Peace Through Strength – Community Driven – Membership Supported
Category: Capitol Hill Watch
Capitol Hill is the seat of the U.S. government, home to the domed United States Capitol, Senate, Houses of Representatives and the neoclassical Supreme Court. Capitol Hill Watch covers the news, current and pending legislation of interest to the Americans for a Stronger Navy.
If you’ve been following along, you know we’ve been sounding the alarm for some time now—raising concerns not out of fear, but out of duty. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we don’t profit from defense contracts or feed the industrial complex. We’re here because the facts are in: the Navy is falling short of the readiness our nation demands—and we must do better.
The U.S. Navy is aiming for 80% surge readiness by 2027—but it’s stuck at 60%. That 20% gap could determine whether America deters conflict—or invites one.
Brent Sadler, Senior Fellow for Naval Warfare and Advanced Technology at The Heritage Foundation and author of U.S. Naval Power in the 21st Century: A New Strategy for Facing the Chinese and Russian Threat, put it bluntly:
“It won’t happen until more ships enter the fleet to drive operational tempo down to 30%.”
Top Navy leaders have echoed this urgency. As one Navy official said plainly:
“We must increase our fleet readiness to 80% by 2027 to meet global security demands and deter peer-level threats.”
That’s the heart of the problem—and a major reason we’re sounding the alarm.
From the Indo-Pacific to the U.S. Southern border, the Navy is being stretched dangerously thin. The ships we have are aging, overworked, and under-maintained. Meanwhile, new construction is lagging—leaving sailors to shoulder an impossible burden, and the nation exposed.
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we don’t advocate fear—we advocate responsibility. We believe war is preventable, but only if America wakes up and acts.
That’s why we launched Charting the Course: Voices That Matter—a 24-part educational series breaking down how we got here, what went wrong, and what must happen next. Our goal is simple: educate the public, connect the dots, and build the support needed to close the readiness gap before it’s too late.
Let’s move beyond slogans. Let’s build understanding, accountability, and strength—before the next crisis comes knocking.
If you’ve been following us over the past couple of years, you already know—we’ve been sounding the alarm.
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Introduction
This week’s news confirms it: Microsoft allowed China-based engineers to support U.S. military cloud systems, including infrastructure tied to the Navy. It took a journalistic exposé, a senator’s inquiry, and finally a directive from the Secretary of Defense to shut it down.
Let’s be clear—this is systemic.
This wasn’t one company’s mistake. It reflects a broader failure—where critical defense infrastructure is entangled with adversarial regimes, our tech workforce has been hollowed out, and profit has been prioritized over patriotism.
This Is My Journey—and My Shout: From Destroyer Sailor to Digital Sentinel
My early days as a U.S. Navy destroyer sailor in the 1970s gave me a global perspective that’s stayed with me ever since. I saw firsthand how the world’s most critical maritime trade routes—from the Malacca Strait to the South China Sea—could quickly become flashpoints when adversaries or their proxies seized control. I came to understand just how vital the U.S. Navy’s role in freedom of navigation is—not only in defending democracy abroad, but in protecting our economic and strategic interests here at home.
After a career in telecommunications, I turned my focus to education. In 1997, I founded a national association committed to building America’s digital workforce. We trained web developers, server administrators, and IT professionals—because I believed then, as I still do, that digital strength is national strength.
Even back then, the writing was on the wall: rising dependence on China, fragile supply chains, and a dangerous complacency about safeguarding America’s digital and strategic backbone.
What I Saw Coming
I could see where this was headed. The decisions being made in boardrooms and bureaucracies—about outsourcing, offshoring, and chasing short-term profits—were creating long-term risks. And I knew exactly who would be left to deal with the fallout: our Navy and the sons and daughters of those I served with.
They’d be the ones sent to navigate hostile waters, defend contested choke points, and hold the line during crises that began far from the sea.
Why I Launched Americans for a Stronger Navy
I couldn’t sit back and hope it would all work itself out. I’ve seen too much. And frankly, it pains me to see the Navy have to grovel for support in an era where threats are multiplying—not receding.
That’s why I founded Americans for a Stronger Navy—to push for the readiness, resources, and respect our Navy needs. Because I know what’s at stake—not just for this country’s future, but for the safety of our allies and the stability of the global order.
This is just the beginning. In the weeks ahead, I’ll be breaking down what went wrong—and how we fight back.
More Than Microsoft: A National Security Crisis
The Navy—and the rest of our armed forces—now depends on cloud systems for everything from warfighting logistics to operational readiness. But when those systems are built or maintained by foreign nationals under weak supervision, our adversaries don’t need to hack their way in. They’re already inside.
