsey, underscore the urgency of bolstering our naval capabilities to respond effectively to emerging threats and maintain a balance of power that favors peace and stability.

A Coherent Strategy for the Middle East

The challenges we face in the Middle East are complex and multifaceted. They require not just military might but a comprehensive strategy that encompasses diplomatic efforts, alliances, and a deep understanding of the regional dynamics. Cropsey’s call for a coherent approach to the region resonates with our advocacy for a strategy that integrates naval strength with broader diplomatic initiatives, ensuring a more stable and secure environment conducive to our interests.

The Need for Decisive Leadership and Investment

Our current predicament in the Middle East, characterized by a lack of clarity and commitment, highlights the necessity for decisive leadership and a unified national approach towards defense and foreign policy. Cropsey’s critique of the present administration’s handling of the situation serves as a reminder of the consequences of inaction and indecision. As such, we advocate for significant investment in our Navy, not only to modernize our fleet but to expand our capabilities to meet the demands of an increasingly complex global landscape. The current fleet of less than 300 ships is not enough to sustain deployed forces in the Indo-Pacific, Mediterranean Sea, and the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. The nation needs that larger and more capable fleet to both defend key chokepoints like the Bab al Mandeb strait, and also ensure that ships and sailors are not extended on deployment, as the Ford carrier strike group had to be in order to meet the mission in the Eastern Mediterranean.

A Unified Call to Action

In agreement with Cropsey, we at StrongerNavy.org call upon our members, friends, and policymakers to recognize the urgency of the situation. It is imperative that we support policies and initiatives that strengthen our Navy and ensure it remains capable of protecting our freedoms, securing our interests, and contributing to global stability.

Let us unite in our commitment to a stronger Navy, one that is fully equipped to navigate the challenges of the 21st century and beyond. Our security, our prosperity, and our place in the world depend on it.

Together, we can forge a future that upholds the principles of freedom, peace, and stability that our great nation stands for.

Sincerely Bill Cullifer, Founder- Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

Don’t Give Up the Ship”: A Legacy of Naval Resilience

Introduction

Bill Culifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I stand before you at the helm of our collective endeavor, navigating through the tempestuous seas of our times. In the spirit of the storied tradition of the U.S. Navy, I am reminded of the age-old battle cry, “Don’t Give Up the Ship.” This phrase, more than just a call to action, is a beacon of resilience that has guided our sailors through storms and skirmishes, embodying the unwavering spirit to persevere, no matter the odds.

We find ourselves in waters marked by significant challenges, yet it is crucial to remember that we have weathered fiercer storms. The annals of history are replete with tales of our forebearers who, with steadfast resolve and a firm grip on the wheel, steered through perils, undeterred by the howling winds of adversity.

Now, as we face the uncertainties of our era, it is time not just to batten down the hatches but to set our sails with purpose, to harness the gales of change, and to chart a course through these turbulent times with courage and determination. Our Navy, a testament to the enduring strength and valor of the human spirit, has for centuries stood as a bulwark against the tempests of history.

Let us draw inspiration from this legacy and rally together, for in unity there is strength. With the compass of our convictions and the anchor of our unity, we shall not only withstand the storms but emerge stronger, guided by the unwavering light of “Don’t Give Up the Ship.”

As we embark on this journey, I invite you to join me at the fore, where together, we will face these challenges head-on, with the resolve and tenacity that have defined our Navy and our nation for generations. The time is now, to stand shoulder to shoulder, as we navigate the choppy waters of our present, buoyed by the lessons of our past and the hope for a brighter tomorrow.

The History Behind the Motto

The story of “Don’t Give Up the Ship” dates back to the War of 1812, when Captain James Lawrence, commanding the USS Chesapeake, uttered these final words amidst a fierce battle with the HMS Shannon. Though Lawrence’s life was cut short, his command lived on, immortalized by Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry at the Battle of Lake Erie. This historic event not only marked a turning point in the war but also solidified the motto as a symbol of American naval fortitude.

Symbolism and Legacy

The phrase transcends its historical origins, embodying the principles of courage, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment that define the U.S. Navy. It serves as a rallying cry, inspiring generations of sailors and officers to uphold the highest standards of duty and honor in the defense of our nation.

Why This Matters Now

In an era of evolving threats and global challenges, the legacy of “Don’t Give Up the Ship” is more relevant than ever. It reminds us of the importance of maintaining a formidable, agile, and technologically advanced Navy to safeguard our freedoms and ensure peace and stability in international waters.

