Are Spaceships in the U.S. Navy’s future? Bill Cullifer, Founder
F-35 vs. Drones in U.S. Defense Strategy
Why This Matters to All Americans
As technology evolves and global security challenges intensify, the conversation about the future of aerial combat grows increasingly critical. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe this debate is not just for defense experts and policymakers—it’s a conversation that impacts every American. The decisions we make today about our military capabilities will shape the safety, security, and strategic posture of the United States for decades to come.
The stakes are monumental. From the taxpayer dollars funding advanced fighter programs to the geopolitical implications of maintaining air superiority, this is a topic that demands both transparency and public engagement. That’s why we’re launching a comprehensive three-part series to explore this issue from every angle.
What We Plan to Cover
Part 1: The Debate Over the F-35 Program
We will present the current arguments surrounding the F-35 program, including Elon Musk’s critiques of manned fighter jets, Lockheed Martin’s defense of the aircraft, and the U.S. Navy’s position on its strategic importance. This installment will provide a clear and balanced view of the differing perspectives.
Part 2: Behind the Scenes of Defense Planning
This segment will peel back the layers of what goes into planning programs like the F-35. From research and development to operational strategies, we’ll dive into the complexity of balancing current needs with future threats. This part will highlight the challenges faced by military planners and strategists, giving Americans a deeper appreciation of the decisions at hand.
Part 3: The Future of Aerial Combat and Public Involvement
In our final piece, we’ll explore how advancements in technology and evolving geopolitical dynamics will shape the future of aerial combat. This installment will conclude with a call to action, inviting the American public to engage with this issue and weigh in on the path forward.
Why This Topic Is Significant
The F-35 program has been a cornerstone of U.S. airpower, but it is also a lightning rod for criticism. High costs, technical challenges, and emerging alternatives like drone swarms have sparked intense debate. At the same time, the world is witnessing rapid advancements in hypersonics, artificial intelligence, and unmanned systems—technologies that could redefine the very nature of warfare.
This is about more than aircraft. It’s about maintaining America’s technological edge, ensuring national security, and spending taxpayer dollars responsibly. The choices we make today will determine whether the U.S. remains a global leader in military innovation or cedes ground to competitors like China and Russia.
Why Americans Should Care
At its heart, this is a conversation about priorities. Should the U.S. continue investing in programs like the F-35, or pivot to emerging technologies? How can we ensure our military remains strong while being fiscally responsible? These are questions that affect every American, and they deserve thoughtful, informed discussion.
We encourage you to follow this series, engage with the content, and share your thoughts. As citizens, we have a vital role to play in shaping the future of our nation’s defense. Together, we can ensure that America’s Navy remains not only stronger but also smarter and more efficient.
Stay tuned for Part 1 of our series, where we dive into the debate over the F-35 program and explore the arguments from all sides. Let’s navigate this complex topic together.
Today, with the sentencing of Leonard “Fat Leonard” Francis to 15 years in prison, the U.S. Navy closes a painful chapter in its history—a chapter that has left a lasting black eye on an institution known for its honor and commitment. Francis’s decade-long bribery scheme, which ensnared dozens of high-ranking officers, stained the Navy’s reputation and highlighted vulnerabilities in military contracting that few would have imagined possible. This editorial is a reminder of both the need for accountability and the resilience of the honest, dedicated men and women who serve our Navy with integrity.
A Scandal of Unimaginable Scale The revelations around the Fat Leonard scandal have been shocking: lavish parties, Kobe beef, fine cigars, and cash exchanged for critical classified information and special favors. This wasn’t just a case of bribery; it was a breach of trust that exposed Navy operations to corruption and mismanagement at an unimaginable scale. The scandal reached as high as the first active-duty admiral to be convicted of a federal crime, creating deep and lasting implications for the Navy’s image.
A Call for Accountability Francis’s sentencing may seem like justice served, but the journey to accountability is far from over. Though some officers have faced consequences, we know that the ripple effects of this scandal have impacted thousands of sailors who honorably serve every day, distancing themselves from this dark episode and instead focusing on the Navy’s mission. For these sailors and those of us who believe in a stronger, more accountable Navy, Leonard’s sentencing underscores a broader mission: to reinforce integrity, transparency, and accountability within Navy procurement and beyond.
