Category: Uncrewed Systems

Posted on

The Autonomous Revolution: Naval Warfare’s Exponential Leap

Rendering of a Blue Water Autonomous ship

Introduction

The future isn’t coming—it’s already here, patrolling our oceans with no human hands on the wheel.

Personal Reflection

Bill Cullifer, onboard USS Henry B. Wilson -DDG 7 1976
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

As someone who stood watch on a destroyer’s deck for years, I’d love nothing more than for every young American to feel the salt air, a wooden helm at their fingertips, the roll of the ship beneath their feet and the breathtaking vastness of the sea. That experience shaped my life and the life of many others that I respect and admire.

But sentiment won’t secure the future. The world has changed—and it’s time we face some hard facts.

We’re now witnessing the dawn of a radically new era in warfare. One that demands we embrace and invest in the technologies that will define the next generation of naval power.

From Science Fiction to Sea Trials

Less than a decade ago, the idea of fully autonomous warships seemed like the stuff of sci-fi. Today, the U.S. Navy’s USX-1 Defiant—a 180-foot, 240-ton vessel designed without a single human accommodation—is conducting sea trials off Washington state.

No bunks. No heads. No mess halls. Just a steel-clad, AI-powered war machine optimized purely for mission.

This isn’t incremental change. It’s an exponential leap.

The Compound Effect of Convergent Technologies

What’s driving this revolution isn’t just a single breakthrough. It’s convergence.

AI Decision-Making at Machine Speed

Ships like USS Ranger and Mariner aren’t just autonomous—they’re operational. They’ve logged thousands of miles, fired missiles, and executed missions without direct human control. Real-time, tactical adaptation is already replacing human-triggered decision trees.

Swarm Coordination Beyond Human Capability

With programs like Ghost Fleet Overlord, we’re moving toward fully integrated autonomous networks—surface, subsurface, aerial. Swarms of unmanned systems coordinating at machine speed, executing joint missions across domains.

New Physical Designs, New Possibilities

When you remove the human factor, new design freedom emerges. The NOMARS program optimizes for function over form—rapid payload reconfiguration, longer endurance, fewer constraints. Defiant doesn’t compromise. It adapts.

The Multiplication Factor

Each of these capabilities amplifies the others:

  • AI enables swarm tactics
  • Swarms generate operational data
  • That data trains the next-gen AI
  • Which enables even more sophisticated missions

The cycle is accelerating. Consider DARPA’s Manta Ray, an autonomous glider designed to “hibernate” on the seabed for months. Now picture that working in tandem with unmanned surface vessels like Defiant, and traditional submarines—all coordinating without a single sailor onboard.

The MASC Paradigm: Speed Over Paperwork

The Navy’s new Modular Attack Surface Craft (MASC) program exemplifies this exponential thinking. Instead of designing ships around specific missions, MASC creates standardized platforms that gain capabilities through containerized payloads—like naval smartphones that become powerful through modular “apps.”

With an aggressive 18-month delivery timeline and emphasis on commercial standards over “exquisite” platforms, MASC represents a fundamental shift in how the Navy acquires capability. As Austin Gray, Navy Reserve Intelligence Officer & Co-founder/CSO, Blue Water Autonomy observed: “The way Navy is approaching MASC—procuring fast, iteratively, and with focus on speed over paperwork—should offer us hope that the future of U.S. seapower is not so dim.”

This isn’t just about new ships—it’s about new thinking. MASC vessels can be missile shooters one day, submarine hunters the next, simply by swapping standardized containers. The high-capacity variant could carry 64 missiles—more firepower than many destroyers, at a fraction of the cost.

Beyond the Horizon

In 2016, Sea Hunter launched with basic navigation. By 2021, converted vessels were firing missiles. In 2025, purpose-built unmanned warships are conducting sea trials. By 2026, MASC prototypes will be delivered for fleet operations.

What’s next?

