Category: Opinion Piece

Posted on

Defending Allies: USS Ronald Reagan’s Mission to Secure the Philippine Sea Amid Rising Tensions


USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76)

Defending Allies: USS Ronald Reagan’s Mission to Secure the Philippine Sea Amid Rising Tensions

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Recent injuries inflicted on Filipino fishermen by Chinese forces in the shoals underscore the increasing tensions in the Philippine Sea. As these events unfold, the U.S. Navy’s forward-deployed carrier, the USS Ronald Reagan, plays a crucial role in maintaining regional stability and providing a deterrent against potential Chinese aggression.

The Strategic Importance of the USS Ronald Reagan

The USS Ronald Reagan, stationed in the Pacific, is undergoing resupply and refueling to extend its deterrence missions in the Philippine Sea. This action highlights the Pentagon’s commitment to a continued forward presence amid the escalating U.S.-China tensions. The strategic placement of the Reagan ensures that the U.S. can project significant air attack power throughout the region, protecting allies like the Philippines from potential threats.

The Threat of a “Fait Accompli” Scenario

A significant concern is the possibility of a “fait accompli” scenario, where China might quickly annex the Philippines or Taiwan before an allied response can be mobilized. This scenario is particularly worrying given China’s ongoing military maneuvers and blockades of small Philippine fishing boats. Kris Osborn noted, “Operating as a floating city with thousands of sailors and hundreds of attack planes and helicopters, the USS Ronald Reagan is likely having its deployment extended to ensure critical ‘proximity’.”

U.S. Support for the Philippines

The United States stands with its ally the Philippines and condemns the escalatory and irresponsible actions by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to deny the Philippines from lawfully delivering humanitarian supplies to service members stationed at the BRP Sierra Madre. Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller stated, “PRC vessels’ dangerous and deliberate use of water cannons, ramming, blocking maneuvers, and towing damaged Philippine vessels endangered the lives of Philippine service members, is reckless, and threatens regional peace and stability.”

The U.S. reaffirms that Article IV of the 1951 United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea. Miller reiterated, “The United States reaffirms that Article IV of the 1951 United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea.”

The Role of Carrier Strike Groups

The Reagan’s ability to deploy 5th-generation aircraft within striking distance of Chinese forces is a key element of the U.S. defense strategy. These aircraft can achieve air supremacy, significantly reducing the effectiveness of any Chinese military operation. The presence of the Reagan also ensures that the U.S. can quickly respond to any sudden moves by China, maintaining a balance of power in the region. Derek Grossman emphasized, “Manila is pressing forward with three other efforts… deepening its alliance with Washington, forging ahead on security drills and agreements with other countries in the region, and adopting a strategy of ‘assertive transparency’ toward Chinese encroachments.”

Commentary

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I believe in peace and peace through strength. Diplomacy is essential, but there comes a time when we must draw a line in the sand and take action. I firmly believe that China will continue its aggression and other nefarious deeds until it is stopped. If they want war, then they better be prepared for one. It is crucial for the American public to engage and support the Navy. Internal conflict among ourselves only plays into the hands of our adversaries, which is a tactic straight out of the communist handbook.

Conclusion

The extended deployment of the USS Ronald Reagan in the Philippine Sea is a clear signal of the U.S. commitment to defending its allies and maintaining stability in the region. As tensions continue to rise, the Reagan’s presence is more critical than ever in preventing a potential crisis and ensuring the security of the Philippines.

By reinforcing our naval capabilities and maintaining a robust presence, we can deter aggression and protect the freedoms and security of our allies in the Indo-Pacific region. The injuries sustained by Filipino fishermen and the aggressive actions against the BRP Sierra Madre remind us of the real and present threats posed by Chinese expansionism, and underscore the necessity of a strong and ready U.S. Navy.

Sources:

  1. Osborn, K. (2024, June 17). Defending the Philippines? USS Ronald Reagan Re-Supplied & Extended in Philippine Sea. Warrior Maven.
  2. Miller, M. (2024, June 17). U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea. U.S. State Department.
  3. Grossman, D. (2024, May 29). How to Respond to China’s Tactics in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy.

Posted on

China Just Escalated in a BIG Way: A Closer Look at Recent Provocations

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Brent Sadler, a former US Navy Captain, recently shed light on a significant escalation in the South China Sea. For months, China has been interfering with Philippine resupply operations to Second Thomas Shoal, employing tactics such as water cannons, shouldering, and forcefully towing vessels. These aggressive actions have resulted in severe injuries and damage to Philippine vessels.