Americans for a Stronger Navy: A Mission of Integrity At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we’ve communicated over the last few years about the importance of maintaining rigorous standards in Navy operations and procurement practices. Our Navy deserves the resources it needs to safeguard our nation, but it also deserves to operate within systems of integrity and transparency. We call for continued reform and vigilance in military contracting, not merely to avoid another scandal but to ensure that taxpayer dollars go toward strengthening our fleet and supporting those who serve.
Turning a New Page As this chapter closes, let us reflect on the millions of honorable sailors who uphold our Navy’s values despite scandals like these. The dedicated men and women of the U.S. Navy are not defined by the actions of a few but by their collective commitment to duty, honor, and country. With the Fat Leonard scandal behind us, it’s time to turn a new page—one that reaffirms our Navy’s values and strengthens its foundation for the future.
Conclusion In closing, we hope that this unfortunate episode serves as a rallying point, a reminder of the Navy’s resilience, and a call for enduring integrity in all facets of military service. As citizens, let us continue to support a Navy that stands by its values and remains steadfast in its mission.
Americans Must Rally: A Call for Accountability, Transparency, Action, and Sustainability in Protecting Our Maritime Future
Dear gCaptain Team, Officers, and Readers,
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Your recent article, “Could Trump Rebuild and Repair The U.S. Navy?”, has sparked crucial questions about the future of our Navy and maritime security. We find ourselves in strong agreement with the article’s urgent call for action within the first 100 days of the next administration. While leadership may change, our commitment to a stronger Navy and secure maritime future must remain constant. The need for a comprehensive fleet readiness review, a revitalized industrial base, and a stronger Navy and civilian maritime workforce are clear. These steps underscore the essential measures needed to sustain and fortify our national maritime capabilities.
This mission, however, extends beyond any one administration—it requires enduring bipartisan support and a commitment from all Americans to ensure the resilience and strength of our Navy. As Dale A. Jenkins, Senior Advisor to Americans for a Stronger Navy, Staff Director of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, and author of Diplomats and Admirals, reminds us,
“True strength isn’t built overnight or through short-term gains. It’s a sustained commitment—one rooted in strategic thinking and a shared vision of America’s future on the world stage.” – Dale A. Jenkins
By fostering a united approach, we can address the challenges our Navy faces and secure a sustainable, long-term future for America’s maritime security.
The Need for Public Trust and Involvement
As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I share your sense of urgency. Our Navy is underfunded and overstretched, struggling to maintain basic readiness in the face of rising global instability. Yet, the solutions to these challenges lie not only within government circles but also in greater public accountability. To that end, we must actively strengthen trust by engaging informed community who bring credibility and understanding to the table, rather than overwhelming the Navy with generalized public input.
Heightened Threats: Cybersecurity and Misinformation Campaigns
The threats we face today are more immediate and serious than many realize. Adversaries like China, Russia, and Iran have repeatedly demonstrated their willingness to hack critical infrastructure and disrupt telecommunications networks. Recent breaches—such as the infiltration of presidential cell phones and sustained attacks targeting U.S. energy, transportation, and communication systems—highlight the vulnerabilities at our nation’s strategic chokepoints. These adversaries are also engaged in misinformation campaigns aimed at disrupting our elections and undermining public discourse. In these volatile times, protecting the Navy also means protecting the commerce and infrastructure that support our economic security. Our readiness to secure these critical pathways is essential to maintaining both national stability and global trade.
Communicating Threats with Clarity
It’s no secret that Americans are weary of “sky-is-falling” rhetoric. Recent messaging around foreign threats and national security has met with mixed reactions, with figures like Senator Rand Paul raising questions about threat exaggeration and others comparing current concerns to past overhyped crises like Y2K. Yet today’s threats are uniquely layered and immediate; they extend beyond traditional warfare into digital, economic, and strategic domains that impact every American. As Reagan wisely put it,
“Our reluctance for conflict should not be misjudged as a failure of will. When action is required to preserve our national security, we will act.” – Ronald Reagan
Overreactions and misdeeds by bad actors have eroded trust, making it crucial that these real and present dangers are communicated with clarity and restraint. Our task, then, is to educate Americans with transparency, balance, and practical information. To do this effectively, we must break out of our silos and work together across organizations, agencies, and forums to foster the lasting support needed for a stronger Navy and a resilient maritime sector.