The Pentagon is backing this future with a $179 billion R&D investment focused on AI, drone swarms, and autonomous systems. The revolution isn’t limited to ships—it extends to autonomous aircraft, land vehicles, and space-based platforms.

The Inflection Point

This may be the most transformative shift in warfare since the atomic age.

But unlike nuclear weapons, which stagnated under treaties and deterrence doctrines, autonomous systems evolve constantly—learning, adapting, improving. The next five years will likely deliver breakthroughs we can’t yet fully comprehend.

We’re not just upgrading platforms. We’re creating entire ecosystems of autonomous coordination that outpace human decision-making and redefine how wars are fought—and deterred.

Welcome to U.S. Navy 3.0—a new era defined not by bigger ships, but by smarter ones.

We’ve discussed this evolution before: Navy 1.0 was sail and steel; Navy 2.0 brought nuclear power and carrier dominance. Navy 3.0 marks a transformational leap driven by artificial intelligence, autonomy, and multi-domain integration. It’s not just about replacing crewed vessels with unmanned ones—it’s about rethinking naval power from the keel up. From swarming tactics to predictive logistics and machine-speed decision-making, Navy 3.0 is our opportunity to regain the edge in a world where adversaries are building faster, cheaper, and without rules.

The Legacy Challenge

This transformation faces significant resistance. Naval culture, built around centuries of seamanship and command tradition, doesn’t easily embrace unmanned systems. The defense industrial base, optimized for billion-dollar platforms with decades-long production cycles, struggles with MASC’s 18-month timelines and commercial standards.

But operational necessity is forcing evolution. When China builds ships faster than we can afford traditional platforms, alternatives become imperatives. The question isn’t whether to change—it’s whether we can change fast enough.

The Future Is Now

This isn’t a concept. It’s not theory. It’s happening:

  • Autonomous vessels are already patrolling the Pacific
  • Underwater gliders are proving months-long endurance
  • Unmanned surface warships are rewriting the rules of naval architecture
  • Containerized missile systems are operational
  • MASC solicitations are active with near-term delivery requirements

The revolution is not ahead of us. It’s around us.

And we’ve only just left the pier.

Why Americans Should Care

Autonomous warfare isn’t just a military story—it’s a national security imperative. Adversaries like China are racing to seize the advantage in unmanned systems. Falling behind means more than losing battles—it risks losing deterrence, freedom of navigation, and geopolitical influence.

The economic implications are equally significant. Navy 3.0’s emphasis on commercial standards and distributed production could revitalize American shipbuilding, creating jobs while strengthening national security.

Implications for the Navy

To remain dominant, the U.S. Navy must rethink everything: shipbuilding timelines, training paradigms, procurement processes, and alliances. Naval power in this new era will favor speed, adaptability, and distributed lethality.

Officer career paths built around commanding ships must evolve to managing autonomous swarms. Training programs must balance traditional seamanship with algorithmic warfare. Most critically, the Navy must maintain its warrior ethos while embracing radical technological change.

A Final Word

Let’s not confuse nostalgia with readiness. The romance of the sea will always have a place in our hearts—but it won’t protect our shores.

The wooden helm and salt air that shaped naval officers for generations remain valuable experiences. But future naval leaders will find meaning in different challenges: commanding autonomous fleets, coordinating multi-domain operations, and outthinking adversaries at machine speed.

If we want peace, we must master this new domain.

It’s time to embrace it. It’s time to invest. It’s time to lead.

That’s why we launched Charting the Course: Voices That Matter—a 24-part educational series breaking down how we got here, what went wrong, and what must happen next. Our goal is simple: educate the public, connect the dots, and build the support needed to close the readiness gap before it’s too late.

Let’s roll.

Posted on

MASGA Marks a Critical Milestone—But the U.S. Navy Still Needs Urgent Industrial Surge

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

From Waltz’s Warning to MASGA’s Launch

On September 27, 2023, Congressman Mike Waltz published “America Needs a National Maritime Strategy,” warning that the United States lacked the shipbuilding capacity and strategic alignment needed to counter China and sustain a maritime advantage.

