Category: Capitol Hill Watch

Capitol Hill is the seat of the U.S. government, home to the domed United States Capitol, Senate, Houses of Representatives and the neoclassical Supreme Court. Capitol Hill Watch covers the news, current and pending legislation of interest to the Americans for a Stronger Navy.

Posted on

Weekly U.S. Navy News Roundup (October 31 – November 6, 2024)

President Trump Wins

This week, the U.S. Navy demonstrated its unwavering commitment to global maritime security and operational excellence.

  • Notably, the USS Stockdale engaged in a bilateral exercise with the Egyptian navy in the Red Sea, enhancing international naval cooperation.
  • In the political arena, Donald Trump has been elected as the 47th President of the United States, marking a significant return to leadership. He is set to assume office as commander in chief on January 20, 2025.
  • The USS John S. McCain returned to Naval Station Everett, marking the successful completion of its deployment.
  • In a significant transition, Fleet Readiness Center Southwest bid farewell to its last legacy aircraft, the F/A-18 Hornet, symbolizing a new era in naval aviation maintenance.
  • Additionally, the USS Oak Hill’s arrival in Limassol, Cyprus, underscores the Navy’s dedication to fostering international relations.
  • These developments, among others, highlight the Navy’s continuous efforts to maintain global partnerships, enhance readiness, and honor its personnel.

Donald Trump Wins Second Term as U.S. President

Donald Trump has been elected as the 47th president of the United States, marking a significant comeback following his tumultuous first term.

U.S., Egyptian Navies Conduct Bilateral Exercise in Red Sea

On November 1, 2024, the USS Stockdale (DDG 106) participated in a bilateral exercise with the Egyptian navy in the Red Sea, enhancing interoperability and strengthening maritime partnerships.

USS John S. McCain Returns Home from Deployment

The guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain (DDG 56) returned to Naval Station Everett after a successful deployment, contributing to regional security and stability.

FRCSW Bids Farewell to Its Last Legacy Aircraft

Fleet Readiness Center Southwest (FRCSW) completed maintenance on its final legacy aircraft, an F/A-18 Hornet, marking a significant transition in naval aviation maintenance.

USS Oak Hill Arrives in Limassol, Cyprus

The Harpers Ferry-class amphibious landing dock ship USS Oak Hill (LSD 51) arrived in Limassol, Cyprus, for a scheduled port visit, fostering international relations and cooperation.

Deputy Under Secretary of the Navy for Intelligence and Security Visits NAVSCIATTS

Victor B. Minella, Deputy Under Secretary of the Navy for Intelligence and Security, toured the Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School’s facilities, emphasizing the importance of intelligence and security training.

HSC-26 Embraces History and Heritage Ahead of Veterans Day 2024

Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 26 hosted a former aviator from its predecessor squadron, HC-6, to discuss squadron history and heritage in anticipation of Veterans Day.

Navy Recruiting Command Announces FY25 Recruiting Goals

Navy Recruiting Command announced its recruitment goals for Fiscal Year 2025, focusing on innovative strategies to build a mission-ready force.

Cybersecurity Awareness Month 2024: A Message from the Chief of Naval Operations

Chief of Naval Operations emphasized the critical role of cybersecurity in safeguarding the Navy’s information and communications technology, urging all personnel to contribute to this effort.

Chief of Naval Operations Inducted into Rhode Island Italian American Hall of Fame

Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Chief of Naval Operations, received the 2024 Lifetime Achievement Award from the Rhode Island Italian-American Hall of Fame, recognizing her distinguished career.

USS The Sullivans Deploys

The guided-missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (DDG 68) departed Naval Station Mayport for a scheduled deployment, continuing its commitment to global maritime security.

SECNAV Announces Service Life Extensions for 3 Cruisers

The Department of the Navy plans to operate three Ticonderoga-class cruisers beyond their expected service life, adding 10 years of cumulative ship service life from fiscal year 2026 to 2029.

Readout of Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti’s Meeting with Chief of the Royal New Zealand Navy

Adm. Lisa Franchetti met virtually with Rear Adm. Garin Golding to discuss shared defense and security priorities, strengthening naval partnerships.

The Department of the Navy is Establishing a Naval Strategic Studies Group (NSSG) Program

The Department of the Navy is establishing a Naval Strategic Studies Group program in January, administered by the DON Office of Strategic Assessment, to enhance strategic planning and assessment.

SECNAV Announces Service Life Extensions for 12 Destroyers

Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro announced plans to operate 12 Arleigh Burke-class Flight I Destroyers beyond their 35-year expected service life, ensuring continued naval readiness.

VCNO Visits Students, Navy Leadership in Newport

Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jim Kilby visited Newport, R.I., to meet with students and Navy leadership, discussing the achievements and lessons learned at Surface Warfare Schools Command.