This Microsoft scandal is just the latest proof point. Behind it lies:
* A depleted domestic technical base
* A defense industry over-leveraged to foreign subcontractors
* Big Tech firms chasing margins—not national security
And at the center of it all? A Navy that’s being asked to do more with less—and too often, without the tools it needs.
What Comes Next: Charting the Course
That’s why we’re launching Charting the Course: Voices That Matter—a comprehensive 24-session educational series designed to peel back the layers of how we got here, what went wrong, and what must happen next.
Each session will tackle a specific facet of the crisis—from the outsourcing of digital infrastructure and the hollowing out of our industrial base, to the cybersecurity vulnerabilities inside the Navy’s digital backbone. We’ll examine the influence of adversarial regimes, the failure of public-private accountability, and the high-stakes strategic chokepoints where our forces may soon be tested.
But this isn’t just about understanding the problem. It’s about charting a path forward.
We’ll offer concrete proposals to revitalize American shipbuilding, retrain our tech workforce, and rebalance the defense-industrial ecosystem to serve national—not corporate—interests. And yes—we’ll ask the tough question: how do we pay for it?
Because the days of bloated, inefficient spending are over. We need what Navy leadership is already calling for: a leaner, more lethal, and more disciplined force. As Acting CNO Admiral James Kilby put it, the Navy must:
“Exercise strategic discipline… while increasing surge readiness… without sacrificing scheduled maintenance,” with a goal of achieving “an 80% combat‑surge ready posture by 2027.”
We’ll explore potential solutions ranging from public-private innovation partnerships and industrial reinvestment incentives, to reallocating wasteful spending and rethinking procurement models that reward results—not red tape.
These sessions are designed to educate the public, inform policymakers, and mobilize everyday Americans—because this is not just a military issue.
In a bold move aimed at restoring America’s maritime edge, President Donald Trump signed an executive order today (April 9, 2025) designed to revitalize the U.S. shipbuilding industry and reduce China’s growing control over the global shipping supply chain. The order calls for sweeping changes across trade, industry investment, and national security infrastructure—setting the stage for long-term renewal of America’s commercial and naval shipping capabilities.
What the Executive Order Includes
The new executive order establishes:
Maritime Security Trust Fund A dedicated fund to provide stable, long-term investment in shipbuilding, shipyards, dry docks, and repair facilities. Potential funding sources include tariffs, fines, port fees, and other federal revenue streams.
Port Fees on Chinese-Linked Ships Ships flagged by China or built in Chinese shipyards may soon face significant docking fees at U.S. ports. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is expected to finalize this remedy by mid-April. Allies will also be encouraged to implement similar restrictions.
Tariffs on Chinese-Made Cargo Equipment The order directs the USTR to consider imposing tariffs on ship-to-shore cranes and cargo handling gear manufactured or assembled in China—or made with Chinese-controlled components anywhere in the world.
Enforcement of Harbor Maintenance Fees To prevent workarounds, Homeland Security will crack down on companies trying to avoid U.S. fees by routing shipments through Mexico and Canada before transporting them across land borders.
Incentives for U.S. Shipyard Investment The executive order includes provisions for incentivizing private sector investment in new or revitalized U.S. shipyards, commercial ship components, and critical maritime infrastructure.
Why Americans Should Care
The United States currently produces less than 1% of the world’s commercial ships—while China builds about 50%. In 1999, China’s share was just 5%. This trend has massive implications not just for economic competitiveness, but for national security and maritime logistics.
As President Trump put it: “We used to build a ship a day, and now we don’t build a ship a year, practically. We have the capacity to do it.”
This executive order is more than policy—it’s a call to action.
Implications for the Navy
While the executive order does not explicitly mention the U.S. Navy, its impact on naval readiness and strategic capability is unmistakable. Revitalizing America’s commercial shipbuilding infrastructure strengthens the industrial base the Navy relies on for new construction, maintenance, and repairs. Investments in dry docks, skilled labor, and cargo handling capabilities bolster our ability to support fleet operations—especially in times of crisis.
Moreover, reducing reliance on Chinese-built shipping equipment and infrastructure directly supports U.S. naval strategy. It limits vulnerabilities in ports and logistics chains, while reinforcing America’s control over critical maritime assets. A stronger shipbuilding sector means a stronger Navy, even if it’s not named in the order.
Implications for Our Allies
The executive order sends a message to America’s allies: We are serious about maritime strength and expect partners to do the same. With Chinese-built vessels operating across global supply chains, coordinated action could limit strategic vulnerabilities and encourage diversified, allied-aligned shipping infrastructure.