Nearly two years later, that warning has materialized into policy.

On April 9–10, 2025, the White House issued the executive order “Restoring America’s Maritime Dominance,” launching the Maritime Action Plan and creating the new Office of Shipbuilding under the National Security Council.

Then, on July 31, 2025, South Korea’s Finance Minister confirmed the formal launch of Make America Shipbuilding Great Again (MASGA)—a $150 billion industrial partnership investing in U.S. shipyards, workforce development, and dual-use naval-commercial platforms.

What MASGA Does

MASGA is the largest public-private shipbuilding effort since the Cold War and includes:

  • Investment from South Korean giants like Hanwha Group into American yards (including the acquisition of Philly Shipyard)
  • Joint U.S.–ROK workforce training programs to close skilled labor gaps
  • New production of replenishment, patrol, and logistics vessels for both Navy and commercial use
  • Maintenance and drydock support for U.S. Navy ships on U.S. soil

It’s a big step forward—but one that must be matched with urgency.

Admiral Caudle’s Stark Warning: “We Need a 100% Industrial Surge”

On July 29, 2025, during his confirmation hearing for Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Daryl Caudle delivered a sobering message to the Senate Armed Services Committee.

To meet U.S. obligations under the AUKUS agreement—selling up to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia while sustaining our own fleet—the Navy must double its submarine output:

  • Current production: ~1.3 Virginia-class submarines per year
  • Required output: 2.3 per year

“We need a transformational improvement,” Caudle testified. “Not a 10 percent improvement, not a 20 percent—a 100 percent improvement.”

He added that international partnerships would be essential as the U.S. works to rebuild its organic capacity:

“There are no magic beans to that. The solution space must open up. We need ships today.”

Committee Chairman Roger Wicker stressed creativity, outsourcing, and urgency. Admiral Caudle agreed, calling for “an all-hands-on-deck approach.”

This is precisely where MASGA comes in.

Why MASGA Matters for the Navy

MASGA’s structure provides the kind of foreign capacity support and workforce relief Caudle explicitly called for. It aligns directly with the Navy’s urgent need for:

  • Surge production of submarines and surface combatants
  • Expanded maintenance infrastructure
  • Shipyard partnerships to relieve domestic pressure

Congressman Waltz anticipated this crisis in 2023. MASGA is the first large-scale step toward solving it.

The Broader Navy Production Challenge

Submarines aren’t the only problem. The Navy’s broader industrial needs remain acute:

  • Destroyer production has slipped behind plan; the Navy aims to buy 51 new destroyers over the next 30 years, but current yards are falling short.
  • Aircraft carriers like the USS John F. Kennedy (CVN‑79) are years behind schedule.
  • The Navy’s long-term fleet goal of 381 ships by 2042 will remain aspirational without massive industrial acceleration.

And even with MASGA, the Navy is still contending with an aging Military Sealift Command, an undersized Merchant Marine, and shipyard repair backlogs.

Modernization Means Autonomy—And We’re Behind

Modernizing the fleet doesn’t just mean more hulls—it means smarter platforms. The future of naval warfare will be shaped by autonomous surface and undersea vehicles, from uncrewed missile boats to AI-enabled minehunters and refueling drones. China is already fielding swarms of semi-autonomous systems in contested waters. Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy’s efforts under programs like the Medium and Large Unmanned Surface Vessel (MUSV/LUSV) remain limited by slow procurement and industrial bottlenecks. MASGA can accelerate the integration of autonomous systems by expanding modular shipbuilding capacity, repurposing civilian infrastructure, and enabling faster tech deployment across the fleet. Without autonomy, we fall behind—not just in numbers, but in survivability and battlefield adaptability.