Building a Sustainable, Long-Term Impact
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, our mission is to educate, engage, and rally Americans around the critical importance of maritime security to national stability and prosperity. We believe the key to lasting impact lies in building a “groundswell of support” from the American people. History shows us the importance of such buy-in; Reagan’s successful naval expansion during the Cold War was driven by bipartisan support and public backing, creating a sustainable, long-term defense initiative. As Reagan once said,
“Strength is the most persuasive argument we have to convince our adversaries to negotiate seriously and to cease bullying other nations.”- Ronald Reagan
While the president undoubtedly influences these decisions, we know from experience that initiatives without public buy-in and congressional support are destined to struggle. Americans also need a clearer understanding of what’s at stake and why these actions matter.
Our Path Forward
Engaging Veteran Groups and Nonprofit Organizations: We propose enlisting veteran groups, nonprofits, and civic organizations to help bridge the gap between the Navy and the American public. These groups offer credibility and firsthand experience, helping Americans understand the Navy’s role beyond headlines and defense budgets. Their connection to local communities is invaluable in turning national support into local action.
A Smarter, More Comprehensive Public Strategy: Rather than working in silos, we must consider the taxpayer in every recommendation. Americans are fatigued with crisis messaging, so our approach must be nuanced, practical, and respectful of their investment. Taxpayers need to see where their support goes, with a clear view of how a stronger Navy directly contributes to national and economic security.
Fostering Long-Term, Congressional Support and Collaboration: Rallying Americans for a stronger Navy isn’t about party lines—it’s about protecting our nation’s future. To achieve this, we must create a platform that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement. Such a united approach can help avoid politicizing the Navy, reinforcing that naval readiness is a shared national responsibility that resonates beyond any one administration.
Expanding on gCaptain’s Key Recommendations:
Comprehensive Fleet Readiness Review: We support a thorough review of our fleet, shipyards, and industrial base, with an eye toward transparency. Bringing in a volunteer committee of former Navy personnel could lend critical insights, ensuring the review captures both strategic needs and firsthand realities.
Halting Early Decommissioning: Rather than prematurely retiring ships, we need creative, cost-effective solutions to extend their service. Involving experienced veterans and industry experts can provide valuable perspectives on this approach, minimizing strategic gaps.
Building a Stronger Maritime Workforce: We echo the call for a revitalized maritime workforce but stress that this must come with taxpayer accountability and public support.
An American Imperative
This is not a left or right initiative—it is an American imperative. As John F. Kennedy wisely said, “Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer.” Today, we echo that call for unity. The threats we face are larger than many realize, and we cannot afford to let partisan divisions stand in the way of building the Navy we need. We call for community leaders to unite under a common voice, advocating for a stronger Navy, greater accountability, and a sustainable foundation for our maritime security. By fostering long-term resilience and preparedness, together, we can protect our maritime future for generations to come.
Sincerely, Bill Cullifer Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy
From the desk of Bill Cullifer, Founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy
Dear Mr. Zakheim,
I recently read your opinion piece in The Hill on October 18, 2024, titled “How the Navy Can Solve Its Submarine Shortage,” with great interest. Dov S. Zakheim, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and vice chairman of the board for the Foreign Policy Research Institute, brings unparalleled expertise to this discussion. As a former undersecretary of Defense (comptroller) and chief financial officer for the Department of Defense from 2001 to 2004, as well as deputy undersecretary of Defense from 1985 to 1987, your insights on defense spending, strategic planning, and military capabilities are invaluable in understanding the complexities of the U.S. Navy’s submarine deficit.
The challenges the Navy faces in maintaining and expanding its submarine force are central to the security and operational effectiveness of the United States and its allies. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we have long advocated for solutions to bolster our naval capabilities in light of growing global threats.
Your analysis of the potential for non-nuclear alternatives, including unmanned submarines and diesel-electric options, highlights viable paths for supplementing our fleet. However, after discussing these ideas with Captain Brent Sadler, U.S. Navy (Retired), Senior Fellow for Naval Warfare and Advanced Technology at The Heritage Foundation, a 26-year Navy veteran with extensive operational experience on nuclear-powered submarines and author of U.S. Naval Power in the 21st Century: A New Strategy for Facing the Chinese and Russian Threat, we are convinced that while these alternatives may fill certain gaps, they fall short of meeting the United States’ broader strategic needs. As Captain Sadler pointed out, “only nuclear-powered submarines possess the range, endurance, and strategic capabilities necessary to project power and safeguard the distant maritime choke points critical to both American and Australian interests.” This reality remains just as pertinent today as it was when Australia evaluated its own submarine needs decades ago.