A Statement from Americans for a Stronger Navy
“This executive order is a long-overdue step toward restoring our nation’s ability to build and maintain the ships we depend on for both commerce and defense. The Navy does not operate in a vacuum—it needs a healthy, resilient industrial base. America must lead again on the seas, not just militarily, but commercially. This is how we secure freedom of navigation, economic stability, and peace through strength.” — Bill Cullifer, founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy
Your Voice Matters
This is our moment. Let’s celebrate the executive order—but keep pushing until America leads on the seas again. Congress must act, industry must respond, and Americans must stay engaged.
By Bill Cullifer, Founder and Advocate-in-Chief, Americans for a Stronger Navy
Editor’s Note: This article is offered as a thought-provoking contribution to the national conversation on military reform and accountability. It is not intended to endorse or oppose any political figure or party. Instead, it invites discussion about how innovation, transparency, and forward-thinking leadership can help strengthen the U.S. Navy for the challenges ahead.
Introduction
While watching Bret Baier’s recent FOX special on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), I found myself thinking: what if this wave of government reviews hits the U.S. Navy? Could it be a disaster—or could it actually make the Navy stronger?
Bill Cullifer, Founder
As someone who served in the Navy and now leads Americans for a Stronger Navy, I know how complex and mission-critical our maritime forces are. You can’t simply apply a Silicon Valley mindset to a warship or a global logistics chain. And yet, listening to the cabinet members speak about their departments being put under the microscope, it struck me: those who embrace scrutiny might come out leaner, smarter, and more ready for the future.
The Risk
DOGE could become a blunt instrument. If reformers misunderstand the Navy’s mission, they might cut where they shouldn’t. They might sideline the experience of sailors and shipbuilders, and leave readiness vulnerable in the name of short-term savings.
The Opportunity
But if the Navy leads from the front—inviting review, owning its challenges, and showcasing innovation—it could become a national model. Not just for efficiency, but for integrity and transformation. It could even spark a new wave of public trust.
A Pattern of Problems We Can’t Ignore
This isn’t just theory—it’s backed by years of Government Accountability Office (GAO) reporting. In its March 2025 report, the GAO stated bluntly that despite nearly doubling the Navy’s shipbuilding budget over the past 20 years, the fleet has not grown.
Programs like the Zumwalt-class destroyers, Littoral Combat Ships, and Constellation-class frigates have been riddled with incomplete designs, delays, weak business cases, and massive cost overruns. The Constellation-class, for example, began construction before its design was finalized—despite being based on a proven European frigate.
Since 2015, the GAO has made 90 recommendations to improve Navy shipbuilding. Only 30 have been addressed. That’s not just bureaucratic foot-dragging—it’s a pattern that puts our national security and naval strength at risk.
A Broader Mandate for Reform
This isn’t happening in a vacuum. On March 29, 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo launching the Workforce Acceleration and Recapitalization Initiative, ordering a top-down realignment of the Department of Defense’s civilian workforce.
The initiative seeks to reduce duplication, cut excessive bureaucracy, and redirect resources to the front lines. It reopens the Deferred Resignation Program, encourages early retirement, and requires senior leaders to propose leaner organizational charts—aiming to build a force that is “lean, mean, and prepared to win.”
Whether you agree with the approach or not, reform is no longer optional. The question is whether the Navy will lead the charge—or be dragged into it.
Civic Engagement
Americans for a Stronger Navy exists to engage the public, ask hard questions, and help translate naval strength into civic understanding. We believe a strong Navy and a responsible government go hand in hand. If DOGE enters the shipyard gates, we’ll be watching—not to tear down, but to help build back smarter.
Let’s make sure this moment strengthens the fleet, not weakens it.
Call to Action
We invite you to be part of the conversation. Share your thoughts, experiences, or concerns by visiting StrongerNavy.org on twitter.
On March 24, 2025, the USS Pinckney (DDG 91) made history. Off the coast of Kauai, Hawaii, the Navy successfully completed Flight Test Other-40 (FTX-40)—also known as Stellar Banshee—using the Aegis Combat System to detect and simulate engagement with a hypersonic missile threat. This test is a major milestone in the United States’ ability to defend against rapidly emerging threats from near-peer adversaries like China and Russia, both of whom are investing heavily in hypersonic technology.
Test Details: Simulating the Future of Warfare
A Medium Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) equipped with a Hypersonic Target Vehicle (HTV-1) was air-launched from a C-17 aircraft. The USS Pinckney used a simulated SM-6 Block IAU interceptor and Lockheed Martin’s latest Aegis Baseline 9 software to detect, track, and engage the target. While no live intercept occurred, the simulated engagement offered critical insights and data collection, validating the system’s ability to counter maneuvering hypersonic threats.