What Americans Need to Know

  • National Security: A strong Navy is vital for deterring aggression and protecting American interests both at home and abroad.
  • Economic Impact: The Navy ensures the safety of critical maritime routes, essential for the global economy and the United States’ economic prosperity.
  • Innovation and Technology: Naval research and development have led to significant technological advances, benefiting military and civilian sectors alike.
  • Global Presence: The U.S. Navy’s global reach supports humanitarian missions, aids in disaster relief, and reinforces America’s commitment to international alliances and partnerships.

Why We Advocate

Our advocacy for a robust Navy is driven by more than just historical reverence; it’s motivated by a clear understanding of the strategic and practical implications of naval power. In championing the principles symbolized by “Don’t Give Up the Ship,” we not only honor our naval heritage but also commit to a future where freedom, democracy, and peace can thrive, supported by the strength and vigilance of the United States Navy.

Together, let us pledge our support for this noble cause, understanding that a strong Navy is not just our shield but also our beacon of hope, guiding us toward a safer, more secure world.

Please sign up for our blog post and newsletter and show your support.

Posted on

U.S. Naval Shipbuilding: Past, Present, and Future – A Nation’s Perspective

Dear Fellow Americans, Members and Friends of Americans for a Stronger Navy.

Today, we stand at a crucial juncture in our nation’s history, where the strength of our naval fleet is not just a matter of pride, but a critical component of our national security.

Bill Cullifer, Fouder

As the leader of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I am deeply committed to ensuring that the United States remains a formidable maritime power. This blog series, “U.S. Naval Shipbuilding: Past, Present, and Future – A Nation’s Perspective,” is a clarion call to action. It aims to shed light on the current challenges, draw lessons from our rich history, and chart a course for a future where America leads the seas.

The Problem Defined

The U.S. Navy currently faces unprecedented delays and workforce shortages in shipyards, resulting in postponed vessel deliveries and operational challenges. This not only hampers our fleet readiness but also impacts our ability to respond to global threats effectively.

In a statemet, January 11, 2024, Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro has ordered a “comprehensive shipbuilding review” to assess both “national and local causes of shipbuilding challenges.”

“I remain concerned with the lingering effects of post-pandemic conditions on our shipbuilders and their suppliers that continue to affect our shipbuilding programs, particularly our Columbia Class Ballistic Missile Submarines and Constellation Class Frigate,” Del Toro.

Historical Context

Reflecting on World War II, the U.S. overcame similar challenges through innovation, rapid expansion, and national mobilization. These lessons from history are vital as we confront today’s challenges.

Why It Matters

Our naval strength is crucial in an era of increasing global tensions.

Dominance at sea is not just about power projection but also about safeguarding international trade routes and ensuring global stability.

Inadequate shipbuilding capacity poses a direct threat to these objectives.

The Navy’s Stance

The U.S. Navy recognizes these challenges, advocating for efficient production practices and skilled labor. There’s an urgent need to modernize shipyards and invest in training programs to meet this demand.

Calling it a “strategic imperative”, Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro urged industry and academia to join efforts to restore the Nation’s competitive shipbuilding and repair landscape.

“We are a nation accustomed to taking on ambitious endeavors, and restoring our maritime strength is no exception.” Del Toro said.

Shipyard Perspectives

Shipyard managers emphasize modernization and investment in workforce training as critical to overcoming current challenges. They advocate for adopting technologies such as automation and advanced materials, and for policies that support the shipbuilding industry.

International Comparisons

Examining successful shipbuilding programs in countries like South Korea and Japan can provide valuable insights into managing efficient and technologically advanced shipyards.

Economic and Environmental Implications

A robust shipbuilding industry is not just a defense asset but also a significant economic driver, creating jobs and fostering technological innovation. Moreover, modern shipbuilding must align with environmental sustainability goals, emphasizing eco-friendly practices.

Public Awareness and Support

It is crucial to increase public awareness and support for naval shipbuilding. This involves understanding the industry’s impact on national security and the economy and recognizing the dedication of those who work in this vital sector.

Role of ‘Americans for a Stronger Navy’

Our organization is committed to highlighting these issues and advocating for a stronger naval fleet. We believe in the power of public support and policy advocacy to drive change.

The Threat and Consequences

Failure to address these challenges could result in a diminished global presence and reduced deterrence capabilities, leaving us vulnerable in an increasingly unpredictable world. The consequences of inaction are stark – diminished naval power in the face of rising global threats.

Public Perspective on U.S. Naval Shipbuilding

In understanding the broader implications of U.S. Naval Shipbuilding, the perspective of the American public plays a crucial role. Recent surveys and public forums indicate a growing awareness of the strategic importance of a strong naval presence for national security.

