Category: Cybersecurity

Posted on

U.S. Naval News Wednesday – September 4, 2024: Operational Highlights & In-Depth Editorial on Shipyard Modernization

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Welcome to this week’s edition of U.S. Naval News. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we’re committed to keeping you informed about the latest developments from around the fleet. This week, we bring you key updates, including the USS Abraham Lincoln’s strategic deployment to the Gulf of Oman and cutting-edge advancements in drone operations aboard the USS George H.W. Bush.

But we’re not stopping there. In this edition, we’re introducing a new feature—an in-depth editorial commentary. Following the news, we’ll dive deeper into a critical issue affecting our Navy: the recent GAO report on the state of U.S. shipyards. This report raises alarms about the capacity and readiness of our shipyards to meet the demands of a modern Navy. We’ll explore why this matters, what needs to be done, and how you—our readers and supporters—can join us in advocating for change.

Your involvement is more important than ever. Together, we can make a difference.

Thank you for your continued support. 

Operational Updates

  • USS Abraham Lincoln Deployment: The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) has positioned itself in the Gulf of Oman as part of a broader strategy to maintain a strong naval presence in the Middle East. This deployment comes amid increasing regional tensions, particularly related to Iran’s activities.
  • Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group Rescue: The USS Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group successfully rescued two distressed Iranian mariners in international waters. The rescue operation underscores the U.S. Navy’s readiness and commitment to maritime safety and humanitarian missions in the region.
  • Submarine Maintenance in Australia: The USS Hawaii (SSN 776) conducted scheduled maintenance at HMAS Stirling, Australia, under the AUKUS Pillar 1 initiative, which supports Australia’s development of a sovereign conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine capability.
  • Bilateral Operations with Italian Navy: The U.S. Navy and Italian Navy conducted joint operations in the Philippine Sea, focusing on enhancing maritime security and demonstrating a unified commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Technological and Strategic Developments

  • Drone Command Center on USS George H.W. Bush: A new drone command center has been installed on the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) to operate MQ-25 “Stingray” drones, marking a significant advancement in the Navy’s unmanned aerial capabilities.
  • FY24 NDAA Shipbuilding Boost: The U.S. Senate’s version of the FY24 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes authorization for the procurement of 10 new battle force ships, emphasizing the ongoing modernization of the Navy’s fleet.
  • China Watch: China recently claimed breakthroughs in autonomous vehicle technology, which could have significant military applications, including advanced driver-assistance systems and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These developments are closely tied to China’s broader strategy of integrating military and civilian technology efforts.
  • Russia Watch: Concerns continue to mount over the U.S. Navy’s readiness, particularly with regard to the availability of dry docks for essential ship repairs. U.S. lawmakers have voiced concerns about how this impacts naval operations, especially when compared to China’s rapid shipbuilding pace.

Community and Leadership News

  • Navy Shipyards Under Scrutiny: The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has raised concerns about the capacity and efficiency of U.S. shipyards, emphasizing the need for modernization to keep pace with global naval demands. The GAO report, released on September 2, 2024, highlights that delays in ship repairs and upgrades could severely impact fleet readiness. The report also notes that inadequate infrastructure and workforce shortages are critical challenges that need immediate attention.
  • Navy Wants Industry’s Help to Reduce Costs: Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro has called on the defense industry to partner with the Navy in reducing sustainment costs, particularly by securing better terms for technical data rights in acquisition contracts.

Editorial: The Imperative to Modernize U.S. Navy Shipyards

The recent GAO report underscores what we at Americans for a Stronger Navy have been emphasizing for the past two years: the state of our Navy’s shipyards is a national crisis. The threats we face are real and cannot be overstated. As the GAO has highlighted, the current state of our shipyards directly threatens our fleet’s readiness and, by extension, our national security.

This is not just a Navy issue—it’s a national imperative. We cannot expect the Navy to shoulder this burden alone. It’s time for Congress to act decisively, providing the necessary funding and legislative support to modernize our shipyards. The Navy’s ability to maintain a robust, ready fleet depends on it.

We propose a multi-faceted approach to solving this crisis. A private-public-community partnership is essential to drive the changes needed. Industry leaders, local communities, and government must come together to build the workforce, improve infrastructure, and streamline processes to ensure our Navy remains the most powerful maritime force in the world.

We can no longer afford to point fingers. It’s time to move forward with a united effort. The future of our national security depends on it.

  1. Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY)
    • Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
    • Established: 1767
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of naval ships, particularly nuclear-powered vessels.
  2. Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard
    • Location: Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
    • Established: 1908
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of submarines and surface ships.
  3. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
    • Location: Bremerton, Washington
    • Established: 1891
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and decommissioning of naval vessels, particularly nuclear-powered ships and submarines.
  4. Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
    • Location: Kittery, Maine
    • Established: 1800
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of nuclear-powered submarines.
  5. Huntington Ingalls Industries (Newport News Shipbuilding)
    • Location: Newport News, Virginia
    • Established: 1886
    • Specializes in: Construction of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines, as well as ship repair.
  6. Mare Island Naval Shipyard (Closed)
    • Location: Vallejo, California
    • Established: 1854, closed in 1996
    • Specializes in: Ship construction and repair (historically).
  7. Philadelphia Naval Shipyard (Closed)
    • Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • Established: 1801, ceased operations in 1995
    • Specializes in: Ship construction and repair (historically).

These shipyards represent a mixture of active and decommissioned facilities, but the active ones remain critical to maintaining and modernizing the U.S. Navy fleet, particularly in nuclear-powered ships and submarines.

Posted on

High-Speed Connectivity at Sea: The USS Abraham Lincoln Embraces SpaceX’s Starlink

High-Speed Connectivity at Sea: The USS Abraham Lincoln Embraces SpaceX’s Starlink

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy and a former U.S. Navy sailor from the 1970s, I find the latest technological advancement aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln both fascinating and promising. The integration of SpaceX’s Starlink system on this iconic aircraft carrier isn’t just about convenience—it’s about revolutionizing life at sea for our sailors and ensuring the Navy remains on the cutting edge of both technological and operational capability.