This test also previewed the system’s scalability. Aegis can be deployed at sea or on land—key flexibility in a complex global security environment. The test utilized a virtualized Aegis software configuration, a leap forward in adapting the system for next-generation warfare.
Building on Momentum: Past Successes and What’s Next
FTX-40 follows the success of FTM-32, known as Stellar Sisyphus, in which the USS Preble (DDG 88) intercepted a MRBM with an upgraded SM-6 Dual II missile in a live-fire test. These continued advancements will pave the way for FTM-43, which will aim to perform a live intercept against an HTV-1 target.
The collaboration between the U.S. Navy, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), Lockheed Martin, and other defense partners signals a renewed commitment to innovation and integrated missile defense.
Why Americans Should Care
Hypersonic missiles travel at speeds greater than Mach 5, can maneuver mid-flight, and are extremely hard to detect and counter with traditional systems. Adversaries like China and Russia are rapidly developing and testing these weapons. If successful, these weapons could bypass our current defenses and strike critical infrastructure, fleets, or even the homeland.
This test shows that the United States is not standing still. Our Navy is preparing for tomorrow’s battles—today. The Aegis Combat System’s evolving capabilities directly protect American service members at sea, allies abroad, and Americans at home. It’s another reason why investment in a stronger Navy isn’t optional—it’s essential.
Implications for the Navy
This test reinforces the Aegis system as the backbone of the Navy’s integrated air and missile defense strategy. With its growing flexibility, the system can support both forward-deployed naval units and U.S.-based missile defense installations. It also helps the Navy operate in contested environments—areas where hypersonic threats are expected to become commonplace.
Implications for Our Allies
Many of our closest allies—Japan, South Korea, Australia—also rely on Aegis-equipped ships or similar missile defense systems. Demonstrating this capability strengthens not only U.S. deterrence but also our credibility with partners. In a world where multilateral defense cooperation is key, proof of performance matters.
Closing Thought
FTX-40 didn’t just simulate a hypersonic intercept—it sent a clear message: The United States Navy is adapting and preparing to meet new challenges head-on. For Americans watching the headlines, this is a win worth knowing—and a mission worth supporting.
Air Wing (CVW) 1, a part of the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group (HSTSCG), conducts flight operations from the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75)
A New Phase in the Red Sea Conflict
The U.S. Navy has officially escalated its engagement in the Red Sea, transitioning from defensive posturing to sustained combat operations against Iran-backed Houthi forces. This shift follows President Donald Trump’s pledge to employ “overwhelming lethal force” in response to persistent Houthi attacks on commercial and military vessels.
The Mission: Neutralizing Houthi Anti-Ship Capabilities
In a press statement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that the campaign aims to dismantle the Houthis’ ability to target international shipping and U.S. assets. Unlike previous limited retaliatory strikes, this new phase includes proactive, sustained efforts to eliminate threats, including:
Additionally, sources indicate that Iranian assets—such as the intelligence-gathering vessel MV Behshad, which has reportedly provided targeting data to Houthi forces—may also be targeted.
Combat Operations Underway
In the past 24 hours, U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets launched from USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) have carried out dozens of strikes across Houthi-controlled territory in Yemen. These operations were supported by Tomahawk cruise missile strikes from Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers in the region.
President Trump’s Warning to Iran
In a post on Truth Social, President Trump issued a direct warning to Iran, stating that any Houthi attack would be treated as an Iranian attack:
“Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of IRAN, and IRAN will be held responsible… and those consequences will be dire!”
The statement underscores growing concerns that the conflict could escalate into a broader regional war.
Houthi Retaliation and U.S. Response
Despite these warnings, Houthi forces launched 10 attack drones at the USS Truman less than a day after the U.S. strikes. All drones were intercepted before reaching the carrier.
According to CENTCOM, since 2023, Houthi forces have attempted:
174 attacks on U.S. Navy ships
145 attacks on commercial vessels
While no U.S. Navy ship has been successfully struck, commercial shipping has suffered multiple hits, including the sinking of the bulk carrier MV Tutor last year.
Preparing for a Prolonged Conflict
The U.S. Navy has been preparing for this scenario for months, including:
Prepositioning missiles and munitions
Deploying airborne minesweepers
Coordinating additional forces
As tensions escalate, the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) Carrier Strike Group is completing COMPUTEX training and may be deployed to reinforce U.S. forces in the region.