What Must Come Next

MASGA is a launchpad, not a destination. To restore maritime power, the U.S. must:

Expand submarine production
Reach 2.3 attack subs/year by 2030. This requires labor, capital, and process modernization on a scale not seen in decades.

Accelerate surface fleet output
Ramp up destroyers, amphibious vessels, and support ships. Congress must deliver multi-year procurement and budget certainty.

Fix regulation and finance
Incentivize private capital to flow into U.S. shipyards, not Chinese ones. Close loopholes and create new maritime investment channels for Americans.

Grow the skilled workforce
Welders, naval architects, systems engineers—we need tens of thousands more. Joint international training must be paired with U.S. educational investments.

Modernize the Merchant Marine
We once had over 5,000 ships. Today, we have fewer than 80 engaged in international trade. This is a critical national vulnerability.

Closing Message: MASGA Is a Start, Not a Solution

MASGA validates the vision Mike Waltz articulated in 2023. It meets Admiral Caudle’s call for relief through allied partnerships. It aligns with the Navy’s production and readiness needs.

But China is still building. Delays persist. And the decision space for national security continues to shrink.

Let’s not wait another decade to act like a maritime power. Let’s build, now.

That’s why we launched Charting the Course: Voices That Matter—a 24-part educational series breaking down how we got here, what went wrong, and what must happen next. Our goal is simple: educate the public, connect the dots, and build the support needed to close the readiness gap before it’s too late.

Let’s move beyond slogans. Let’s build understanding, accountability, and strength—before the next crisis comes knocking.

Join us at StrongerNavy.org
Let’s roll.

Posted on

Introducing Our Three-Part Series: Shaping the Future of Aerial Combat

Are Spaceships in the U.S. Navy’s future?
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

F-35 vs. Drones in U.S. Defense Strategy

Why This Matters to All Americans

As technology evolves and global security challenges intensify, the conversation about the future of aerial combat grows increasingly critical. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe this debate is not just for defense experts and policymakers—it’s a conversation that impacts every American. The decisions we make today about our military capabilities will shape the safety, security, and strategic posture of the United States for decades to come.

The stakes are monumental. From the taxpayer dollars funding advanced fighter programs to the geopolitical implications of maintaining air superiority, this is a topic that demands both transparency and public engagement. That’s why we’re launching a comprehensive three-part series to explore this issue from every angle.

What We Plan to Cover

Part 1: The Debate Over the F-35 Program

  • We will present the current arguments surrounding the F-35 program, including Elon Musk’s critiques of manned fighter jets, Lockheed Martin’s defense of the aircraft, and the U.S. Navy’s position on its strategic importance. This installment will provide a clear and balanced view of the differing perspectives.

Part 2: Behind the Scenes of Defense Planning

  • This segment will peel back the layers of what goes into planning programs like the F-35. From research and development to operational strategies, we’ll dive into the complexity of balancing current needs with future threats. This part will highlight the challenges faced by military planners and strategists, giving Americans a deeper appreciation of the decisions at hand.

Part 3: The Future of Aerial Combat and Public Involvement

  • In our final piece, we’ll explore how advancements in technology and evolving geopolitical dynamics will shape the future of aerial combat. This installment will conclude with a call to action, inviting the American public to engage with this issue and weigh in on the path forward.

Why This Topic Is Significant

The F-35 program has been a cornerstone of U.S. airpower, but it is also a lightning rod for criticism. High costs, technical challenges, and emerging alternatives like drone swarms have sparked intense debate. At the same time, the world is witnessing rapid advancements in hypersonics, artificial intelligence, and unmanned systems—technologies that could redefine the very nature of warfare.

This is about more than aircraft. It’s about maintaining America’s technological edge, ensuring national security, and spending taxpayer dollars responsibly. The choices we make today will determine whether the U.S. remains a global leader in military innovation or cedes ground to competitors like China and Russia.