A Game-Changer for Morale and Productivity

The introduction of Starlink provides high-speed, low-latency internet, even in the most remote ocean regions. This capability dramatically enhances the quality of life for sailors who spend long periods away from home. With this system, sailors can now reliably connect with loved ones, play video games, stream content, and even engage in real-time video calls—a stark contrast to the unreliable and sluggish internet previously available through older Department of Defense satellites.

Vice Adm. Daniel Cheever and other Navy officials have highlighted how this development transforms the maritime experience by blending quality of life and work. It’s a significant morale booster, enabling sailors to maintain connections with family and friends, which is crucial for mental well-being during deployments​.

Balancing Connectivity with Security and Privacy

While the benefits of this high-speed connectivity are clear, the Navy has also implemented necessary measures to manage and secure the use of these systems. Content filtering is in place to ensure that internet access is used appropriately. This includes restrictions on accessing certain types of content, such as pornography, online gambling, and potentially some gaming sites. These filters help preserve the integrity of the network and ensure that bandwidth is allocated for essential communication and operational purposes​.

However, the increased connectivity also brings privacy concerns. The Navy’s network monitors which sites are accessed and controls bandwidth distribution among users. This monitoring is essential for maintaining network performance and ensuring fair usage across the crew, but it also raises questions about how much privacy sailors can expect when using the internet for personal communications. Although efforts have been made to provide private spaces for phone calls, such as the newly established phone booths, the system still tracks and manages internet usage, which could potentially impact the personal privacy of the sailors​.

Operational Implications: Beyond Morale

Beyond personal connectivity, Starlink’s high-speed internet is crucial for operational effectiveness. The ability to transfer several terabytes of data daily to cloud services enhances everything from training readiness to supply chain management. This capability allows the Navy to perform system updates remotely and stay ahead of potential adversaries, ensuring that the USS Abraham Lincoln and other vessels are always prepared for their missions​.

Conclusion

The deployment of SpaceX’s Starlink aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln is a remarkable step forward, reflecting the Navy’s commitment to enhancing both the operational effectiveness and quality of life for its sailors. It’s a development that, as a former sailor, I can only imagine would have been a game-changer during my time at sea. Yet, with this advancement comes the responsibility to address the accompanying challenges head-on to ensure that our Navy remains secure, resilient, cost effective and ready for the future.

A special thanks to @EryckStamper for the news tip that inspired this deep dive into the implications and benefits of this new technology for our sailors.

Posted on

U.S. Navy News Wednesday – July 24, 2024

RIMPAC 2024

Introduction

On behalf of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I’m pleased to present this comprehensive update on recent developments and activities involving the U.S. Navy. As highlighted in Navy News Wednesday, these stories showcase the dedication and resilience of our naval forces in various challenging and strategic scenarios. From cutting-edge technological advancements to crucial international collaborations, the following summaries provide insight into the pivotal role the Navy continues to play in safeguarding our nation’s security and interests.

Unmanned Systems Integration on Destroyers

The U.S. Navy has successfully integrated unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) onto Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, expanding the tactical capabilities of these vessels. These USVs are equipped with advanced surveillance and reconnaissance equipment, enhancing situational awareness and operational flexibility in contested maritime environments. This integration marks a significant step towards incorporating more autonomous systems within the Navy’s fleet.

RIMPAC 2024 Highlights

The Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC) 2024 concluded with a series of multinational naval exercises designed to enhance interoperability and strategic partnerships. Notable events included amphibious assault operations, maritime interdiction exercises, and live-fire drills involving over 25,000 personnel from 26 nations. These exercises underscored the importance of multinational cooperation in maintaining maritime security and stability.

USS Carl Vinson Returns to San Diego

The USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) returned to its homeport in San Diego after a six-month deployment in the Indo-Pacific. The carrier strike group conducted freedom of navigation operations, joint exercises with allied navies, and provided humanitarian assistance during its deployment. The Vinson’s return highlights the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Navy to maintain a forward presence in key regions around the world.

New Cybersecurity Measures Implemented

The Navy has implemented new cybersecurity protocols to protect its critical infrastructure from increasing cyber threats. These measures include enhanced encryption, advanced threat detection systems, and comprehensive training programs for personnel. The initiative aims to safeguard naval operations and maintain the integrity of the Navy’s digital assets in the face of evolving cyber challenges.

Collaboration with Indian Navy on Anti-Submarine Warfare

The U.S. Navy and the Indian Navy conducted joint anti-submarine warfare exercises in the Indian Ocean, focusing on tracking and neutralizing underwater threats. This collaboration involved P-8A Poseidon aircraft and surface combatants from both navies, strengthening bilateral ties and enhancing regional maritime security. The exercise demonstrated the strategic importance of U.S.-India naval cooperation in countering submarine threats.

USS Zumwalt Completes Combat System Trials

The USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) has completed its combat system trials, validating its advanced weaponry and sensor capabilities. The trials included live-fire tests of the ship’s Long Range Land Attack Projectile (LRLAP) and other advanced systems. The successful completion of these trials signifies a milestone in the operational readiness of the Zumwalt-class destroyers, designed to provide unmatched firepower and technological superiority.

Naval Diplomacy Efforts in Southeast Asia

U.S. Navy leaders engaged in a series of high-level discussions with counterparts in Southeast Asia, focusing on strengthening maritime security and cooperation. These talks included agreements on joint exercises, port visits, and initiatives to combat piracy and smuggling. The diplomatic efforts highlight the Navy’s commitment to fostering stability and collaboration in a strategically vital region.

These stories underscore the critical role of the U.S. Navy in addressing global challenges and ensuring the safety and security of maritime operations. Stay tuned for more updates and insights from Americans for a Stronger Navy.