U.S. Navy, Royal Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps Meet to Discuss Strategic Charter

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Royal Navy First Sea Lord Adm. Sir Ben Key, and U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Commandant Lt. Gen. James Bierman Jr. met to discuss the ongoing strategic charter and celebrate the 10th anniversary of delivering combined seapower.

Assistant Secretary of the Navy Emphasizes National Call to Maritime Service and Education

Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs), the Honorable Franklin R. Parker, visited California institutions to emphasize the national call to maritime service and education.

Chief of Naval Operations, Master Chief Petty Officer of Navy Visit Gulf Coast

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti and Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy James Honea traveled to the Gulf Coast to engage with warfighters, discussing the Navy’s role in national defense.

U.S. Navy’s Newest Destroyer Honors a True American Hero

The latest Arleigh Burke-class destroyer honors a respected American hero, showcasing dedication to service.

Oldest Arleigh Burke Destroyers Receive Service Extensions

Selected Arleigh Burke-class destroyers will remain in service into the 2030s, ensuring operational readiness.

Russia Watch:

Satellite Images Show Russian Warships’ Unusual Movements

Russia temporarily vacated its Black Sea Fleet base, later returning the warships, raising questions about strategic maneuvers.

Russia Deploys ‘Most Dangerous Warship’

The Russian Navy has deployed a heavily armed warship, underscoring its naval buildup amidst rising global tensions.

China Watch:

China’s New Radar System Enhances South China Sea Surveillance

Satellite images reveal China’s construction of a new radar system on Triton Island in the South China Sea, potentially capable of detecting stealth aircraft, thereby enhancing its surveillance capabilities in the region.

China’s Rapid Construction of New Aircraft Carrier

Recent satellite photographs indicate that China has constructed a new aircraft carrier within six months, highlighting its rapid expansion of military-industrial capabilities and raising concerns among analysts.

Iran Watch:

Iran Plans Significant Increase in Military Budget

Iran’s government plans to raise its military budget by around 200%, as stated by government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani, following recent exchanges of attacks with Israel.

Conclusion:

This week’s news highlights the Navy’s continuous efforts in honoring heroes, securing readiness, and advancing maritime partnerships. Keep up with more in-depth stories on our blog at 👉 strongernavy.org/blog.

Please support the Navy and the Americans for Stronger Navy by following us on Facebook or by completing the contact us page by clicking here.

#USNavy #Naval

Posted on

U.S. Naval News Wednesday – July 31, 2024

USS Sampson DDG 102

Welcome to this week’s edition of US Naval News Wednesday, bringing you the latest and most significant updates from the naval front.

Change of Command at COMSUBRON Two
Captain Jason Deichler has officially relieved Daniel Reiss as Commodore of Commander, Submarine Squadron (COMSUBRON) Two. The ceremony, marked by naval tradition, was held at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine. This transition marks a pivotal moment in leadership for the squadron, emphasizing continuity and commitment to excellence in submarine operations.

Innovations in Semiconductor Technology at NRL
Scientists at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) have made a significant breakthrough in semiconductor technology, identifying a new class of semiconductor nanocrystals. This advancement could revolutionize the development of light-emitting devices, enhancing operational capabilities in naval technologies.

USS Nantucket Delivered to Navy
The USS Nantucket, a freedom-variant Littoral Combat Ship, has been officially delivered to the Navy after successful acceptance trials. It will soon be commissioned and homeported in Mayport, Florida. This ship represents a crucial addition to the Navy’s capabilities in littoral zones.

Future of the U.S. Navy
Amidst increasing global maritime challenges, the strategic importance of the U.S. Navy’s role has never been more critical. Recent opinion pieces discuss the state of the Navy, highlighting the need for robust shipbuilding programs and enhanced operational readiness to maintain maritime superiority.

New Ship Procurements
The Senate’s FY24 National Defense Authorization Act has approved procurement plans for the Navy to acquire 10 new battle force ships, including submarines, destroyers, and more, underscoring ongoing efforts to modernize and strengthen the fleet.

Upcoming Ship Commissionings
Preparations are underway for the commissioning of several significant vessels like the USS John Basilone (DDG 122) and USS New Jersey (SSN 796), showcasing the Navy’s commitment to expanding and updating its capabilities.

Fair Winds and Following Seas
We also acknowledge the exemplary service of CAPT Joe Parsons and LT Albert Liu, wishing them fair winds and following seas in their future endeavors. Their dedication and service have significantly contributed to the Navy’s mission and the security of our nation.

Seafair Celebrates 75 Years
Seattle’s iconic Seafair festival marked its 75th anniversary with Fleet Week activities, including ship parades and public tours, underscoring the community’s strong connection with the maritime forces.

Navy’s Old Town Campus Revitalization Moves Forward
The U.S. Navy’s project to revitalize the 70.3-acre Naval Base Point Loma Old Town Campus in San Diego continues to advance with the environmental review process and partnerships for development.

First Royal Australian Navy Sailors Graduate From US Submarine School
Marking a significant milestone under the AUKUS security pact, Royal Australian Navy sailors have graduated from the Basic Enlisted Submarine School in the US.