Why Americans Should Care

At its heart, this is a conversation about priorities. Should the U.S. continue investing in programs like the F-35, or pivot to emerging technologies? How can we ensure our military remains strong while being fiscally responsible? These are questions that affect every American, and they deserve thoughtful, informed discussion.

We encourage you to follow this series, engage with the content, and share your thoughts. As citizens, we have a vital role to play in shaping the future of our nation’s defense. Together, we can ensure that America’s Navy remains not only stronger but also smarter and more efficient.

Stay tuned for Part 1 of our series, where we dive into the debate over the F-35 program and explore the arguments from all sides. Let’s navigate this complex topic together.

Posted on

U.S. Naval News Wednesday – September 4, 2024: Operational Highlights & In-Depth Editorial on Shipyard Modernization

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Welcome to this week’s edition of U.S. Naval News. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we’re committed to keeping you informed about the latest developments from around the fleet. This week, we bring you key updates, including the USS Abraham Lincoln’s strategic deployment to the Gulf of Oman and cutting-edge advancements in drone operations aboard the USS George H.W. Bush.

But we’re not stopping there. In this edition, we’re introducing a new feature—an in-depth editorial commentary. Following the news, we’ll dive deeper into a critical issue affecting our Navy: the recent GAO report on the state of U.S. shipyards. This report raises alarms about the capacity and readiness of our shipyards to meet the demands of a modern Navy. We’ll explore why this matters, what needs to be done, and how you—our readers and supporters—can join us in advocating for change.

Your involvement is more important than ever. Together, we can make a difference.

Thank you for your continued support. 

Operational Updates

  • USS Abraham Lincoln Deployment: The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) has positioned itself in the Gulf of Oman as part of a broader strategy to maintain a strong naval presence in the Middle East. This deployment comes amid increasing regional tensions, particularly related to Iran’s activities.
  • Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group Rescue: The USS Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group successfully rescued two distressed Iranian mariners in international waters. The rescue operation underscores the U.S. Navy’s readiness and commitment to maritime safety and humanitarian missions in the region.
  • Submarine Maintenance in Australia: The USS Hawaii (SSN 776) conducted scheduled maintenance at HMAS Stirling, Australia, under the AUKUS Pillar 1 initiative, which supports Australia’s development of a sovereign conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine capability.
  • Bilateral Operations with Italian Navy: The U.S. Navy and Italian Navy conducted joint operations in the Philippine Sea, focusing on enhancing maritime security and demonstrating a unified commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Technological and Strategic Developments

  • Drone Command Center on USS George H.W. Bush: A new drone command center has been installed on the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) to operate MQ-25 “Stingray” drones, marking a significant advancement in the Navy’s unmanned aerial capabilities.
  • FY24 NDAA Shipbuilding Boost: The U.S. Senate’s version of the FY24 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes authorization for the procurement of 10 new battle force ships, emphasizing the ongoing modernization of the Navy’s fleet.
  • China Watch: China recently claimed breakthroughs in autonomous vehicle technology, which could have significant military applications, including advanced driver-assistance systems and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These developments are closely tied to China’s broader strategy of integrating military and civilian technology efforts.
  • Russia Watch: Concerns continue to mount over the U.S. Navy’s readiness, particularly with regard to the availability of dry docks for essential ship repairs. U.S. lawmakers have voiced concerns about how this impacts naval operations, especially when compared to China’s rapid shipbuilding pace.

Community and Leadership News

  • Navy Shipyards Under Scrutiny: The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has raised concerns about the capacity and efficiency of U.S. shipyards, emphasizing the need for modernization to keep pace with global naval demands. The GAO report, released on September 2, 2024, highlights that delays in ship repairs and upgrades could severely impact fleet readiness. The report also notes that inadequate infrastructure and workforce shortages are critical challenges that need immediate attention.
  • Navy Wants Industry’s Help to Reduce Costs: Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro has called on the defense industry to partner with the Navy in reducing sustainment costs, particularly by securing better terms for technical data rights in acquisition contracts.