Posted on

Ocean Shipping Disruptions and Their Economic Impact on Americans

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I have encountered a few pushback from those who believe that the need for a stronger Navy is overstated and that current global situations are someone else’s problem. This perspective overlooks the critical role that a robust Navy plays in safeguarding our economic interests and national security. In light of recent disruptions in ocean shipping, it is crucial to understand why the vast majority of Americans support a stronger Navy and how it impacts our daily lives.

Why This Matters

Global supply chains are intricately connected, and disruptions in one part of the world can have far-reaching impacts. The Red Sea, a critical maritime route, has recently seen increased attacks, forcing vessels to divert and causing gridlock at key ports such as Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea, China, and parts of Europe. This congestion is reminiscent of the chaos experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the repercussions are already being felt across the logistics and shipping industries.

Key Takeaways

  1. Rising Shipping Costs: The diversions and delays are leading to increased shipping costs. With vessels stuck waiting for berths and navigating longer routes, the cost of transporting goods is climbing rapidly.
  2. Port Congestion: Ports are struggling to manage the influx of containers, leading to long wait times and operational inefficiencies. This congestion exacerbates delays and adds to the overall costs of shipping goods.
  3. Supply Chain Delays: As ports become bottlenecks, the timely delivery of goods is compromised. This affects the availability of products on store shelves, especially as we head into the holiday season, traditionally a peak period for consumer spending.Implications for the U.S. Navy

Implications for the U. S. Navy

Drawing from Alfred Mahan’s principles of sea power, the current instability in the Red Sea underscores the importance of maintaining control over critical maritime routes. The U.S. Navy’s presence in these regions ensures the security of trade routes, thereby safeguarding the global economy and national interests. Mahan emphasized that control of the seas, especially through a formidable navy, is crucial not only for wartime dominance but also for peacetime economic influence.

Implications for America

The economic implications of these disruptions are multifaceted:

  1. Increased Consumer Prices: The rising costs of shipping are often passed down to consumers. Whether it’s electronics, clothing, or everyday household items, Americans will likely see higher prices at the checkout counter.
  2. Inflationary Pressures: As transportation costs rise, so do the prices of goods. This can contribute to broader inflationary pressures, impacting the overall cost of living.
  3. Business Costs: Companies that rely on imported goods face higher operational costs. These businesses may need to increase prices to maintain margins, further affecting consumer prices.
  4. Supply Chain Reliability: The reliability of supply chains is crucial for economic stability. Persistent delays and disruptions can lead to stock shortages, affecting businesses’ ability to meet consumer demand and potentially leading to lost sales and revenue.

Lessons from Alfred Mahan

Nicholas Lambert’s book, “The Neptune Factor,” reexamines Mahan’s theories, arguing that sea power is not just about military might but also economic influence. Alfred Thayer Mahan, a prominent American naval officer and historian, is best known for his influential book, “The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783.” Mahan’s groundbreaking ideas emphasized the strategic importance of a formidable naval presence to deter potential adversaries and ensure economic prosperity through control of maritime trade routes. Lambert emphasizes the need to integrate new technologies, such as cybersecurity and unmanned vehicles, and address environmental threats to maintain maritime dominance and economic security.

What Can Be Done?

To mitigate these impacts, several measures can be taken:

  1. Diversifying Supply Chains: Companies can explore alternative routes and suppliers to reduce dependency on any single shipping lane.
  2. Investing in Infrastructure: Enhancing port infrastructure and technology can improve efficiency and reduce congestion.
  3. Policy Measures: Governments can play a role in ensuring maritime security and supporting international efforts to stabilize regions like the Red Sea.

Conclusion

Current disruptions in ocean shipping underscore the vulnerability of global supply chains to geopolitical events. As Americans, understanding these connections is crucial. The economic ripple effects—from increased consumer prices to broader inflationary pressures—highlight the importance of resilient and adaptive strategies in both business and policy.

By addressing these challenges proactively, we can better navigate the complexities of a globalized economy and ensure stability and prosperity for all.

Drawing from Mahan’s insights, we must recognize that sea power encompasses both military strength and economic influence. Maintaining a robust naval presence and addressing modern challenges is essential for safeguarding our economic security and way of life.

Posted on

A Call for Unity and Urgency: Addressing America’s Security Challenges

In his recent piece, “America Hits the Global Snooze Button” in The Wall Street Journal, Walter Russell Mead, the James Clarke Chace Professor of Foreign Affairs and Humanities at Bard College and a scholar at the Hudson Institute underscores the critical nature of current global threats, echoing a sentiment that I wholeheartedly share. The urgency cannot be overstated: China’s aggressive expansion, Russia’s advances in Ukraine, and Iran’s destabilizing actions in the Middle East constitute a significant and multifaceted threat to global stability. This demands stronger U.S. armed forces to counter these threats effectively.

The situation around Taiwan, the South China Sea and the Philippines exemplifies the complexities we face. China’s assertive territorial claims and militarization of the region threaten not only our allies but also global trade routes. It necessitates a stronger U.S. naval presence and support for regional partners. The Middle East is increasingly volatile and involves contested waters of the eastern Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.  The U.S. Navy is the only effective naval force to counter the threats there and it is stretched thin.

Moreover, it is alarming to consider that our defense systems have potentially been compromised, which could be construed as an act of war. Yet, many Americans remain oblivious to these dangers, and who can blame them? After decades of conflict with little to show for it, the American public feels disillusioned, cheated, and exhausted. They see corruption and self-interest within the military-industrial complex and feel that politicians are complicit in perpetuating these issues.

The prevailing sentiment of mistrust extends to the government itself. Some argue for a more isolationist approach, focusing solely on defending our shores, while others, particularly younger generations, feel disenfranchised and disconnected from these geopolitical issues. This disconnect is further exacerbated by a widespread lack of historical knowledge, a consequence of its declining emphasis in our education system.