Why Americans Should Care
Strategic Waterways Under Threat: The Bab al-Mandab Strait and Red Sea are critical for global trade. Disruptions could impact oil prices and supply chains.
Broader Implications for U.S. National Security: Iran’s role in these attacks highlights the risk of expanded conflict in the Middle East.
Protecting U.S. and Allied Assets: The safety of commercial shipping, as well as military and civilian personnel in the region, remains a top priority.
Implications for the U.S. Navy
Sustained combat operations will test the Navy’s ability to conduct extended engagements while maintaining readiness elsewhere.
Increased missile defense efforts will be critical to counter future threats.
Potential strain on resources could impact deployments in the Pacific and other high-priority regions.
Implications for U.S. Allies
Increased pressure on regional partners (Saudi Arabia, UAE) to respond to Iranian-backed aggression.
Possible involvement of NATO and European allies in securing international shipping routes.
Greater U.S. military presence in the region could shape future diplomatic efforts.
Final Thoughts
With the U.S. Navy now in active combat and President Trump’s warning to Iran, the stakes in the Red Sea have never been higher. Whether this campaign will succeed in neutralizing the Houthi threat or escalate into a larger regional conflict remains to be seen.
One thing is certain—this is a defining moment for U.S. maritime power and its role in global security. Join the discussion on X.
The latest National Security Innovation Base Summit gave the Pentagon a D grade for modernization. A D—not just in shipbuilding, but across the board in weapons innovation, procurement, and efficiency. This isn’t just a bureaucratic failure; it’s a direct threat to America’s national security.
My friend and shipmate from the ‘70s, Captain David Lennon, USNR (Retired), sent me this Fox News article, saying, “This echoes what you and I have been saying.” He’s right. We’ve been warning for years that America’s defense strategy is moving too slowly to keep up with global threats
The Pentagon’s Outdated Approach to Modern Warfare
According to House Armed Services Committee Vice Chair Rob Wittman, the Pentagon operates like the Ford Motor Company in the 1950s—slow, bureaucratic, and resistant to change.
“The Pentagon is the Ford Motor Company of the 1950s. I mean, the way they operate—slow, stoic. ‘Let’s spend years to write a requirement, then let’s spend years to go to a program or record, let’s spend years to acquire.’ By the time we acquire something, guess what? The threat’s way ahead of us.” – Rep. Wittman
That’s the fundamental problem—our enemies aren’t waiting for us to figure things out. China is churning out warships at breakneck speed, modernizing its naval capabilities, and outpacing us in cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, the U.S. is stuck in a procurement cycle that takes decades.
Captain Lennon put it bluntly:
“America once built a navy that could fight and win a world war. Today, we struggle to maintain 295 deployable ships while our adversaries launch vessels at breakneck speed. This is not just a shipbuilding problem—it’s a national security crisis.”
Shipbuilding: A Slow-Motion Disaster
The U.S. Navy currently has 295 deployable ships. The plan calls for 390 by 2054, but at this rate, we won’t even keep up with ship retirements.
The Maritime Security Program, which maintains a fleet of privately owned, military-useful ships, is down to just 60 vessels. If a major conflict broke out in the Pacific tomorrow, we wouldn’t have the sealift capability to respond effectively.
And while China expands its navy at an alarming rate, the U.S. struggles with:
Delayed procurement cycles that take years just to approve new ships.
Budget cuts and shifting priorities that prevent consistent progress.
Shipyard bottlenecks due to a weakened industrial base.
Cyber Warfare: The Unseen Battlefield
Another major concern raised in the Fox News report is China’s superiority in cybersecurity. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA) stated:
“China specifically is better at cybersecurity than we are. It only takes one or two incursions that we don’t see coming or that we aren’t responsive to, to make an enormous difference here.”
Captain Lennon underscored this growing threat:
“China and Russia don’t just challenge us at sea—they challenge us in cyberspace, in supply chains, and in economic warfare. The Navy can’t just be stronger; it has to be smarter, faster, and ready for an entirely new battlespace.”
The Pentagon’s inability to keep pace in cybersecurity makes America vulnerable. China is hacking into critical infrastructure, stealing defense blueprints, and gaining access to classified information. The next war may not begin with missiles—it may start with an attack on our power grid, financial systems, or military networks.
A White House Office of Shipbuilding? What Comes Next?
The Fox News report also revealed that President Trump is taking a direct interest in shipbuilding. His nominee for Navy Secretary, John Phelan, stated that Trump regularly texts him late at night, asking about the state of the fleet.
