Blog - Americans for a Stronger Navy

February 20, 2025February 20, 2025

Why Blue Water Matters—And Why a Strong Navy Is Essential

Introduction

The oceans—often called “blue water”—provide more than just scenery and a place for recreation. They are essential to global commerce, climate regulation, and geopolitical stability. For an organization like Americans for a Stronger Navy, the value of these waters extends beyond the environment; it includes national security, economic prosperity, and humanitarian efforts. Here’s how #bluewater matters ties directly to the need for a robust naval presence.

Vital Trade Routes and Economic Security

Over 90% of international trade travels by sea, making reliable maritime routes the backbone of the global economy.
A well-equipped navy safeguards shipping lanes from piracy, terrorism, and other disruptions—ensuring that essential goods, including food, energy, and raw materials, reach the United States and allied nations safely.
When shipping lanes remain secure, American businesses and consumers benefit from stability and minimized costs.

National Security and Global Partnerships

A strong naval force deters potential adversaries and helps uphold international law by patrolling the world’s oceans.
Through joint exercises and collaborative maritime security initiatives, the Navy fosters global partnerships that enhance collective security.
Whether it’s countering piracy or responding to terrorist threats, a capable navy provides rapid response in critical situations—protecting lives and strengthening America’s role on the world stage.

Environmental Stewardship with Strategic Importance

Oceans help regulate the Earth’s climate by absorbing carbon dioxide and heat. Shifts in ocean conditions—like rising sea levels—can lead to conflicts over resources and displaced communities.
An active navy can work with environmental agencies and research institutions to monitor marine ecosystems, support scientific research, and enforce regulations against illegal fishing and dumping.
The Navy often leads the way in developing cleaner energy technologies for its vessels, which can benefit commercial industries and the environment alike.

Technological Innovation and Workforce Development

Naval forces drive research in shipbuilding, propulsion, cybersecurity, and communications—innovations that can also enhance commercial maritime operations.
A strong navy means investment in personnel training. Many service members acquire valuable skills (engineering, navigation, operations) that support America’s industrial and technological base upon returning to civilian life.

Humanitarian and Disaster Relief

Aircraft carriers, hospital ships, and naval vessels frequently deliver aid after hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters.
These missions save lives and foster goodwill, showcasing America’s commitment to global stability and compassion.
Ensuring the Navy is well-resourced allows it to continue providing this vital humanitarian assistance around the world.

Upholding International Law and Freedom of Navigation

A strong navy enforces maritime law and maintains freedom of navigation, helping to resolve territorial disputes peacefully.
Advocating for freedom of navigation and respecting legitimate sovereignty claims keeps the world’s oceans open and accessible.
Americans for a Stronger Navy believes a balanced, determined naval presence supports global trade and diplomacy.

Bringing It All Together: #bluewater Matters and National Strength When we say #bluewater matters, we’re highlighting the connection between healthy oceans, global trade, and national security. Our seas are crucial, not only for environmental reasons but also for peace, commerce, and humanitarian operations. By championing a robust, well-funded Navy, Americans for a Stronger Navy seeks to protect this critical resource and, in turn, safeguard our nation’s future.

What You Can Do

Stay informed by following reputable sources on defense, maritime security, and environmental matters.
Engage your elected officials about the importance of naval preparedness and responsible ocean stewardship.
Support military families through volunteer work or donations, recognizing that people are the Navy’s greatest asset.
Spread awareness using the hashtag #bluewater matters to emphasize the interconnected importance of strong naval forces and thriving oceans.

Conclusion A thriving maritime domain underpins America’s security, economy, and standing in the world. By uniting under the message #bluewater matters, we remind everyone that the ocean’s well-being and a strong Navy go hand in hand. Whether it’s safeguarding sea lanes, championing sustainable practices, or providing swift humanitarian aid, our seas deserve our attention—and our Navy must be equipped to protect them for generations to come.

February 15, 2025February 15, 2025

An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is

An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is

To the Editors of War on the Rocks and Dr. Jonathan Panter,

Your recent commentary argues that naval forward presence is to blame for the U.S. Navy’s inability to deter China and sustain high-end warfighting capacity. While your article correctly identifies the exhaustion and strain imposed by relentless deployments, it misdiagnoses the cause and proposes a dangerous solution.

The problem is not forward presence—it’s fleet size, maintenance shortfalls, and a lack of leadership advocacy for real change.

“It is both realistic and very necessary to maintain forward presence while preparing for high-end conflict.”
— Captain Brent D. Sadler, USN (Ret.), Senior Fellow, Heritage Foundation

“The U.S. fleet size to support that deployment has significantly decreased since 1990.”
— Captain Steven Wills, USN (Ret.), Senior Advisor, Center for Maritime Strategy

A Shrinking Navy, An Expanding Mission

The numbers tell the real story:

✅ In 1991: The U.S. Navy had 550 ships. Today, it has fewer than 290—a nearly 50% decline.
✅ During the Cold War: Only one-fifth of the fleet was forward deployed. Today, it’s one-third, meaning fewer ships are doing more work.
✅ Maintenance Shortfalls: The Navy has lost critical shore-based infrastructure, making it difficult to sustain current commitments—let alone expand.

Meanwhile, China’s threat has grown, not receded:

✅ China’s Navy: Surpassed 340 ships in 2023 and continues expanding.
✅ Indo-Pacific: Now the primary theater of strategic competition—where U.S. presence is more critical than ever.