A Line Drawn in the Sand

The seriousness of these provocations cannot be overstated. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. highlighted the gravity of the situation, stating, “If a Filipino citizen was killed by a willful act, that is very close to what we define as an act of war.” Such a statement underscores the potential for these incidents to escalate into a broader conflict.

China’s actions have not gone unnoticed on the international stage. The 2016 international arbitration found China in violation of several articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, specifically regarding their obligation to settle disputes peacefully, respect the finality and binding force of decisions, and act in good faith.

The Risk of Escalation

The most recent incident, which resulted in severe injury to a Philippine sailor and damage to several vessels, risks triggering the U.S.-Philippines mutual defense treaty. This treaty obligates the U.S. to respond if Philippine forces are attacked, marking a potential serious escalation in the region.

The U.S. must respond forcefully to this provocation to signal the danger of China’s continued actions. Anything less than a clear military signal combined with forceful diplomacy will likely see the cycle of violence continue to escalate.

Details of the Incident

On June 17, 2024, during a resupply mission to the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57) outpost at Second Thomas Shoal, Chinese Coast Guard vessels 21555 and 21551 used water cannons and dangerous maneuvers to block Philippine vessels. This resulted in severe injuries to a Philippine sailor and significant damage to the vessels involved. This marks the third instance of Philippine personnel being injured by Chinese forces during resupply missions to Second Thomas Shoal.

Despite the severity of the incident, the Philippine government has yet to release detailed imagery or a timeline of events, unlike previous incidents. Meanwhile, Chinese state media justified their actions, blaming the Philippine side for the collision.

International and Domestic Reactions

The Pentagon condemned the Chinese actions, reaffirming support for the Philippines and highlighting the mutual defense treaty that could be invoked in response to these provocations. “We stand with our Philippine allies and condemn the escalatory and irresponsible actions by the PRC,” reads a statement from the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Philippine government releases have condemned the dangerous maneuvers by Chinese forces, although they have not detailed the extent of the injuries or damage.

A Call for Vigilance

As these tensions escalate, it is crucial for the international community to remain vigilant and responsive to these provocations. The stability of the South China Sea is essential for global commerce and regional security, and unchecked aggression must not be tolerated.

Americans for a Stronger Navy’s Position

China’s recent actions in the South China Sea represent a serious threat to regional stability and international law. We stand firmly with our Philippine allies and urge the United States and the international community to respond decisively to these provocations. The safety of our allies and the security of maritime operations are paramount.

Posted on

A Call for Unity and Urgency: Addressing America’s Security Challenges

In his recent piece, “America Hits the Global Snooze Button” in The Wall Street Journal, Walter Russell Mead, the James Clarke Chace Professor of Foreign Affairs and Humanities at Bard College and a scholar at the Hudson Institute underscores the critical nature of current global threats, echoing a sentiment that I wholeheartedly share. The urgency cannot be overstated: China’s aggressive expansion, Russia’s advances in Ukraine, and Iran’s destabilizing actions in the Middle East constitute a significant and multifaceted threat to global stability. This demands stronger U.S. armed forces to counter these threats effectively.

The situation around Taiwan, the South China Sea and the Philippines exemplifies the complexities we face. China’s assertive territorial claims and militarization of the region threaten not only our allies but also global trade routes. It necessitates a stronger U.S. naval presence and support for regional partners. The Middle East is increasingly volatile and involves contested waters of the eastern Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.  The U.S. Navy is the only effective naval force to counter the threats there and it is stretched thin.

Moreover, it is alarming to consider that our defense systems have potentially been compromised, which could be construed as an act of war. Yet, many Americans remain oblivious to these dangers, and who can blame them? After decades of conflict with little to show for it, the American public feels disillusioned, cheated, and exhausted. They see corruption and self-interest within the military-industrial complex and feel that politicians are complicit in perpetuating these issues.

The prevailing sentiment of mistrust extends to the government itself. Some argue for a more isolationist approach, focusing solely on defending our shores, while others, particularly younger generations, feel disenfranchised and disconnected from these geopolitical issues. This disconnect is further exacerbated by a widespread lack of historical knowledge, a consequence of its declining emphasis in our education system.