Trump announced the creation of a White House Office of Shipbuilding, promising to revitalize ship production. While this sounds promising, the real test will be whether it cuts through the bureaucracy and actually delivers results.
Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) described how slow innovation is killing our ability to compete:
“We’re operating off of an innovation cycle right now that, you know, used to be a decade, and it used to be five years. Then it used to be three years, and now it’s a year or less innovation cycle. In Ukraine, they’re actually operating off of week-long innovation cycles.”
Where Do We Go From Here?
This isn’t just a military problem—it’s an economic and strategic problem that affects every American. If we fail to modernize, we risk losing control of key shipping lanes, economic stability, and military deterrence.
Captain Lennon and I both agree:
“Our nation faces an inflection point. Will we modernize our Navy to meet the challenges ahead, or will we let slow processes and outdated thinking leave us vulnerable? The choice is ours—but the clock is ticking.”
This is Why I’m Launching Our Educational Series
This conversation is exactly why I’m launching the China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges series.
This 23-episode educational initiative will break down how history, economics, and military strategy shape today’s global threats—and why America must rally behind its Navy.
We’ll dive deeper into shipbuilding, looking at past successes and today’s failures.
We’ll unpack cybersecurity threats, explaining why China and Russia view cyber warfare as a battlefield as real as the Pacific or the South China Sea.
We’ll break down public policy, exposing how red tape and slow procurement cripple our defense efforts.
This series isn’t just about the Navy—it’s about why the Navy matters to you.
We need Americans engaged in this conversation because without public support, we won’t get the changes we need.
Captain Lennon and I will continue speaking out, but we need more voices in this fight.
Join Us. Stay Informed. Take Action.
Follow along at StrongerNavy.org as we roll out this critical series. It’s time to wake up America—before it’s too late.
We stand at a crossroads in our nation’s history—one that will determine the future of our Navy, our national security, and the very strength of our industrial base. The question before us is clear: Should we rebuild our naval shipbuilding capabilities here at home, seek foreign assistance, or attempt a hybrid approach?
This is not just a debate about policy. It’s a decision that affects every American—from those who serve at sea to the workers who build our ships, to the families and businesses that rely on safe and open trade routes secured by the U.S. Navy.
A Crisis Decades in the Making
The United States Navy, once unrivaled, now finds itself struggling to maintain a fleet large enough to meet global threats. At the same time, our domestic shipbuilding industry has shrunk to a fraction of its former strength.
Fewer Shipyards: During World War II, the U.S. built a ship a day. Now, we are lucky to produce a handful of warships per year due to limited shipyard capacity.
Aging Repair Facilities: The few remaining naval repair yards are overburdened and outdated, leading to costly maintenance delays.
Worker Shortages: The skilled workforce needed to build and maintain ships has dwindled, leaving shipyards struggling to meet demand.
Rising Threats: China now produces more naval tonnage every year than the U.S. does in a decade. Russia and other adversaries are also modernizing their fleets.
The urgency is real. The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is behind schedule, over budget, and falling short of strategic needs. Simply put, we need more ships, more shipyards, and more skilled workers to build and sustain them.
The Debate: Build Here, Look Abroad, or Both?
President-elect Donald Trump recently suggested leaning on allies to help build U.S. Navy ships. His words have sparked a debate with far-reaching consequences.
There are three paths forward:
1. Fully Rebuild U.S. Shipbuilding Capacity (America First Approach)
Invest in more shipyards and repair facilities to increase production.
Expand apprenticeship and workforce training programs to address skilled labor shortages.
Modernize naval infrastructure to improve efficiency and speed of delivery.
✅ Pros: Strengthens U.S. industry, creates jobs, ensures security. ❌ Cons: Takes time, requires significant investment.
2. Use Allied Shipyards for Basic Infrastructure (Hybrid Approach)
Partner with allies (e.g., Japan, South Korea, Italy) to build less complex vessels while reserving warship production for U.S. yards.
Temporarily relieve the burden on U.S. shipyards while domestic capacity is rebuilt.
✅ Pros: Speeds up production, allows time for U.S. shipbuilding expansion. ❌ Cons: Security risks, reliance on foreign suppliers, potential job losses.
Contract allied nations to build support ships and basic naval infrastructure abroad.
Focus U.S. shipyards solely on high-end warship production.
✅ Pros: Short-term boost in fleet numbers, cost savings. ❌ Cons: Weakens U.S. shipbuilding industry, risks foreign dependency.
What’s at Stake?
No matter which path we take, one fact remains: The U.S. Navy needs more ships—and we need them faster. The growing threats on the world stage do not wait for political debates or bureaucratic delays.