The Wrong Solution: Scaling Back Presence

The argument that pulling back from forward deployment would somehow strengthen the Navy by reducing strain is not just wrong—it’s dangerous.

A reduced forward presence does not deter China—it emboldens it.

Beijing is already testing U.S. resolve in the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and beyond. A withdrawal would send a clear signal:

America is retreating.

That is not a path to deterrence—it’s a path to ceding maritime dominance to an adversary actively working to reshape the global order.

The Right Solution: A Bigger, More Sustainable Navy

Rather than abandoning forward presence, we must fix the real problem: our shrinking, overstretched fleet.

That means:

✅ Growing the Fleet: Expand to at least 355 ships—endorsed repeatedly by military leaders.
✅ Rebuilding Shore Support: Reinvest in shipyards, dry docks, and logistics infrastructure.
✅ Leadership Advocacy: Navy leaders must demand either more ships or fewer assignments, not accept the status quo.
✅ Congressional Action: Congress must prioritize fleet expansion over short-term cuts.

Conclusion: We Need More Ships, Not Fewer Commitments

Your commentary correctly highlights that the U.S. Navy is stretched thin and struggling to sustain global operations. But forward presence is not the problem. The real issue is that we are trying to maintain it with a fleet too small to sustain the mission.

For more than 75 years, forward-deployed U.S. naval forces have prevented conflict, reassured allies, and ensured maritime security. Scaling back presence does not fix the strain—it accelerates decline and weakens deterrence at the worst possible moment.

“If the United States is serious about deterring China, protecting global stability, and upholding its commitments, the answer is clear: Build a larger, more capable, and better-supported Navy.”

Educating the Public: Our Responsibility

The problem is not just military—it’s political and public awareness.

Too many Americans don’t realize how naval power secures our national and economic security. Without public pressure, there will be no political will to rebuild the fleet.

That’s why we at Americans for a Stronger Navy are launching:

“China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges”

In our upcoming educational series, we will tackle the most pressing issues facing U.S. naval power, including:

✅ The Role of Naval Power in Preventing Global Conflict
✅ Economic & Strategic Impact of a Shrinking Fleet
✅ China & Russia’s Naval Expansion and the Strategic Threat
✅ U.S. Shipbuilding Crisis: Causes and Solutions
✅ Congressional Accountability: Who’s Responsible for the Shrinking Fleet?

This isn’t just a discussion—it’s a call to action.

To naval leadership, policymakers, and media: Stop pretending all is well. Demand action before the Navy reaches a breaking point.

To the American public: Get informed. Get involved. A strong Navy is not just for the military—it’s for every American who benefits from global stability.

The U.S. Navy’s forward presence is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.

The problem is not the strategy—it’s the lack of resources to sustain it.

If the U.S. wants to deter China, protect its interests, and maintain global stability, the answer is clear: Build a stronger, larger, better-supported, and more capable Navy.

We urge the administration, Congress, and military leadership to acknowledge reality:

Our commitments are not too big—our Navy is too small.

Sincerely, Bill Cullifer
Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

February 11, 2025February 11, 2025

Why the Gulf (of America) Matters: A Maritime Powerhouse & Naval Stronghold

The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America has sparked discussions, but names aside, this region has long been one of the most strategic waterways in the world. The U.S. Navy has played a critical role in securing these waters, ensuring trade routes remain open, energy supplies are protected, and national security is upheld.

Renaming bodies of water is nothing new. According to the Associated Press (AP), in 2015, President Barack Obama renamed Mount McKinley to Denali, recognizing its indigenous heritage. In 2013, Hillary Clinton remarked that if China could claim nearly the entire South China Sea, the U.S. could have labeled the Pacific Ocean the ‘American Sea’ after World War II. Even earlier, Mississippi legislators proposed renaming their portion of the Gulf as the “Gulf of America” in 2012, though it was largely symbolic.

While names may change, the Gulf’s importance remains the same—it is a lifeline for trade, military operations, and energy security. This article focuses on the facts—why the Gulf matters to America’s security, economy, and the strength of the U.S. Navy.

The Gulf’s Strategic History and Naval Legacy

The Gulf has been a key maritime battlefield in U.S. history, from the War of 1812 to World War II. The U.S. Navy has played a central role in defending American interests and maintaining stability in these waters.

The Battle of Mobile Bay (1864) – A defining moment in the Civil War.
The Gulf Blockade in WWII – Preventing German U-boats from disrupting supply chains.
The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) – A tense naval standoff that highlighted the Gulf’s strategic importance.

Today, the Navy remains the dominant force in the Gulf, ensuring stability and security in the region.

The U.S. Navy’s Role in the Gulf of America

The Navy conducts daily operations to protect trade, energy, and national security. Key missions include:

Patrolling shipping lanes to ensure free trade.
Securing oil and gas infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks.
Countering drug smuggling and trafficking networks.
Responding to hurricanes and natural disasters.

Key U.S. Naval Bases in the Gulf

Naval Air Station Pensacola (FL) – Aviation training.
Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (TX) – Aircraft support.
Naval Station Mayport (FL) – Destroyer and amphibious fleet.
Naval Air Station Key West (FL) – Counter-drug operations.

As threats increase globally, is the U.S. Navy stretched too thin to secure the Gulf effectively?