Editorial: The Imperative to Modernize U.S. Navy Shipyards

The recent GAO report underscores what we at Americans for a Stronger Navy have been emphasizing for the past two years: the state of our Navy’s shipyards is a national crisis. The threats we face are real and cannot be overstated. As the GAO has highlighted, the current state of our shipyards directly threatens our fleet’s readiness and, by extension, our national security.

This is not just a Navy issue—it’s a national imperative. We cannot expect the Navy to shoulder this burden alone. It’s time for Congress to act decisively, providing the necessary funding and legislative support to modernize our shipyards. The Navy’s ability to maintain a robust, ready fleet depends on it.

We propose a multi-faceted approach to solving this crisis. A private-public-community partnership is essential to drive the changes needed. Industry leaders, local communities, and government must come together to build the workforce, improve infrastructure, and streamline processes to ensure our Navy remains the most powerful maritime force in the world.

We can no longer afford to point fingers. It’s time to move forward with a united effort. The future of our national security depends on it.

  1. Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY)
    • Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
    • Established: 1767
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of naval ships, particularly nuclear-powered vessels.
  2. Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard
    • Location: Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
    • Established: 1908
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of submarines and surface ships.
  3. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
    • Location: Bremerton, Washington
    • Established: 1891
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and decommissioning of naval vessels, particularly nuclear-powered ships and submarines.
  4. Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
    • Location: Kittery, Maine
    • Established: 1800
    • Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of nuclear-powered submarines.
  5. Huntington Ingalls Industries (Newport News Shipbuilding)
    • Location: Newport News, Virginia
    • Established: 1886
    • Specializes in: Construction of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines, as well as ship repair.
  6. Mare Island Naval Shipyard (Closed)
    • Location: Vallejo, California
    • Established: 1854, closed in 1996
    • Specializes in: Ship construction and repair (historically).
  7. Philadelphia Naval Shipyard (Closed)
    • Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • Established: 1801, ceased operations in 1995
    • Specializes in: Ship construction and repair (historically).

These shipyards represent a mixture of active and decommissioned facilities, but the active ones remain critical to maintaining and modernizing the U.S. Navy fleet, particularly in nuclear-powered ships and submarines.

Posted on

Navy News Monday – June 24, 2024

Welcome back to the “Navy News Monday” blog post series. This series is dedicated to bringing you the latest and most significant updates from the United States Navy, focusing on a variety of key areas that are crucial to maintaining a robust and effective naval force.

In our upcoming posts, we will be covering a range of topics including:

  • Ship Building and Modernization: The latest developments in naval ship construction, including new vessel launches, updates on shipyard activities, and advancements in ship design that enhance the capabilities of the fleet.
  • Naval Technology and Innovation: Innovations in naval warfare technology, such as cutting-edge weapons systems, sensor technologies, and communication advancements that keep the Navy at the forefront of modern warfare.
  • Blue Water Navy Operations: Insights into the strategic operations of the Navy in open oceans, showcasing the power projection and global reach of our maritime forces.
  • Submarine Navy News: Updates on the silent service, including new submarine classes, undersea warfare developments, and the role of submarines in ensuring underwater dominance.

For this week’s feature, let’s dive into the latest news across these topics:

Ship Building and Modernization

The U.S. Navy has released a new long-range shipbuilding strategy that outlines plans for both construction and decommissioning over the next 30 years. The plan aims to expand the fleet to 381 ships by the mid-2030s under an optimal funding scenario. This includes maintaining the current build rate for Virginia-class submarines and introducing new classes of surface combatants and unmanned platforms. Notably, the USS New Jersey (SSN 796), a Virginia-class submarine, has been delivered and is set for commissioning later this year​ (USNI News)​​ (Naval News)​​ (Navy Commissionings)​.