America must decide:
Do we commit to fully restoring our shipbuilding industry, investing in shipyards, repair facilities, and workforce training?
Do we pursue a temporary partnership with allies to fill immediate gaps?
Do we accept foreign-built support ships, potentially at the cost of domestic industry?
This is not just a decision for policymakers—it is a choice for every American. The strength of our Navy is the strength of our nation.
A Call to Action
We need a national shipbuilding strategy that prioritizes American security, economic resilience, and industrial strength.
Expand our domestic shipbuilding capacity.
Modernize and build more repair facilities.
Train and recruit more American workers to sustain naval readiness.
Ensure the Navy has the fleet it needs to protect global commerce and national security.
History shows us that when America builds, America wins. The decision before us will shape the Navy for generations to come. Let’s make sure it’s a future built on strength. Americans for a Stronger Navy StrongerNavy.org. Join the discussion on X.com/strongernavy
The oceans—often called “blue water”—provide more than just scenery and a place for recreation. They are essential to global commerce, climate regulation, and geopolitical stability. For an organization like Americans for a Stronger Navy, the value of these waters extends beyond the environment; it includes national security, economic prosperity, and humanitarian efforts. Here’s how #bluewater matters ties directly to the need for a robust naval presence.
Vital Trade Routes and Economic Security
Over 90% of international trade travels by sea, making reliable maritime routes the backbone of the global economy.
A well-equipped navy safeguards shipping lanes from piracy, terrorism, and other disruptions—ensuring that essential goods, including food, energy, and raw materials, reach the United States and allied nations safely.
When shipping lanes remain secure, American businesses and consumers benefit from stability and minimized costs.
National Security and Global Partnerships
A strong naval force deters potential adversaries and helps uphold international law by patrolling the world’s oceans.
Through joint exercises and collaborative maritime security initiatives, the Navy fosters global partnerships that enhance collective security.
Whether it’s countering piracy or responding to terrorist threats, a capable navy provides rapid response in critical situations—protecting lives and strengthening America’s role on the world stage.
Environmental Stewardship with Strategic Importance
Oceans help regulate the Earth’s climate by absorbing carbon dioxide and heat. Shifts in ocean conditions—like rising sea levels—can lead to conflicts over resources and displaced communities.
An active navy can work with environmental agencies and research institutions to monitor marine ecosystems, support scientific research, and enforce regulations against illegal fishing and dumping.
The Navy often leads the way in developing cleaner energy technologies for its vessels, which can benefit commercial industries and the environment alike.
Technological Innovation and Workforce Development
Naval forces drive research in shipbuilding, propulsion, cybersecurity, and communications—innovations that can also enhance commercial maritime operations.
A strong navy means investment in personnel training. Many service members acquire valuable skills (engineering, navigation, operations) that support America’s industrial and technological base upon returning to civilian life.
Humanitarian and Disaster Relief
Aircraft carriers, hospital ships, and naval vessels frequently deliver aid after hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters.
These missions save lives and foster goodwill, showcasing America’s commitment to global stability and compassion.
Ensuring the Navy is well-resourced allows it to continue providing this vital humanitarian assistance around the world.
Upholding International Law and Freedom of Navigation
A strong navy enforces maritime law and maintains freedom of navigation, helping to resolve territorial disputes peacefully.
Advocating for freedom of navigation and respecting legitimate sovereignty claims keeps the world’s oceans open and accessible.
Americans for a Stronger Navy believes a balanced, determined naval presence supports global trade and diplomacy.
Bringing It All Together: #bluewater Matters and National Strength When we say #bluewater matters, we’re highlighting the connection between healthy oceans, global trade, and national security. Our seas are crucial, not only for environmental reasons but also for peace, commerce, and humanitarian operations. By championing a robust, well-funded Navy, Americans for a Stronger Navy seeks to protect this critical resource and, in turn, safeguard our nation’s future.
What You Can Do
Stay informed by following reputable sources on defense, maritime security, and environmental matters.
Engage your elected officials about the importance of naval preparedness and responsible ocean stewardship.
Support military families through volunteer work or donations, recognizing that people are the Navy’s greatest asset.
Spread awareness using the hashtag #bluewater matters to emphasize the interconnected importance of strong naval forces and thriving oceans.
Conclusion A thriving maritime domain underpins America’s security, economy, and standing in the world. By uniting under the message #bluewater matters, we remind everyone that the ocean’s well-being and a strong Navy go hand in hand. Whether it’s safeguarding sea lanes, championing sustainable practices, or providing swift humanitarian aid, our seas deserve our attention—and our Navy must be equipped to protect them for generations to come.