Is the U.S. Navy Strong Enough to Secure the Gulf?

With rising global tensions, cyber vulnerabilities, and shipbuilding challenges, the Navy’s presence in the Gulf faces new pressures.

The Navy is spread across the Pacific, Arctic, and Middle East, requiring more ships and personnel.
Shipbuilding delays mean the U.S. Navy is shrinking rather than growing.
Older ships are being retired faster than new ones are being built, creating fleet gaps.

Cybersecurity Threats in the Gulf

The biggest future threats may not come from warships—but from cyberattacks.

Hackers have already targeted U.S. energy infrastructure, shutting down pipelines and refineries.
China, Russia, and Iran have cyber units capable of disrupting U.S. ports and energy grids.
The Gulf’s 4,000+ offshore oil platforms and refineries are vulnerable to hacking.

A successful cyberattack on a major port like Houston or New Orleans could cripple U.S. exports, disrupt global trade, and weaken naval operations.

U.S. Response: Strengthening Cyber Defense

The Navy and U.S. Cyber Command are expanding maritime cybersecurity operations.
AI-driven threat detection is being tested for oil rigs and naval vessels.
Private industries are working with the military to protect infrastructure.

Military-Commercial Overlap: The Jones Act & Shipbuilding

The Jones Act (1920) requires that only U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed ships can transport goods between U.S. ports. This protects American shipbuilders and maritime workers, but there’s a problem:

American shipbuilding is lagging behind China, South Korea, and Japan.
The U.S. fleet of commercial ships has shrunk, making supply chains vulnerable in wartime.

A weaker shipbuilding industry means a weaker Navy. If war broke out, the U.S. would rely on foreign-built commercial ships for logistics.

Revitalizing U.S. shipbuilding would strengthen both military and commercial fleets, ensuring the U.S. remains competitive and secure.

Economic & Strategic Impact of the Gulf of America

The Gulf isn’t just a naval stronghold—it’s an economic powerhouse.

15% of U.S. crude oil production comes from the Gulf.
Over 50% of all U.S. maritime commerce moves through the Gulf.
40% of U.S. seafood (shrimp, oysters) is sourced from the Gulf.

Economic Vulnerabilities

A hurricane, cyberattack, or naval conflict could cripple energy exports and supply chains.
A strong U.S. Navy presence ensures stability, preventing disruptions that could impact millions of Americans.

The Gulf of America Needs a Strong Navy

The renaming of the Gulf is symbolic, but the real issue is whether the U.S. has the naval power to secure it.

The Navy must remain strong in the Gulf to protect trade, energy, and security.
Cyber defense is as important as naval defense.
Revitalizing U.S. shipbuilding would strengthen both the Navy and the economy.

A Call to Action

Supporting a Stronger Navy means:

✔ More investment in fleet modernization.
✔ Better cybersecurity for ports and oil infrastructure.
✔ Reviving American shipbuilding to ensure a strong commercial-military fleet.

February 4, 2025February 4, 2025

When America Ships, America Wins

Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it.

Introduction

In our ongoing pursuit to strengthen America’s sea power, we must confront the challenges facing both our Navy and the broader maritime domain. Over the weekend, I immersed myself in key publications—from Captain Brent D. Sadler’s impassioned article, The Nation Needs a Shipbuilding Revolution (February 2025 Proceedings), to insightful analyses on platforms like War on the Rocks and legislative presentations regarding the SHIPS for America Act. In addition, I revisited the history and nuance of Naval versus Maritime Statecraft.

The conclusion is clear: our nation’s strength at sea relies on a transformative, integrated approach. In short, When America Ships, America Wins.

Why This Matters

For too long, the U.S. Navy has operated under a narrow warfighting mandate—a legacy of policies from the 1950s that prioritized combat readiness above all else. Yet history teaches us that true American sea power has always depended on two interlinked capabilities: a modern, formidable fleet and an engaged maritime domain that underpins commerce, diplomacy, and humanitarian efforts.

As Rep. Garamendi recently stated,
“Today, less than 200 oceangoing ships fly the American flag; the SHIPS for America Act will empower our shipyards and marine merchants to uphold our country’s status as a leader in the maritime industry.”

Meanwhile, Senator Mark Kelly emphasized,
“Strengthening America’s shipbuilding capacity and revitalizing our commercial maritime industry is critical to both our national security and economic resilience.”

These words capture the urgent need to reinvest in our naval statecraft while simultaneously enhancing our broader maritime strength.

Our Journey to Clarity
Throughout my review, several key insights emerged:

Dissecting the Sources: Captain Sadler’s article calls for a revolution in U.S. naval shipbuilding. He writes, “For too long, needed investment in and action to bolster our nation’s maritime industrial base have been elusive. That luxury is no longer feasible given the threat from a revanchist and massively invested Chinese military.” His words, combined with insights from War on the Rocks and historical reflections, remind us that our Navy must once again balance combat readiness with essential peacetime missions.

Clarifying Terminology: We now clearly distinguish between “naval statecraft”—focused on rebuilding our fleet and shipbuilding capacity—and “maritime statecraft,” which encompasses the broader economic, diplomatic, and logistical roles at sea. Recognizing that these two concepts are mutually reinforcing helps create a coherent strategic message.