The threat of Chinese cyberattacks on global infrastructure is a significant concern. Chinese state-sponsored hacking has emerged as a critical global threat, targeting vital infrastructure across multiple nations. Recent reports reveal that Chinese military hackers have infiltrated Japan’s defense networks since 2020, accessing classified information about military capabilities and strategic plans. This breach, discovered by the U.S. National Security Agency, highlights the deep and persistent nature of Chinese cyber espionage. Despite efforts to secure these systems, the continued breaches underscore the sophistication and persistence of Chinese cyber capabilities. Additionally, China-based hackers have targeted U.S. government agencies, including the State and Commerce Departments, and critical sectors like transportation and utilities. These attacks are part of a broader strategy to gain access to sensitive information and disrupt vital infrastructure.

Additionally, recent reports indicate a troubling rise in cyberattacks against our critical infrastructure, including water supplies, by actors linked to China, Russia, and Iran. These cyberattacks do not just target water utilities but extend to other critical infrastructure, telecommunications networks, and security systems. They can disrupt access to essential services, steal intellectual property, and undermine our trade networks. The increasing frequency and sophistication of these attacks pose a significant threat to our national security and economic stability.

While Mead raises valid points about the severity of the threats we face, his politicization of the issue is counterproductive. The truth is, there is ample blame to go around, and what we need now more than ever is education and transparency. Americans deserve to understand the stakes and be assured of the integrity of those advocating for stronger defense measures. This is not a right versus left issue—it’s an American issue that requires a united, all-hands-on-deck approach.

A key mission of Americans for a Stronger Navy is to educate the public about these security challenges and the need for a stronger Navy. By fostering a national dialogue, we can bridge the gap between policymakers and the public, fostering mutual understanding and engagement. It is also crucial to emphasize the need for bipartisan cooperation in addressing these threats. A unified approach is necessary to effectively respond to the complex and evolving global security landscape.

In sum, the threats are indeed formidable, but trust is in short supply. Addressing this requires a commitment to honesty and clarity from our leaders, ensuring that the American public is both informed and engaged in the security decisions that will shape our future.

Thanks for listening.

Bill,
Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

AI in Naval Warfare – From Logistics to Combat Strategy

Introduction from Americans for a Stronger Navy:

Bill Cullifer

Hello, Bill Cullifer here with Americans for a Stronger Navy. Welcome to our inaugural episode of this enlightening series where we delve into transformative technologies reshaping naval operations. Throughout this series, we will explore various cutting-edge topics, including AI, unmanned systems, Directed Energy Weapons, cyber warfare, and more. Today, we begin with the crucial role of Artificial Intelligence in naval warfare.

Series Outline:

  1. AI in Naval Warfare – This episode.
  2. Uncrewed Systems – How drones and autonomous vehicles are changing naval tactics.
  3. Directed Energy Weapons – The future of combat with lasers and high-energy systems.
  4. Cyber and Electronic Warfare – Securing supremacy in digital battlefields.
  5. Future Naval Strategies – Integrating new tech into traditional naval doctrines.

Overview: The Strategic Importance of AI in Military Operations AI’s role in military operations extends from enhancing logistical support to refining combat strategies. Its integration into naval operations promises significant advancements in operational efficiency and tactical decision-making.

Interview Segment: Insights from Admiral James Stavridis

We feature key insights from Admiral Stavridis during his interview with Fareed Zakaria on GPS. His expertise illuminates AI’s potential in transforming naval capabilities.

  • Logistics and Maintenance: AI’s predictive capabilities ensure higher readiness and efficiency.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: AI’s ability to analyze historical data aids in crucial decision-making processes.
  • Advanced Threat Response: The evolving role of AI in managing drone swarms and other asymmetric threats.

Why It Matters: Understanding the integration of AI into naval operations is crucial for anticipating how future conflicts will be managed and fought. AI not only enhances current capabilities but also opens new avenues in warfare strategy.

Implications for the Navy: Admiral Stavridis’ insights lead into a broader discussion on:

  • The necessity for ongoing training and adaptation among naval personnel to leverage AI effectively.
  • The potential shifts in naval strategy as AI technologies mature, particularly in terms of autonomous decision-making and real-time strategy adjustments.
  • Ethical and security considerations as AI becomes a pivotal element in defense.

Interview: CNN ZAKARIA and ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER

  • CNN ZAKARIA: We humans have a lot to worry about these days, climate change and other pandemic, even the threat of World War Three. But the unregulated development of artificial intelligence might be as potent a threat as any, according to my next guest. He was NATO’s allied commander Eirope. And he’s now vice chair of global affairs at the Carlisle Group. His fascinating new book “2054 Novel,” which he co-wrote with Elliot Ackerman, very talented, is centered on the existential treat AI poses for the future of the world. Jim, pleasure to have you on. Fascinating how you’re writing these series of books. And this one is really about the A.I. race in military affairs. So first, I want to ask you, explain to us the power of A.I.
  • CNN ZAKARIA: So, you’re a — you’re a naval commander, what would A.I. allow you to do as a naval commander that you weren’t able to do when you were actually commanding ships?
  • ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER: Let me give you three very practical things. Number one — and it doesn’t sound sexy, but it’s logistics and maintenance. Artificial Intelligence has a capability to predict when a particular set of maintenance functions are needed, make sure that the spare parts are in train, all of that done in a way that is much more efficient, much more capable.
  • ZAKARIA: But that’s huge because it keeps the ships in permanent readiness.
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. We always say in the military, the amateurs are the ones talking about strategy. The professionals are focused on logistics. That’s what wins wars.
  • But number two, artificial intelligence will allow a commander — say I was the captain of a destroyer, which I was. If I had an A.I. advising me, plugged into my decision process, that A.I. will have access to every naval battle ever fought. It would be capable of scanning the horizon of history and whispering into the commander, you really ought to think about this.
  • And then third and finally, and we’re seeing the edges of this in Ukraine, drone, swarms, bringing them together in very lethal ways. We currently can’t quite do that. Artificial intelligence will make swarming drones the greatest threat by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: You talk a lot about the A.I. race and it’s really U.S. versus China.
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: Who’s ahead?
  • STAVRIDIS: U.S. marginally ahead. Our mutual friend, Eric Schmidt, did a marvelous set of research on this a couple of years ago, and he would have said then, we’re about a year ahead of China.
  • My sense from my sources, China is closing that gap. This is the foot race that will determine geopolitical superiority by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: Are we building the right kind of military for that kind of world?
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. And let me add another example in terms of drones versus naval. Look what’s happening in the Black Sea. The Russian Black Sea fleet a third of it is on the bottom of the Black Sea, drinking seawater as we would say in the business.
  • Why? Not because Ukraine has a Navy, they don’t. It’s because the Ukrainians have used both air and surface drones. So, to your question
  • ZAKARIA: Drones are amazing. The minister showed them to me. They looked like toy boats —
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: — and they are really highly lethal drones that can sink these hundred — hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of warships.
  • STAVRIDIS: Correct. And so, the question then becomes, are the carriers still viable? I think they are for the moment, for the tenure future, 15-year future. Boy, you get much beyond that. And the capacity of massive swarms of drones accompanied by cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, all linked together by artificial intelligence, it will make those crown jewels of the fleet, our aircraft carriers vulnerable.
  • ZAKARIA: So, you’ve — you’ve held very, very high military office. And you know that there are some people who worry that Donald Trump, where he to be elected again, would politicize the military. Do you worry about that?
  • STAVRIDIS: I do. And I think that the greatest aspect of our national security isn’t a political military. And we would edge in to politics into that force at great peril to the republic. At the moment, all of my contacts in the active-duty military reassure me that the military continues to regard itself as apolitical, followers of the constitution. Let’s hope it stays that way.
  • ZAKARIA: And when you look at NATO, you were the former supreme allied commander, great, great title, by the way, there are people in Europe who worry a lot about Trump and NATO. And what I’ve heard people say is it’s — he doesn’t have to pull out of NATO. He just has to say, I’m not going to defend Latvia, Lithuania —
  • STAVRIDIS: Estonia.
  • ZAKARIA: Right. Because it’s a sort of — in some ways the whole — NATO is basically — it’s a psychological game. It’s the thread is psychological that the U.S. will get involved. That’s what Putin has to be calculating. And if the president says something like that — the NATO — the building can continue, the meetings can continue, but the heart of it is lost.
  • STAVRIDIS: We always say deterrence is the combination of capability and credibility.
  • NATO is incredibly capable. The defense budget of the United States and the Europeans together is well over 10 times that of Russia. The population is well over five times the size of Russia.
  • So, the capability is not the problem. You’ve put your finger on it, it’s the credibility. And yes, I would be very concerned about a Trump presidency that did not actively support and, indeed, lead within NATO. That’s a real concern.
  • ZAKARIA: From the former supreme allied commander of NATO.
  • STAVRIDIS: My pleasure, Fareed.
  • ZAKARIA: Thank you, sir.
  • STAVRIDIS: Thank you.

Further Viewing

Carrie Council interview with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral Stavridis:

Outro

Thank you for joining us for the first episode of our series. Don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast on your favorite platform to ensure you don’t miss any of our discussions on the future of naval warfare. Together, we aim to keep you informed and engaged with the latest in naval defense technology.

 

 

Posted on

Charting the Course, Navigating the Future of Naval Power: The Navy’s Role in America’s New Warfighting Doctrine

Bill Cullifer. Founder

Today, we introduce the U.S. Navy’s new warfighting doctrine. According to the U.S.Navy, the doctrine not only reinforces the commitment to securing maritime freedom but also strengthens collaborative ties, ensuring the Navy remains a vanguard of global stability and security.

Introduction

The unveiling of the new joint warfighting doctrine signifies an evolution, not a departure, from the traditional “peace through strength” stance. It reaffirms the U.S. Navy’s pivotal role as the global guardian of the seas, adapting to modern challenges while maintaining its foundational principles.

What’s New

This doctrine introduces a multi-domain approach, integrating land, air, sea, space, and cyber capabilities. It emphasizes agility, technological innovation, and a proactive stance in the dynamic security landscape.

Why Americans Should Care

The doctrine, according to the U.S. Navy ensures the U.S. remains at the forefront of global security, safeguarding national interests, and promoting international peace and stability.

  • Integration Across Domains: It advocates for seamless operations across all military domains, enhancing responsiveness and effectiveness.
  • Innovative Approaches: The focus is on harnessing cutting-edge technologies and concepts to stay ahead of adversaries.
  • Adapting to Modern Threats: It addresses the need to continuously evolve in response to emerging security challenges.

Implications for the Navy

The Navy is set to benefit from enhanced strategic direction, capability development, and operational planning, ensuring it remains a formidable force in protecting global maritime interests.

Implications for Our Global Partners

The doctrine fosters stronger alliances and interoperability among international partners, uniting efforts in maintaining a secure global environment.

Conclusion

The new doctrine is a testament to the enduring value of “peace through strength,” with the Navy continuing to serve as a cornerstone of global security and stability. Supporting a strong, adaptable Navy is more crucial than ever in navigating the complexities of contemporary and future threats.

Posted on

US Navy Receives First Orca Unmanned Submarine from Boeing

Hello, members and friends of Americans for a Stronger Navy. We have some exciting news to share with you today. The Navy has received its first Orca Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV) from Boeing, following a series of tests at sea. This is a major milestone for the Navy’s unmanned undersea capabilities, and we are proud to support this innovative and game-changing program.

What is Orca and why is it important?

Orca is a new class of autonomous submarine that can perform long duration critical missions to achieve undersea maritime dominance in changing environments and contested waters. Orca is based on Boeing’s Echo Voyager, a prototype XLUUV that began at-sea testing in 2017 and was a precursor to the Navy’s Orca XLUUV competition. Echo Voyager has spent over 10,000 hours operating at sea and transited hundreds of nautical miles autonomously.

Orca is important because it provides the Navy with a new and versatile tool to enhance its undersea warfare capabilities and to deter and defeat potential adversaries. Orca can operate in areas that are too dangerous, too distant, or too denied for manned submarines, and can extend the Navy’s reach and persistence in the maritime domain. Orca can also complement and augment the Navy’s existing and future manned and unmanned undersea assets, and provide a cost-effective and scalable solution for the Navy’s undersea needs.