Chief of Naval Operations Strengthens Ties in Indo-Pacific
Admiral Lisa Franchetti’s recent engagements in the Indo-Pacific region highlight strategic naval collaborations and security discussions at high-level international conferences.

MAKO Global 2024 Enhances Warfighting Readiness for Reserve Sailors
This training program is designed to boost the operational readiness of Navy reservists, preparing them for real-world challenges through intensive, scenario-based training exercises.

USS Sampson Arrives in Seattle for Seafair Fleet Week
Highlighting community engagement, the USS Sampson participates in Seattle’s Seafair Fleet Week, offering ship tours and public interactions.

USS Carl Vinson Returns to San Diego
The USS Carl Vinson returned to its homeport in San Diego after a six-month deployment in the Indo-Pacific. The carrier strike group conducted freedom of navigation operations, joint exercises with allied navies, and provided humanitarian assistance during its deployment. The Vinson’s return highlights the ongoing commitment of the U.S. Navy to maintain a forward presence in key regions around the world.

Collaboration with Indian Navy on Anti-Submarine Warfare
The U.S. Navy and the Indian Navy conducted joint anti-submarine warfare exercises in the Indian Ocean, focusing on tracking and neutralizing underwater threats. This collaboration involved P-8A Poseidon aircraft and surface combatants from both navies, strengthening bilateral ties and enhancing regional maritime security. The exercise demonstrated the strategic importance of U.S.-India naval cooperation in countering submarine threats.

Stay Updated with Naval Developments
For ongoing coverage and detailed articles about these stories and more, follow us on social media. Join us next week for more updates from the US Naval News Wednesday.

Posted on

Navy News Monday – June 24, 2024

Welcome back to the “Navy News Monday” blog post series. This series is dedicated to bringing you the latest and most significant updates from the United States Navy, focusing on a variety of key areas that are crucial to maintaining a robust and effective naval force.

In our upcoming posts, we will be covering a range of topics including:

  • Ship Building and Modernization: The latest developments in naval ship construction, including new vessel launches, updates on shipyard activities, and advancements in ship design that enhance the capabilities of the fleet.
  • Naval Technology and Innovation: Innovations in naval warfare technology, such as cutting-edge weapons systems, sensor technologies, and communication advancements that keep the Navy at the forefront of modern warfare.
  • Blue Water Navy Operations: Insights into the strategic operations of the Navy in open oceans, showcasing the power projection and global reach of our maritime forces.
  • Submarine Navy News: Updates on the silent service, including new submarine classes, undersea warfare developments, and the role of submarines in ensuring underwater dominance.

For this week’s feature, let’s dive into the latest news across these topics:

Ship Building and Modernization

The U.S. Navy has released a new long-range shipbuilding strategy that outlines plans for both construction and decommissioning over the next 30 years. The plan aims to expand the fleet to 381 ships by the mid-2030s under an optimal funding scenario. This includes maintaining the current build rate for Virginia-class submarines and introducing new classes of surface combatants and unmanned platforms. Notably, the USS New Jersey (SSN 796), a Virginia-class submarine, has been delivered and is set for commissioning later this year​ (USNI News)​​ (Naval News)​​ (Navy Commissionings)​.

Naval Technology and Innovation

A significant advancement in naval technology is the development of a new electronic warfare system designed to provide enhanced protection against various electronic threats. This system is expected to improve the Navy’s operational capabilities significantly. Additionally, there are ongoing investments in sensor and communication technologies to ensure the Navy remains at the forefront of modern warfare​ (Defense News)​​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Blue Water Navy Operations

The Blue Water Navy continues to demonstrate its global reach with extensive maneuvers in the Pacific. These operations underscore the United States’ commitment to maintaining freedom of navigation and readiness to respond to international maritime challenges. The deployment of carrier strike groups such as the USS Theodore Roosevelt is a key element of these strategic operations​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Submarine Warfare and Undersea Dominance

The submarine fleet is poised for significant upgrades, with the integration of new sonar technology into Virginia-class submarines. This will enhance their stealth and detection capabilities, reinforcing their critical role in undersea warfare. The delivery of the USS New Jersey (SSN 796) marks an important milestone, as it is the first Virginia-class submarine designed with crew gender integration​ (Naval News)​.

Naval Aviation

Naval aviation continues to evolve with innovations in aircraft carrier operations and the introduction of new aircraft. The commissioning of new vessels and upgrades to existing ones, such as the ongoing fitting out of the John F. Kennedy (CVN 79), highlight the Navy’s commitment to maintaining a robust and capable aviation component​ (Navy Commissionings)​.