The U.S. Navy’s dependence on nuclear-powered submarines stems not just from their superior endurance but from their ability to maintain forward presence in vital regions like the Indo-Pacific, where distances and operational demands far exceed the capabilities of diesel-electric subs. While unmanned systems like the Manta Ray and smaller ISR variants may enhance the fleet’s flexibility, they cannot replace the strategic depth provided by manned, nuclear-powered vessels.
Moreover, the capital infusion from Australia under the AUKUS agreement is a critical step toward increasing the production rates of Virginia-class submarines. Yet, as you astutely noted, even with this funding, workforce and industrial base shortages present formidable hurdles. The U.S. Navy must prioritize workforce development and shipyard modernization to accelerate production timelines and meet both our own force requirements and our commitments to allies like Australia.
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe in advocating for a multifaceted approach—one that includes continued investments in nuclear-powered submarines, increased collaboration with our allies, and targeted support for the U.S. industrial base to reduce delays in production. This will allow us to respond effectively to the twin challenges posed by China and Russia, while also maintaining readiness in other volatile regions like the Middle East.
In conclusion, while unmanned and non-nuclear options can and should play a role in the future of undersea warfare, nuclear submarines remain the backbone of our strategy. We must remain steadfast in building and maintaining a fleet capable of meeting the global challenges of the 21st century.
Thank you again for your insightful analysis, and I look forward to further discussions on this critical topic.
Sincerely, Bill Cullifer Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy
Note: I am not a paid spokesperson for any organization. My statements reflect my personal commitment to strengthening the U.S. Navy and advocating on behalf of those who serve.
As the Coast Guard recently raised its enlistment age to 42, the conversation has sparked renewed interest among Navy veterans about whether the Navy should follow suit. In a recent survey conducted by Americans for a Stronger Navy, many former Navy veterans agreed that raising the enlistment age would be a step in the right direction to address recruitment shortfalls while filling critical technical and leadership roles.
The Need for Broader Recruitment In an era of increasingly complex military operations, the Navy is faced with the dual challenge of recruiting more personnel while maintaining readiness. Raising the enlistment age could help the Navy reach a wider pool of potential recruits who bring not only maturity and discipline but also valuable civilian expertise, particularly in fields like cybersecurity, aviation, and engineering. This would allow the Navy to meet its manpower needs without compromising on the quality of recruits.
Insights from Veterans: Why Raising the Age Matters
Our survey of former Navy veterans revealed a strong consensus that the Navy should increase its enlistment age from 41 to at least 45. Veterans cited several reasons for their support, including:
Experience and Expertise: Many roles in today’s Navy require not just physical capability but technical expertise and life experience. Older recruits often bring a wealth of knowledge from their civilian careers that could be immediately applied in highly specialized areas.
Retention and Return of Prior Service Members: Former sailors are more likely to return if the Navy makes it easier for them to reenlist later in life. This ensures the Navy retains institutional knowledge and leadership capabilities that take years to develop.
Physical and Technical Balance: While physical fitness is important for all military branches, not every role in the Navy demands the same level of physical rigor as in ground combat. Older recruits can excel in areas like logistics, command and control, and technical maintenance roles, where mental acuity and decision-making are paramount.
Visualizing the Benefits
To further illustrate the insights gathered from veterans, below is a breakdown of the benefits of raising the enlistment age based on survey responses.
As the chart shows, the primary benefits cited by veterans include the recruitment of more experienced individuals, improved retention, and the ability to fill technical roles that are critical to modern naval operations.
Addressing Concerns About Physical Standards
One challenge often brought up in discussions about raising the enlistment age is whether older recruits can meet the Navy’s physical fitness standards. However, many veterans believe the Navy could adjust fitness standards based on the role being filled. While roles requiring peak physical fitness, such as Navy SEALs or shipboard operations, would maintain strict standards, technical and administrative positions could afford to prioritize experience over physical endurance.
Veterans’ Reasons for Supporting a Higher Enlistment Age
The following chart highlights the main reasons veterans support raising the enlistment age, emphasizing the importance of technical expertise and leadership experience.
