As a former U.S. Navy destroyer sailor in the 1970s, I’ve seen firsthand how technology—when coupled with skilled people—can shape the course of history. I later spent decades in the tech industry mentoring thousands of budding web professionals. Today, as the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I continue to advocate for the strength of our Navy—and that strength begins with education.
That’s why I’m honored to participate in the Navy League’s 7th annual STEM Expo this year at National Harbor. This event, designed to inspire students from grades 5 through 12, is more than just a fun afternoon of experiments, ROV building, and dolphin doctors. It’s a launching pad.
Why? Because STEM education matters more now than ever.
When I served aboard the USS Henry B. Wilson (DDG-7), our edge came from training, teamwork, and an ability to adapt—qualities that mirror the STEM mindset. Experiment. Fail. Learn. Repeat. That’s the rhythm of science. It’s also the rhythm of a Navy that must constantly innovate to stay ahead of evolving global threats.
The hands-on exhibits, mad science performances, and marine mammal medicine demos aren’t just entertainment. They’re experiences that ignite curiosity, build confidence, and foster critical thinking—traits that lead to careers in shipbuilding, AI, cybersecurity, logistics, and the next generation of maritime defense.
The U.S. Navy and industry don’t just need ships. They need thinkers. Builders. Doers. And that starts with investing in our youth—encouraging them to dive into robotics, physics, medicine, and engineering so they can one day help keep our sea lanes secure and our nation strong.
I’m proud to stand with the Navy League, the Sea Cadets, and all the educators and parents who believe in this mission. Let’s inspire the next generation—one hands-on demonstration, one question, and one ‘aha’ moment at a time.
Because if we want a stronger Navy, we need stronger minds.
See you at the STEM Expo.
— Bill Cullifer Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy Former U.S. Navy Destroyer Sailor Mentor | Technologist | Advocate
A Review of Heritage Foundation Report BG3902 by Americans for a Stronger Navy
Introduction
The Heritage Foundation’s latest report, “Arming for Peace: Expanding the Defense Industrial Base and Arming Taiwan Faster” (BG3902), echoes what Americans for a Stronger Navy has been sounding the alarm on: The threats facing the United States are real, escalating, and dangerously close to overwhelming our current naval capabilities. As Brent Sadler writes, the time for talk has passed. Action is overdue. If we don’t mobilize now, America risks losing the ability to deter war and defend freedom in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.
As Sadler states: “As Americans go about their daily lives unmolested, the world is accelerating in its change—much of it perilous to U.S. national survival.” He warns that “on the back of a decades-long sustained military build-up, China’s military is increasingly confident and willing to directly challenge the U.S.”
His call to action is clear: “The U.S. must restore ebbing national deterrence and prevent a war in Asia—while not ceding its democratic way of life and prosperity for the next generations.”
Key Findings That Should Wake America Up
China is preparing for war. Admiral Davidson’s 2021 warning that China could strike Taiwan by 2027 has not only proven prescient, it’s now backed by an unprecedented military buildup. China has conducted massive joint-force invasion rehearsals and increased provocations around Taiwan. As Brent Sadler put it, “Aggressive maneuvers around Taiwan right now are not exercises, as they call them. They are rehearsals.”
That warning was underscored this week when the Chinese military launched large-scale joint drills around Taiwan, including its Shandong aircraft carrier battle group. According to China’s own Eastern Theater Command, these drills are a “severe warning and forceful containment against Taiwan independence.” With missile forces, air strikes, and blockade rehearsals now unfolding, many in Taiwan — and around the world — are rightfully concerned. Sadler’s insights about China’s evolving risk tolerance add important context to these real-time developments.
Further validating the urgency, the U.S. Naval War College’s China Maritime Report No. 14 found that Chinese analysts themselves believe the PLA has narrowed the gap with the U.S. military, especially in its immediate region. “There is consensus in China that the PLA has narrowed the gap in overall military capabilities with the United States over the last two decades,” the report notes.
Russia and China are approaching U.S. shores. Testimony from U.S. Northern Command chief Gen. Gregory Guillot before Congress confirmed that joint Russian-Chinese military patrols have entered the U.S. Air Defense Identification Zone near Alaska — levels not seen since before the Ukraine war began. One coordinated flight last July saw Russian TU-95 and Chinese H-6 bombers test U.S. response time. This should serve as a wake-up call: our adversaries are not just projecting power near Taiwan, they’re probing U.S. airspace and waters closer to home. As Politico reported, Chinese “dual-use” vessels under scientific pretenses are mapping the Arctic for future military operations.