The threat of Chinese cyberattacks on global infrastructure is a significant concern. Chinese state-sponsored hacking has emerged as a critical global threat, targeting vital infrastructure across multiple nations. Recent reports reveal that Chinese military hackers have infiltrated Japan’s defense networks since 2020, accessing classified information about military capabilities and strategic plans. This breach, discovered by the U.S. National Security Agency, highlights the deep and persistent nature of Chinese cyber espionage. Despite efforts to secure these systems, the continued breaches underscore the sophistication and persistence of Chinese cyber capabilities. Additionally, China-based hackers have targeted U.S. government agencies, including the State and Commerce Departments, and critical sectors like transportation and utilities. These attacks are part of a broader strategy to gain access to sensitive information and disrupt vital infrastructure.

Additionally, recent reports indicate a troubling rise in cyberattacks against our critical infrastructure, including water supplies, by actors linked to China, Russia, and Iran. These cyberattacks do not just target water utilities but extend to other critical infrastructure, telecommunications networks, and security systems. They can disrupt access to essential services, steal intellectual property, and undermine our trade networks. The increasing frequency and sophistication of these attacks pose a significant threat to our national security and economic stability.

While Mead raises valid points about the severity of the threats we face, his politicization of the issue is counterproductive. The truth is, there is ample blame to go around, and what we need now more than ever is education and transparency. Americans deserve to understand the stakes and be assured of the integrity of those advocating for stronger defense measures. This is not a right versus left issue—it’s an American issue that requires a united, all-hands-on-deck approach.

A key mission of Americans for a Stronger Navy is to educate the public about these security challenges and the need for a stronger Navy. By fostering a national dialogue, we can bridge the gap between policymakers and the public, fostering mutual understanding and engagement. It is also crucial to emphasize the need for bipartisan cooperation in addressing these threats. A unified approach is necessary to effectively respond to the complex and evolving global security landscape.

In sum, the threats are indeed formidable, but trust is in short supply. Addressing this requires a commitment to honesty and clarity from our leaders, ensuring that the American public is both informed and engaged in the security decisions that will shape our future.

Thanks for listening.

Bill,
Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

Unity in the Face of Division: Lessons from Porter Halyburton, a U.S Navy fighter pilot and POW

American prisoners being paraded through the streets in Hanoi in 1977. (Courtesy of the Naval Institute photo archive)
Bill Cullifer, founder
Bill Cullifer, founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy and a former US Navy destroyer sailor, my journey to strengthen the Navy has led me to explore the complexities of the world we live in. This exploration includes interviewing experts, meeting with people from diverse backgrounds, and absorbing their insights. During this journey, I came across the book “Reflections on Captivity” by Porter Halyburton, a powerful account that caught my attention for its depiction of the bravery of Navy pilots and POWs.

Summary of “Reflections on Captivity”

“Reflections on Captivity” is a collection of 50 short stories that offer a window into Halyburton’s life as a POW. The North Vietnamese captors employed various methods to exploit personal and racial differences among prisoners, hoping to weaken their resolve and extract propaganda victories. Despite these efforts, Halyburton and his fellow prisoners used creativity, communication, and mutual support to maintain their unity. Stories of secret tap-code communication, shared acts of defiance, and moments of humanity shine through the darkness of their captivity, illustrating the indomitable spirit of the American POWs.

Analysis of Key Themes

Communist Tactics of Division: The North Vietnamese sought to exploit racial tensions by pairing Halyburton, a white Southerner, with Fred Cherry, an African American pilot. This tactic aimed to deepen existing societal divides and weaken the prisoners’ collective strength. However, instead of succumbing to hate, Halyburton and Cherry forged a deep bond, proving that unity could overcome even the most insidious attempts at division.

Resilience and Unity: In the face of relentless efforts to pit prisoners against each other, Halyburton and his comrades developed ingenious ways to stay connected and support one another. The tap-code communication system became their lifeline, allowing them to share news, organize covert activities, and maintain a semblance of normalcy. This sense of community was crucial in sustaining their morale and resisting the captors’ psychological warfare.

Power of Forgiveness: One of the most profound lessons from Halyburton’s story is his decision to forgive his captors. This act of forgiveness was not just a personal liberation but a powerful repudiation of the hatred and division the captors sought to instill. By choosing forgiveness, Halyburton reclaimed his freedom and demonstrated that true strength lies in unity and compassion.

Relevance to Modern Times

Modern Parallels: Halyburton’s experiences offer timeless lessons that are particularly relevant in today’s polarized world. The tactics of sowing division and exploiting differences are not confined to the past; they are evident in various aspects of contemporary American society. From political polarization to social media echo chambers, the divisive tactics employed by adversaries aim to fracture our sense of community and unity. Recognizing and countering these tactics with resilience, unity, and forgiveness is crucial for building a stronger, more cohesive society.