Looking to the Future: Aligning with Modern Needs
By raising the enlistment age, the Navy would be tapping into a broader talent pool at a time when recruiting has become increasingly difficult. Other branches, like the Army and now the Coast Guard, have already adapted their recruiting strategies to reflect this reality. The Navy should lead in utilizing older, experienced recruits to help bridge the gap in technical skills, fill critical positions, and ensure our fleet is ready to face 21st-century challenges.
Conclusion: Veterans Support the Change
As the conversation continues around recruitment in the U.S. military, it’s clear that raising the enlistment age for the Navy would be a strategic move to address both immediate and long-term needs. The survey of former Navy veterans shows strong support for this change, and it could significantly benefit both the Navy and the nation it protects. By adapting its recruitment strategies, the Navy can continue to grow as a force that combines both physical readiness and the intellectual rigor needed to lead in an ever-evolving geopolitical landscape.
Welcome to this week’s edition of US Naval News Wednesday, bringing you the latest and most significant updates from the naval front.
Operational Updates
USS Abraham Lincoln Heads to Middle East: The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) is on its way to the Middle East to replace the USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71), which has been operating in the region to support maritime security and protect merchant traffic.
USS Wasp in Eastern Mediterranean: The Wasp Amphibious Ready Group, including the USS Wasp (LHD-1), USS New York (LPD-21), and USS Oak Hill (LSD-51), is currently deployed in the Eastern Mediterranean as part of a potential non-combatant evacuation operation from Lebanon.
US and Philippine Warships Patrol South China Sea: The USS Mobile (LCS-26) and BRP Ramon Alcaraz (PS-16) conducted a joint patrol in the South China Sea to demonstrate the strength of the alliance between the two nations.
Pacific Partnership 2024-2 Kicks Off in Legazpi, Philippines: This humanitarian mission kicked off with an opening ceremony at the Legazpi City Expo Center. The mission will focus on disaster response, medical care, and strengthening regional partnerships.
USS Preble to Forward Deploy to Japan: The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Preble (DDG 88) will move to Yokosuka, Japan, enhancing the U.S. Navy’s presence and operational capability in the Indo-Pacific region.
Technological Advances
New Uncrewed Underwater Vehicle (UUV) Deployment: The USS Delaware will soon be equipped with a new uncrewed underwater vehicle (UUV) capability. This initiative is part of the Navy’s efforts to enhance subsea and seabed warfare operations, utilizing advanced autonomous technologies.
Final Littoral Combat Ship Launched: Austal USA launched the final Littoral Combat Ship, USS Pierre (LCS-38), marking the end of this shipbuilding program. The Navy will now focus on the Constellation-class frigate program.
Diplomatic and Strategic Developments
Continuing Promise 2024: The U.S. Navy’s expeditionary fast transport, USNS Burlington (T-EPF 10), is set to deploy to the U.S. Southern Command area of operations. The mission aims to foster goodwill, strengthen partnerships with countries like Jamaica, Costa Rica, Honduras, Colombia, and Panama, and enhance medical readiness through collaboration with local medical personnel.
Personnel News
Change of Command at Naval Safety Command: Rear Adm. Daniel Martin relieved Rear Adm. Christopher Engdahl as the 59th commander of the Navy’s safety organization during a ceremony at Joint Forces Staff College.
Dr. Lloyd’s Journey: Dr. Christopher Lloyd was named as the Navy Distinguished Scientist for Directed Energy, becoming the Navy’s senior subject matter expert on directed energy. His career highlights the importance of resilience and dedication to scientific excellence in the Navy.
Community and Family News
U.S. Navy Band Country Current Tour: The Navy’s only country/bluegrass ensemble, Country Current, is set to tour Maine starting August 25. The performances aim to connect with communities and inspire national pride through music.
Shipbuilding News
Austal USA to Build More Landing Craft Utility Vessels: Austal USA will construct two additional Landing Craft Utility (LCU) 1700-class vessels for the U.S. Navy, enhancing its amphibious capabilities.
General Dynamics Secures Contract for Virginia-class Submarines: General Dynamics Electric Boat has received a $1.3 billion contract to procure materials for the Virginia-class Block VI submarines, supporting the Navy’s efforts to replace aging Los Angeles-class submarines.