What are the implications for the Navy?

The delivery of the first Orca XLUUV is a significant achievement for the Navy and Boeing, and a testament to their innovation, perseverance, and unwavering commitment. The Navy plans to acquire five more Orca XLUUVs in the future, and to gradually ramp up the quantities and capabilities of these vehicles. The Navy will also conduct further testing and evaluation of Orca, and apply the lessons learned to improve the reliability and performance of the system.

The Navy’s acquisition of Orca XLUUVs is part of a broader effort to develop and deploy a variety of unmanned systems for the fleet, including unmanned surface vessels and unmanned aerial systems. The Navy’s vision is to integrate these systems into a networked and distributed force that can operate across all domains and domains, and to leverage the advantages of autonomy, artificial intelligence, and machine learning to enhance the Navy’s decision-making and effectiveness.

The Navy’s investment in Orca XLUUVs and other unmanned systems reflects the Navy’s recognition of the changing security environment and the technological developments that are eroding the U.S. military advantages. The Navy faces growing challenges and threats from China and Russia, who are developing and deploying advanced anti-access/area denial capabilities, such as submarines, missiles, and cyber weapons, to challenge the U.S. presence and influence in the Indo-Pacific and Europe. The Navy also faces emerging and evolving challenges from rogue regimes, such as Iran and North Korea, and violent non-state actors, such as terrorists and pirates, who pose threats to the U.S. interests and allies in the Middle East and Africa.

The Navy’s adoption of Orca XLUUVs and other unmanned systems demonstrates the Navy’s commitment and ability to adapt and innovate to meet these challenges and to maintain its maritime superiority. The Navy’s use of Orca XLUUVs and other unmanned systems also reaffirms the Navy’s role and responsibility as the “keepers of the peace” in a turbulent and uncertain world, and as a vital partner and leader in the international community, working with allies and partners to uphold the rules-based order and to promote peace and security.

What others are saying

  • “This has been a very busy year for the XLUUV team and their hard work is culminating in delivery of the Navy’s first-ever unmanned diesel-electric submarine. We look forward to continued success with our Boeing teammates in fielding this important capability for the warfighter.” – Capt. Scot Searles, US Navy Unmanned Maritime Systems Program Manager
  • “The Orca XLUUV is a multi-phased accelerated acquisition featuring a full and open competition to industry to design, fabricate, test and deliver systems to the US Navy. The navy selected the best value of price and technical capabilities.” – Alan Baribeau, US Naval Sea Systems Command spokesperson
  • “Orca XLUUV is a game-changing capability that will provide the Navy with a long-range, long-endurance, multi-mission undersea vehicle that will complement and augment the Navy’s undersea force structure.” – Rear Adm. Casey Moton, US Navy Program Executive Officer for Unmanned and Small Combatants

Conclusion

We at Americans for a Stronger Navy congratulate the Navy and Boeing on the delivery of the first Orca XLUUV, and we look forward to seeing more of these vehicles in the fleet. We believe that Orca XLUUV is a critical and revolutionary capability that will enhance the Navy’s undersea warfare and deterrence posture, and that will support the Navy’s strategic plan and its 30-year shipbuilding plan.

We urge Congress and the public to support the Navy’s acquisition and development of Orca XLUUV and other unmanned systems, and to provide the necessary funding and oversight for their implementation. We also encourage the Navy to continue to improve its performance and accountability, and to foster a culture of innovation and excellence.

We also commend the Navy for its continued engagement and cooperation with its allies and partners, and for its dedication and service to the nation and the world. We stand with the Navy, and we thank them for their service and sacrifice.

Posted on

When Army and Navy plays America wins

An open letter to America from Americans for a Stronger Navy

About Me

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy and a former member of the United States Navy, I have witnessed firsthand the profound impact that the Navy has on individuals, communities, and our nation. My experience in the Navy was not merely a commitment of time; it profoundly deepened my appreciation and respect for the dedication and sacrifice of those who serve and significantly reshaped my worldview.

Serving in the Navy, I learned the importance of self-discipline, collaborating effectively with others, and adaptability. These values, along with fair play, were not mere abstract concepts but daily practices that guided us through challenging times. They fostered in me a newly found appreciation for the value of unity and respect for tradition.

The sense of shared purpose and my commitment to these values, experienced during my service in the Navy, have been compelling reasons for establishing Americans for a Stronger Navy. This initiative is crucial in addressing the need to advocate for and strengthen our naval forces amidst rising global threats and the safeguarding of critical infrastructure.

About Americans for a Stronger Navy

This organization is not just an education foundation and advocacy group; it is a tribute to the men and women who have served and continue to serve in our Navy. It represents our collective effort to ensure that our Navy remains strong, not just in terms of military might, but as a beacon of hope, freedom, and peace through strength.

We support and promote the Navy’s values and achievements, and encourage people to join or volunteer to support the Navy. We also educate and inform the public about the importance and relevance of the Navy and its role in the world. We believe that a strong Navy is essential for our national security, our global leadership, and our prosperity.

About the Army-Navy Game

The Army-Navy game, an event I hold dear, encapsulates these values and traditions. It’s more than a game; it’s a celebration of our military’s spirit and dedication. As I watched this year’s game, I was reminded of my days in the Navy, the sense of pride and the responsibility it entailed. This game is a vivid representation of the excellence, discipline, and teamwork cultivated in our service members, traits that are essential both on and off the field.

As we reflect on the Army-Navy game of 2023, set against the backdrop of significant historical milestones and current national achievements, it’s a reminder of the enduring legacy and relevance of our naval service. This game, and our ongoing efforts, are not just about supporting the Navy; they are about upholding the values that define us as a nation and as individuals committed to cause greater than ourselves.

