USS Louisiana (SSBN-743) The Trident II (D5LE) missile
Introduction:
In the rapidly evolving world of military technology, the U.S. Navy continues to be a beacon of excellence and reliability. The recent missile test flight from USS Louisiana (SSBN-743) serves as a testament to the unmatched capabilities of the Trident II strategic weapon system. Let’s delve into what this means for the Navy and the nation.
Why This Matters:
With maritime territories becoming more contested and the global political climate continually shifting, it’s vital for the U.S. to maintain a clear edge in strategic deterrence. A successful test such as this underscores our commitment to peace through strength.
Key Takeaways:
Consistent Track Record: The recent test from the USS Louisiana marks the 191st successful missile launch of the Trident II (D5 & D5LE) since its inception in 1989. This consistency is unparalleled and showcases the reliability of American defense systems.
State-of-the-Art Technology: The Trident II (D5LE) missile is a life-extended version of its predecessor, symbolizing the U.S. Navy’s commitment to technological upgrades and maintaining its edge in naval warfare.
Strategic Deterrence: The success of the Trident II missile program sends a clear message to potential adversaries about the U.S.’s capability and readiness to defend its interests, allies, and global peace.
A Testament to the Crew: Behind every successful test is a dedicated crew, like that aboard the USS Louisiana. Their expertise, training, and commitment play an integral role in these achievements.
Strengthening Global Alliances: Successful tests and advancements in strategic weapons systems bolster the confidence of U.S. allies and partners, strengthening international alliances and cooperative defense strategies.
Forward-Looking Approach: The Navy’s Strategic Systems Programs emphasize not just current capabilities but also future readiness. The regular testing and upgrading of systems like Trident II ensure the U.S. remains prepared for tomorrow’s challenges.
Conclusion:
The unmatched reliability of the Trident II missile system, as demonstrated by the USS Louisiana, is more than just a technological marvel. It represents the diligence, expertise, and forward-thinking approach of the U.S. Navy. As we reflect on this successful test, we are reminded of the immense responsibility and capability our naval forces carry, ensuring a safer world for all.
To the esteemed members and subscribers of Americans for a Stronger Navy,
An impactful maritime exercise recently took place in the Gulf of Oman, marking a significant stride in naval coordination. Two A-10 Thunderbolt IIs, colloquially known as Warthogs, teamed up with the USS Stethem (DDG-63) in an integrated Air Operation in Maritime Surface Warfare.
Key Takeaways:
Enhanced Naval Coordination:
The recent exercise showcased the two Warthogs from the Air Force’s 75th Fighter Squadron cooperating with USS Stethem.
A live surface combat air patrol was conducted which involved joint fires against surface threats, emphasizing the potential of improving tactical proficiency.
The Versatility of Warthogs:
Originally designed to confront Soviet tanks from the sky, the Warthogs boast a massive GAU-8 Avenger 30 mm cannon capable of firing at an extraordinary rate.
While their primary function in recent times has been infantry close air support during conflicts like those in Iraq and Afghanistan, they’ve also demonstrated maritime capabilities.
Growing Importance of Joint Exercises:
Such exercises have been a recurring theme. Earlier this year, the Air Force dispatched A-10s to the Middle East due to increasing Iranian disruptions to oil traffic. Moreover, joint Air Force-Navy operations have been frequent over the past year, reinforcing the importance of inter-service coordination.
Dale A. Jenkins, author of “Diplomats and Admirals” and Senior advisor to the Americans for a Stronger Navy, aptly articulates:
“The coordination between a U.S. Navy Destroyer and the Warthog Air Force attack plane is an example of specialized actions that should be taking place. They make the Navy stronger by participating in more active missions. The challenge for the Navy is to initiate such coordinated missions and thereby lead the effort, not wait to be invited. This is particularly important now when the Navy has only one of eleven of the unified combatant commands.” Jenkins further adds that had decisions gone differently regarding leadership roles, the Navy could have been at a more precarious position concerning the Indo-PAC command
Conclusion:
The recent joint exercise between the Warthogs and the USS Stethem serves as a testament to the potential and necessity of inter-service collaboration. In an era where naval strength and presence are paramount, these initiatives should be celebrated and further encouraged. As Jenkins emphasized, proactive leadership and coordination in such operations are vital for the Navy to retain its commanding position in the global arena.