Opinion
Seth Cropsey on U.S. Navy Strategy: In his recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Seth Cropsey,former United States Department of Defense official, author of several books and studies on maritime strategy and the president of the Yorktown Institute, argues that the U.S. Navy is a “ship without a rudder,” emphasizing that the current defense strategy of being everywhere at once is unsustainable. Cropsey highlights the impact of the Houthis’ Red Sea attacks, noting the significant loss in shipping traffic through the Suez Canal and the economic strain on Egypt. He calls for a more focused and strategic approach to naval operations to ensure effective and sustainable defense capabilities.
International Naval News
U.S. Navy Submarine Returns from Two-Year Mission: The USS Florida, an Ohio-class guided-missile submarine, returned to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia, after a 727-day deployment across multiple fleet areas of operations.
Stay tuned for more updates and insights in next week’s edition of US Naval News Wednesday!
U.S. Navy Ohio-class guided-missile submarine USS FloridaBill Cullifer, Founder
Introduction:
As a U.S. Destroyer Navy sailor who served in the 1970s, I find myself deeply conflicted. The Ohio-class guided missile submarine, USS Florida, has returned home after an extraordinary 727-day deployment, marking a significant moment for the U.S. Navy’s submarine force. This mission highlights the resilience and dedication of our sailors who have operated silently but effectively across multiple theaters of operation.
In the 1970s, when I served, the world was a different place, and so were the challenges we faced. Today, the threats have significantly increased, yet the support from a GDP perspective has not kept pace.
As someone who has seen the evolution of naval operations firsthand, I have enormous respect for those who serve and sacrifice, particularly the unsung heroes of the Silent Service and others on the front lines of battle. We owe them our deepest gratitude and respect. Welcoming home these brave sailors is a moment of celebration and recognition for their extraordinary efforts and commitment.
On the other hand, I feel the need to use this opportunity to raise awareness about the critical challenges our Navy faces. While our Navy is strong, it is spread thin, and we must ensure that our sailors have the tools and resources they need to continue safeguarding our freedoms and maintaining global stability. This is not about war mongering or bantering; it is about genuinely supporting those who are in need and advocating on their behalf.
Graph: Increased Threats vs. Support from GDP Perspective
Increased Demand: Over the past decade, the demand for submarines has surged, especially with the growing tensions involving China and Russia. However, our fleet size has remained stagnant, making it increasingly difficult to meet operational needs.
Maintenance Issues: A June 2023 CRS report found that 37% of the Navy’s nuclear-powered attack submarines are unavailable for service, and the situation is worsening. The public naval shipyard system is overwhelmed, and private shipbuilders have been called in to help, but they are also struggling to keep up.
Industrial Base: The U.S. government’s industrial base currently produces about 1.2 Virginia-class attack submarines per year, while the Navy needs between 2.3 and 2.5 per year to meet its commitments. Production has been hampered by supply-chain and workforce issues.
As we welcome the USS Florida and its crew back home, we must also recognize the ongoing challenges and the critical need for more support. By doing so, we honor their service and ensure they have the resources they need to continue performing their vital roles. These sailors, along with their families who support them, are the unsung heroes of our nation. Their sacrifices often go unnoticed, but they are the backbone of our national security.
Conclusion: In conclusion, while I celebrate the homecoming of the USS Florida and its brave crew, I am also reminded of the broader challenges facing our Navy. This is a genuine call for supporting those in need and advocating on their behalf. Reflecting on the sacrifices of those on the front line and their families, let’s welcome them home as the heroes they are. By addressing these issues, we can ensure our Navy remains strong and capable of meeting the demands of an ever-changing global landscape.
Rendering of USS Constellation (FFG-62). Fincantieri Image
Guest Commentaryby Captain David Lennon, USNR (Ret.)
The recent directive from the Senate Armed Services Committee, calling for the U.S. Navy to explore alternative missile-armed ship options, highlights a significant issue: the persistent delays and design challenges with the Constellation class frigate program. As a retired Navy captain, I have witnessed firsthand the impact of such delays on our fleet’s readiness and capability. The committee’s concern is not unfounded, and their call for a “highly producible small surface combatant study” is a necessary step to address the near-term gaps in our naval capabilities.
The Constellation class frigates, envisioned as a modern and versatile addition to the Navy’s fleet, have been plagued by extensive changes to their core design. These modifications have resulted in a projected three-year delay for the delivery of the first ship, the USS Constellation, and similar delays for subsequent ships in the class. Such setbacks not only strain the Navy’s resources but also undermine our strategic readiness, especially in light of the ongoing naval buildup by the People’s Republic of China.