Lessons in Leadership and Ethics: The leadership and ethical choices demonstrated by Halyburton and his fellow POWs provide valuable insights for both military and civilian life. Their story underscores the importance of integrity, solidarity, and the moral courage to forgive. These lessons are vital as we navigate current social and political challenges, emphasizing the need for leaders who can unite rather than divide.

Online Hate and Division: As I continue my journey to understand and strengthen the US Navy, I have noticed a disturbing increase in hate and division, particularly online. This is not merely a societal issue; it is a strategic one. Adversaries exploit these divisions to weaken our national unity, a tactic with roots in communist strategies observed during the Vietnam War. By recognizing this pattern, we can better understand the importance of fostering resilience and unity in our digital interactions and beyond.

Conclusion

Porter Halyburton’s story is a powerful reminder of the strength found in unity and the liberating power of forgiveness. In a world where hate and division are often used as tools of control, his experiences teach us the importance of standing together and choosing compassion over conflict.

Reflecting on his journey encourages us to apply these lessons in our own lives, fostering resilience and unity in the face of adversity.

As America faces its own challenges, Halyburton’s story serves as a cautionary tale, urging us to resist division and embrace the power of unity and forgiveness.

Posted on

AI in Naval Warfare – From Logistics to Combat Strategy

Introduction from Americans for a Stronger Navy:

Bill Cullifer

Hello, Bill Cullifer here with Americans for a Stronger Navy. Welcome to our inaugural episode of this enlightening series where we delve into transformative technologies reshaping naval operations. Throughout this series, we will explore various cutting-edge topics, including AI, unmanned systems, Directed Energy Weapons, cyber warfare, and more. Today, we begin with the crucial role of Artificial Intelligence in naval warfare.

Series Outline:

  1. AI in Naval Warfare – This episode.
  2. Uncrewed Systems – How drones and autonomous vehicles are changing naval tactics.
  3. Directed Energy Weapons – The future of combat with lasers and high-energy systems.
  4. Cyber and Electronic Warfare – Securing supremacy in digital battlefields.
  5. Future Naval Strategies – Integrating new tech into traditional naval doctrines.

Overview: The Strategic Importance of AI in Military Operations AI’s role in military operations extends from enhancing logistical support to refining combat strategies. Its integration into naval operations promises significant advancements in operational efficiency and tactical decision-making.

Interview Segment: Insights from Admiral James Stavridis

We feature key insights from Admiral Stavridis during his interview with Fareed Zakaria on GPS. His expertise illuminates AI’s potential in transforming naval capabilities.

  • Logistics and Maintenance: AI’s predictive capabilities ensure higher readiness and efficiency.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: AI’s ability to analyze historical data aids in crucial decision-making processes.
  • Advanced Threat Response: The evolving role of AI in managing drone swarms and other asymmetric threats.

Why It Matters: Understanding the integration of AI into naval operations is crucial for anticipating how future conflicts will be managed and fought. AI not only enhances current capabilities but also opens new avenues in warfare strategy.

Implications for the Navy: Admiral Stavridis’ insights lead into a broader discussion on:

  • The necessity for ongoing training and adaptation among naval personnel to leverage AI effectively.
  • The potential shifts in naval strategy as AI technologies mature, particularly in terms of autonomous decision-making and real-time strategy adjustments.
  • Ethical and security considerations as AI becomes a pivotal element in defense.

Interview: CNN ZAKARIA and ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER

  • CNN ZAKARIA: We humans have a lot to worry about these days, climate change and other pandemic, even the threat of World War Three. But the unregulated development of artificial intelligence might be as potent a threat as any, according to my next guest. He was NATO’s allied commander Eirope. And he’s now vice chair of global affairs at the Carlisle Group. His fascinating new book “2054 Novel,” which he co-wrote with Elliot Ackerman, very talented, is centered on the existential treat AI poses for the future of the world. Jim, pleasure to have you on. Fascinating how you’re writing these series of books. And this one is really about the A.I. race in military affairs. So first, I want to ask you, explain to us the power of A.I.
  • CNN ZAKARIA: So, you’re a — you’re a naval commander, what would A.I. allow you to do as a naval commander that you weren’t able to do when you were actually commanding ships?
  • ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER: Let me give you three very practical things. Number one — and it doesn’t sound sexy, but it’s logistics and maintenance. Artificial Intelligence has a capability to predict when a particular set of maintenance functions are needed, make sure that the spare parts are in train, all of that done in a way that is much more efficient, much more capable.
  • ZAKARIA: But that’s huge because it keeps the ships in permanent readiness.
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. We always say in the military, the amateurs are the ones talking about strategy. The professionals are focused on logistics. That’s what wins wars.
  • But number two, artificial intelligence will allow a commander — say I was the captain of a destroyer, which I was. If I had an A.I. advising me, plugged into my decision process, that A.I. will have access to every naval battle ever fought. It would be capable of scanning the horizon of history and whispering into the commander, you really ought to think about this.
  • And then third and finally, and we’re seeing the edges of this in Ukraine, drone, swarms, bringing them together in very lethal ways. We currently can’t quite do that. Artificial intelligence will make swarming drones the greatest threat by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: You talk a lot about the A.I. race and it’s really U.S. versus China.
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: Who’s ahead?
  • STAVRIDIS: U.S. marginally ahead. Our mutual friend, Eric Schmidt, did a marvelous set of research on this a couple of years ago, and he would have said then, we’re about a year ahead of China.
  • My sense from my sources, China is closing that gap. This is the foot race that will determine geopolitical superiority by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: Are we building the right kind of military for that kind of world?
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. And let me add another example in terms of drones versus naval. Look what’s happening in the Black Sea. The Russian Black Sea fleet a third of it is on the bottom of the Black Sea, drinking seawater as we would say in the business.
  • Why? Not because Ukraine has a Navy, they don’t. It’s because the Ukrainians have used both air and surface drones. So, to your question
  • ZAKARIA: Drones are amazing. The minister showed them to me. They looked like toy boats —
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: — and they are really highly lethal drones that can sink these hundred — hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of warships.
  • STAVRIDIS: Correct. And so, the question then becomes, are the carriers still viable? I think they are for the moment, for the tenure future, 15-year future. Boy, you get much beyond that. And the capacity of massive swarms of drones accompanied by cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, all linked together by artificial intelligence, it will make those crown jewels of the fleet, our aircraft carriers vulnerable.
  • ZAKARIA: So, you’ve — you’ve held very, very high military office. And you know that there are some people who worry that Donald Trump, where he to be elected again, would politicize the military. Do you worry about that?
  • STAVRIDIS: I do. And I think that the greatest aspect of our national security isn’t a political military. And we would edge in to politics into that force at great peril to the republic. At the moment, all of my contacts in the active-duty military reassure me that the military continues to regard itself as apolitical, followers of the constitution. Let’s hope it stays that way.
  • ZAKARIA: And when you look at NATO, you were the former supreme allied commander, great, great title, by the way, there are people in Europe who worry a lot about Trump and NATO. And what I’ve heard people say is it’s — he doesn’t have to pull out of NATO. He just has to say, I’m not going to defend Latvia, Lithuania —
  • STAVRIDIS: Estonia.
  • ZAKARIA: Right. Because it’s a sort of — in some ways the whole — NATO is basically — it’s a psychological game. It’s the thread is psychological that the U.S. will get involved. That’s what Putin has to be calculating. And if the president says something like that — the NATO — the building can continue, the meetings can continue, but the heart of it is lost.
  • STAVRIDIS: We always say deterrence is the combination of capability and credibility.
  • NATO is incredibly capable. The defense budget of the United States and the Europeans together is well over 10 times that of Russia. The population is well over five times the size of Russia.
  • So, the capability is not the problem. You’ve put your finger on it, it’s the credibility. And yes, I would be very concerned about a Trump presidency that did not actively support and, indeed, lead within NATO. That’s a real concern.
  • ZAKARIA: From the former supreme allied commander of NATO.
  • STAVRIDIS: My pleasure, Fareed.
  • ZAKARIA: Thank you, sir.
  • STAVRIDIS: Thank you.

Further Viewing

Carrie Council interview with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral Stavridis:

Outro

Thank you for joining us for the first episode of our series. Don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast on your favorite platform to ensure you don’t miss any of our discussions on the future of naval warfare. Together, we aim to keep you informed and engaged with the latest in naval defense technology.

 

 

Posted on

Rising Tides of Tension: The Strategic Standoff at Scarborough Shoal and Its Implications for U.S. Naval Power

China claims the Scarborough Shoal, although it is inside the Philippines’ 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone. An international arbitration tribunal in the Hague said in 2016 that China’s claims had no legal basis – a decision Beijing has rejected according to press reports by Reuters

Introduction

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In light of recent developments in the South China Sea, particularly the installation of a floating barrier at the entrance of Scarborough Shoal, our ongoing coverage seeks to delve deeper into the escalating maritime tensions between the Philippines and China. This strategic waterway, vital for international trade and rich in natural resources, continues to be a flashpoint in regional geopolitics, affecting not just the immediate stakeholders but also global maritime norms and security.