Uncrewed Systems and Autonomous Vehicles

The Navy is expanding its use of uncrewed systems, with plans to field between 89 and 143 unmanned platforms by 2045. These include both surface and underwater vehicles that will play key roles in future naval operations, enhancing capabilities while reducing risk to human personnel​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Naval Diplomacy and International Relations

Naval diplomacy remains a cornerstone of U.S. maritime strategy, with the Navy engaging in numerous international exercises and cooperative efforts with allied nations. These activities help to strengthen alliances and promote stability in key regions around the world​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Recruitment and Retention

Efforts to attract and retain naval personnel are ongoing, with new initiatives aimed at improving training programs and career development opportunities. The Navy continues to address challenges related to recruitment, aiming to ensure a steady influx of talented individuals to maintain its operational readiness​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Naval History and Heritage

Commemorations of significant naval battles and events, such as the upcoming commissioning of vessels named after historical figures and battles, help to preserve the rich heritage of the U.S. Navy. These events serve as reminders of the Navy’s longstanding tradition of service and sacrifice​ (Navy Commissionings)​.

Naval Logistics and Support

Enhancements in logistics and support infrastructure are crucial for fleet readiness. The Navy’s new shipbuilding plan includes significant investments in shipyard infrastructure and the procurement of used vessels to replace aging surge sealift capacity, ensuring the Navy’s ability to project power globally​ (Defense News)​.

These updates ensure that our readers stay informed about the latest developments in the U.S. Navy, highlighting the ongoing efforts to maintain a strong and capable maritime force. Stay tuned for more detailed articles on each of these topics as we continue to explore the might and innovation of the United States Navy.

Posted on

Ensuring Naval Dominance in Uncertain Times

Recent developments reported by the Navy Secretary, Carlos Del Toro, to the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee illuminate the critical challenges and operational demands facing the U.S. Navy. Amid 130 direct attacks over six months and a significant munition shortfall, the testimony underscores the urgent need for enhanced naval capabilities and support.

Key Takeaway

* The U.S. Navy’s ability to defend against frequent hostile actions and its urgent need for funding to replenish critical munitions highlights the indispensable role of naval forces in maintaining national and global security.

* The recent combat use of Standard Missile 3s (SM-3) further underscores the Navy’s forefront position in technological defense advancements.

Facing Frequent Threats

Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro revealed that U.S. warships have fended off 130 direct attacks in the Middle East over the past six months, demonstrating the volatile environment in which our forces operate. This significant number of attacks highlights the constant threats our naval forces face and the critical role they play in deterrence and defense.

Financial Strain and Legislative Urgency

The Navy is currently experiencing a $1 billion shortfall in munitions essential for these defenses. Del Toro’s appeal for Congress to approve additional funding is a stark reminder of the financial strains on military readiness. The delay in passing the national security supplemental funding by the House represents a critical bottleneck in supporting our naval operations.

Technological Advancements in Combat

The first-ever combat use of the SM-3 missile during the recent Iranian assault on Israel marks a significant milestone. This event not only demonstrates the Navy’s advanced capabilities but also the effectiveness of our current investments in missile defense technology.

Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA guided missile

Del Toro’s confirmation of the SM-3’s deployment highlights the Navy’s capability to engage and neutralize threats from beyond the atmosphere.

Bipartisan Support for Global Security

Senator Patty Murray’s comments emphasize the bipartisan nature of national security and the global implications of a well-funded Navy. Her criticism of the House’s delay in passing the supplemental reflects the broader political dynamics that can impact military readiness and global stability.

Why This Matters

The ongoing operational challenges and financial needs of the U.S. Navy are not just matters of military preparedness but are essential to sustaining global peace and security. The capability to deploy advanced defensive technologies like the SM-3 in combat situations is critical to deterring aggressive actions by state and non-state actors, ensuring the safety of international waters and global trade routes.

Conclusion

The testimonies before Congress serve as a critical reminder of the stakes involved in maintaining a strong and responsive U.S. Navy. As we navigate these uncertain times, it is paramount that bipartisan support for naval funding is secured without delay. The strength and readiness of our naval forces are key to our national defense strategy and a cornerstone of our international security commitment.

 

 

Posted on

Navigating the Waters: The U.S. Navy’s Divest-to-Invest Strategy and Its Implications

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

As we continue charting the course of the U.S. Navy’s future, we set sail into a sea of critical decisions. Well, today we focus on – the contentious debated divest-to-invest strategy. The Navy proposes to decommission certain vessels to free up resources for advanced capabilities, but Congress has its own course to chart. Let’s navigate these turbulent waters and explore the implications for the Navy, potential challenges, and the long-term impact on U.S. naval power.

What You Need to Know

At the heart of the debate is the Navy’s proposal to decommission 19 ships, including 10 before reaching their expected service lives. These ships may include cruisers, dock landing ships, and littoral combat ships (specific details are still being verified with Navy contacts). The Navy argues that divesting from older vessels will free up resources for investments in newer technologies and capabilities, better positioning the Navy to address evolving global threats. This divest-to-invest strategy, however, has faced opposition from some members of Congress.