In response to these challenges, the committee has proposed exploring the feasibility of arming other types of ships with missile systems, including large uncrewed surface vessels (LUSVs), amphibious warfare ships, and auxiliary support vessels. This approach could provide a more immediate solution to increase our fleet’s missile-launching capacity. Additionally, the idea of adapting commercial hulls or existing Navy ships with bolt-on or containerized missile launchers presents a practical and cost-effective alternative to waiting for the delayed frigates.
The committee’s report also highlights a broader concern: the projected decline in the number of Navy battle force ships and fleet-wide vertical launch system (VLS) capacity between now and 2027. With the retirement of Ticonderoga class cruisers and Ohio class guided missile submarines, the Navy is facing a significant reduction in its missile-launching platforms. The planned acquisition of new destroyers and uncrewed surface vessels aims to fill this gap, but these solutions are not without their own challenges and timelines.
To address the immediate needs, the committee has outlined specific points for the Navy to study, including the feasibility of a crewed variant of the LUSV and the adaptation of foreign, commercial, or U.S. Government ship designs for missile deployment. This pragmatic approach acknowledges the constraints of the current supply chain and industrial base, while also emphasizing the need for rapid fielding and cost-effective solutions.
The Constellation class frigate program’s delays underscore the complexity and risks associated with modern naval shipbuilding. However, the proactive steps proposed by the Senate Armed Services Committee offer a path forward to mitigate these issues. By exploring alternative platforms and leveraging existing technologies, the Navy can enhance its missile-launching capacity and maintain its strategic advantage.
In conclusion, the committee’s directive represents a critical intervention at a time when our naval capabilities are being closely scrutinized. As we navigate these challenges, it is imperative that the Navy remains adaptable and innovative, ensuring that we continue to meet the demands of an increasingly complex maritime environment.
Captain David Lennon, USNR (Ret.) served in the U.S. Navy for over 30 years, with extensive experience in surface warfare and naval operations.
Defending Allies: USS Ronald Reagan’s Mission to Secure the Philippine Sea Amid Rising Tensions
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Recent injuries inflicted on Filipino fishermen by Chinese forces in the shoals underscore the increasing tensions in the Philippine Sea. As these events unfold, the U.S. Navy’s forward-deployed carrier, the USS Ronald Reagan, plays a crucial role in maintaining regional stability and providing a deterrent against potential Chinese aggression.
The Strategic Importance of the USS Ronald Reagan
The USS Ronald Reagan, stationed in the Pacific, is undergoing resupply and refueling to extend its deterrence missions in the Philippine Sea. This action highlights the Pentagon’s commitment to a continued forward presence amid the escalating U.S.-China tensions. The strategic placement of the Reagan ensures that the U.S. can project significant air attack power throughout the region, protecting allies like the Philippines from potential threats.
The Threat of a “Fait Accompli” Scenario
A significant concern is the possibility of a “fait accompli” scenario, where China might quickly annex the Philippines or Taiwan before an allied response can be mobilized. This scenario is particularly worrying given China’s ongoing military maneuvers and blockades of small Philippine fishing boats. Kris Osborn noted, “Operating as a floating city with thousands of sailors and hundreds of attack planes and helicopters, the USS Ronald Reagan is likely having its deployment extended to ensure critical ‘proximity’.”
U.S. Support for the Philippines
The United States stands with its ally the Philippines and condemns the escalatory and irresponsible actions by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to deny the Philippines from lawfully delivering humanitarian supplies to service members stationed at the BRP Sierra Madre. Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller stated, “PRC vessels’ dangerous and deliberate use of water cannons, ramming, blocking maneuvers, and towing damaged Philippine vessels endangered the lives of Philippine service members, is reckless, and threatens regional peace and stability.”
The U.S. reaffirms that Article IV of the 1951 United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea. Miller reiterated, “The United States reaffirms that Article IV of the 1951 United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea.”
The Role of Carrier Strike Groups
The Reagan’s ability to deploy 5th-generation aircraft within striking distance of Chinese forces is a key element of the U.S. defense strategy. These aircraft can achieve air supremacy, significantly reducing the effectiveness of any Chinese military operation. The presence of the Reagan also ensures that the U.S. can quickly respond to any sudden moves by China, maintaining a balance of power in the region. Derek Grossman emphasized, “Manila is pressing forward with three other efforts… deepening its alliance with Washington, forging ahead on security drills and agreements with other countries in the region, and adopting a strategy of ‘assertive transparency’ toward Chinese encroachments.”