Following Our Coverage

Building on our previous discussions around the strengthening of maritime alliances and the pivotal role of the U.S. Navy in maintaining a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, today’s focus shifts to a more granular incident that epitomizes the complexities of sovereignty disputes in these waters.

The Scarborough Shoal is one of Asia’s most contested maritime features and a flashpoint for diplomatic flare-ups over sovereignty and fishing rights. Here is what you need to know about the hotly contested area.

The recent satellite imagery revealing a floating barrier, presumably installed by China, at a critical juncture of the Scarborough Shoal, underscores the tactical maneuvers being employed to assert territorial claims.

Why Should Americans Care

The South China Sea is a linchpin in global maritime trade, with a significant portion of the world’s commerce transiting through its waters. Any disruption or militarization in this region poses a direct threat to international shipping routes, potentially escalating into broader conflicts that could involve U.S. interests and allies. Moreover, the principles at stake, including freedom of navigation and adherence to international law, are foundational to the global maritime order that the United States has long championed.

Implications for the U.S. Navy

For the U.S. Navy, these developments represent both a challenge and a call to action. Ensuring freedom of navigation in the South China Sea requires not just a robust naval presence but also a nuanced strategy that balances deterrence with diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions. The situation at Scarborough Shoal, and the broader territorial disputes in the region, test the U.S. Navy’s capability to uphold international norms, support allies, and engage in a strategic competition with China.

This independent story not only continues our coverage of the critical issues at play in the South China Sea but also highlights why these developments matter to Americans and the implications for U.S. naval strategy. By focusing on a specific incident within the larger narrative, we aim to provide our readers with a clearer understanding of the stakes involved and the importance of sustained attention and engagement with maritime security issues.

Posted on

Strengthening Maritime Alliances: A Call to Action for American Advocates

Australia and the Philippines Courtesy of Wiki

In a significant move toward bolstering regional security, Australia and the Philippines have recently inked a pivotal agreement aimed at enhancing maritime collaboration. This accord, underscored by a shared commitment to uphold international law, marks a critical juncture in the face of China’s expanding military footprint in the South China Sea. As Americans, it’s essential to understand why this development matters and the consequential role of the U.S. Navy in ensuring a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region.

Why Americans Should Care

The South China Sea is not just a distant waterway; it’s a vital artery for global commerce, with a significant portion of the world’s trade passing through it. The freedom of navigation in this area is paramount, not only for the countries directly bordering it but also for major trading nations like the United States. The recent agreement between Australia and the Philippines signals a growing consensus among like-minded nations to safeguard these crucial sea lanes from unilateral claims and aggressive actions that threaten regional stability and, by extension, global economic security. Please subscribe, support and tell your friends.

Implications for the U.S. Navy

The U.S. Navy stands as a pivotal force in maintaining maritime freedom and deterring aggression in international waters. The strengthening of alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, as exemplified by the Australia-Philippines accord, is a testament to the collective resolve to maintain a free and open region. This collaborative stance not only enhances the operational capabilities of the U.S. Navy through joint patrols and exercises but also amplifies the strategic message to potential adversaries that the international community remains united in its defense of the rules-based order.

For the U.S. Navy, this evolving security landscape underscores the necessity for continued investment in naval capabilities and readiness. It also highlights the importance of diplomatic efforts in forging and reinforcing alliances that extend the Navy’s reach and effectiveness. In an era where strategic competition demands not just military might but also the strength of partnerships, the U.S. Navy’s role in ensuring a stable and secure Indo-Pacific is more crucial than ever.

Join The Club

For those who recognize the importance of a strong and vigilant maritime force, the recent developments in the South China Sea serve as a clarion call. The Americans for a Stronger Navy advocates for the indispensable role of naval power in securing America’s interests and upholding international norms. By joining this community, you align with a group dedicated to ensuring that the U.S. Navy remains capable, adaptable, and ready to face the challenges of tomorrow.

As we navigate through these turbulent waters, the unity and strength of our alliances stand as our best defense against threats to maritime freedom and regional peace. It’s time to rally behind our Navy and support the partnerships that keep our seas open and secure. Join us in this vital mission for a stronger, more resilient maritime future.