U.S. deterrence is fading. Years of underinvestment in shipbuilding and naval readiness have created dangerous gaps. Delays in weapons deliveries, inadequate port infrastructure, and a depleted missile defense stockpile are symptoms of a nation unprepared for a prolonged maritime conflict. As Sadler warns, “Failing to act… could result in the most destructive and consequential war the U.S. has ever had to fight.”
The Navy is stretched thin. The U.S. Navy has sustained an aggressive forward presence, but at great cost. Ship wear, sailor fatigue, and insufficient repair capacity are taking their toll. The grounding of the USNS Big Horn disrupted combat ops in the Red Sea, highlighting our logistical fragility. Sadler notes, “This comes at a cost in added wear on the ships and sailors reliant on a logistics infrastructure of ports, support ships, and dry docks too few to assure contested forward naval operations.”
The world is on fire. From Ukraine to the Red Sea to the Arctic, our adversaries are watching and testing U.S. resolve. China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea now operate more boldly, confident in America’s disunity and domestic distraction.
Taiwan is not a distant concern. More than 80,000 Americans live, work, or travel there. A war over Taiwan would drag us into conflict, devastate global supply chains, and send shockwaves through the U.S. economy. As Sadler puts it plainly, “Taiwan is where over 80,000 Americans live, work, or travel on any given day.”
China’s geographic advantage cannot be ignored. According to the CMSI report, Chinese military capabilities are particularly potent within the First Island Chain, which includes Taiwan. “Chinese capabilities may…contest U.S. supremacy in scenarios close to home,” the report warns. That’s where deterrence matters most—and where readiness is most urgently needed.
Why Americans Should Care
This is not just a Navy problem. It’s an American problem. Delays in defense production, weak infrastructure, and an uninformed public are national vulnerabilities. If Americans fail to understand what is at stake, we will fail to hold our leaders accountable. And if we fail to act, we will be forced to react under far worse circumstances.
A strong Navy protects freedom of navigation, global trade, energy security, and the American way of life. Without it, our adversaries will decide what happens in the Taiwan Strait, the Red Sea, the South China Sea — and now, even the Arctic.
What the Navy Needs Now
A modern Naval Act. We need a 21st-century version of the pre-WWII Naval Act to rapidly rebuild shipyards, expand production, and modernize our fleet. Sadler calls this “a promising first step to regain the ability to sustain a wartime economy in a prolonged war with China.”
Real investment in maritime infrastructure. Ports, dry docks, and logistics support are vital national security assets that must be revitalized now.
Faster arms deliveries to Taiwan. The delays in Harpoon, Javelin, and Stinger deliveries must be resolved. Taiwan’s ability to defend itself is our first line of deterrence. Sadler emphasizes that “how the new Administration responds and accelerates the arming of Taiwan will be key in sustaining the military balance and peace in the near term.”
A unified national strategy. We must operate differently — with diplomatic, economic, and military efforts aligned. Naval statecraft must be at the heart of this new Cold War strategy. Sadler emphasizes, “Naval statecraft is the recommended way forward; that is, a maritime strategic framework for using American power.”
The CMSI report reminds us that training, human capital, and logistics remain U.S. advantages. While China may be catching up in hardware, “Chinese training still lags. The gap in the software [human resources and development] is even bigger,” the report notes. But these gaps can close — unless we act now to protect and reinforce our edge.
An Engaged and Educated Public
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe in peace through strength. But strength requires public awareness, buy-in, and civic action. That’s why we launched the Americans for a Stronger Navy Educational Series — to help Americans understand the stakes, the history, and the path forward.
We invite every reader to check out and sign up for the Educational Series on StrongerNavy.org. Learn what makes our Navy vital to our security and prosperity. Share it with others. Talk about it. Get involved.
Conclusion
We are not powerless. But we must not be silent. The Heritage Foundation, the U.S. Naval War College, and recent military testimony to Congress all point to the same reality: America is in the early stages of a long contest with near-peer adversaries, and we must prepare now.
It’s time for Americans to wake up, stand up, and demand a Navy that is ready not just for today’s threats, but tomorrow’s challenges.