Many Americans acknowledge the economic impact of the shipbuilding industry, recognizing its role in job creation and technological innovation.

However, there is also a call for greater transparency and efficiency in naval operations and ship construction processes. Concerns about fiscal responsibility and environmental sustainability in shipbuilding practices are increasingly becoming part of the public discourse.

This collective voice underlines the need for a balanced approach that upholds national security interests while addressing public concerns about cost, efficiency, and environmental stewardship.

Conclusion

The need for action is clear. By learning from our past, addressing current challenges, and investing in our future, we can ensure a robust and ready naval fleet. Join us in this series to explore these themes and advocate for a stronger Navy.

Stay tuned for our next post, where we delve deeper into the lessons from World War II and how they can inform our approach today. Let’s move America towards a future of maritime strength and security.

Bill, Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

Outdated Footage of US Warship Fire Falsely Presented as Recent Houthi Attack

Americans for a Stronger Navy: Navigating the Tides of Information and Misinformation

USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) at Naval Base San Diego

In our digital age, where information is rapidly disseminated and often distorted, the recent incident involving the USS Bonhomme Richard video serves as a poignant example of the challenges posed by misinformation. This story aims to explore the impact of misinformation on public perception and policy, particularly in relation to the strategic role and operations of the U.S. Navy.

Misinformation in Naval Affairs: The USS Bonhomme Richard Incident

In January 2024, a video from July 2020 displaying the USS Bonhomme Richard engulfed in flames was inaccurately shared online as an attack during the Israel-Hamas war.

The significant point to note is that the original source of this misinformation was not identified by Reuters.

This omission is a common occurrence in misinformation cases, where content can become widespread without a traceable origin. The incident, in reality, was a well-documented fire in San Diego, leading to the ship’s decommissioning.

This case underscores the importance of verifying information in the digital realm.

The Challenge of Tracing Misinformation

The spread of misinformation, especially when the source is unclear, presents a significant challenge in the digital era.

This is not a new phenomenon in naval history; past incidents have demonstrated similar patterns of misinformation and their significant impact.

The inability to trace the original source often complicates the process of correcting false narratives.

Why Accurate Information Matters The ramifications of misinformation are far-reaching.

In the context of naval power, misinformation can influence public opinion, policy decisions, and even the strategic direction and support of naval operations.

Ensuring accurate and reliable information is critical for informed decision-making and maintaining public trust in naval affairs.

Conclusion The USS Bonhomme Richard video incident is a stark reminder of the critical need for accuracy in disseminating information related to naval operations.

As advocates for a strong and effective Navy, it is essential to recognize and confront the challenges of misinformation.

Ensuring that discussions and decisions are based on verified information is crucial for the future of naval strategy and national security.

Posted on

“Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power – ‘The Ocean’s Edge: Maritime Trade and Security Shaping World Order”

Welcome to ‘Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power’.

In this insightful episode, we have the honor of featuring Dr. Bruce Jones, a distinguished expert from the Talbot Center on Security, Strategy, and Technology, and the Center on East Asia Policy. Dr. Jones, known for his acclaimed work ‘To Rule the Waves’, brings a wealth of knowledge to our discussion on the critical issues shaping maritime power in our rapidly evolving global landscape.

My co-host Dale and I have previously laid the groundwork by introducing key themes and objectives of our series, including an in-depth conversation with Dr. Steven Wills, a respected naval historian and former U.S. Naval officer, in our episode ‘Developing and Implementing Effective U.S. Navy Strategies’.

Join us as we continue ‘Charting the Course’ for American Naval Power, exploring how maritime trade and security are pivotal in shaping the world order.”

In our dynamic global environment, we explore pressing questions:

    • Are we entering a new era of maritime power struggles due to climate change and intensified sea-based globalization?

    • What constitutes ‘ruling the waves’ in terms of maritime shipping dominance? How are factors like ship ownership, port control, and trade flow interconnected?

    • Dr. Jones discusses the vulnerability of container-based supply chains. Can he provide a specific incident of piracy or disruption that caused substantial economic impact?

    • What emerging threats, such as cyberattacks, climate disruptions, and political instability, are facing container shipping, and how can the US Navy and other stakeholders respond?

    • How will technological advancements like automation and AI reshape the future of container shipping, and what are the implications for efficiency, security, and workforce dynamics?

    • What is the current state of global trade, naval power, and the impact of climate change on oceans? What challenges and implications do these trends pose for the future world order?

    • Finally, how does the history of maritime trade and power mirror the patterns of post–Cold War globalization, with historical examples to support this relation?