The Army-Navy Game 2023: A Win for Both Teams and for America

Dear America,

We are Americans for a Stronger Navy, a group that advocates for a robust U.S. Navy, and believes in peace through strength. We are writing to you today to share our perspective and insights on the Army-Navy game 2023, and to congratulate both teams for a great game.

The game was also a close and exciting one, with both teams showing their skills and spirit. The final score was Army 17, Navy 11. We are proud of our service members and their performance and achievements in the game. We respect and appreciate the players and the teams, and their values and ethics. We thank everyone who supported and cheered for our sailors and soldiers, and we look forward to the next game in 2024.

The game was also a win for the spirit and tradition of the Army-Navy game, as it reflects the values and culture of the military academies and the armed forces. The game is more than just a sporting event, it is a symbol of the honor and duty that the Navy and the Army uphold and embody. It is also a testament to the sportsmanship, the sense of community, and the pride that the Navy and the Army share and inspire.

One of the most touching and inspiring moments of the game was the tradition of singing the alma mater of both schools at the end of the game, and how it showed sportsmanship and unity among the players and the fans.

The tradition also shows the resilience and determination of the players and the teams, who faced many challenges and difficulties during the pandemic, such as limited practice time, frequent testing, and strict protocols. As former Army coach Bob Sutton said, “They’ve gone through more than any other team in America to play this game. They’ve had to do things that most of us can’t even imagine. And yet they’ve done it with such class and such dignity.”

The game also shows the modernization and innovation of the Navy and the Army, and how they are working together to achieve a common goal, and how they are leveraging the latest technology and innovation to enhance their capabilities and performance. The game also shows how the Navy and the Army are collaborating with our allies and partners, and how they are contributing to our national security, our global leadership, and our prosperity.

One of the most exciting and promising developments in this regard is the Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) concept, which the Department of Defense has developed to connect sensors from all branches of the military into a unified network powered by artificial intelligence JADC2 is intended to provide the warfighting capability to sense, make sense, and act at all levels and phases of war, across all domains, and with partners, to deliver information advantage at the speed of relevance.

JADC2 is a game-changer for the Navy and the Army, as it will enable them to operate more effectively and efficiently in all operational domains, across echelons, and with our mission partners. JADC2 will also allow them to use automation, artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, and machine learning to improve their decision making and performance in the game and in the battlefield.

The Department of Defense has recently released the JADC2 Implementation Plan, which outlines the vision, goals, objectives, and actions for achieving JADC2 by 2028 . The plan also describes the JADC2 strategy, which consists of four lines of effort: developing joint warfighting concepts and processes, delivering joint network and transport capabilities, integrating joint fires and effects, and advancing joint information advantage.

The Navy and the Army are actively involved in the JADC2 efforts, and have demonstrated their commitment and readiness to implement the JADC2 concept. For example, the Navy has conducted several experiments and exercises to test and evaluate its JADC2 capabilities, such as the Project Overmatch, the Trident Warrior, and the Valiant Shield. The Army has also conducted several experiments and exercises to test and evaluate its JADC2 capabilities, such as the Project Convergence, the Joint Warfighting Assessment, and the Defender Europe.

We are impressed and inspired by the Navy and the Army’s JADC2 achievements, and we are confident that they will continue to lead and excel in this domain. We believe that JADC2 is not only a vital component of our national defense, but also a reflection of our national values and identity. JADC2 represents our ability to join forces across all domains and with allies, and to use the best of our technology and innovation to protect and advance our interests and ideals.

We hope that you are as excited and proud of the Navy and the Army’s JADC2 efforts as we are. We hope that you will join us in supporting and cheering for the Navy and the Army in the next game, and in the future. We hope that you will also consider donating or volunteering for the Navy or the Army, or joining or recommending the Navy or the Army as a career option. We hope that you will also recognize and appreciate the impact and benefits of JADC2 for the Navy and the nation, and how it showcases the strength and excellence of the naval service.

We are Americans for a Stronger Navy, and we believe in peace through strength. We are proud of our Navy, and we are proud of our country. Go Navy, Beat Army!

Sincerely, Bill

Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

Fleet Forward: Charting Tomorrow’s Navy: Episode 2: The Budgetary Challenge of Naval Shipbuilding

Bill Cullifer, Founder

Welcome back to Fleet Forward: Charting Tomorrow’s Navy, a podcast series that explores the challenges and opportunities facing the US Navy in the 21st century. 

With this series, inspired by our shared values and patriotic spirit, we aim to complement our upcoming December podcast series ‘Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power’

In the previous episode, we introduced the series and explained why we decided to create it. We also discussed the format and the content of the series, and how we hope to provide you with insightful and informative analysis and commentary on the issues and trends that shape the Navy’s present and future.

The Budgetary Challenge of Naval Shipbuilding

In this episode, we will focus on one of the most important and contentious issues facing the Navy: the budgetary challenge of naval shipbuilding. How much does it cost to build a Navy? How do we balance the need for a larger and more capable fleet with the reality of fiscal constraints and competing priorities? How do we ensure that our naval force is ready and relevant for the 21st century?

These are some of the questions that we will explore in this episode, as we examine the Navy’s shipbuilding plan for fiscal year 2024, which presents three alternatives for the future fleet, each with different costs and capabilities. We will also explore how the Congressional Budget Office and Brent Sadler have critiqued the Navy’s plan and offered alternative perspectives on how to optimize the Navy’s budget and capabilities. We will also delve into the stories and people behind the Navy’s shipbuilding strategies, and reflect on their implications for our national security, economic vitality, and our role on the global stage. 

The Stakeholders and Perspectives of Naval Strategy

Today we ’ll not only delve into the Navy’s shipbuilding strategies but also the stories and people behind them, reflecting on our national security, economic vitality, and our role on the global stage.

Introduction

In this episode, we will examine the fiscal landscape of naval procurement, focusing on the budgetary challenges and trade-offs that the Navy faces in pursuing its shipbuilding plans. We will also explore how the CBO and Sandler have critiqued the Navy’s strategies and offered alternative perspectives on how to optimize the Navy’s budget and capabilities.