Refining Our Message: After extensive review and discussion, our distilled, bold message is: When America Ships, America Wins. Coupled with the rallying cry, Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it, this encapsulates the urgent need to invest in our naval statecraft to secure our maritime future.

Key Takeaways and Implications

Integrated Mission for a Modern Era: A strong Navy is not just about preparing for war—it is the foundation of national security, economic prosperity, and global maritime influence. When America builds its ships, it reinforces its entire maritime domain.

Economic and Security Benefits: Investment in our shipbuilding industry creates high-quality jobs, revitalizes our manufacturing base, and ensures our fleet is capable of sustaining military operations and global trade. Without sufficient modern vessels, our ability to maintain critical supply chains is at risk.

Historical Lessons for Today: The interwar period showed that the U.S. Navy once balanced readiness for war with vital peacetime missions like humanitarian aid and diplomatic engagement. Recalling these lessons provides a blueprint for integrating naval and maritime statecraft in today’s complex environment.

In my efforts to understand the challenges facing the U.S. Navy and our maritime infrastructure, I have spent a fair amount of time reviewing the Jones Act and the range of views surrounding it. While there are differing opinions on how best to strengthen our domestic shipping industry, one thing is clear—America needs more ships, a stronger supporting infrastructure, and a Navy that is fully equipped to protect our national security. Regardless of where one stands on the specifics of maritime policy, we can all agree that a Stronger Navy is critical to American security and economic resilience. My focus remains on ensuring that we have the industrial capacity, shipbuilding capabilities, and logistics networks necessary to maintain U.S. maritime strength in an increasingly contested world.

Why Americans Should Care

For over two centuries, American maritime strength has been a cornerstone of our global leadership. Yet today, our domestic shipbuilding industry has shrunk from over 300 shipyards in the 1980s to just 20, and our U.S.-flagged commercial fleet has dwindled to fewer than 80 vessels. With China dominating global shipbuilding and maritime trade, the equation is simple: When America Ships, America Wins. Our shipyards are the engines powering our Navy, safeguarding our commerce, and securing our freedom.

Implications for the Navy and the Maritime Domain

For the Navy: Modernizing our fleet enhances operational readiness, supports a skilled and sustainable workforce, and allows the Navy to execute both war and peacetime missions. A modernized Navy is essential to deter adversaries and defend our national interests.

For the Maritime Domain: A thriving shipbuilding industry is vital for protecting American commerce, ensuring free navigation, and fostering economic resilience. Strengthening our maritime statecraft reinforces strategic partnerships and maintains our global influence.

The Legislative Response: SHIPS for America Act

Bipartisan efforts led by figures such as Senator Mark Kelly, Congressman Mike Waltz, Rep. Trent Kelly, and Rep. John Garamendi have culminated in the introduction of the Shipbuilding and Harbor Infrastructure for Prosperity and Security (SHIPS) for America Act. This comprehensive legislation proposes to:

Revive U.S. Shipbuilding: Offer tax incentives and targeted investments to rebuild our shipyards and attract private-sector growth.
Expand the U.S.-Flagged Merchant Fleet: Implement cargo preference laws to ensure more goods travel on American ships.
Strengthen National Security: Increase the supply of ships available for military logistics and rapid response.
Develop a New Maritime Workforce: Establish apprenticeships, trade school incentives, and recruiting programs to restore critical skills in ship maintenance and marine operations.
Forge Strategic Partnerships with Allies: Collaborate with trusted nations like Japan, South Korea, Finland, and Canada to enhance our shipbuilding capacity while ensuring American oversight.

This legislation is not about partisan politics—it’s about survival. With global supply chains vulnerable to disruption, the urgency to rebuild our maritime strength has never been greater.

Conclusion & Call to Action

History teaches us that nations fall when they lose control of the seas. Today, as our adversaries grow stronger and our industrial base shrinks, we cannot afford to dawdle. It’s not war we desire, but peace achieved through strength—and our enemies must know that America will not stand idly by.

Join us in this crucial mission. We call on policymakers, industry leaders, and every American who values freedom and prosperity to support transformative initiatives that invest in our naval statecraft. By strengthening our shipbuilding industry and modernizing our Navy, we secure a robust maritime future that benefits us all.

When American Ships, America Wins.
Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it.

Visit StrongerNavy.org to learn more, get involved, and help ensure that our nation’s shipbuilding efforts pave the way for a secure and prosperous future.

In service to a stronger America,
Bill

January 30, 2025January 30, 2025

Is DeepSeek, Deep Trouble? The U.S. Navy Thinks So.

The U.S. Navy has issued a firm directive banning the use of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence platform, citing serious security and ethical concerns. This move highlights growing apprehensions over foreign AI technology, particularly when developed in adversarial nations like China.

What’s the Issue with DeepSeek?

On January 28, 2025, the Navy sent out an “all hands” email warning all personnel to avoid using DeepSeek “in any capacity.” The directive explicitly prohibits service members from downloading, installing, or using the AI for work-related or personal tasks.

The concerns are rooted in the platform’s Chinese origins and its potential ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Like TikTok, DeepSeek is suspected of being subject to Chinese laws that compel companies to share data with the government upon request. Cybersecurity experts warn that the AI may be capable of tracking user keystrokes and collecting sensitive data.

Why Now?

DeepSeek has recently made headlines for surpassing OpenAI’s ChatGPT in popularity on Apple’s App Store. The app’s sudden rise, its free access model, and its reportedly advanced reasoning capabilities have made it an instant disruptor in the AI space. But its low-cost development and unclear data security policies have set off alarm bells.