Naval Technology and Innovation

A significant advancement in naval technology is the development of a new electronic warfare system designed to provide enhanced protection against various electronic threats. This system is expected to improve the Navy’s operational capabilities significantly. Additionally, there are ongoing investments in sensor and communication technologies to ensure the Navy remains at the forefront of modern warfare​ (Defense News)​​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Blue Water Navy Operations

The Blue Water Navy continues to demonstrate its global reach with extensive maneuvers in the Pacific. These operations underscore the United States’ commitment to maintaining freedom of navigation and readiness to respond to international maritime challenges. The deployment of carrier strike groups such as the USS Theodore Roosevelt is a key element of these strategic operations​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Submarine Warfare and Undersea Dominance

The submarine fleet is poised for significant upgrades, with the integration of new sonar technology into Virginia-class submarines. This will enhance their stealth and detection capabilities, reinforcing their critical role in undersea warfare. The delivery of the USS New Jersey (SSN 796) marks an important milestone, as it is the first Virginia-class submarine designed with crew gender integration​ (Naval News)​.

Naval Aviation

Naval aviation continues to evolve with innovations in aircraft carrier operations and the introduction of new aircraft. The commissioning of new vessels and upgrades to existing ones, such as the ongoing fitting out of the John F. Kennedy (CVN 79), highlight the Navy’s commitment to maintaining a robust and capable aviation component​ (Navy Commissionings)​.

Uncrewed Systems and Autonomous Vehicles

The Navy is expanding its use of uncrewed systems, with plans to field between 89 and 143 unmanned platforms by 2045. These include both surface and underwater vehicles that will play key roles in future naval operations, enhancing capabilities while reducing risk to human personnel​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Naval Diplomacy and International Relations

Naval diplomacy remains a cornerstone of U.S. maritime strategy, with the Navy engaging in numerous international exercises and cooperative efforts with allied nations. These activities help to strengthen alliances and promote stability in key regions around the world​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Recruitment and Retention

Efforts to attract and retain naval personnel are ongoing, with new initiatives aimed at improving training programs and career development opportunities. The Navy continues to address challenges related to recruitment, aiming to ensure a steady influx of talented individuals to maintain its operational readiness​ (Defense Security Monitor)​.

Naval History and Heritage

Commemorations of significant naval battles and events, such as the upcoming commissioning of vessels named after historical figures and battles, help to preserve the rich heritage of the U.S. Navy. These events serve as reminders of the Navy’s longstanding tradition of service and sacrifice​ (Navy Commissionings)​.

Naval Logistics and Support

Enhancements in logistics and support infrastructure are crucial for fleet readiness. The Navy’s new shipbuilding plan includes significant investments in shipyard infrastructure and the procurement of used vessels to replace aging surge sealift capacity, ensuring the Navy’s ability to project power globally​ (Defense News)​.

These updates ensure that our readers stay informed about the latest developments in the U.S. Navy, highlighting the ongoing efforts to maintain a strong and capable maritime force. Stay tuned for more detailed articles on each of these topics as we continue to explore the might and innovation of the United States Navy.

Posted on

AI and the US Navy: Transforming Naval Warfare

In our ongoing exploration of the future of American Naval power, we’ve already covered crucial topics that lay the groundwork for understanding AI’s role in naval warfare. In Episode 1: AI in Naval Warfare – From Logistics to Combat Strategy: , we examined the necessity of modernizing the Navy’s fleet and adapting shipbuilding strategies to meet contemporary challenges. Following that, Episode 2: Uncrewed Systems: How Drones and Autonomous Vehicles are Changing Naval Tactics delved into the realm of emerging technologies reshaping naval warfare, including groundbreaking initiatives like the Pentagon’s “Replicator.” These discussions set the stage for understanding how AI fits into the broader context of naval innovation and modernization.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the landscape of naval warfare and technology. The US Navy, recognizing the immense potential of AI, is integrating it across various domains, enhancing operational efficiency, decision-making processes, and multi-domain operations. This blog post delves into the transformative power of AI in the US Navy, highlighting key applications, opportunities, challenges, and insights from a former Navy captain.