Several lawmakers have voiced concerns about specific aspects of the plan. For instance, Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT) expressed worries about reducing the number of Virginia-class attack submarines, emphasizing the need for a larger submarine fleet in the face of a growing Chinese navy. Sen. Angus King (I-ME) highlighted the importance of icebreakers for operating in the Arctic Ocean.

Lawmakers have also been critical of the proposed decommissioning of cruisers and other vessels, citing their combat capabilities and missile power. These concerns have sparked debates between Navy officials and Congress, highlighting the complexities of balancing fiscal constraints with the need for a modern and effective fleet.

We are reaching out to Navy contacts to verify the complete list of proposed decommissionings and will update this post with any further information.

Why This Matters

The divest-to-invest strategy is not merely a budgetary concern; it’s a reflection of the Navy’s vision for future warfare readiness. The Navy argues that investing in newer, more capable vessels is essential to address evolving global threats, particularly a rising China, effectively. While the Navy’s proposal is part of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget plan, Congress has yet to decide on its implementation.

Implications for the Navy

For the Navy, the proposed decommissioning represents a shift towards a leaner, more technologically advanced fleet. It’s a move that could enhance the Navy’s combat power and operational agility but also requires careful consideration of the costs associated with maintaining older ships versus investing in new ones. Additionally, recent reports indicate delays in the construction of new ships, which could further complicate the implementation of the divest-to-invest strategy.

Implications for Congress

Congress faces the challenge of balancing the strategic needs of a larger fleet with the economic impact of decommissioning on shipyards and communities. Lawmakers must weigh the Navy’s arguments against the potential loss of jobs and the broader economic repercussions.

Challenges in Implementing the Divest-to-Invest Strategy

While the divest-to-invest strategy offers a potential path towards a modernized fleet, challenges remain in its implementation. A recent article from Breaking Defense highlights concerns from Congress about the divestment of ships exceeding the number of new ships being built. This raises questions about the Navy’s ability to maintain a sufficiently sized fleet in the short term.

The article also mentions the Navy’s request for only one Virginia-class submarine in FY25, despite previously planned purchases of two. This points to broader challenges in shipbuilding, potentially impacting the Navy’s ability to deliver on its long-term goals.

Conclusion

The debate over the Navy’s divest-to-invest strategy is more than a fiscal discussion; it’s a strategic deliberation that will shape the future of U.S. naval power. As the Navy and Congress navigate these turbulent waters, the decisions made today will have long-lasting implications for national security, economic stability, and the Navy’s ability to fulfill its mission in an ever-changing global landscape.

Call to Action

We encourage our readers to stay informed about this important issue. Follow along for updates on the budget proposal and Congressional hearings as continue . We also invite you to share your thoughts and questions about the divest-to-invest strategy by joining the discussion on our social channels by clicking here for Facebook.

Posted on

Charting the Course: The Future of American Naval Power – An Evaluation of US Navy Strengthening Plans FY25

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In our previous blog post, we acknowledged the importance of defining requirements before diving into the intricacies of Navy budget analysis.

We appreciate the insightful feedback received from a reader who highlighted this point, and we recognize the valuable insights it brings to our exploration of the Navy’s budget.

The US Navy plays a vital role in global security and national defense. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, it’s crucial to assess current plans for strengthening the Navy’s capabilities. This analysis will delve into various proposals and strategies, aiming to foster a well-rounded understanding.

To gain further insights into the Navy’s FY25 budget request, let’s take a moment to view a C-SPAN video featuring a press briefing by Navy officials. This briefing delves into the details of the proposed budget and its implications for strengthening the Navy.

Building a Stronger Navy

Building a stronger Navy requires a comprehensive understanding of its present and future needs. We explored critical areas like artificial intelligence (AI) and unmanned systems in our “Charting the Course – The Future of Naval Power” series.

We also delved into the DDG(X) program, the next-generation guided-missile destroyer envisioned as the backbone of the future surface fleet. You can find a more detailed analysis of the DDG(X) program within the series and by clicking here the summary of the series.

Evaluating Strengthening Plans

This framework focuses on several key criteria:

To conduct this analysis, we will rely on a variety of data sources. These include official Navy reports, independent analyses from think tanks, and insights from experienced naval experts.

By considering diverse perspectives and utilizing credible data, we aim to present a balanced and informative evaluation.

Examining Existing Programs

The DDG(X) program, among others, is a significant initiative aimed at modernizing the Navy’s fleet. A dedicated section within this analysis can detail the specific features and potential impact of the DDG(X) program in light of the established evaluation criteria. (Here, you can delve deeper into the DDG(X) program) [Refer to previous outline for details on how to approach the DDG(X) analysis]

Other Strengthening Plans: While the DDG(X) program represents a significant initiative, it’s important to acknowledge the existence of other proposals for strengthening the Navy. We are committed to analyzing these plans as well, utilizing the established evaluation framework.