This blog post draws inspiration from recent developments in maritime security alliances and the pivotal role of the U.S. Navy in maintaining a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region. It serves as a call to action for Americans to support naval advocacy initiatives and understand the strategic importance of a robust naval presence in global affairs.

Posted on

Reinforcing America’s Pacific Defense through Strategic Partnerships

The First Island Chain, extending from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines and Borneo.
NOTE TO READER: The blue line should go between Taiwan and China because Taiwan is an integral component of the First Island Chain.

Introduction

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In an era where global dynamics are rapidly evolving, the strategic importance of the Pacific region in maintaining America’s defense capabilities cannot be overstressed. A key element, often overlooked even by the well-informed, is the mid-Pacific chain of islands. These islands are not just dots on the map but pivotal assets in the geopolitical chessboard, ensuring America’s military and strategic superiority in the Asia-Pacific.

Strategic Significance of the Compacts of Free Association

The First Island Chain’s Defense Backbone

The First Island Chain, extending from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines and Borneo, forms a natural barrier crucial for regional stability and security. However, its defense is untenable without a secure base of operations in the central Pacific, provided by the Compacts of Free Association (COFA) states: Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Marshall Islands.

Guardians of the Central Pacific

These nations, through COFA agreements with the U.S., offer more than just strategic locations; they ensure American military mobility and operational freedom across a vast east-west corridor. This not only deters potential adversaries but also fortifies America’s defense posture across the Pacific.

Financial and Diplomatic Dimensions

A Cost-Effective Investment

At a glance, the financial commitment to the COFA states—$2.3 billion over 20 years—may seem substantial. However, when contextualized within the broader U.S. defense budget and the strategic value it brings, this investment is not only prudent but also cost-effective. The COFA agreements represent a fraction of America’s defense expenditure but play a critical role in maintaining peace and stability in the region.

Reciprocal Benefits

Beyond financial aid, the COFA agreements encompass deeper ties, including the right for COFA citizens to work in the U.S., many of whom serve in the U.S. military at commendable rates. This reciprocal relationship strengthens cultural and economic bonds, enhancing the strategic partnership beyond mere financial transactions.

Why This Matters

In the current geopolitical climate, where the balance of power in the Pacific is increasingly contested, the role of the COFA states becomes even more critical. The strategic locations of these island nations offer unparalleled advantages for surveillance, rapid deployment, and logistical support, essential for deterring aggression and ensuring regional security. The renewal of the COFA agreements is not just a matter of policy but a cornerstone of America’s Pacific defense strategy.

Conclusion

“The strategic landscape of the Pacific is intricately defined by the mid-Pacific islands, which are essential for our defense strategy. Dale A Jenkins, a Senior Advisor to Americans for a Stronger Navy and the author of ‘Diplomats and Admirals,’ poignantly underscores the critical significance of these islands within our defense framework—a fact that often eludes even the well-informed.”

As we navigate the complexities of contemporary geopolitics, the renewal of our agreements with these islands transcends mere policy—it’s an essential investment in the bedrock of America’s security and its leadership stance in the Pacific.

For entities like the Americans for a Stronger Navy and all advocates for regional peace and stability, championing these agreements is not just strategic but an imperative.

These partnerships stand as a testament to our enduring commitment to our Pacific allies, underpinning the collective security that safeguards our nation’s interests and upholds the values we share with our friends across the vast expanse of the Pacific.

Posted on

Securing Global Trade: The Critical Role of Naval Power in the Red Sea

Introduction

The Importance of a Strong Maritime Presence

Bill Cullifer, Founder

The recent actions in the Red Sea underscore the indispensable role of naval power in ensuring the security of international waterways. The coalition’s efforts to disrupt Houthi capabilities demonstrate the importance of maintaining a formidable maritime presence to protect global trade routes and uphold international maritime law.

The Need for a Stronger Navy

The challenges faced in the Red Sea highlight the ongoing need for a stronger navy, capable of projecting power, deterring aggression, and safeguarding the principles of freedom of navigation upon which global commerce depends. A robust U.S. naval force is not just a pillar of national defense; it’s a cornerstone of global stability and economic prosperity.

Why This Matters

The Red Sea is a strategic chokepoint in global trade, connecting the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal to the Indian Ocean via the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Any disruption in this area can have significant repercussions on global trade, energy supplies, and economic stability. The recent increase in Houthi attacks on commercial and naval vessels not only poses a direct threat to those at sea but also undermines international maritime law and global security.

Joint International Response

In a concerted effort to protect shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, the U.S. and the U.K., alongside Australia, Bahrain, Denmark, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, executed precision strikes on 36 Houthi targets across 13 locations in Yemen. This action was a direct response to over 30 attacks by the Houthis on maritime vessels since mid-November.