AI Applications in the US Navy

The integration of AI in the US Navy is multifaceted, impacting numerous areas:

  • Autonomous Vehicles: AI-powered unmanned surface and underwater vehicles are enhancing surveillance, reconnaissance, and mine countermeasure operations.
  • Intelligent Decision Aids: AI systems assist naval officers in making faster and more informed decisions by analyzing vast amounts of data and providing actionable insights.
  • Unmanned Systems: Drones and other unmanned systems are increasingly used for tasks that are dangerous, repetitive, or require real-time data analysis.

Opportunities and Challenges

The adoption of AI presents both opportunities and challenges for the Navy:

  • Opportunities:
    • Enhancing operational efficiency and readiness.
    • Fostering multi-domain integration and collaboration.
    • Driving innovation in naval technology and warfare strategies.
    • Expanding into new domains like underwater, space, and cyberspace.
  • Challenges:
    • Ensuring data quality and security.
    • Addressing ethical and legal concerns.
    • Overcoming technical and organizational barriers.
    • Competing with AI advancements from foreign rivals, particularly China and Russia.

Insights from a Former Navy Captain

In a recent interview, Captain Sam Tangredi, a former US Navy officer, shared his thoughts on the broad implications of AI for naval operations. Captain Tangredi highlighted the following points:

  • Strategic Advantage: AI can provide a significant strategic advantage by improving situational awareness and enabling faster decision-making in critical situations.
  • Operational Efficiency: AI reduces the burden on human operators by automating routine tasks, allowing naval personnel to focus on more complex and strategic responsibilities.
  • Ethical Considerations: The importance of adhering to ethical principles in AI development and deployment was emphasized, ensuring that AI systems are reliable, safe, and governed appropriately.

Ensuring Responsible AI Adoption

As the Navy embraces AI, it is crucial to ensure responsible adoption:

  • Ethical AI: The Department of Defense⁸’s AI Ethical Principles emphasize being responsible, equitable, traceable, reliable, and governable.
  • Safety and Governance: Robust measures are in place to ensure AI systems are safe and their deployment is governed by strict regulations.

Conclusion

AI is set to transform naval warfare and technology, providing the US Navy with enhanced capabilities and strategic advantages. However, it is essential to address the associated challenges and ensure the responsible use of AI. By staying informed and engaged with developments in AI, we can support the Navy’s mission to maintain maritime superiority and safeguard national security.

For more insights, tune in to our latest podcast episode where we delve deeper into AI’s impact on the US Navy, featuring an exclusive interview with Captain Sam Tangredi.

.

Posted on

Uncrewed Systems: How Drones and Autonomous Vehicles are Changing Naval Tactics

The Navy is introducing GARCS to San Diego Bay. (US Navy )

Introduction

 

Welcome back to our series exploring the cutting-edge technologies reshaping naval warfare. In our first post, we delved into the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing naval operations. Today, we shift our focus to uncrewed systems—drones and autonomous vehicles—that are revolutionizing naval tactics through increased capabilities and strategic flexibility.

If you missed our discussion on how AI is transforming naval warfare, you can catch up here. 

Recent Developments

The U.S. Navy’s commitment to integrating advanced technologies into its operations is more apparent than ever. Recently, the Navy stationed a squadron of small, experimental sea drones, known as Global Autonomous Reconnaissance Crafts (GARCs), in San Diego Bay. These uncrewed surface vessels, measuring 16 feet in length and capable of speeds up to 40 mph, represent the forefront of naval innovation. Designed for maritime security and potentially weaponized engagements, these drones are a key part of the Navy’s strategy to enhance its operational capabilities with autonomous technology. Continue reading “Uncrewed Systems: How Drones and Autonomous Vehicles are Changing Naval Tactics”