America needs a stronger Navy. And the Navy needs a stronger America behind it.
By Bill Cullifer, Founder and Advocate-in-Chief, Americans for a Stronger Navy
Editor’s Note: This article is offered as a thought-provoking contribution to the national conversation on military reform and accountability. It is not intended to endorse or oppose any political figure or party. Instead, it invites discussion about how innovation, transparency, and forward-thinking leadership can help strengthen the U.S. Navy for the challenges ahead.
Introduction
While watching Bret Baier’s recent FOX special on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), I found myself thinking: what if this wave of government reviews hits the U.S. Navy? Could it be a disaster—or could it actually make the Navy stronger?
Bill Cullifer, Founder
As someone who served in the Navy and now leads Americans for a Stronger Navy, I know how complex and mission-critical our maritime forces are. You can’t simply apply a Silicon Valley mindset to a warship or a global logistics chain. And yet, listening to the cabinet members speak about their departments being put under the microscope, it struck me: those who embrace scrutiny might come out leaner, smarter, and more ready for the future.
The Risk
DOGE could become a blunt instrument. If reformers misunderstand the Navy’s mission, they might cut where they shouldn’t. They might sideline the experience of sailors and shipbuilders, and leave readiness vulnerable in the name of short-term savings.
The Opportunity
But if the Navy leads from the front—inviting review, owning its challenges, and showcasing innovation—it could become a national model. Not just for efficiency, but for integrity and transformation. It could even spark a new wave of public trust.
A Pattern of Problems We Can’t Ignore
This isn’t just theory—it’s backed by years of Government Accountability Office (GAO) reporting. In its March 2025 report, the GAO stated bluntly that despite nearly doubling the Navy’s shipbuilding budget over the past 20 years, the fleet has not grown.
Programs like the Zumwalt-class destroyers, Littoral Combat Ships, and Constellation-class frigates have been riddled with incomplete designs, delays, weak business cases, and massive cost overruns. The Constellation-class, for example, began construction before its design was finalized—despite being based on a proven European frigate.
Since 2015, the GAO has made 90 recommendations to improve Navy shipbuilding. Only 30 have been addressed. That’s not just bureaucratic foot-dragging—it’s a pattern that puts our national security and naval strength at risk.
A Broader Mandate for Reform
This isn’t happening in a vacuum. On March 29, 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo launching the Workforce Acceleration and Recapitalization Initiative, ordering a top-down realignment of the Department of Defense’s civilian workforce.
The initiative seeks to reduce duplication, cut excessive bureaucracy, and redirect resources to the front lines. It reopens the Deferred Resignation Program, encourages early retirement, and requires senior leaders to propose leaner organizational charts—aiming to build a force that is “lean, mean, and prepared to win.”
Whether you agree with the approach or not, reform is no longer optional. The question is whether the Navy will lead the charge—or be dragged into it.
Civic Engagement
Americans for a Stronger Navy exists to engage the public, ask hard questions, and help translate naval strength into civic understanding. We believe a strong Navy and a responsible government go hand in hand. If DOGE enters the shipyard gates, we’ll be watching—not to tear down, but to help build back smarter.
Let’s make sure this moment strengthens the fleet, not weakens it.
Call to Action
We invite you to be part of the conversation. Share your thoughts, experiences, or concerns by visiting StrongerNavy.org on twitter.
Welcome to the launch of our 24-episode educational series at StrongerNavy.org! We’re building on our core mission to support a strong and capable U.S. Navy—one that safeguards American interests at home and abroad—by adding a central focus on civic engagement and personal responsibility. Our goal isn’t just to spread knowledge about naval history or current threats, but to inspire action among citizens who share our commitment to a resilient and unified nation.
Why This Matters Now
China and Russia are testing American economic, military, and technological leadership. The U.S. Navy, historically a guardian of global stability, now defends not only sea lanes but also digital infrastructure, space-based assets, and critical supply chains—all of which touch Americans’ everyday lives. From gas prices to grocery shelves, a strong Navy underpins the economic stability we often take for granted.
Captain Charlie Plumb’s Call to Action
Today, we are honored to feature insights from Captain Charlie Plumb, a retired U.S. Naval Aviator, combat veteran, and former prisoner of war. His message about “packing each other’s parachutes” highlights the team effort required for any crucial mission—underscoring that every American can (and should) contribute to a stronger nation, whether in uniform or as a supportive citizen at home.