Seeking Balanced Perspectives

Engaging with experienced analysts and experts from diverse backgrounds is vital for a comprehensive evaluation. We will actively seek out a range of viewpoints to ensure a balanced and informative discussion. This includes considering the perspectives expressed by stakeholders like Rep. Rob Wittman.

The quote from Rep. Wittman (March 11 statement) exemplifies the ongoing debate surrounding Navy force structure and shipbuilding cadence. By incorporating a variety of voices, we strive to present a nuanced picture of the challenges and opportunities facing the US Navy.

Moving Forward

Through this evaluation, we hope to contribute to a well-informed conversation regarding the future of the US Navy. By analyzing existing plans and fostering a dialogue with experts, we can help chart a course towards a stronger and more effective maritime force. We will continue this discussion in future blog posts, delving deeper into specific plans and the findings of our analysis.

Call to Action

We encourage our readers to share their feedback and suggestions for additional resources, especially regarding the financial aspects of these plans. Your input is valuable in ensuring a well-rounded analysis. We also invite you to engage on our social media Facebook page by following the links beloe to share your thoughts on strengthening the US Navy.

Posted on

Charting the Course, Navigating the Future of Naval Power: The Navy’s Role in America’s New Warfighting Doctrine

Bill Cullifer. Founder

Today, we introduce the U.S. Navy’s new warfighting doctrine. According to the U.S.Navy, the doctrine not only reinforces the commitment to securing maritime freedom but also strengthens collaborative ties, ensuring the Navy remains a vanguard of global stability and security.

Introduction

The unveiling of the new joint warfighting doctrine signifies an evolution, not a departure, from the traditional “peace through strength” stance. It reaffirms the U.S. Navy’s pivotal role as the global guardian of the seas, adapting to modern challenges while maintaining its foundational principles.

What’s New

This doctrine introduces a multi-domain approach, integrating land, air, sea, space, and cyber capabilities. It emphasizes agility, technological innovation, and a proactive stance in the dynamic security landscape.

Why Americans Should Care

The doctrine, according to the U.S. Navy ensures the U.S. remains at the forefront of global security, safeguarding national interests, and promoting international peace and stability.

Implications for the Navy

The Navy is set to benefit from enhanced strategic direction, capability development, and operational planning, ensuring it remains a formidable force in protecting global maritime interests.

Implications for Our Global Partners

The doctrine fosters stronger alliances and interoperability among international partners, uniting efforts in maintaining a secure global environment.

Conclusion

The new doctrine is a testament to the enduring value of “peace through strength,” with the Navy continuing to serve as a cornerstone of global security and stability. Supporting a strong, adaptable Navy is more crucial than ever in navigating the complexities of contemporary and future threats.

Posted on

Chester Alan Arthur: A Forgotten Architect of America’s Naval Strength

Chester Alan Arthur: A Forgotten Architect of America’s Naval Strength

Introduction:

In the annals of American history, some presidents shine brightly, while others, like Chester Alan Arthur, the 21st President of the United States, are less remembered. Yet, Arthur’s contributions, particularly in strengthening the U.S. Navy, were pivotal in shaping the country’s future.

This blog post, inspired by PBS’s extensive collection on American Presidents, delves into Arthur’s presidency and his unheralded role in fortifying America’s naval power.

Early Presidency: Chester Alan Arthur, a product of the New York political machine, ascended to the presidency in 1881 following the assassination of President James Garfield. Known for his integrity and honesty, Arthur’s administration was characterized by surprising reformative actions, especially considering his roots in political patronage.

Civil Service and Domestic Policy: Arthur’s commitment to reform was evident in his domestic policies. He signed the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, revolutionizing federal employment by prioritizing merit over political allegiance. His veto of pork barrel expenditures reflected a fiscally responsible approach, even as he indulged in refurbishing the White House with the creative touch of Louis Comfort Tiffany.

Foreign Affairs and Naval Expansion: Arthur’s presidency is notable for its impact on foreign relations and naval development. His efforts to lower tariffs and negotiate trade agreements demonstrated a progressive approach to international economics. However, his most enduring legacy lies in his vision for a modern U.S. Navy. Recognizing the strategic importance of naval power, Arthur championed the development of a fleet with steam-powered engines and steel cladding, a significant advancement from the wooden ships of prior eras.

Presidential Politics and Legacy: Arthur’s rise to the presidency, initially seen with skepticism, turned into a narrative of surprising integrity and dedication to public service. His battle against his political patron, Senator Roscoe Conkling, and his governance despite a fatal kidney disease diagnosis, showcased his resilience and commitment to the nation’s welfare.

Conclusion: Chester Alan Arthur’s presidency, often overlooked in the broader tapestry of American history, was a period of significant transition and modernization, especially for the U.S. Navy. His contributions laid the groundwork for America’s emergence as a major naval power in the 20th century. As Americans, we owe a part of our naval strength and international standing to this often-forgotten president, a testament to the lasting impact of Arthur’s administration.

Posted on

Exploring the Future of Naval Power and Army-Navy Football

As we prepare to launch our podcast series, “Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval PoIwer,” on December 7 2023.