Government and Industry Reaction

President Donald Trump called DeepSeek’s success “a wake-up call” for American tech companies, urging greater innovation in AI.
Marc Andreessen, a billionaire tech investor, likened the rise of DeepSeek to a “Sputnik moment”, referring to the Soviet Union’s early lead in the space race.
Cybersecurity analysts warn that if DeepSeek gains widespread adoption, it could become a national security risk due to potential espionage capabilities.

The Bigger Picture

The U.S. has a history of banning or restricting Chinese tech over security concerns, with TikTok being the most high-profile example. The DeepSeek ban aligns with a broader generative AI policy shift within the Department of Defense, which prioritizes domestic and trusted AI sources for operational use.

Final Thoughts

The Navy’s ban raises critical questions about how foreign AI might be used for surveillance, data gathering, and influence operations. While DeepSeek might be an impressive technological achievement, the potential risks far outweigh the benefits—at least in the eyes of U.S. military leadership.

For Americans concerned about national security, this move should serve as a reminder: Who controls the technology, controls the information..

Stay updated on U.S. Navy news at StrongerNavy.org.

January 28, 2025January 28, 2025

Sealab and the Silent Frontier: Why Undersea Exploration Still Matters for America

SEALAB I was lowered off the coast of Bermuda in 1964

In the 1960s, while the world marveled at NASA’s race to the moon, the U.S. Navy was quietly conducting its own groundbreaking experiments in the depths of the ocean. Capt. George Bond, a visionary Navy medical officer, saw the ocean floor as humanity’s next frontier. Through the Sealab program, Bond and his team pioneered technologies and techniques that pushed the boundaries of what was possible underwater.

Why this matters

Though it lacked the glory and attention of space exploration, Sealab revealed the untapped potential of the ocean and laid the groundwork for advancements that still benefit us today. But the real question remains: Why should Americans care about undersea exploration now, decades after the Sealab program ended?

The answer lies in what the oceans represent—security, resources, and innovation. In an increasingly competitive and interconnected world, America’s ability to operate and protect its interests underwater is more critical than ever.

The Vision of Sealab

The Sealab program was nothing short of audacious. In an era when divers could barely spend 30 minutes underwater using compressed air, Capt. Bond and his team envisioned a future where humans could live and work on the ocean floor for weeks or even months. Through Sealab I, II, and III, they developed and tested the revolutionary concept of saturation diving, which allowed divers to stay submerged for extended periods without suffering from decompression sickness.

Sealab II, in particular, demonstrated the viability of underwater living. Teams of aquanauts conducted scientific experiments, tested tools for underwater construction, and explored how the human body coped with prolonged exposure to the deep sea. The program even incorporated whimsical innovations, like a trained dolphin named Tuffy, to deliver supplies.

Despite its promise, the program ended tragically with the death of aquanaut Berry Cannon during the Sealab III mission. But the legacy of Sealab lived on, influencing both naval operations and the oil industry’s offshore drilling advancements.

The Ocean’s Strategic and Economic Importance

While Sealab was ahead of its time, its lessons are more relevant today than ever. The oceans cover 71% of the Earth’s surface and hold the key to global trade, communication, and resources. Undersea cables, for instance, carry 95% of the world’s internet traffic—making them critical to both commerce and national security.

Moreover, the ocean floor contains vast reserves of minerals, rare earth elements, and other resources essential for modern technologies. Nations like China are actively pursuing undersea mining and infrastructure projects to secure these resources, positioning themselves as dominant players in the maritime domain.

The U.S. Navy plays a vital role in safeguarding these interests. From protecting shipping lanes to monitoring underwater activity, the Navy’s ability to operate in the undersea domain is essential to America’s security and economic stability. Sealab’s pioneering spirit reminds us that exploration and innovation are necessary to maintain this edge.

The Lessons of Sealab for Today

The Sealab program was a testament to human ingenuity and resilience. The aquanauts’ willingness to push physical and technological limits paved the way for modern advancements in undersea exploration. Technologies developed during Sealab, such as saturation diving, are still used by the Navy and commercial industries today.

But the program also underscores the importance of readiness and adaptability. The challenges faced by the Sealab teams—equipment malfunctions, extreme cold, and life-threatening situations—are reminders that operating underwater requires constant vigilance and innovation.

As competition for undersea resources intensifies and adversaries like China and Russia expand their capabilities, the U.S. cannot afford to fall behind. Investing in undersea technologies, such as autonomous underwater vehicles and advanced submarines, is critical to maintaining America’s strategic advantage.

Why America Should Care

The oceans may not capture the public’s imagination like space, but they are no less important. Sealab showed us that the ocean floor is not just a mysterious expanse—it’s a frontier of opportunity and strategic importance. The Navy’s ability to operate effectively underwater is essential for protecting our economy, ensuring global stability, and deterring aggression.

And let me add this—while Elon Musk is busy dreaming of Mars, I think we can start a little closer to home. We live here. This planet is our home, and the ocean is a wealth of untapped opportunity. Supporting our Navy’s efforts to explore and protect the undersea domain isn’t just about national security; it’s about investing in the place where humanity will continue to thrive. Sorry, Elon, but this sailor would rather stay right here, on Earth.