This exercise marks the sixth iteration of the joint and combined AOMSW between U.S. Navy and Air Force this year. Previous exercises incorporated the Air Force Two U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II aircraft operate alongside USS Bataan (LHD 5) & USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116) in the Gulf of Oman, in August; An A-10 firing a 30mm practice rounds on a practice target on the surface of the water in July 10; A U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidon patrol aircraft, two United States Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft, & three U.S. Coast Guard cutters with embarked U.S. Marine Corps joint terminal attack controllers, trained together in the Arabian Gulf, April 28; Guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60) and an HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopter conducted joint operations in the Gulf of Aden, April 2.
USS Stethem is are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help ensure maritime security and stability in the Middle East region. The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses nearly 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
Taiwan is a small island nation off the coast of China, with a population of about 23 million people and a land area of about 14,000 square miles. It is also one of the most important and contentious issues in global security, especially for the United States and its Navy.
Taiwan’s History and Status
Taiwan has a complex and contested history with China, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory and vows to reunify with it by force if necessary. Taiwan, on the other hand, has developed its own identity and democracy, and seeks to maintain its autonomy and sovereignty. The United States has been Taiwan’s main ally and protector since 1979, when it established the Taiwan Relations Act, which commits the United States to provide Taiwan with arms sales and assistance, and to help Taiwan defend itself against any threats or attacks.
However, the United States has also maintained a policy of strategic ambiguity on Taiwan, which means that it neither promises nor rules out military intervention in case of a Chinese attack. This policy is intended to deter both China and Taiwan from taking any provocative or unilateral actions that could destabilize the status quo and trigger a war. However, this policy also creates uncertainty and confusion for both sides, as well as for the United States itself.
Taiwan as a Tipping Point
In his recent speech at the Global Security Forum ’23, Professor James Holmes, a professor of strategy at the Naval War College and a nonresident fellow at the University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs, addressed the question of whether Taiwan will be a tipping point in global security. He defined a tipping point as a change of state that involves cause and effect and time. He used the metaphor of a boiling point to illustrate his definition, and he explained how human beings can regulate changes of state by adjusting the heat or pressure in a system.
He then applied his definition and metaphor to the case of Taiwan, which he considered to be a potential flashpoint between the United States and China. He argued that Taiwan is not yet at a tipping point, but it could be if certain conditions are met. He identified three conditions that could trigger a tipping point:
(1) China decides to use force to reunify with Taiwan;
(2) the United States decides to intervene militarily to defend Taiwan; and
(3) Taiwan decides to declare formal independence from China.
He analyzed each of these conditions and evaluated their likelihood and consequences. He concluded that none of them are very likely or desirable, but they are not impossible or unthinkable either. He warned that miscalculation, misperception, or miscommunication could lead to an escalation or a crisis that could push Taiwan over the tipping point. He also cautioned that domestic politics, public opinion, and media influence could affect the decision-making process of the actors involved.
How to Prevent or Manage Tipping Point
He then offered some recommendations on how to prevent or manage a tipping point in Taiwan. He suggested that the United States should maintain its strategic ambiguity on Taiwan, which means that it should neither promise nor rule out military intervention in case of a Chinese attack. He also advised that the United States should strengthen its deterrence and diplomacy vis-à-vis China, which means that it should bolster its military presence and capabilities in the region, as well as engage in dialogue and cooperation with China on areas of common interest. He also proposed that the United States should support Taiwan’s security and democracy, which means that it should provide arms sales and assistance to Taiwan, as well as encourage its participation in international organizations and forums.
Why Taiwan Matters For America’s Interests and Values
Why should Americans care about Taiwan? Because Taiwan matters for America’s interests and values, as well as for its Navy’s missions and objectives. Taiwan is an important economic partner and trading partner for the United States, with bilateral trade worth over $100 billion in 2020. Taiwan is also an important democratic ally and friend for the United States, sharing common ideals and principles such as freedom, human rights, and rule of law. Taiwan is also an important strategic partner and asset for the United States, helping to balance China’s power and influence in Asia-Pacific.