Bill Cullifer Founder

I’ve had the privilege of engaging with multiple experts at the forefront of naval innovation and strategy.

These conversations have illuminated the significant technological strides and forward thinking in the U.S. Navy, particularly in the realm of autonomous vessels.

During a brief pause in these discussions, my thoughts drifted to the storied Army-Navy football game set for December 9, 2023. This annual event, steeped in tradition and camaraderie, sparked a curious reflection on the future intersection of technology and tradition.

In a creative moment, I envisioned autonomous Army and Navy football players – a fusion of technology and sport. This vision, while fascinating in a technological sense, also stirred a poignant realization.

The rapid evolution of autonomous technologies, while enhancing our naval capabilities, might also mean that future generations could miss out on traditional experiences. The prospect of serving at sea or competing on the football field might become memories of a bygone era.

This duality is at the heart of our upcoming series. While we explore the technological advancements and their implications for national security, we must also acknowledge the sentimental aspects. The camaraderie of sailors at sea, the saltiness in the air, the taste of ballpark hot dogs, and the roar of the crowd at a football game – these are experiences that shape character, foster bonds, and define human experiences.

As members and friends of Americans for a Stronger Navy, you understand the delicate balance between embracing innovation and preserving tradition. Our naval history is rich with tales of bravery and unity, and our future promises unprecedented technological prowess.

Let’s embrace this journey together, exploring how these advancements will shape the U.S. Navy while remembering the human element that has always been its backbone. The future of American naval power is not just about ships and technology; it’s about the people who serve and the traditions that bind us.

Join us in this exploration. Tune into “Charting the Course,” and let’s navigate these waters together, honoring our past while boldly steering towards the future.

Posted on

Fleet Forward: Charting Tomorrow’s Navy: Episode 2: The Budgetary Challenge of Naval Shipbuilding

Bill Cullifer, Founder

Welcome back to Fleet Forward: Charting Tomorrow’s Navy, a podcast series that explores the challenges and opportunities facing the US Navy in the 21st century. 

With this series, inspired by our shared values and patriotic spirit, we aim to complement our upcoming December podcast series ‘Charting the Course: Navigating the Future of American Naval Power’

In the previous episode, we introduced the series and explained why we decided to create it. We also discussed the format and the content of the series, and how we hope to provide you with insightful and informative analysis and commentary on the issues and trends that shape the Navy’s present and future.

The Budgetary Challenge of Naval Shipbuilding

In this episode, we will focus on one of the most important and contentious issues facing the Navy: the budgetary challenge of naval shipbuilding. How much does it cost to build a Navy? How do we balance the need for a larger and more capable fleet with the reality of fiscal constraints and competing priorities? How do we ensure that our naval force is ready and relevant for the 21st century?

These are some of the questions that we will explore in this episode, as we examine the Navy’s shipbuilding plan for fiscal year 2024, which presents three alternatives for the future fleet, each with different costs and capabilities. We will also explore how the Congressional Budget Office and Brent Sadler have critiqued the Navy’s plan and offered alternative perspectives on how to optimize the Navy’s budget and capabilities. We will also delve into the stories and people behind the Navy’s shipbuilding strategies, and reflect on their implications for our national security, economic vitality, and our role on the global stage. 

The Stakeholders and Perspectives of Naval Strategy

Today we ’ll not only delve into the Navy’s shipbuilding strategies but also the stories and people behind them, reflecting on our national security, economic vitality, and our role on the global stage.

Introduction

In this episode, we will examine the fiscal landscape of naval procurement, focusing on the budgetary challenges and trade-offs that the Navy faces in pursuing its shipbuilding plans. We will also explore how the CBO and Sandler have critiqued the Navy’s strategies and offered alternative perspectives on how to optimize the Navy’s budget and capabilities.

The Navy’s Shipbuilding Budget

The Navy’s shipbuilding budget is the primary source of funding for acquiring new ships and maintaining the existing fleet. The budget is determined by the Navy’s long-term shipbuilding plan, which outlines the desired size, composition, and capabilities of the future fleet, as well as the projected costs and schedules for each ship class. The plan is updated annually and submitted to Congress as part of the President’s budget request.

The current shipbuilding plan, released in December 2022, covers the period from 2023 to 2052 and aims to achieve a fleet of 355 ships by 2035 and 400 ships by 2052. The plan also introduces the DDG(X) program, which is intended to replace the aging Arleigh Burke-class destroyers with a more advanced and capable design. The plan estimates that the Navy will need an average of $33 billion per year (in 2022 dollars) for shipbuilding over the next 30 years, which is 50 percent more than the historical average of $22 billion per year over the past 30 years.