A Call to Action

Sealab may be a forgotten chapter in America’s history, but its lessons remain vital. The program was a bold attempt to explore the unknown and push the limits of human potential. Today, we face new challenges and opportunities in the undersea domain, and we must rise to meet them with the same spirit of innovation and determination.

As Americans, we have a responsibility to support the Navy and ensure it has the resources and technologies needed to protect our interests. The oceans are a silent frontier, but their importance to our security and prosperity cannot be overstated. Let’s honor the legacy of Sealab by championing the Navy’s mission and investing in the future of undersea exploration.

The U.S. Navy’s commitment to undersea exploration and innovation lives on through the work of institutions like the Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), the Office of Naval Research (ONR), and the Naval Postgraduate School. These organizations, alongside collaborations like the National Institute for Undersea Vehicle Technology (NIUVT), continue to push the boundaries of what is possible beneath the waves. Their efforts ensure that America remains at the forefront of undersea research, protecting vital resources and advancing technology in ways that honor the legacy of Sealab and its pioneers.

January 21, 2025January 22, 2025

Strengthening America’s Maritime Future: A Wake-Up Call for Action

At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we have long advocated for a robust maritime strategy that includes both a stronger U.S. Navy and a revitalized civilian maritime industry. Our commitment to this cause is rooted in a belief that America’s strength at sea is indispensable to its national security, economic stability, and global leadership.

Recently, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) released findings from an investigation into China’s dominance in the shipbuilding, maritime, and logistics sectors, revealing practices that undermine fair competition and threaten American interests. This news reaffirms the urgency of revitalizing our shipbuilding industry—a call echoed by U.S. legislators like Senator John Garamendi and others who are leading efforts to rebuild our maritime capabilities.

What the Investigation Found

The USTR investigation, launched in response to petitions by five unions, highlights how China’s aggressive industrial policies have positioned it as a global leader in shipbuilding. According to USTR Katherine Tai, China builds over 1,700 ships annually—dwarfing the fewer than five built by the United States. The report emphasizes that Beijing’s practices displace foreign firms, foster dependencies, and create significant economic and security risks for the U.S.

Quoting Katherine Tai:
“Beijing’s targeted dominance of these sectors undermines fair, market-oriented competition, increases economic security risks, and is the greatest barrier to revitalization of U.S. industries.”

Why This Matters

America’s maritime industry was once the backbone of our global influence and security. Today, it is a shadow of its former self, leaving us vulnerable to external dependencies. The decline of U.S. shipbuilding not only erodes our military readiness but also jeopardizes our economic security, particularly in the face of escalating geopolitical tensions with China.

The implications extend beyond shipbuilding. Logistics, supply chains, and the broader maritime ecosystem are critical to ensuring that America can sustain its global commitments and respond to crises effectively. As Alliance for American Manufacturing President Scott Paul aptly noted:
“Failing to take decisive action will leave our shipbuilding capabilities at the mercy of Beijing’s persistent predatory market distortions.”

Legislative Efforts to Revitalize U.S. Shipbuilding

Amid these challenges, leaders like Senator John Garamendi are working to reverse the tide. Garamendi, alongside Senators Mark Kelly and Todd Young, recently introduced the SHIPS for America Act—a comprehensive, bipartisan effort to rebuild the U.S. shipbuilding industry and expand the U.S.-flagged fleet. Key provisions of this legislation include:

Establishing a national maritime strategy and a White House Maritime Security Advisor.
Expanding the U.S.-flagged fleet by 250 ships over the next decade.
Rebuilding the shipyard industrial base with tax credits, financial incentives, and funding for workforce development.
Strengthening regulations to ensure government-funded cargo is transported on U.S.-flagged vessels.

These efforts align closely with our own calls for a balanced strategy that integrates the needs of both the Navy and civilian maritime industries.

What Needs to Be Done

The USTR’s findings, combined with the SHIPS for America Act and related initiatives, offer a roadmap to reclaim America’s maritime leadership. However, this will require decisive action from policymakers, industry leaders, and the American public. We need to:

Invest in shipbuilding infrastructure and workforce development.
Expand the U.S.-flagged fleet to reduce dependence on foreign shipping.
Foster innovation in shipbuilding technologies to compete globally.
Unite bipartisan support for maritime legislation that prioritizes national security and economic resilience.

A Call to Action: Wake Up, America!

The stakes have never been higher. As we outlined in our recent open letter, the decline of America’s maritime capabilities is not just an industry problem—it’s a national security crisis. For too long, we have allowed complacency to erode our standing as a maritime power. It’s time to wake up.

We urge you to contact your representatives and demand support for legislation like the SHIPS for America Act. Share this message with your community, and join us in advocating for a stronger Navy and a revitalized civilian maritime industry.

America’s future at sea depends on it. Let’s make it happen.

Credit to AFP for their reporting on the USTR investigation and to the Alliance for American Manufacturing for their continued advocacy.

“`

January 15, 2025January 15, 2025

Global Risks to Undersea Infrastructure and the Growing Need for Defense

Undersea cables are the unseen arteries of modern communication, carrying 99% of the world’s internet and telecommunications traffic. Yet, as geopolitical tensions rise, these vital systems are becoming frequent targets of sabotage and hybrid warfare. Incidents from the Baltic Sea to the Taiwan Strait highlight both their strategic importance and vulnerabilities.