Targeted Strikes for Maritime Security

The coalition’s strikes focused on degrading the Houthis’ ability to launch further attacks, targeting their weapons storage, missile systems, launchers, air defense systems, and radars. These measures are crucial for disrupting the Houthis’ capabilities, thereby ensuring the safety of international and commercial vessels traversing the Red Sea.

Ensuring Freedom of Navigation

The importance of these operations extends beyond immediate security concerns, aiming to preserve the principle of freedom of navigation. The recent actions, including the defensive strike against a Houthi anti-ship cruise missile and the engagement of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) by U.S. forces, underscore the coalition’s commitment to maintaining open and safe international waterways.

Why Americans Should Care

The security of the Red Sea affects not just regional stability but also has direct implications for the United States. A significant portion of global trade, including energy supplies, passes through this region. Ensuring its security directly supports the U.S. economy and global standing. Moreover, these operations highlight the value of international partnerships and the U.S.’s role in leading and supporting global security initiatives.

Conclusion

The recent coalition strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen represent a critical step in ensuring the security of the Red Sea and, by extension, the stability of global trade routes. It is a stark reminder of the importance of naval power and international cooperation in addressing global challenges. As Americans, recognizing and supporting our nation’s efforts in these endeavors is essential for our national and economic security.

Posted on

Strengthening Our Navy: A Path to Security and Stability

Seth Cropsey, Yorktown Institute

Opinion Piece

Dear Members and Friends of StrongerNavy.org,

In light of recent developments and insightful analyses, such as the compelling opinion piece by Seth Cropsey, it has become increasingly clear that the path to securing our national interests and ensuring global stability heavily relies on the strength and capability of our Navy.

Bill Cullifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I/we stand firmly with the views expressed by Cropsey, particularly regarding the critical need for a coherent strategy in the Middle East and the indispensable role of a formidable naval force in the eastern Mediterranean, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, and the Persian Gulf.

The Indispensable Role of Naval Power

Naval power has long been the cornerstone of our national defense and international influence. Our navy has been protecting free trade since the beginning of the republic during wars against the Barbary pirates, a quasi-state actor not unlike the Houthis attempting to close the Red Sea to commerce in the present day. Our Navy not only secures vital trade routes that underpin the global economy but also serves as a potent deterrent against adversaries who might seek to destabilize regions critical to our interests. The recent events in the Middle East, as highlighted by Cropsey, underscore the urgency of bolstering our naval capabilities to respond effectively to emerging threats and maintain a balance of power that favors peace and stability.

A Coherent Strategy for the Middle East

The challenges we face in the Middle East are complex and multifaceted. They require not just military might but a comprehensive strategy that encompasses diplomatic efforts, alliances, and a deep understanding of the regional dynamics. Cropsey’s call for a coherent approach to the region resonates with our advocacy for a strategy that integrates naval strength with broader diplomatic initiatives, ensuring a more stable and secure environment conducive to our interests.

The Need for Decisive Leadership and Investment

Our current predicament in the Middle East, characterized by a lack of clarity and commitment, highlights the necessity for decisive leadership and a unified national approach towards defense and foreign policy. Cropsey’s critique of the present administration’s handling of the situation serves as a reminder of the consequences of inaction and indecision. As such, we advocate for significant investment in our Navy, not only to modernize our fleet but to expand our capabilities to meet the demands of an increasingly complex global landscape. The current fleet of less than 300 ships is not enough to sustain deployed forces in the Indo-Pacific, Mediterranean Sea, and the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. The nation needs that larger and more capable fleet to both defend key chokepoints like the Bab al Mandeb strait, and also ensure that ships and sailors are not extended on deployment, as the Ford carrier strike group had to be in order to meet the mission in the Eastern Mediterranean.

A Unified Call to Action

In agreement with Cropsey, we at StrongerNavy.org call upon our members, friends, and policymakers to recognize the urgency of the situation. It is imperative that we support policies and initiatives that strengthen our Navy and ensure it remains capable of protecting our freedoms, securing our interests, and contributing to global stability.

Let us unite in our commitment to a stronger Navy, one that is fully equipped to navigate the challenges of the 21st century and beyond. Our security, our prosperity, and our place in the world depend on it.

Together, we can forge a future that upholds the principles of freedom, peace, and stability that our great nation stands for.

Sincerely Bill Cullifer, Founder- Americans for a Stronger Navy