Why Taiwan Matters for America’s Navy
Taiwan is also crucial for America’s Navy, which has been operating in the western Pacific for over 70 years. The Navy’s role is to protect U.S. interests and allies in the region, as well as to ensure freedom of navigation and access to the global commons. The Navy’s presence is also meant to deter China from using force or coercion against its neighbors, especially Taiwan. The Navy’s capabilities are also essential for responding to any contingency or crisis involving Taiwan, whether it is humanitarian assistance or military intervention.
Taiwan is not only an island nation; it is also an idea worth defending. It represents what America stands for: democracy, liberty, and peace. It also represents what America needs: a strong Navy that can protect its interest and values around the world.
Conclusion
We are the Americans for a Stronger Navy and we advocate for Peace Through Strength. We believe that a strong navy is the best guarantee of peace and security in the maritime domain.
We believe that a strong Navy is the best deterrent against aggression and coercion by our adversaries. We also believe that a strong Navy is the best instrument of diplomacy and cooperation with our allies and partners.
We stand with our sailors and their families during this difficult time. We support them with our words and deeds. We thank them for their dedication and sacrifice. We hope that they will receive their due respect and reward soon.
We are the Americans for a Stronger Navy, and we say: “Don’t give up the ship!”
As the advocacy group “Americans for a Stronger Navy,” we’ve always championed the importance of a robust naval force in safeguarding our nation’s interests, both domestically and globally. Today, we find ourselves at a juncture where our very principles are under threat, not from an external adversary, but from internal bureaucratic deadlock. The potential government shutdown carries implications far beyond political disagreements, directly impacting the lives of those who stand at the forefront of our defense – the brave men and women of the U.S. Navy.
The Direct Impact on Military Families
The looming government shutdown poses a severe threat, not only to the functioning of various federal departments but more critically, to the sailors on the frontlines of the U.S. Navy. Such a shutdown would result in unpaid troops, causing hardships for military families who often live paycheck to paycheck. These families would be thrust into financial uncertainty, having to depend on savings, loans, or charity.
Operational Setbacks and Morale Decline
The ripple effects would also be felt in the operational readiness and morale of the Navy. Essential training sessions, drills, and exercises would face postponements or cancellations. This disruption could hamper sailors’ combat proficiency and the Navy’s strategic objectives in different global scenarios.
Community Engagement and International Commitments at Risk
Events like San Francisco’s Fleet Week, which boosts the Navy’s public engagement, could be adversely affected. Such disruptions tarnish the Navy’s image and hinder vital community interactions. Additionally, the Navy’s commitment to supporting nations like Ukraine, especially in light of ongoing external threats, could face roadblocks, potentially compromising defense capabilities. The modernization drives within the Navy, which focuses on new technologies and advanced systems, may also experience delays, giving adversaries potential advantages.
A Call for Congressional Responsibility
This shutdown is not just a failure on the part of leadership; it is an affront to those who dedicate their lives to safeguarding the nation. It’s imperative for Congress to rise above political impasses, pass the necessary budget, and ensure that national security and public service remain uncompromised. As the situation remains precarious, it’s essential to express solidarity with sailors and their families, lauding their unwavering commitment and hoping for a quick resolution to this crisis. In times like these, the nation must rally with a united voice, echoing the sentiment: “Don’t give up the ship!”
Introduction: In the vast expanse of global waters, maritime security plays an indispensable role in fostering stability, ensuring the free flow of commerce, and preserving national interests. As advocates for a robust and capable naval force with the “Americans for a Stronger Navy,” we consistently emphasize the need for nations to collaborate in the maritime domain. The recent move by ASEAN nations to conduct their first joint naval exercise near the contentious waters of the South China Sea serves as a testament to the value of cooperative maritime endeavors and presents an important lesson for naval forces worldwide
Analysis of the Southeast Asia Joint Navy Drills Near the South China Sea
The commencement of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN) first joint naval exercise represents a significant and potentially transformative moment in regional geopolitics, particularly in the context of the South China Sea. Here’s why:
Unified ASEAN Front: Historically, ASEAN nations have navigated the complexities of their relationships with major global powers, such as the U.S. and China, often individually rather than as a unified bloc. This first-ever joint exercise, specifically involving only ASEAN nations, suggests a stronger, more unified approach to regional security challenges.
Strategic Timing & Location: The choice of conducting drills in Indonesia’s Natuna waters, which lie close to the South China Sea, is noteworthy. Given the territorial disputes and increasing Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea, these drills communicate a clear message: ASEAN nations are prepared to collaboratively address regional security challenges.
Holistic Approach to Security: The ASEAN Solidarity Exercise isn’t just a demonstration of military prowess. By incorporating search and rescue operations, humanitarian relief, and disaster prevention, ASEAN is emphasizing its commitment to broader regional stability and the well-being of its citizens.
Civil-Military Synergy: The involvement of civilian groups in disaster prevention and humanitarian relief reflects an intention to foster civil-military collaboration. This synergy can significantly amplify the efficacy of such exercises and underscores the bloc’s holistic approach to regional challenges.
Implicit Signal to China: While ASEAN has been careful not to overtly antagonize China, the drills, especially being the first of their kind, can be perceived as a subtle yet firm signal. The bloc is demonstrating that while they seek peaceful and cooperative relations, they also prioritize their collective security and sovereignty.
Boosting Interoperability: Enhancing interoperability is crucial for any collective defense or response initiative. By conducting these joint exercises, ASEAN nations are laying the groundwork for smoother coordination in the face of future crises, whether they be natural disasters or man-made conflicts.
In conclusion, the ASEAN Solidarity Exercise is more than a routine military drill. It is a strategic, well-timed demonstration of ASEAN’s evolving role in regional geopolitics, emphasizing collective security, diplomacy, and a unified front in the face of potential adversities.
Conclusion: The ASEAN Solidarity Exercise, as observed by the “Americans for a Stronger Navy,” embodies the very principles we champion: unity in the face of challenges, the holistic approach to maritime security, and the seamless integration of civil and military assets for a common purpose. As ASEAN nations pave the way for a more cooperative and unified regional maritime strategy, it offers a blueprint for other naval forces around the world. We believe that such exercises underscore the importance of a well-prepared and collaborative naval force in safeguarding not just regional, but global interests. The seas connect us all, and in these waters, unity and strength will always chart the course for a safer, more prosperous future.
USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) arrives in Trieste, Italy for a scheduled port visit, Sept. 17, 2023.
The USS Gerald R. Ford has anchored off the coast of Trieste, marking a significant step in strengthening ties between the U.S. Navy and its Italian counterparts. Commanding Officer Capt. Rick Burgess highlighted the importance of this visit, stating, “This port call offers Sailors from the USS Gerald R. Ford, Carrier Strike Group 12, Carrier Air Wing 8, and Destroyer Squadron 2 a unique opportunity to connect with a key ally and deepen their appreciation for Italian culture.”
During its anchorage, the Gerald R. Ford will welcome local officials and military leaders for a lunch and tour, emphasizing the longstanding alliance between the U.S. and Italy. Additionally, the crew will actively engage with the local community, with plans to participate in a city clean-up event to express gratitude to the city of Trieste.
Cmdr. Tim Yuhas, commanding officer of the USS Ramage, a ship accompanying the Gerald R. Ford, reemphasized the strategic significance of such visits: “The Carrier Strike Group symbolizes the U.S. Navy’s commitment to maintaining forward presence. This visit underscores the value we place on our alliance with Italy and our collective commitment within NATO.”
The Gerald R. Ford’s port call in Italy is part of its scheduled deployment within the U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. Sixth Fleet’s operational area. This deployment exemplifies the U.S. Navy’s commitment to ensuring maritime stability, with the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group playing a pivotal role. Over 5,000 Sailors across various platforms are currently deployed, showcasing the Navy’s readiness to respond to global challenges.
Comprising this Strike Group are the Carrier Strike Group 12, Carrier Air Wing 8, Destroyer Squadron 2, along with notable ships such as the USS Normandy, USS Ramage, USS McFaul, and USS Thomas Hudner.
U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. Sixth Fleet, with headquarters in Naples, Italy, orchestrates operations across European and African waters. Their continuous presence serves as a testament to the U.S.’s unwavering commitment to upholding international agreements and ensuring collective defense with its allies.
From September 24-28, 2023, immerse yourself in the profound legacy of the Tin Can Sailors Association at the iconic Lord Baltimore Hotel. Established in 1976, the association stands as a touchstone for those cherishing our naval heritage, spotlighting the pivotal role of destroyers, backing the current destroyer Navy, and nurturing camaraderie among members.
Amidst the backdrop of engaging discussions, shared memories, and deep appreciation for our naval roots, we’re elated to share that Dale A. Jenkins, renowned Naval historian and author of “Diplomats and Admirals,” will be in attendance. An Advisory Board Member for the Americans for a Stronger Navy, Dale is poised to discuss his insights on the upcoming podcast series, ‘Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power’. While not presenting formally, his insights promise to add depth to discussions about the present challenges and future trajectories of naval power.
Reunion highlights include:
A welcome luncheon, business meeting, banquet dinner, and memorial service.
A scenic dinner cruise on the Inner Harbor.
Guided tours of Baltimore’s landmarks, such as Fort McHenry National Monument and USS Constellation.
A journey through history at the B & O Railroad Museum.
To partake in this momentous event, reach out to Annmarie at 508-677-0515 for an information packet. For registration specifics, a preliminary itinerary, and hotel booking links, visit the association’s official website.
Join us in Baltimore, celebrating our shared naval past and looking forward to our collective future! 🚢
Dale A. Jekinsa, Advisory Board Member – Americans for a Stronger Navy.
The Americans for A Stronger Navy organization proudly welcomes renowned naval historian, author, and former US Navy officer, Dale A. Jenkins, to its Advisory Board. As a distinguished Staff Director of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, and author of “Diplomats and Admirals,” Dale also holds positions on the Samuel Eliot Morison Committee of the Naval Order of the United States, New York, and as a Regional Director of the Naval War College Foundation. Jenkins contributes immense knowledge and expertise to the organization.
“Diplomats and Admirals,” Jenkins’ acclaimed work, explores the nuanced relationship between diplomacy and warfare during Pacific War events from July 1941 to June 1942. His research underscores the complex naval strategies, highlighting the significant transformation of naval warfare during WWII as focus transitioned from battleships to aviation supremacy.
Bill Cullifer, Founder of Americans for A Stronger Navy, remarked, “With Dale on board, our organization stands strengthened. His profound understanding of naval history, coupled with his commitment to harnessing the lessons of the past for a brighter, more resilient future, aligns perfectly with our mission. We eagerly anticipate the wealth of insights he will provide as we champion the ideals of a Stronger Navy and Peace through Strength.”
Jenkins’ collaboration with the organization has already yielded results, manifesting in the “Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power” Podcast Series and the “Wings of Victory: How Naval Aviators Transformed WWII from Battleships to the Skies” webinar series. These educational endeavors embody the informed and captivating narratives Jenkins is known for.
Reflecting on his new advisory role, Dale A. Jenkins expressed, “Joining Americans for A Stronger Navy is opportunity to bring our knowledge from past naval engagements forward to meet our current challenges. It’s crucial for our generation to grasp the pivotal strategies and moments that defined naval engagements of yesteryears. Our shared vision is to enlighten, educate, and reinforce the essence of a formidable naval force.”
About Americans for A Stronger Navy:
Founded by Bill Cullifer, Americans for A Stronger Navy is committed to championing a robust navy and advocating for peace through strength. The organization values the essence of shared history, community fostering, and the significance of gleaning insights from historical naval strategies to fortify the future.
About Dale A. Jenkins
Naval historian, author “Diplomats and Admirals,” former US Navy officer, Advisory Board member, for Americans for a Stronger Navy, distinguished Staff Director of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, Dale also holds positions on the Samuel Eliot Morison Committee of the Naval Order of the United States, New York, and as a Regional Director of the Naval War College Foundation.
For further inquiries or to arrange an interview with Dale A. Jenkins, please contact:
The USS Murphy was a Benson-class destroyer that served in World War II and earned four battle stars for its actions.
We are grateful to Captain Lennon, a former crew member of the USS Henry B. Wilson, for sharing this story with us and allowing us to honor the memory of the USS Murphy and its crew.
But the USS Murphy also had a unique and tragic story that made it one of the most unusual ships in naval history.
In 1943, the USS Murphy was cut in half by a collision with a tanker off the coast of New Jersey, and its bow section sank with 38 sailors on board.
However, the stern section survived and was repaired with a new bow, and the ship returned to service until 1946.
In this blog post, we will explore the strange tale of the USS Murphy, the ship that sank but didn’t.
The USS Murphy: The Ship That Sank But Didn’t
• The USS Murphy was commissioned in July of 1942 and joined the Atlantic Fleet. It was one of 30 Benson-class destroyers, which were 348 feet long and carried a crew of 260 enlisted men and 15 officers. The USS Murphy was armed with five 5-inch guns, six 0.5-inch machine guns, ten 21-inch torpedo tubes, and two depth charge racks . • The USS Murphy first saw action in 1943 as part of Operation Torch, the invasion of North Africa. It provided fire support for the landing forces and engaged in several naval battles with the Axis forces. The USS Murphy took a hit in its starboard engine room while shelling a coastal battery at Point Blondin, Algeria, causing three deaths and 25 injuries among its crew . The ship returned to Boston for repairs and resumed its escort duty along the east coast. • In July of 1943, the USS Murphy participated in the invasion of Sicily, where it again supported the landing forces and fought off enemy air attacks. After completing this operation, the ship returned to the US to escort convoys across the North Atlantic to Great Britain. It was during one of these convoys that the USS Murphy met its fate on October 21, 1943 . • On that night, the USS Murphy was part of a convoy of 38 ships that left New York Harbor for Liverpool, England. The moon was waning in its last quarter, making it difficult to see in the dark. The USS Murphy received a report of an unidentified radar contact ahead of the convoy and was sent to investigate. The contact turned out to be one of the convoy’s own ships, the tanker SS Bulkoil . • The SS Bulkoil was a T2 tanker that carried 140,000 barrels of fuel oil. It was 523 feet long and weighed over 10,000 tons. The captain of the SS Bulkoil mistook the USS Murphy for a torpedo attack and turned sharply to avoid it. However, this maneuver put the tanker on a collision course with the destroyer . • The SS Bulkoil struck the USS Murphy at full speed on its port side, between its superstructure and forward stack. The impact was so powerful that it sliced through the destroyer’s hull and severed it in two. The bow section sank within minutes, taking with it 38 sailors who were trapped inside. The stern section remained afloat, thanks to its watertight doors and compartments . • The survivors of the USS Murphy were rescued by other ships in the convoy, while the damaged stern section was towed back to New York by two tugs. The SS Bulkoil also survived the collision with minor damage and continued its voyage to England . • The Navy decided to salvage what was left of the USS Murphy and rebuild it with a new bow section. The repair work took seven months and cost over $4 million. The USS Murphy was recommissioned in May of 1944 and rejoined the Atlantic Fleet . • The USS Murphy resumed its service in World War II and took part in several operations in Europe. It supported the Normandy invasion at Omaha Beach in June of 1944, where it bombarded enemy positions and defended against air attacks. It also escorted convoys to France and Russia, patrolled the English Channel, and participated in the invasion of Southern France in August of 1944 . • In January of 1945, the USS Murphy had a special mission: it transported King Ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia from Jeddah to Egypt, where he met with President Franklin D. Roosevelt aboard the cruiser USS Quincy. The meeting was part of Roosevelt’s effort to secure oil supplies and strategic alliances in the Middle East . • The USS Murphy continued its service in the Mediterranean until the end of the war in Europe. It then returned to the US and prepared for the war in the Pacific. However, the war ended before the USS Murphy could join the Pacific Fleet. The ship was decommissioned in October of 1946 and placed in the Atlantic Reserve Fleet in Charleston, South Carolina . • The USS Murphy remained in reserve until 1969, when it was stricken from the Naval Vessel Register. In October of 1972, it was sold for scrap. But somewhere, deep beneath the Atlantic Ocean, there was still a part of the USS Murphy that had never been recovered: its original bow section . • The bow section of the USS Murphy still rests on its side under 260 feet of water, about 20 miles off the coast of New Jersey. It is a solemn reminder of the 38 sailors who died on that fateful night in 1943. The wreck was discovered by divers in 1989 and explored by several expeditions since then. In 2006, a team from the Seeker filmed the wreck for a documentary series called Quest for Sunken Warships. They left behind a commemorative plaque honoring the fallen sailors .
• Today, there is also a memorial for the USS Murphy and its crew in a park in Surf City, Long Island. The memorial consists of a plaque with the names of the 38 sailors who died in the collision, as well as a piece of metal from the ship’s hull. The memorial was dedicated in 1993, on the 50th anniversary of the sinking .
Conclusion
The USS Murphy was a remarkable ship that served in World War II and earned four battle stars for its actions. But it also had a unique and tragic story that made it one of the most unusual ships in naval history.
In 1943, it was cut in half by a collision with a tanker off the coast of New Jersey, and its bow section sank with 38 sailors on board.
However, the stern section survived and was repaired with a new bow, and the ship returned to service until 1946.
The USS Murphy was a ship that sank but didn’t, and its story is a testament to the courage and resilience of its crew and the Navy.
Let us have a moment of silence for the 38 sailors who lost their lives on that fateful night in 1943.
General characteristics Class and type Benson-class destroyer Displacement 1,620 tons Length 348 ft 4 in (106.17 m) Beam 36 ft 1 in (11.00 m) Draft 17 ft 4 in (5.28 m) Speed 37 knots (69 km/h; 43 mph) Complement 265 Armament 4 x 5 in (130 mm) guns 40 mm guns 5 x 21 inch (533 mm) torpedo tubes 4 depth charge throwers
Small Ship, Big Impact? Reevaluating the Navy’s Approach to Vessel Size. U.S. NAVY
Introduction:
To the esteemed members and subscribers of Americans for a Stronger Navy,
In our continued endeavor to promote an educated dialogue surrounding the strength and direction of our nation’s naval forces, we bring forward an opinion piece recently penned by Craig Hooper for Forbes.
The piece titled “U.S. Navy Turns Away From Small Warships Despite Growing Demand, Tactical Relevance” delves into the Navy’s decision to shift focus away from small combat-oriented ships, despite their apparent global demand and tactical significance.
This is a topic of paramount importance, as the balance between small and large naval vessels has implications for our tactical flexibility, regional engagements, and how we project power and diplomacy on the global stage.
Key Takeaways:
Departure from Small Ships:
Hooper discusses the U.S. Navy’s move away from managing small combatants, such as the Cyclone class coastal patrol ships. This responsibility has now been transferred to the U.S. Coast Guard, which is grappling with its own challenges.
Global Interest in Small Vessels:
There seems to be a discrepancy between the U.S. Navy’s stance and the rest of the world. Many allies have shown keen interest in the U.S. Navy’s Cyclone class ships. This interest juxtaposes the Navy’s lack of enthusiasm to invest in small craft.
Unprecedented Elimination:
The wholesale removal of small combat-oriented ships from the U.S. Navy is a historical shift. Currently, the Naval Vessel Register lists only ten battle force ships under 2400-tons.
Differing Perspectives:
While the U.S. Navy finds smaller vessels vulnerable against adversaries like China, other nations seem to be taking a different stance. The South China Sea, for instance, has seen small ship engagements, with countries like the Philippines commissioning former U.S. Navy’s Cyclone class ships.
The Robot Replacements:
There’s a hint of an inclination to look towards maritime robots. While valuable, Hooper believes that they can’t yet replace the human-led missions of crewed small ships.
The Coast Guard’s Role:
With the Navy shifting its focus, the Coast Guard has been compelled to pick up the slack, despite its distinct and diverse mission set.
Conclusion:
We are grateful to Dr. Craig Hooper for shedding light on this evolving aspect of our naval strategy. While his perspective provides valuable insights, it’s crucial to remember the foundational principle of the Americans for a Stronger Navy: the belief in a robust, versatile, and adequately equipped naval force.
Both small and large vessels have their unique tactical and strategic advantages. As we advocate for a stronger Navy, it’s essential to understand the role of every ship, large or small, in ensuring America’s maritime supremacy.
Thank you for your continued support and commitment. Let’s foster an informed conversation, ensuring the best future for our Navy.