Special Video Feature with Captain Charlie Plumb
We invite you to watch this short, inspiring video where Captain Plumb shares his personal story and the significance of “packing each other’s parachutes.”
“How are you contributing to the resilience, teamwork, and unity of our nation? How’s your parachute packing coming along?” – Captain Charlie Plumb
For Captain Plumb, “parachute packing” is both literal and metaphorical—a reminder that we all rely on each other, whether flying fighter jets, maintaining ships, or simply watching out for our neighbors. In the context of Americans for a Stronger Navy, it means stepping up to learn, engage, and take an active part in defending our freedoms.
A Call for National Unity and Civic Engagement
Captain Plumb’s central question—“How are you contributing to resilience, teamwork, and unity?”—is especially relevant in a time of domestic polarization. Our greatest victories, from WWII to the Cold War, depended on national unity. As Captain Plumb discovered, everyone’s role matters: the pilot in the cockpit, the sailor on the deck, the rigger in the parachute loft—and the citizen at home who advocates, volunteers, or serves in the community.
Civic Engagement Matters
A strong Navy is more than just ships and sailors. It depends on:
Public Awareness – Understanding the strategic challenges worldwide, from Cold War legacies to renewed tensions with Russia and China.
Community Support – Standing behind those who serve, including families and veterans, and ensuring our elected representatives stay informed and accountable.
Personal Responsibility – As Captain Plumb emphasizes, each of us has a role. Through service, advocacy, volunteering, or simply spreading the word, we help “pack each other’s parachutes.”
By illuminating pivotal moments—such as Nixon’s visit to China, the evolution of foreign relations with Russia, and how global power shifts shaped today’s challenges—this series aims to equip you with the knowledge to engage confidently in national security discussions.
Sneak Peek: Our 24-Episode Series
Each episode is designed to educate, inspire, and equip you to take meaningful actions—whether that’s contacting your representatives, sharing important facts with your community, or even considering military service. Here’s a high-level look:
1. The Role of the U.S. Navy in American History 2. Lessons from Vietnam: Stories of Resilience and Unity 3. Technology at Sea: From WWII to the Digital Age 4. Nixon’s Visit to China: Turning Points in U.S. Foreign Policy 5. Naval Statecraft and Diplomacy: Building (and Rebuilding) Global Relationships 6. Facing the Soviet Threat: A Cold War Overview 7. Russia Today: How We Got Here and Where We’re Headed 8. China Rising: Economic Power, Global Dominance and Naval Ambitions – A Deep Dive 9. Key Global Hotspots: Straits, Seas, and Chokepoints 10. Life Aboard a Modern Naval Vessel: Voices from the Fleet 11. Women in the Navy: Progress, Challenges, and Future 12. Recruitment & Retention: Why Today’s Youth Matter 13. Veterans’ Perspectives: Transitioning from Service to Civilian Life 14. The Navy’s Humanitarian Missions: Beyond Combat 15. Cybersecurity on the High Seas: New Frontiers of Defense 16. Alliances and Partnerships: NATO, the Pacific, and Beyond 17. Marine Corps & Navy Integration: A Closer Look 18. Naval statecraft, Budget and Strategy: Funding a Future-Ready Navy 19. Emerging Technologies: Drones, AI, and Robotics 20. Civil-Military Relations: Keeping Democracy Strong 21. Environmental Stewardship: Conserving Our Oceans 22. Stories of Heroism: Unsung Sailors and Surprising Tales 23. Leadership 101: Character, Courage, and Command at Sea 24. The Call to Serve: Civic Engagement for a Stronger Nation
Connecting Policy to Practice
From the Jones Act to the Ships Act and the Fleet Act Proposal, policy and legislation play major roles in shaping naval capabilities. We’ll delve into these and other initiatives—like Anti-Lobbying Efforts—to illustrate how specific actions on Capitol Hill determine our Navy’s ability to stay well-funded, well-equipped, and technologically agile. Influencing these policies isn’t reserved for experts in Washington; every American has a voice in ensuring that the Navy remains a formidable force.
The Navy’s Evolving Mission: Sea, Space, and Cyberspace
Gone are the days when naval power was confined to the oceans. Today’s U.S. Navy must also protect undersea cables, fortify space-based assets, and counter cybersecurity threats—all while confronting China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Russia’s resurgent ambitions. In upcoming episodes, we’ll explore AI, autonomous systems, and cyber warfare, offering insight into how the Navy is adapting to 21st-century challenges.