The Stakes: Why Undersea Cables Matter

Global Communication: These cables carry 99% of international data, enabling everything from financial transactions to government communications.
Economic Lifeline: Damaging these cables can disrupt trillions of dollars in daily transactions, impacting economies and businesses globally.
Military and Security Concerns: Undersea cables are vital for military communication, making them high-value targets in hybrid warfare strategies.

Recent Incidents and Their Implications
Baltic Sea

October 2023: The Hong Kong-registered containership Newnew Polar Bear dragged its anchor across the seabed, damaging the Balticconnector natural gas pipeline and data cables in the Gulf of Finland. The ship fled toward Russia, evading investigation.
December 2024: A power cable between Finland and Estonia was severed, and suspicion fell on a Russian “shadow fleet” tanker, the Eagle S. Finnish authorities found specialized surveillance equipment on board, allegedly used to monitor naval activity.

Taiwan Strait

February 2023: Two undersea cables connecting Taiwan to the Matsu Islands were severed by a Chinese fishing boat and cargo vessel, leaving the island without internet for weeks.
January 2025: The freighter Shunxin-39 severed a cable off Taiwan’s northern coast. Although the ship escaped investigation, Taiwan suspects deliberate sabotage. Herming Chiueh, Deputy Head of Taiwan’s Digital Ministry, said the cable-cutting was likely intentional: “You need to accidentally [drop your] anchor on the cable, and then you need to accidentally turn on your engine with the anchor down, and even [if] you realize your anchor is down, you need to keep the engine moving until you cut the cable.”

Red Sea

Houthi rebels were suspected of damaging cables belonging to four major telecom networks, though the group denied involvement.

The Strategic Significance of Undersea Infrastructure

Economic Importance: These cables carry trillions of dollars in financial transactions daily. Disruptions can cripple economies, hinder communication, and destabilize global markets.
Military Implications: Reliable undersea communications are vital for military operations and coordination. Sabotage could cripple responses during crises, delaying information flow and strategic decisions.
Geopolitical Pressures: Russia and China employ unorthodox tactics to assert dominance and destabilize their adversaries.

U.S. Navy and Allied Responses

Enhanced Patrols: NATO and allied nations are increasing naval presence in the Baltic and other regions to monitor suspicious activity.
Technological Investments: AI-driven systems and underwater sensors are being deployed to detect and deter sabotage.
Policy and Collaboration: Strengthened international legal frameworks and collaborative efforts among allies are essential for defending undersea infrastructure.

The Way Forward

Mitigating Risks: Building redundant systems, deploying advanced monitoring technologies, and fostering public-private partnerships are key steps to reduce vulnerabilities.
A Call for Action: Safeguarding undersea cables requires prioritization at the highest levels of government and international collaboration to counter hybrid threats.

Undersea cables, often taken for granted, are critical to the global economy, security, and military operations. The recent spate of incidents underscores the need for vigilance, innovation, and collaboration. For the U.S. and its allies, safeguarding these invisible lifelines is not just a technical challenge—it’s a strategic imperative.

January 9, 2025January 15, 2025

A Lesson in Leadership: My Encounters with President Jimmy Carter

A Historic Moment: Five Presidents United

When I worked for the Reagan Library, I was in charge of communications for the library and the visiting presidents and their families. One of the most extraordinary moments of my career occurred during the library’s dedication, a historic occasion where five living U.S. presidents—Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, and Bush—would stand together for the first time. Or so we thought.

Initially, it was announced that President Jimmy Carter would not be attending. He had prior commitments in Zimbabwe, monitoring elections. At the time, I understood the demands of his global responsibilities, as well as the history of tensions between President Reagan and President Carter during the Iran hostage crisis. His absence seemed understandable. The office prepared for him sat empty.

A Midnight Change of Heart

Then, at 2 a.m. the night before the dedication, everything changed. I received a call from my boss informing me that President Carter had a change of heart. He was on a red-eye flight to California and would be attending after all. I was asked to have his office telecommunications ready in time for his arrival. Despite the unexpected timing, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of awe at his decision. It spoke volumes about his character and the depth of his commitment to history. He was determined to be there, recognizing the significance of the moment.

That day remains one of the most extraordinary events I’ve witnessed. The sight of five living presidents together was a reminder of the shared commitment that transcends differences, something President Carter exemplified with his presence.

A Meeting in Plains, Georgia

On a personal note, I brought photos of the presidents to the event, which I managed to have signed by the other four. My goal was to complete the set with President Carter’s signature. Unfortunately, years later, when I had the chance to meet him again, a delayed flight caused me to miss the connection. The photos went back into the closet, unsigned, and I thought I had missed my opportunity.

Persistence Pays: Completing the Signatures

But persistence often pays off. Twenty-five years after the Reagan Library dedication, I finally met President Carter in Plains, Georgia, during a church service. It was a quiet but profound moment. I thanked him for his service, both as a Navy officer and as President, and I shared the story of the photos. To my great joy, he graciously signed them, completing a journey that had begun decades earlier.

Those two photos, now signed by five living presidents, are treasures I’ve passed on to my children. They represent not just a piece of history but a lesson in perseverance, leadership, and unity.

Lessons in Leadership and Unity

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I often reflect on how President Carter embodies the values of service and humility we hold dear. His actions at the Reagan Library and throughout his life remind us of the importance of rising above differences and serving a greater good.