Commentary
As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I believe in peace and peace through strength. Diplomacy is essential, but there comes a time when we must draw a line in the sand and take action. I firmly believe that China will continue its aggression and other nefarious deeds until it is stopped. If they want war, then they better be prepared for one. It is crucial for the American public to engage and support the Navy. Internal conflict among ourselves only plays into the hands of our adversaries, which is a tactic straight out of the communist handbook.
Conclusion
The extended deployment of the USS Ronald Reagan in the Philippine Sea is a clear signal of the U.S. commitment to defending its allies and maintaining stability in the region. As tensions continue to rise, the Reagan’s presence is more critical than ever in preventing a potential crisis and ensuring the security of the Philippines.
By reinforcing our naval capabilities and maintaining a robust presence, we can deter aggression and protect the freedoms and security of our allies in the Indo-Pacific region. The injuries sustained by Filipino fishermen and the aggressive actions against the BRP Sierra Madre remind us of the real and present threats posed by Chinese expansionism, and underscore the necessity of a strong and ready U.S. Navy.
Sources:
Osborn, K. (2024, June 17). Defending the Philippines? USS Ronald Reagan Re-Supplied & Extended in Philippine Sea. Warrior Maven.
Miller, M. (2024, June 17). U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea. U.S. State Department.
Grossman, D. (2024, May 29). How to Respond to China’s Tactics in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy.
Brent Sadler, a former US Navy Captain, recently shed light on a significant escalation in the South China Sea. For months, China has been interfering with Philippine resupply operations to Second Thomas Shoal, employing tactics such as water cannons, shouldering, and forcefully towing vessels. These aggressive actions have resulted in severe injuries and damage to Philippine vessels.
A Line Drawn in the Sand
The seriousness of these provocations cannot be overstated. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. highlighted the gravity of the situation, stating, “If a Filipino citizen was killed by a willful act, that is very close to what we define as an act of war.” Such a statement underscores the potential for these incidents to escalate into a broader conflict.
China’s actions have not gone unnoticed on the international stage. The 2016 international arbitration found China in violation of several articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, specifically regarding their obligation to settle disputes peacefully, respect the finality and binding force of decisions, and act in good faith.
The Risk of Escalation
The most recent incident, which resulted in severe injury to a Philippine sailor and damage to several vessels, risks triggering the U.S.-Philippines mutual defense treaty. This treaty obligates the U.S. to respond if Philippine forces are attacked, marking a potential serious escalation in the region.
The U.S. must respond forcefully to this provocation to signal the danger of China’s continued actions. Anything less than a clear military signal combined with forceful diplomacy will likely see the cycle of violence continue to escalate.
Details of the Incident
On June 17, 2024, during a resupply mission to the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57) outpost at Second Thomas Shoal, Chinese Coast Guard vessels 21555 and 21551 used water cannons and dangerous maneuvers to block Philippine vessels. This resulted in severe injuries to a Philippine sailor and significant damage to the vessels involved. This marks the third instance of Philippine personnel being injured by Chinese forces during resupply missions to Second Thomas Shoal.
Despite the severity of the incident, the Philippine government has yet to release detailed imagery or a timeline of events, unlike previous incidents. Meanwhile, Chinese state media justified their actions, blaming the Philippine side for the collision.
International and Domestic Reactions
The Pentagon condemned the Chinese actions, reaffirming support for the Philippines and highlighting the mutual defense treaty that could be invoked in response to these provocations. “We stand with our Philippine allies and condemn the escalatory and irresponsible actions by the PRC,” reads a statement from the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Philippine government releases have condemned the dangerous maneuvers by Chinese forces, although they have not detailed the extent of the injuries or damage.
A Call for Vigilance
As these tensions escalate, it is crucial for the international community to remain vigilant and responsive to these provocations. The stability of the South China Sea is essential for global commerce and regional security, and unchecked aggression must not be tolerated.
Americans for a Stronger Navy’s Position
China’s recent actions in the South China Sea represent a serious threat to regional stability and international law. We stand firmly with our Philippine allies and urge the United States and the international community to respond decisively to these provocations. The safety of our allies and the security of maritime operations are paramount.