Join Us for This Free Educational Event
Ready to jump in? Here’s how you can get involved:
Register for our FREE online series at StrongerNavy.org.
Share this blog post and Captain Plumb’s video with friends, family, and community groups.
Engage with us on social media using #StrongerNavy—post your own “parachute packing” stories to recognize mentors or teammates who’ve supported you.
Volunteer or Donate to local veterans’ organizations, or find ways to encourage future Navy recruits in your schools and communities.
Conclusion: Pack Each Other’s Parachutes
As Captain Plumb reminds us, every role matters in safeguarding our nation’s security. “Just doing my job, sir” may sound unassuming, but it speaks volumes about the power of teamwork. Whether you’re a sailor in uniform or a concerned citizen writing to your elected officials, your contribution is vital.
The latest National Security Innovation Base Summit gave the Pentagon a D grade for modernization. A D—not just in shipbuilding, but across the board in weapons innovation, procurement, and efficiency. This isn’t just a bureaucratic failure; it’s a direct threat to America’s national security.
My friend and shipmate from the ‘70s, Captain David Lennon, USNR (Retired), sent me this Fox News article, saying, “This echoes what you and I have been saying.” He’s right. We’ve been warning for years that America’s defense strategy is moving too slowly to keep up with global threats
The Pentagon’s Outdated Approach to Modern Warfare
According to House Armed Services Committee Vice Chair Rob Wittman, the Pentagon operates like the Ford Motor Company in the 1950s—slow, bureaucratic, and resistant to change.
“The Pentagon is the Ford Motor Company of the 1950s. I mean, the way they operate—slow, stoic. ‘Let’s spend years to write a requirement, then let’s spend years to go to a program or record, let’s spend years to acquire.’ By the time we acquire something, guess what? The threat’s way ahead of us.” – Rep. Wittman
That’s the fundamental problem—our enemies aren’t waiting for us to figure things out. China is churning out warships at breakneck speed, modernizing its naval capabilities, and outpacing us in cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, the U.S. is stuck in a procurement cycle that takes decades.
Captain Lennon put it bluntly:
“America once built a navy that could fight and win a world war. Today, we struggle to maintain 295 deployable ships while our adversaries launch vessels at breakneck speed. This is not just a shipbuilding problem—it’s a national security crisis.”
Shipbuilding: A Slow-Motion Disaster
The U.S. Navy currently has 295 deployable ships. The plan calls for 390 by 2054, but at this rate, we won’t even keep up with ship retirements.
The Maritime Security Program, which maintains a fleet of privately owned, military-useful ships, is down to just 60 vessels. If a major conflict broke out in the Pacific tomorrow, we wouldn’t have the sealift capability to respond effectively.
And while China expands its navy at an alarming rate, the U.S. struggles with:
Delayed procurement cycles that take years just to approve new ships.
Budget cuts and shifting priorities that prevent consistent progress.
Shipyard bottlenecks due to a weakened industrial base.
Cyber Warfare: The Unseen Battlefield
Another major concern raised in the Fox News report is China’s superiority in cybersecurity. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA) stated:
“China specifically is better at cybersecurity than we are. It only takes one or two incursions that we don’t see coming or that we aren’t responsive to, to make an enormous difference here.”
Captain Lennon underscored this growing threat:
“China and Russia don’t just challenge us at sea—they challenge us in cyberspace, in supply chains, and in economic warfare. The Navy can’t just be stronger; it has to be smarter, faster, and ready for an entirely new battlespace.”
The Pentagon’s inability to keep pace in cybersecurity makes America vulnerable. China is hacking into critical infrastructure, stealing defense blueprints, and gaining access to classified information. The next war may not begin with missiles—it may start with an attack on our power grid, financial systems, or military networks.
A White House Office of Shipbuilding? What Comes Next?
The Fox News report also revealed that President Trump is taking a direct interest in shipbuilding. His nominee for Navy Secretary, John Phelan, stated that Trump regularly texts him late at night, asking about the state of the fleet.
Trump announced the creation of a White House Office of Shipbuilding, promising to revitalize ship production. While this sounds promising, the real test will be whether it cuts through the bureaucracy and actually delivers results.
Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) described how slow innovation is killing our ability to compete:
“We’re operating off of an innovation cycle right now that, you know, used to be a decade, and it used to be five years. Then it used to be three years, and now it’s a year or less innovation cycle. In Ukraine, they’re actually operating off of week-long innovation cycles.”
Where Do We Go From Here?
This isn’t just a military problem—it’s an economic and strategic problem that affects every American. If we fail to modernize, we risk losing control of key shipping lanes, economic stability, and military deterrence.
Captain Lennon and I both agree:
“Our nation faces an inflection point. Will we modernize our Navy to meet the challenges ahead, or will we let slow processes and outdated thinking leave us vulnerable? The choice is ours—but the clock is ticking.”
This is Why I’m Launching Our Educational Series
This conversation is exactly why I’m launching the China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges series.
This 23-episode educational initiative will break down how history, economics, and military strategy shape today’s global threats—and why America must rally behind its Navy.
We’ll dive deeper into shipbuilding, looking at past successes and today’s failures.
We’ll unpack cybersecurity threats, explaining why China and Russia view cyber warfare as a battlefield as real as the Pacific or the South China Sea.
We’ll break down public policy, exposing how red tape and slow procurement cripple our defense efforts.
This series isn’t just about the Navy—it’s about why the Navy matters to you.
We need Americans engaged in this conversation because without public support, we won’t get the changes we need.
Captain Lennon and I will continue speaking out, but we need more voices in this fight.
Join Us. Stay Informed. Take Action.
Follow along at StrongerNavy.org as we roll out this critical series. It’s time to wake up America—before it’s too late.
For years, America’s Navy has been a punching bag for criticism, often seen as slow to modernize or inefficient in spending. While scrutiny is necessary, it’s time to tell the other side of the story—the one about the thousands of dedicated Navy personnel and industry professionals working relentlessly to ensure the fleet remains strong, cost-effective, and mission-ready.
One of the best examples of this commitment is the Navy’s rapid deployment of Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (C-UAS) capabilities aboard USS Indianapolis (LCS 17). Instead of developing an entirely new system at great expense, the Navy and its partners took a smarter approach—upgrading the existing Surface-to-Surface Missile Module (SSMM) to counter drone threats in contested environments.
Real People, Real Impact
This isn’t just about technology—it’s about people.
Navy officers and sailors who are actively testing and deploying these systems in real-world operations.
Engineers and defense contractors working behind the scenes to ensure the technology is reliable, cost-effective, and adaptable.
Strategists and policymakers balancing modernization with budget efficiency, ensuring that America’s Navy is both powerful and financially responsible.
Capt. Matthew Lehmann, program manager for LCS Mission Modules, highlighted this teamwork: “By leveraging the adaptability of proven technologies in partnership with the Integrated Warfare Systems 80 program office, we were able to deliver on a critical need to the Fleet. This accomplishment showcases the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the Littoral Combat Ship Mission Module Program.”
Smart Spending in a Scrutinized Budget
At a time when leaders like former President Trump and business mogul Elon Musk are calling for greater accountability in defense spending, the Navy is proving that modernization doesn’t have to mean runaway costs.
The SSMM upgrade shows that the Navy is reusing and improving existing systems rather than building from scratch.
By integrating AI-driven detection, modular sensors, and open-architecture systems, upgrades remain adaptable and cost-efficient.
Industry partnerships with Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and General Atomics ensure that new technology is integrated without unnecessary government overhead.
Rear Adm. Kevin Smith summed it up best: “This rapid integration of C-UAS capabilities enhances our ability to project power and maintain freedom of maneuver in contested environments. We are not only addressing immediate threats but also strengthening the Navy’s overall strategy for operational agility, deterrence, and sustained dominance.”
Industry & Navy Partnership Driving Innovation
Modernizing the U.S. Navy isn’t just a military effort—it’s a collaborative mission between dedicated sailors and some of the most advanced technology companies in the country. Industry leaders like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and General Atomics are bringing cutting-edge AI, automation, and drone defense solutions to the fleet. These partnerships ensure that modernization is not just about spending money—it’s about getting the best value for every dollar spent while equipping our Navy with the tools needed to stay ahead of emerging threats.
Key industry players include:
Lockheed Martin – Developing scalable counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) with AI-driven detection, modular sensors, and command-and-control systems.