The Navy’s Shipbuilding Budget

The Navy’s shipbuilding budget is the primary source of funding for acquiring new ships and maintaining the existing fleet. The budget is determined by the Navy’s long-term shipbuilding plan, which outlines the desired size, composition, and capabilities of the future fleet, as well as the projected costs and schedules for each ship class. The plan is updated annually and submitted to Congress as part of the President’s budget request.

The current shipbuilding plan, released in December 2022, covers the period from 2023 to 2052 and aims to achieve a fleet of 355 ships by 2035 and 400 ships by 2052. The plan also introduces the DDG(X) program, which is intended to replace the aging Arleigh Burke-class destroyers with a more advanced and capable design. The plan estimates that the Navy will need an average of $33 billion per year (in 2022 dollars) for shipbuilding over the next 30 years, which is 50 percent more than the historical average of $22 billion per year over the past 30 years.

The CBO’s Analysis of the Navy’s Shipbuilding Plan

The CBO, an independent and nonpartisan agency that provides budgetary and economic analysis to Congress, has conducted a detailed assessment of the Navy’s shipbuilding plan and its implications for the federal budget and the Navy’s capabilities. The CBO’s report, released in October 2023, raises several issues and challenges with the plan, such as:

•  The plan’s cost estimates are optimistic and likely to increase over time, due to factors such as inflation, technical risks, and schedule delays. The CBO projects that the plan will actually cost an average of $40 billion per year (in 2022 dollars) for shipbuilding over the next 30 years, which is 21 percent more than the Navy’s estimate and 82 percent more than the historical average.

•  The plan’s funding requirements are unsustainable and unrealistic, given the competing demands and constraints on the federal budget. The CBO estimates that the plan will consume an average of 13 percent of the total defense budget over the next 30 years, which is significantly higher than the historical average of 9 percent. The plan will also require increasing the Navy’s share of the defense budget from 28 percent in 2022 to 34 percent in 2052, which will likely entail reducing the funding for other military services or increasing the overall defense budget.

•  The plan’s fleet size and composition goals are ambitious and questionable, given the operational and strategic environment. The CBO questions the rationale and feasibility of achieving a 400-ship fleet by 2052, which would be the largest fleet since the end of World War II. The CBO also suggests that the plan may not adequately account for the changing nature of naval warfare and the emergence of new threats and technologies, such as cyberattacks, hypersonic weapons, and unmanned systems.

The CBO’s report concludes that the Navy’s shipbuilding plan is not a viable or effective strategy for meeting the nation’s naval needs and recommends that the Navy and Congress reconsider the plan’s assumptions, objectives, and priorities. The CBO also offers some alternative shipbuilding scenarios that would achieve different fleet sizes and compositions at lower costs than the Navy’s plan.

Sandler’s Critique of the Navy’s Shipbuilding Plan

Sandler, a former U.S. Naval Captain and author of U.S. Power in the 21st Century, has also published a blog post in November 2023, criticizing the Navy’s shipbuilding plan and proposing a different approach to naval strategy and shipbuilding. Sandler’s main arguments are:

•  The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is based on a flawed and outdated paradigm of naval power, which emphasizes quantity over quality, platforms over payloads, and conventional over asymmetric warfare. Sandler argues that the Navy is stuck in a Cold War mentality and fails to adapt to the changing realities and challenges of the 21st century, such as the rise of China, the proliferation of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, and the diffusion of power and influence.

•  The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is wasteful and inefficient, as it invests in expensive and vulnerable ships that are not suited for the current and future threat environment. Sandler singles out the DDG(X) program as an example of a misguided and unnecessary project, which he calls a “gold-plated boondoggle” that will cost billions of dollars and provide marginal benefits. Sandler contends that the DDG(X) is a redundant and obsolete design that will be outmatched by cheaper and more effective weapons and systems, such as missiles, drones, and submarines.

•  The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is counterproductive and dangerous, as it provokes and escalates tensions with potential adversaries, especially China, and undermines the stability and security of the international order. Sandler warns that the Navy’s pursuit of a 400-ship fleet and the DDG(X) program will trigger a naval arms race and increase the risk of conflict and miscalculation in the Indo-Pacific region. Sandler also cautions that the Navy’s plan will alienate and weaken the U.S.’s allies and partners, who may not share the same vision or interests as the U.S. and may not be willing or able to contribute to the Navy’s ambitious and costly goals.

Sandler’s blog post concludes that the Navy’s shipbuilding plan is a strategic blunder and a fiscal disaster that will undermine the U.S.’s naval power and global leadership. Sandler advocates for a radical shift in the Navy’s mindset and approach, which he calls “smart power”. Sandler’s smart power concept is based on four principles:

•  Quality over quantity: The Navy should focus on developing and acquiring fewer but more capable and versatile ships that can deliver multiple effects and missions across the spectrum of conflict.

•  Payloads over platforms: The Navy should prioritize investing in and deploying advanced and adaptable weapons and systems, such as missiles, drones, and cyber capabilities, that can enhance the lethality and survivability of the existing and future fleet.

•  Asymmetric over conventional warfare: The Navy should embrace and exploit the opportunities and advantages of asymmetric warfare, such as stealth, speed, deception, and innovation, that can offset and counter the A2/AD capabilities of potential adversaries.

•  Cooperation over competition: The Navy should seek and strengthen cooperation and coordination with the U.S.’s allies and partners, as well as engage and deter potential adversaries, through diplomacy, deterrence, and dialogue, rather than confrontation, coercion, and conflict.

Conclusion

In this episode, we have explored the fiscal landscape of naval procurement and the budgetary challenges and trade-offs that the Navy faces in pursuing its shipbuilding plans. We have also examined how the CBO and Sandler have critiqued the Navy’s strategies and offered alternative perspectives on how to optimize the Navy’s budget and capabilities. In the next episode, we will delve into the technological advancements and design considerations in modern shipbuilding, with a spotlight on the DDG(X) program. Stay tuned for more insights and analyses on the Navy’s path forward.

sources 

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59708