Inspired by the Navy’s Legacy

The U.S. Navy is, and always has been, a source for good in the world. My respect for those who serve and have served in the Navy inspires me every single day. Their dedication, sacrifice, and commitment to safeguarding our nation and promoting peace globally is a profound reminder of what it means to lead a life of purpose.

A Call to Serve with Honor

I hope President Carter’s legacy continues to inspire others, as it has inspired me, to serve with honor and dedication in our own ways.

R.I.P., Mr. President.

Bill

January 7, 2025January 7, 2025

Reflections on the U.S.-China Science and Technology Agreement: A Legacy of Neglect

*On Jan. 31, 1979, Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping and President Jimmy Carter sign historic diplomatic agreements between the United States and China. (Photos: Jimmy Carter Library*

Introduction: A Decision Made in Haste

The December 2024 renewal of the U.S.-China Science and Technology Agreement (STA) has left some Americans questioning its timing and rationale. While the original 1979 agreement aimed to foster collaboration and mutual respect, today’s geopolitical realities demand a more cautious approach. As an American deeply concerned about our nation’s security and technological leadership, I share the frustration of Senators Marco Rubio, Bill Hagerty, and Jim Risch, who criticized this rushed decision. Senator Risch aptly noted, “The era when this agreement made sense is long gone,” a sentiment that reflects the growing consensus among those wary of China’s strategic ambitions.

Historical Context: Cooperation vs. Competition

The STA, first signed under President Jimmy Carter and Premier Deng Xiaoping, symbolized a hopeful era of collaboration. It was a landmark moment in U.S.-China relations, with industries and policymakers believing that shared knowledge could lead to mutual prosperity. However, over the decades, successive administrations—Republican and Democratic alike—failed to reassess the agreement’s implications. Instead, they allowed industries to prioritize market access over national security, kicking the proverbial can down the road.

Now, as the stakes grow higher, the optics of renewing this agreement without public scrutiny are troubling. Worse, the decision was made just before a presidential transition, effectively denying the incoming administration an opportunity to weigh in. This lack of transparency is a glaring issue, especially given how previous agreements with China have often left the U.S. vulnerable.

The Costs of Neglect: Knowledge Shared, Power Shifted

The consequences of this complacency are clear:

Industrial Espionage: Cases like Motorola and Micron Technology illustrate how China has systematically exploited intellectual property to advance its technological and military capabilities.

Military Implications: From stealth fighters to missile technology, stolen innovations have directly bolstered China’s ability to challenge U.S. military dominance.

A Navy Left Holding the Line

While industries reaped profits, the Navy was left to address the fallout:

Countering Advanced Threats: The Navy now faces adversaries equipped with technologies once exclusive to the U.S., making global readiness more challenging.

Strategic Vulnerabilities: Decades of neglect have created gaps in naval capabilities, leaving our sailors to pick up the pieces without the tools they need.

A Call for Accountability and Action

The renewal of the STA should have been an opportunity for reevaluation, not a rushed decision made behind closed doors. While the updated agreement includes some safeguards, such as excluding critical technologies like AI and quantum computing, these measures fall short of addressing the broader risks.

As Dr. Steven T. Wills, Ph.D., Captain (USN Retired), author of Strategy Shelved: The Collapse of Cold War Naval Strategic Planning and Senior Advisor for American for a Stronger Navy, explains: “The renewal of the U.S.-China Science and Technology Agreement must be viewed with a critical eye, especially given China’s consistent exploitation of open collaborations to advance its military and technological objectives. As a former U.S. Navy officer and author focused on strategic naval planning, I’ve seen firsthand how seemingly innocuous decisions can have long-term implications for national security. This agreement, while framed as a step forward in modernizing cooperation, risks overlooking the broader strategic context. If we fail to adopt a comprehensive approach that aligns scientific collaboration with national security, we risk repeating the mistakes of the past—leaving our Navy and national defense community to address the consequences without adequate tools or support. The time for a unified, forward-looking strategy is now.”

Dr. Wills’ perspective highlights a critical point: this isn’t just about protecting intellectual property—it’s about ensuring that strategic decisions today don’t leave the Navy and the broader defense community vulnerable tomorrow.

It’s time to demand:

Comprehensive Evaluation: Policymakers, industry leaders, and defense experts must scrutinize agreements like the STA to ensure they align with national security interests.

Support for the Navy: Our sailors deserve the resources and tools necessary to address the consequences of decades of neglect.

A Unified National Strategy: The U.S. must adopt a cohesive approach to balancing innovation with security, ensuring industries that benefited from globalization contribute to safeguarding national interests.

Conclusion: Enough Is Enough

The optics of this renewal are undeniably poor. It sends the wrong message at a time when China has consistently exploited partnerships for strategic gain. Americans for a Stronger Navy stands for transparency, accountability, and vigilance. We cannot afford to be naïve or complacent when the stakes are so high.

As someone who served in the U.S. Navy during the Cold War, I’ve had enough of watching decision-makers prioritize short-term gains over long-term security. In upcoming podcasts, we will examine this agreement and its implications in greater detail, bringing together experts to discuss how America can reclaim its leadership in science and technology while safeguarding its future.

It’s time for all Americans—especially industries that have profited most—to step up and support the Navy and national security. This isn’t just about science; it’s about our freedom, our future, and our ability to stand strong in the face of growing challenges.