The CBO’s Analysis of the Navy’s Shipbuilding Plan

The CBO, an independent and nonpartisan agency that provides budgetary and economic analysis to Congress, has conducted a detailed assessment of the Navy’s shipbuilding plan and its implications for the federal budget and the Navy’s capabilities. The CBO’s report, released in October 2023, raises several issues and challenges with the plan, such as:

•  The plan’s cost estimates are optimistic and likely to increase over time, due to factors such as inflation, technical risks, and schedule delays. The CBO projects that the plan will actually cost an average of $40 billion per year (in 2022 dollars) for shipbuilding over the next 30 years, which is 21 percent more than the Navy’s estimate and 82 percent more than the historical average.

•  The plan’s funding requirements are unsustainable and unrealistic, given the competing demands and constraints on the federal budget. The CBO estimates that the plan will consume an average of 13 percent of the total defense budget over the next 30 years, which is significantly higher than the historical average of 9 percent. The plan will also require increasing the Navy’s share of the defense budget from 28 percent in 2022 to 34 percent in 2052, which will likely entail reducing the funding for other military services or increasing the overall defense budget.

•  The plan’s fleet size and composition goals are ambitious and questionable, given the operational and strategic environment. The CBO questions the rationale and feasibility of achieving a 400-ship fleet by 2052, which would be the largest fleet since the end of World War II. The CBO also suggests that the plan may not adequately account for the changing nature of naval warfare and the emergence of new threats and technologies, such as cyberattacks, hypersonic weapons, and unmanned systems.

The CBO’s report concludes that the Navy’s shipbuilding plan is not a viable or effective strategy for meeting the nation’s naval needs and recommends that the Navy and Congress reconsider the plan’s assumptions, objectives, and priorities. The CBO also offers some alternative shipbuilding scenarios that would achieve different fleet sizes and compositions at lower costs than the Navy’s plan.

Sandler’s Critique of the Navy’s Shipbuilding Plan

Sandler, a former U.S. Naval Captain and author of U.S. Power in the 21st Century, has also published a blog post in November 2023, criticizing the Navy’s shipbuilding plan and proposing a different approach to naval strategy and shipbuilding. Sandler’s main arguments are:

•  The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is based on a flawed and outdated paradigm of naval power, which emphasizes quantity over quality, platforms over payloads, and conventional over asymmetric warfare. Sandler argues that the Navy is stuck in a Cold War mentality and fails to adapt to the changing realities and challenges of the 21st century, such as the rise of China, the proliferation of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, and the diffusion of power and influence.

•  The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is wasteful and inefficient, as it invests in expensive and vulnerable ships that are not suited for the current and future threat environment. Sandler singles out the DDG(X) program as an example of a misguided and unnecessary project, which he calls a “gold-plated boondoggle” that will cost billions of dollars and provide marginal benefits. Sandler contends that the DDG(X) is a redundant and obsolete design that will be outmatched by cheaper and more effective weapons and systems, such as missiles, drones, and submarines.

•  The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is counterproductive and dangerous, as it provokes and escalates tensions with potential adversaries, especially China, and undermines the stability and security of the international order. Sandler warns that the Navy’s pursuit of a 400-ship fleet and the DDG(X) program will trigger a naval arms race and increase the risk of conflict and miscalculation in the Indo-Pacific region. Sandler also cautions that the Navy’s plan will alienate and weaken the U.S.’s allies and partners, who may not share the same vision or interests as the U.S. and may not be willing or able to contribute to the Navy’s ambitious and costly goals.

Sandler’s blog post concludes that the Navy’s shipbuilding plan is a strategic blunder and a fiscal disaster that will undermine the U.S.’s naval power and global leadership. Sandler advocates for a radical shift in the Navy’s mindset and approach, which he calls “smart power”. Sandler’s smart power concept is based on four principles:

•  Quality over quantity: The Navy should focus on developing and acquiring fewer but more capable and versatile ships that can deliver multiple effects and missions across the spectrum of conflict.

•  Payloads over platforms: The Navy should prioritize investing in and deploying advanced and adaptable weapons and systems, such as missiles, drones, and cyber capabilities, that can enhance the lethality and survivability of the existing and future fleet.

•  Asymmetric over conventional warfare: The Navy should embrace and exploit the opportunities and advantages of asymmetric warfare, such as stealth, speed, deception, and innovation, that can offset and counter the A2/AD capabilities of potential adversaries.

•  Cooperation over competition: The Navy should seek and strengthen cooperation and coordination with the U.S.’s allies and partners, as well as engage and deter potential adversaries, through diplomacy, deterrence, and dialogue, rather than confrontation, coercion, and conflict.

Conclusion

In this episode, we have explored the fiscal landscape of naval procurement and the budgetary challenges and trade-offs that the Navy faces in pursuing its shipbuilding plans. We have also examined how the CBO and Sandler have critiqued the Navy’s strategies and offered alternative perspectives on how to optimize the Navy’s budget and capabilities. In the next episode, we will delve into the technological advancements and design considerations in modern shipbuilding, with a spotlight on the DDG(X) program. Stay tuned for more insights and analyses on the Navy’s path forward.

sources 

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59708