An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is
To the Editors of War on the Rocks and Dr. Jonathan Panter,
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Your recent commentary argues that naval forward presence is to blame for the U.S. Navy’s inability to deter China and sustain high-end warfighting capacity. While your article correctly identifies the exhaustion and strain imposed by relentless deployments, it misdiagnoses the cause and proposes a dangerous solution.
The problem is not forward presence—it’s fleet size, maintenance shortfalls, and a lack of leadership advocacy for real change.
“It is both realistic and very necessary to maintain forward presence while preparing for high-end conflict.” — Captain Brent D. Sadler, USN (Ret.), Senior Fellow, Heritage Foundation
“The U.S. fleet size to support that deployment has significantly decreased since 1990.” — Captain Steven Wills, USN (Ret.), Senior Advisor, Center for Maritime Strategy
A Shrinking Navy, An Expanding Mission
The numbers tell the real story:
✅ In 1991: The U.S. Navy had 550 ships. Today, it has fewer than 290—a nearly 50% decline.
✅ During the Cold War: Only one-fifth of the fleet was forward deployed. Today, it’s one-third, meaning fewer ships are doing more work.
✅ Maintenance Shortfalls: The Navy has lost critical shore-based infrastructure, making it difficult to sustain current commitments—let alone expand.
Meanwhile, China’s threat has grown, not receded:
✅ China’s Navy: Surpassed 340 ships in 2023 and continues expanding.
✅ Indo-Pacific: Now the primary theater of strategic competition—where U.S. presence is more critical than ever.
The Wrong Solution: Scaling Back Presence
The argument that pulling back from forward deployment would somehow strengthen the Navy by reducing strain is not just wrong—it’s dangerous.
A reduced forward presence does not deter China—it emboldens it.
Beijing is already testing U.S. resolve in the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and beyond. A withdrawal would send a clear signal:
America is retreating.
That is not a path to deterrence—it’s a path to ceding maritime dominance to an adversary actively working to reshape the global order.
The Right Solution: A Bigger, More Sustainable Navy
Rather than abandoning forward presence, we must fix the real problem: our shrinking, overstretched fleet.
That means:
✅ Growing the Fleet: Expand to at least 355 ships—endorsed repeatedly by military leaders.
✅ Rebuilding Shore Support: Reinvest in shipyards, dry docks, and logistics infrastructure.
✅ Leadership Advocacy: Navy leaders must demand either more ships or fewer assignments, not accept the status quo.
✅ Congressional Action: Congress must prioritize fleet expansion over short-term cuts.
Conclusion: We Need More Ships, Not Fewer Commitments
Your commentary correctly highlights that the U.S. Navy is stretched thin and struggling to sustain global operations. But forward presence is not the problem. The real issue is that we are trying to maintain it with a fleet too small to sustain the mission.
For more than 75 years, forward-deployed U.S. naval forces have prevented conflict, reassured allies, and ensured maritime security. Scaling back presence does not fix the strain—it accelerates decline and weakens deterrence at the worst possible moment.
“If the United States is serious about deterring China, protecting global stability, and upholding its commitments, the answer is clear: Build a larger, more capable, and better-supported Navy.”
Educating the Public: Our Responsibility
The problem is not just military—it’s political and public awareness.
Too many Americans don’t realize how naval power secures our national and economic security. Without public pressure, there will be no political will to rebuild the fleet.
That’s why we at Americans for a Stronger Navy are launching:
“China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges”
In our upcoming educational series, we will tackle the most pressing issues facing U.S. naval power, including:
✅ The Role of Naval Power in Preventing Global Conflict
✅ Economic & Strategic Impact of a Shrinking Fleet
✅ China & Russia’s Naval Expansion and the Strategic Threat
✅ U.S. Shipbuilding Crisis: Causes and Solutions
✅ Congressional Accountability: Who’s Responsible for the Shrinking Fleet?
This isn’t just a discussion—it’s a call to action.
To naval leadership, policymakers, and media: Stop pretending all is well. Demand action before the Navy reaches a breaking point.
To the American public: Get informed. Get involved. A strong Navy is not just for the military—it’s for every American who benefits from global stability.
The U.S. Navy’s forward presence is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.
The problem is not the strategy—it’s the lack of resources to sustain it.
If the U.S. wants to deter China, protect its interests, and maintain global stability, the answer is clear: Build a stronger, larger, better-supported, and more capable Navy.
We urge the administration, Congress, and military leadership to acknowledge reality:
Our commitments are not too big—our Navy is too small.
Sincerely, Bill Cullifer Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy
