Peace Through Strength – Community Driven – Membership Supported
Category: Analysis
The Analysis category will feature publicly available content published by the U.S. Navy. The Americans for a Stronger Navy will review and proviide to its members and subscribers, in-depth analysis, commentary, and insights on the latest developments and issues related to the United States Navy’s strategic direction. The category will cover a wide range of topics, including warfighting, operating forward, readiness, modernization, and people, as well as other issues related to the Navy’s mission and goals. The aim is to provide members and subscribers with valuable information and perspectives that can help them better understand the challenges and opportunities facing the Navy and how Americans for a Stronger Navy is working to support its strategic direction.
As the USS Mount Whitney, the Navy’s primary command-and-control ship in Europe, departs for the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, it joins a broader U.S. military buildup in the region. This deployment comes in the wake of intensified conflicts, as the U.S. lends its support to Israel during its ongoing engagement with Hamas. Such actions reiterate the Navy’s commitment to allies and the pivotal role maritime diplomacy plays in global geopolitics.
Comprehensive Maritime Power
The partnership between U.S. Sailors and Military Sealift Command civil service mariners showcases the harmony of military and civilian efforts. Their combined efforts in the U.S. 6th Fleet area are a testament to the multifaceted strength of our naval forces.
Building and Sustaining Relationships
For over eight decades, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has cultivated strategic relationships. Shared values form the bedrock of these alliances, contributing immensely to regional security and stability.
Diverse Operations, Singular Goal
While the U.S. Sixth Fleet is involved in a spectrum of joint and naval operations, its prime directive remains clear: safeguarding U.S. national security interests in Europe and Africa. By operating in these areas, the Navy is a beacon of stability and assurance.
Conclusion: The Path Forward
Our Navy’s continued efforts in Europe and Africa underscore a fundamental belief: peace is achieved not by retreat but by a balanced show of strength and diplomacy. As members and supporters of Americans for a Stronger Navy, we firmly stand by the principle of “peace through strength.” In championing a stronger Navy, we’re not advocating for conflict; we’re championing the most effective route to sustained peace.
Let us continue our support for our naval forces as they sail forward, fostering connections and ensuring the seas remain free and secure for all.
Segment: Navigating Naval Insights: The RAND Perspective and Our Vision for U.S. Naval Power
Editor’s Note: This segment is part of our ongoing series “From Depths to Skies: Exploring the Future Landscape of U.S. Naval Power.” We delve deep into various perspectives to understand and shape the future of the U.S. Navy. In this installment, we explore the insights provided by the RAND Corporation and how they align with our vision for a stronger naval presence.
Dear Members and Friends of Americans for a Stronger Navy,
Greetings to each and every one of you. As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, it’s an immense honor and privilege to connect with a community so deeply committed to the strength and future of our Navy.
Each of you, whether serving, having served, or standing as a steadfast supporter from the civilian community, shares the profound belief that a robust and well-equipped Navy is the bedrock of our nation’s security and global influence.
The journey to establish Americans for a Stronger Navy was fueled by personal passion and driven by the countless stories of dedication and sacrifice I’ve encountered over the years. Our Navy’s resilience, innovation, and indomitable spirit have inspired this venture, and I feel a profound responsibility to champion its cause.
But this mission isn’t mine alone; it’s ours. Together, we can navigate the complexities of advocacy, foster understanding among our fellow Americans, and ensure our Navy receives the support and resources it rightly deserves.
As we embark on this shared journey, I want you to know that your insights, experiences, and dedication are the foundation of our collective efforts. I am eager to hear your stories, understand your concerns, and work hand-in-hand to champion the needs of our Navy.
Thank you for being an integral part of Americans for a Stronger Navy. Our strength lies in our unity, and together, we will ensure our Navy remains unmatched, now and for generations to come.
Best, Bill Cullifer, Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy.
With our collective goals in mind:
“I’m excited to introduce the first installment of our series, “From Depths to Skies: Exploring the Future Landscape of U.S. Naval Power.”
Today’s commentary hails from the respected research institution, the RAND Corporation. Authored by experts Bradley Martin and Scott Savitz, this piece sheds light on some pressing issues our Navy is grappling with. I believe it’s crucial for all of us to understand these challenges to advocate more effectively for our Navy’s future.
Understanding the RAND Corporation and Its Importance to Americans:
Who is RAND Corporation?
RAND Corporation is a non-profit global policy think tank established in 1948. It provides research and analysis in various areas, including defense, health, education, and more. Its mission is to improve policy and decision-making through research and analysis.
Why do they matter?
Experts from RAND are known for their research rigor and objectivity. They dive deep into complex issues, offering nuanced insights based on solid evidence. In the realm of defense and the Navy, their commentaries and analyses are instrumental in guiding policy decisions and in shaping public perceptions.
Why should Americans care?
When RAND speaks on defense matters, policymakers, and the defense community pay attention.
Analysis of the Recent RAND Commentary:
The commentary by Bradley Martin and Scott Savitz raises important issues for the Navy:
Fleet Size & Configuration: The piece questions the Navy’s readiness for a diverse range of missions, from all-out conflict to low-level provocations, and raises concerns about the Navy’s force structure.
Presence vs. Deterrence: A significant naval presence aids deterrence, but the optimal level of presence required for deterrence is yet to be determined.
Unmanned Vessels: The Navy sees potential in unmanned assets to achieve a balanced force structure. But there are challenges in integration, and Congress remains skeptical about their effectiveness.
Strategic Vision: The Navy needs a clearer strategic vision. Its day-to-day operations, while essential, may hinder long-term planning and readiness for future conflicts.
Why Should We Care?
The U.S. Navy’s decisions today will shape our ability to deter and, if necessary, win wars tomorrow. These decisions impact our national security, our global reputation, and our ability to safeguard American interests.
We owe our gratitude to Bradley Martin and Scott Savitz for sharing their insights. Their expertise gives us a deeper understanding of the challenges our Navy faces and the need for a well-informed advocacy.
Dive Deeper with ‘Charting the Course’:
As we explore the future landscape of the U.S. Naval Power, our journey doesn’t end here. The “Americans for a Stronger Navy” initiative is excited to announce our upcoming groundbreaking webinar series, ‘Charting the Course’. This series will dive deeper into the challenges and opportunities facing our Navy, from AI advancements to defense budgetary nuances.
Why ‘Charting the Course’?:
Understand the potential of the “Replicator” initiative in AI system development.
Navigate the intricate waters of budgetary challenges within the defense sector.
Learn about the pivotal role of Naval strategy in global geopolitics.
For interested speakers, please find more details and submit your credentials by clicking here. “Call for Speakers” . You can also reach out to us at strongernavydotorg AT gmail.com or on Twitter @StrongerNavy.
Final Call to Action: The future of American naval power is not just a topic for discussion—it’s a collaborative mission. Whether you’re an expert or an interested party, we urge you to participate. Let’s not only witness the future; let’s shape it together.
To the esteemed members and subscribers of Americans for a Stronger Navy,
An impactful maritime exercise recently took place in the Gulf of Oman, marking a significant stride in naval coordination. Two A-10 Thunderbolt IIs, colloquially known as Warthogs, teamed up with the USS Stethem (DDG-63) in an integrated Air Operation in Maritime Surface Warfare.
Key Takeaways:
Enhanced Naval Coordination:
The recent exercise showcased the two Warthogs from the Air Force’s 75th Fighter Squadron cooperating with USS Stethem.
A live surface combat air patrol was conducted which involved joint fires against surface threats, emphasizing the potential of improving tactical proficiency.
The Versatility of Warthogs:
Originally designed to confront Soviet tanks from the sky, the Warthogs boast a massive GAU-8 Avenger 30 mm cannon capable of firing at an extraordinary rate.
While their primary function in recent times has been infantry close air support during conflicts like those in Iraq and Afghanistan, they’ve also demonstrated maritime capabilities.
Growing Importance of Joint Exercises:
Such exercises have been a recurring theme. Earlier this year, the Air Force dispatched A-10s to the Middle East due to increasing Iranian disruptions to oil traffic. Moreover, joint Air Force-Navy operations have been frequent over the past year, reinforcing the importance of inter-service coordination.
Dale A. Jenkins, author of “Diplomats and Admirals” and Senior advisor to the Americans for a Stronger Navy, aptly articulates:
“The coordination between a U.S. Navy Destroyer and the Warthog Air Force attack plane is an example of specialized actions that should be taking place. They make the Navy stronger by participating in more active missions. The challenge for the Navy is to initiate such coordinated missions and thereby lead the effort, not wait to be invited. This is particularly important now when the Navy has only one of eleven of the unified combatant commands.” Jenkins further adds that had decisions gone differently regarding leadership roles, the Navy could have been at a more precarious position concerning the Indo-PAC command
Conclusion:
The recent joint exercise between the Warthogs and the USS Stethem serves as a testament to the potential and necessity of inter-service collaboration. In an era where naval strength and presence are paramount, these initiatives should be celebrated and further encouraged. As Jenkins emphasized, proactive leadership and coordination in such operations are vital for the Navy to retain its commanding position in the global arena.
This exercise marks the sixth iteration of the joint and combined AOMSW between U.S. Navy and Air Force this year. Previous exercises incorporated the Air Force Two U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II aircraft operate alongside USS Bataan (LHD 5) & USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116) in the Gulf of Oman, in August; An A-10 firing a 30mm practice rounds on a practice target on the surface of the water in July 10; A U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidon patrol aircraft, two United States Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft, & three U.S. Coast Guard cutters with embarked U.S. Marine Corps joint terminal attack controllers, trained together in the Arabian Gulf, April 28; Guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60) and an HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopter conducted joint operations in the Gulf of Aden, April 2.
USS Stethem is are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help ensure maritime security and stability in the Middle East region. The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses nearly 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
Taiwan is a small island nation off the coast of China, with a population of about 23 million people and a land area of about 14,000 square miles. It is also one of the most important and contentious issues in global security, especially for the United States and its Navy.
Taiwan’s History and Status
Taiwan has a complex and contested history with China, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory and vows to reunify with it by force if necessary. Taiwan, on the other hand, has developed its own identity and democracy, and seeks to maintain its autonomy and sovereignty. The United States has been Taiwan’s main ally and protector since 1979, when it established the Taiwan Relations Act, which commits the United States to provide Taiwan with arms sales and assistance, and to help Taiwan defend itself against any threats or attacks.
However, the United States has also maintained a policy of strategic ambiguity on Taiwan, which means that it neither promises nor rules out military intervention in case of a Chinese attack. This policy is intended to deter both China and Taiwan from taking any provocative or unilateral actions that could destabilize the status quo and trigger a war. However, this policy also creates uncertainty and confusion for both sides, as well as for the United States itself.
Taiwan as a Tipping Point
In his recent speech at the Global Security Forum ’23, Professor James Holmes, a professor of strategy at the Naval War College and a nonresident fellow at the University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs, addressed the question of whether Taiwan will be a tipping point in global security. He defined a tipping point as a change of state that involves cause and effect and time. He used the metaphor of a boiling point to illustrate his definition, and he explained how human beings can regulate changes of state by adjusting the heat or pressure in a system.
He then applied his definition and metaphor to the case of Taiwan, which he considered to be a potential flashpoint between the United States and China. He argued that Taiwan is not yet at a tipping point, but it could be if certain conditions are met. He identified three conditions that could trigger a tipping point:
(1) China decides to use force to reunify with Taiwan;
(2) the United States decides to intervene militarily to defend Taiwan; and
(3) Taiwan decides to declare formal independence from China.
He analyzed each of these conditions and evaluated their likelihood and consequences. He concluded that none of them are very likely or desirable, but they are not impossible or unthinkable either. He warned that miscalculation, misperception, or miscommunication could lead to an escalation or a crisis that could push Taiwan over the tipping point. He also cautioned that domestic politics, public opinion, and media influence could affect the decision-making process of the actors involved.
How to Prevent or Manage Tipping Point
He then offered some recommendations on how to prevent or manage a tipping point in Taiwan. He suggested that the United States should maintain its strategic ambiguity on Taiwan, which means that it should neither promise nor rule out military intervention in case of a Chinese attack. He also advised that the United States should strengthen its deterrence and diplomacy vis-à-vis China, which means that it should bolster its military presence and capabilities in the region, as well as engage in dialogue and cooperation with China on areas of common interest. He also proposed that the United States should support Taiwan’s security and democracy, which means that it should provide arms sales and assistance to Taiwan, as well as encourage its participation in international organizations and forums.
Why Taiwan Matters For America’s Interests and Values
Why should Americans care about Taiwan? Because Taiwan matters for America’s interests and values, as well as for its Navy’s missions and objectives. Taiwan is an important economic partner and trading partner for the United States, with bilateral trade worth over $100 billion in 2020. Taiwan is also an important democratic ally and friend for the United States, sharing common ideals and principles such as freedom, human rights, and rule of law. Taiwan is also an important strategic partner and asset for the United States, helping to balance China’s power and influence in Asia-Pacific.
Why Taiwan Matters for America’s Navy
Taiwan is also crucial for America’s Navy, which has been operating in the western Pacific for over 70 years. The Navy’s role is to protect U.S. interests and allies in the region, as well as to ensure freedom of navigation and access to the global commons. The Navy’s presence is also meant to deter China from using force or coercion against its neighbors, especially Taiwan. The Navy’s capabilities are also essential for responding to any contingency or crisis involving Taiwan, whether it is humanitarian assistance or military intervention.
Taiwan is not only an island nation; it is also an idea worth defending. It represents what America stands for: democracy, liberty, and peace. It also represents what America needs: a strong Navy that can protect its interest and values around the world.
Conclusion
We are the Americans for a Stronger Navy and we advocate for Peace Through Strength. We believe that a strong navy is the best guarantee of peace and security in the maritime domain.
We believe that a strong Navy is the best deterrent against aggression and coercion by our adversaries. We also believe that a strong Navy is the best instrument of diplomacy and cooperation with our allies and partners.
We stand with our sailors and their families during this difficult time. We support them with our words and deeds. We thank them for their dedication and sacrifice. We hope that they will receive their due respect and reward soon.
We are the Americans for a Stronger Navy, and we say: “Don’t give up the ship!”
As the advocacy group “Americans for a Stronger Navy,” we’ve always championed the importance of a robust naval force in safeguarding our nation’s interests, both domestically and globally. Today, we find ourselves at a juncture where our very principles are under threat, not from an external adversary, but from internal bureaucratic deadlock. The potential government shutdown carries implications far beyond political disagreements, directly impacting the lives of those who stand at the forefront of our defense – the brave men and women of the U.S. Navy.
The Direct Impact on Military Families
The looming government shutdown poses a severe threat, not only to the functioning of various federal departments but more critically, to the sailors on the frontlines of the U.S. Navy. Such a shutdown would result in unpaid troops, causing hardships for military families who often live paycheck to paycheck. These families would be thrust into financial uncertainty, having to depend on savings, loans, or charity.
Operational Setbacks and Morale Decline
The ripple effects would also be felt in the operational readiness and morale of the Navy. Essential training sessions, drills, and exercises would face postponements or cancellations. This disruption could hamper sailors’ combat proficiency and the Navy’s strategic objectives in different global scenarios.
Community Engagement and International Commitments at Risk
Events like San Francisco’s Fleet Week, which boosts the Navy’s public engagement, could be adversely affected. Such disruptions tarnish the Navy’s image and hinder vital community interactions. Additionally, the Navy’s commitment to supporting nations like Ukraine, especially in light of ongoing external threats, could face roadblocks, potentially compromising defense capabilities. The modernization drives within the Navy, which focuses on new technologies and advanced systems, may also experience delays, giving adversaries potential advantages.
A Call for Congressional Responsibility
This shutdown is not just a failure on the part of leadership; it is an affront to those who dedicate their lives to safeguarding the nation. It’s imperative for Congress to rise above political impasses, pass the necessary budget, and ensure that national security and public service remain uncompromised. As the situation remains precarious, it’s essential to express solidarity with sailors and their families, lauding their unwavering commitment and hoping for a quick resolution to this crisis. In times like these, the nation must rally with a united voice, echoing the sentiment: “Don’t give up the ship!”
Small Ship, Big Impact? Reevaluating the Navy’s Approach to Vessel Size. U.S. NAVY
Introduction:
To the esteemed members and subscribers of Americans for a Stronger Navy,
In our continued endeavor to promote an educated dialogue surrounding the strength and direction of our nation’s naval forces, we bring forward an opinion piece recently penned by Craig Hooper for Forbes.
The piece titled “U.S. Navy Turns Away From Small Warships Despite Growing Demand, Tactical Relevance” delves into the Navy’s decision to shift focus away from small combat-oriented ships, despite their apparent global demand and tactical significance.
This is a topic of paramount importance, as the balance between small and large naval vessels has implications for our tactical flexibility, regional engagements, and how we project power and diplomacy on the global stage.
Key Takeaways:
Departure from Small Ships:
Hooper discusses the U.S. Navy’s move away from managing small combatants, such as the Cyclone class coastal patrol ships. This responsibility has now been transferred to the U.S. Coast Guard, which is grappling with its own challenges.
Global Interest in Small Vessels:
There seems to be a discrepancy between the U.S. Navy’s stance and the rest of the world. Many allies have shown keen interest in the U.S. Navy’s Cyclone class ships. This interest juxtaposes the Navy’s lack of enthusiasm to invest in small craft.
Unprecedented Elimination:
The wholesale removal of small combat-oriented ships from the U.S. Navy is a historical shift. Currently, the Naval Vessel Register lists only ten battle force ships under 2400-tons.
Differing Perspectives:
While the U.S. Navy finds smaller vessels vulnerable against adversaries like China, other nations seem to be taking a different stance. The South China Sea, for instance, has seen small ship engagements, with countries like the Philippines commissioning former U.S. Navy’s Cyclone class ships.
The Robot Replacements:
There’s a hint of an inclination to look towards maritime robots. While valuable, Hooper believes that they can’t yet replace the human-led missions of crewed small ships.
The Coast Guard’s Role:
With the Navy shifting its focus, the Coast Guard has been compelled to pick up the slack, despite its distinct and diverse mission set.
Conclusion:
We are grateful to Dr. Craig Hooper for shedding light on this evolving aspect of our naval strategy. While his perspective provides valuable insights, it’s crucial to remember the foundational principle of the Americans for a Stronger Navy: the belief in a robust, versatile, and adequately equipped naval force.
Both small and large vessels have their unique tactical and strategic advantages. As we advocate for a stronger Navy, it’s essential to understand the role of every ship, large or small, in ensuring America’s maritime supremacy.
Thank you for your continued support and commitment. Let’s foster an informed conversation, ensuring the best future for our Navy.
The global maritime landscape is undergoing a significant transformation, with China rapidly emerging as a dominant naval power. The implications of this shift have profound consequences for the United States and its position in the world. Recent revelations from a leaked US Navy briefing slide provide alarming insights into the trajectory of China’s naval capabilities and ambitions.
Key Takeaways
China’s Overwhelming Shipbuilding Capacity
China’s shipyards boast a capacity of over 23.2 million tons, a staggering 232 times greater than the US’s capacity, which is less than 100,000 tons.
About 70% of China’s shipbuilding revenue is derived from naval production, while nearly 95% of American shipbuilding revenue is attributed to naval production.
China currently commands the world’s largest navy with more than 355 vessels, including an array of combatant ships, submarines, and other essential naval assets.
By 2025, China’s naval fleet is anticipated to encompass 400 ships and is further projected to expand to 440 ships by 2030. In contrast, the US naval fleet is expected to hover between 305 and 317 ships.
China’s fervent naval expansion is fueled by its strategic aspirations to establish itself as a global superpower and challenge the US’s supremacy in the Indo-Pacific realm.
The sheer magnitude of China’s shipbuilding prowess and its burgeoning naval fleet poses grave challenges to the US’s strategic interests and its longstanding dominance in the Indo-Pacific region. In the face of such rapid naval ascendance by China, it’s imperative for the United States to adopt robust measures to bolster its naval capabilities. As members and subscribers of the Americans for a Stronger Navy, the call to action is clear: Advocate for greater investments in the US Navy to ensure it remains a formidable force in the years to come.
To the esteemed members and subscribers of the Americans for A Stronger Navy,
Our nation’s security is a matter of collective pride and responsibility. A significant portion of this duty is understanding the complexities and dynamics between our armed forces and the industries that support them.
The relationship between the Navy and the defense industry is pivotal in this regard. In this article, we explore this intricate bond, highlighting its challenges and explaining its significance to all Americans and our mission.
Why This Matters to Americans and to Our Mission
The Navy serves as a beacon of our nation’s might, guarding our seas and ensuring our interests remain secure. But behind this force lies a complex network of collaborations, decisions, and strategies involving various stakeholders, most notably the defense industry.
To truly fortify our Naval capabilities, this partnership must be not just functional but exceptional. At the heart of the Americans for a Stronger Navy’s mission is the endeavor to ensure that this relationship is productive, transparent, and efficient.
Del Toro on the Essence of Partnerships
Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, has frequently emphasized the significance of industry partnerships in strengthening the Navy. “I know what it takes to build a warship,” he remarked, shedding light on the intricate nature of defense contracts and collaborations.
Del Toro’s firsthand experience in shipbuilding has given him a deep appreciation for the teamwork between the government and industry players. “It’s an example of how America’s best can come together to build these tremendous platforms,” he observed, highlighting the symbiotic relationship that ultimately benefits national and economic security.
The Challenges for the Navy
Budget Constraints: Fiscal restrictions challenge the Navy to strike a balance between acquiring cutting-edge technology and ensuring value for money. Rapid Technological Changes: The pace of tech advancements means the Navy must ensure new innovations integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Bureaucratic Processes: Lengthy procurement procedures can potentially hamper the Navy’s preparedness.
The Challenges for the Industry
Understanding Navy Requirements: The defense industry must constantly adapt to the Navy’s evolving and specific needs. Financial Risks: High initial costs with no certain returns can be a significant burden. Security Protocols: While critical, stringent security guidelines can pose challenges to industry partners.
Role of Organizations in Strengthening the Partnership
External organizations play a pivotal role in nurturing and amplifying this relationship. Their contributions include:
Educating Both Parties: Through seminars and workshops, ensuring synergy between the Navy and industry. Facilitating Communication: Promoting open dialogue to preempt misunderstandings and encourage seamless collaborations. Advocacy: Championing policies and practices that benefit both the Navy and its industry partners.
A Personal Note from Bill Cullifer, FounderAmericans for a Stronger Navy
“At the core of our ethos at the Americans for A Stronger Navy is the understanding that a robust Navy translates to enhanced safety and prosperity here at home.
Clarity and focus are our guiding principles. We strive to hone in on the essentials, especially in the procurement process, weeding out redundancies, stripping away non-essentials, and bypassing unnecessary overhead.
This perspective isn’t just about clarity; it’s about potential cost-savings, ensuring our Navy receives the best without undue expenses.”
Conclusion
In our commitment to enhancing public understanding and fostering dialogue about naval strength and its significance, the Americans for A Stronger Navy proudly underwrites a range of educational initiatives.
These resources serve as a bridge between the Navy, the defense industry, and the public, underscoring the importance of partnerships. The ‘Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power Podcast Series’ provides insights into how these partnerships can shape the future of naval capabilities.
Image IconForeign Minister Tobias Billström, background, listens, during a press briefing together with US congressmen Michael McCaul, centre and Gregory Meeks, in Stockholm, Friday, Sept. 1, 2023. The United States House Foreign Affairs chair says that a partnership of the Russian and Chinese leaders worries him, saying: “We have never seen a threat this large-scale to Europe and the Pacific, I would argue, since World War II.” Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said Friday during a trip to Sweden with a U.S. Congressional Delegation that an alliance of Beijing and Moscow poses a big challenges to the free world. (Henrik Montgomery/TT News Agency via AP) The Associated Press
Hello, and welcome to the blog of the Americans for a Stronger Navy.
We are a group of patriotic citizens who support and appreciate the U.S. Navy and its mission to protect our nation and its interests around the world.
In this blog, we will share with you news, stories, facts, and opinions about the Navy and its amazing ships and sailors.
Today, we want to talk about a recent development that caught our attention: the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee chair calling the Russia-China alliance the biggest threat since World War II. This is a serious and alarming statement that reflects the growing challenges and dangers that our Navy and our allies face in the global arena.
What did the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee chair say?
The U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee chair is Rep. Michael McCaul, a Republican from Texas. He made his remarks during a visit to Sweden on September 1, 2023, where he met with the Swedish foreign minister and other officials. He was part of a U.S. congressional delegation that also visited the Netherlands and discussed issues such as support for NATO and Ukraine, ways to hold Russia accountable for its actions in Ukraine, and how to confront shared threats from China.
McCaul said that a partnership between Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin worried him, adding, “We have never seen a threat this large scale to Europe and the Pacific, I would argue, since World War II.” He said that an alliance between Beijing and Moscow poses a big challenge for the free world in this great power competition that we find ourselves in.
Why is the Russia-China alliance a threat?
The Russia-China alliance is a threat because it combines two authoritarian regimes that have aggressive and expansionist ambitions in their respective regions and beyond. Both countries have been violating international norms and rules, undermining democratic values and human rights, and challenging the U.S. and its allies’ interests and security.
Some examples of their threatening behavior are:
• Russia’s invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014, its ongoing support for separatists in eastern Ukraine, its cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns against Western countries, its interference in elections and political processes, its military buildup and provocations near NATO borders, its use of chemical weapons against dissidents, and its development of new nuclear weapons and hypersonic missiles.
China’s militarization of disputed islands and reefs in the South China Sea, its coercion and intimidation of neighboring countries over maritime claims, its violation of Taiwan’s airspace and sovereignty, its crackdown on Hong Kong’s autonomy and democracy, its genocide against Uyghurs and other minorities in Xinjiang, its theft of intellectual property and trade secrets from Western companies, its suppression of free speech and dissent at home and abroad, and its rapid modernization of its military capabilities and space program.
The Russia-China alliance is also a threat because it enables both countries to support each other economically, politically, diplomatically, militarily, and technologically. They have increased their cooperation in various fields such as energy, trade, infrastructure, defense, security, intelligence, science, innovation, culture, media, education, health, and environment. They have also coordinated their positions on global issues such as Iran’s nuclear program, North Korea’s nuclear weapons, Syria’s civil war, Venezuela’s crisis, Myanmar’s coup, Afghanistan’s situation, climate change, human rights, multilateralism, and reform of international institutions.
The Russia-China alliance is especially a threat because it challenges the U.S.-led international order that has maintained peace and stability since World War II. They seek to undermine the credibility and effectiveness of NATO, the European Union, the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, and other organizations that promote cooperation and dialogue among nations. They also seek to create alternative blocs and platforms that serve their interests and values such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the BRICS (Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa) group
How does the Navy respond to the Russia-China alliance?
The Navy is well aware of the threat posed by the Russia-China alliance and is taking various measures to counter it and protect our interests and allies. Some of these measures are:
• Strengthening our alliances and partnerships with like-minded countries that share our values and vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific and a secure and prosperous Europe. The Navy conducts regular exercises, operations, exchanges, and consultations with our allies and partners to enhance our interoperability, coordination, and cooperation. Some examples of these activities are the Malabar naval exercise with India, Japan, and Australia; the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise with 26 nations; the Baltic Operations (BALTOPS) exercise with 18 NATO and partner nations; the Sea Breeze exercise with Ukraine and 31 other nations; the Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) in the South China Sea; and the Enhanced Forward Presence (EFP) in Eastern Europe.
• Increasing our presence and readiness in the regions where Russia and China are most active and assertive. The Navy deploys its ships, aircraft, submarines, and personnel to strategic locations such as Japan, Guam, Bahrain, Spain, Italy, Romania, Poland, Norway, and Iceland. The Navy also rotates its assets through temporary deployments such as the Carrier Strike Group (CSG), the Amphibious Ready Group (ARG), the Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG), and the Surface Action Group (SAG). The Navy also maintains a continuous nuclear deterrent patrol with its ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and a global undersea dominance with its attack submarines (SSNs).
• Modernizing our capabilities and platforms to match or exceed those of Russia and China. The Navy invests in research, development, acquisition, and innovation of new technologies, systems, weapons, and concepts that will give us an edge over our adversaries. Some examples of these initiatives are the Columbia-class SSBN program, the Constellation-class frigate program, the F-35C Lightning II fighter jet program, the MQ-25 Stingray unmanned aerial refueling tanker program, the Naval Strike Missile (NSM) anti-ship cruise missile program, the Hypersonic Glide Body (HGB) weapon system program, the Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) concept, and the Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air (NIFC-CA) network.
What can we do to support the Navy?
As members and subscribers of #AmericansforaStrongerNavy, we can do many things to support the Navy and its mission to counter the Russia-China alliance. Some of these things are:
• Educating ourselves and others about the threat posed by the Russia-China alliance and the importance of maintaining a strong and capable Navy. Stay informed by subscribing to the blog and newsletter. We can also share these sources with our friends, family, colleagues, and social media followers.
• Advocating for adequate funding and resources for the Navy to sustain its current operations and modernize its future capabilities. We can contact our representatives in Congress and urge them to support the Navy’s budget requests and legislative priorities. We can also sign petitions, join campaigns, attend rallies, write letters, or make phone calls to express our views and opinions.
• Appreciating and honoring our Navy sailors who serve our country with honor and excellence. We can send them letters, cards, care packages, or donations to show them our gratitude and support. We can also volunteer for organizations that assist Navy families, veterans, or wounded warriors. We can also attend or host events that celebrate or commemorate Navy achievements or milestones.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we hope you learned something new and interesting about the Russia-China alliance and how it affects our Navy and our nation. We also hope you feel inspired and motivated to support our Navy in its efforts to counter this threat and protect our interests and allies. We thank you for reading this blog post and for following #AmericansforaStrongerNavy. Please leave your comments below or contact us if you have any questions or feedback. Stay safe and stay Navy!
We at the Americans for a Stronger Navy are deeply concerned about the current situation in the Senate, where more than 300 military nominations are being blocked by a single senator. This unprecedented and irresponsible action is putting our national security and our naval capabilities at risk.
The Senate Hold: What Is It and Why Is It Happening?
A Senate hold is a parliamentary procedure that allows any senator to delay or prevent a vote on a nomination or a bill. It is not a rule, but a courtesy that the Senate leadership usually honors. However, it can also be abused for political or personal reasons.
That is what Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama is doing. He has placed a hold on more than 300 military nominations since February 2023, demanding that the Pentagon reverse its decision to cancel a contract with an Alabama company that was supposed to build a new missile defense system. The contract was canceled due to cost overruns, technical failures, and ethical violations.
Senator Tuberville claims that he is fighting for the jobs and the security of his state, but he is actually hurting the entire country and the military services that he claims to support. He is holding hostage the careers and the futures of hundreds of officers who have dedicated their lives to serving our nation.
The Impact of the Hold: How It Affects Our Military Services and Our National Security
Ladies and gentlemen, to tackle the national-security challenges of the 21st century, we need our Navy more than ever,” Austin said. “It’s especially vital in today’s world.”
As you may have heard, Admiral Michael Gilday, the Chief of Naval Operations, relinquished his command on Monday, August 14, after serving for four years as the Navy’s top admiral. He was praised by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin for his dedication to advancing American sea power at a critical time for global security.
However, his nominated successor, Admiral Lisa Franchetti, has not been confirmed by the Senate due to the hold imposed by Senator Tuberville. Franchetti, who has been serving as the Vice Chief of Naval Operations since September 2022, would become the first female CNO and the first woman on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, if confirmed.
She is not the only one affected by this hold. The Army and the Marine Corps are also operating without confirmed leaders, as General Randy George and General Eric Smith are also waiting for their confirmations. This is the first time in history that three military services are without Senate-confirmed chiefs.
This is unacceptable and dangerous. The hold is undermining our military readiness, hindering our ability to retain our best officers, and upending the lives of far too many military families. It is also hampering our efforts to deter conflict and keep the peace in the Indo-Pacific region, where we rely on our Navy to sail, fly, and operate wherever international law allows.
The Solution: How We Can End the Hold and Confirm Our Military Leaders
We urge Senator Tuberville to lift his hold immediately and allow these highly qualified and experienced officers to assume their rightful positions.
We also urge all senators to fulfill their constitutional duty and confirm these nominations without further delay. Our national security and our naval strength depend on it.
We thank Admiral Gilday for his service and his leadership, and we wish him all the best in his retirement. We also congratulate Admiral Franchetti on her nomination and we hope to see her confirmed soon as the next CNO.
We also ask you, our readers and supporters, to join us in this cause.