Northrop Grumman – Contracted to develop C-UAS solutions for the Navy.
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI) – Testing government-provided autonomy software aboard the MQ-20 Avenger, demonstrating potential advances in Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs).
uAvionix – Developed Casia G, enabling 24/7 Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) drone operations.
Volatus Aerospace & Draganfly – Enhancing geospatial and automation capabilities.
Pierce Aerospace – Working on Remote ID detection technology to identify unauthorized drones.
A Message from Americans for a Stronger Navy
“This isn’t just about hardware—it’s about the people who believe in a stronger, more cost-effective Navy. From the sailors aboard the USS Indianapolis to the engineers at Lockheed Martin, thousands of Americans are working every day to ensure the Navy remains a force to be reckoned with—without wasting taxpayer dollars.
We at Americans for a Stronger Navy believe this is the kind of smart, strategic modernization that deserves recognition. Our Navy isn’t just adapting to today’s threats—it’s building a foundation for a stronger, smarter future. This is what peace through strength looks like.”
Final Call to Action: Join the Conversation
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe in supporting the hardworking sailors, engineers, and industry partners who are ensuring the Navy remains strong, modern, and cost-effective. But we can’t do it alone.
✅ Engage with us—Share your thoughts on what a stronger, smarter Navy looks like. ✅ Spread the word—Help shift the narrative to recognize the real efforts behind modernization. ✅ Stay informed—Follow us for updates on how the Navy is adapting to new challenges.
A stark reality: China’s naval task force is actively testing Australia’s response—militarily, politically, and diplomatically. A Chinese fleet operating near Australia’s waters isn’t just a message to Canberra; it’s a signal to the world that Beijing is expanding its reach.
For Americans, this should be a wake-up call. Australia, a key U.S. ally, has long enjoyed security from major conflicts. Yet, China’s maneuvers off its coast expose vulnerabilities in a way that should concern every nation reliant on maritime security, global trade, and naval power.
If China can challenge Australia’s sovereignty at sea today, what stops it from doing the same to America and its allies tomorrow?
China’s Strategy: Testing and Expanding
The deployment of a Chinese naval task group so close to Australia is no accident. It follows a pattern:
Probing reactions. Just as it has done in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and Latin American ports, China is assessing how the world will respond to its growing military presence.
Disrupting global security norms. Conducting live-fire drills near civilian air routes, refusing to issue proper warnings, and testing defense response times all serve a greater goal—normalizing an expanded Chinese naval footprint.
Challenging the free world. This is about more than Australia. China is signaling that it has the capability—and the intent—to pressure democratic nations and reshape global power structures in its favor.
This matters to the United States because we rely on the same global shipping lanes, trade networks, and security partnerships that China is testing right now.
Lessons for the U.S. Navy and America
Jennifer Parker’s article points out an uncomfortable truth: Australia’s navy is struggling to meet growing demands. Its limited number of warships, outdated replenishment capabilities, and defense spending shortfalls are now under the spotlight.
But let’s not pretend this problem is unique to Australia.
The U.S. Navy is stretched thin. With growing commitments in the Indo-Pacific, Middle East, and beyond, America is already balancing a smaller fleet against greater global threats.
Shipbuilding capacity is a bottleneck. While China launches warships at record speed, the U.S. struggles to maintain its current fleet.
Defense funding debates mirror Australia’s. At just 2% of GDP, U.S. defense spending is below Cold War levels, and ship procurement continues to face budgetary and political hurdles.
Australia’s vulnerabilities should be a case study for the United States. If a key U.S. ally is struggling to keep pace with China’s naval expansion, America cannot afford to take its own naval dominance for granted.
What Needs to Happen Next?
The right response is not panic—it’s preparation. America must learn from Australia’s situation and take the following steps:
Increase Naval Readiness
The U.S. must expand and modernize its fleet, ensuring it has the ships, submarines, and logistical support needed to deter threats.
Fleet maintenance and shipyard infrastructure must be prioritized so that existing assets remain operational.
Strengthen Strategic Alliances
The U.S.-Australia partnership is critical—joint naval exercises, intelligence sharing, and strategic basing agreements must be expanded.
Coordination with Japan, the Philippines, India, and other Indo-Pacific allies must also be reinforced.
Engage the American Public
Most Americans aren’t aware of how dependent the U.S. economy and security are on naval power.
China isn’t just flexing its military strength—it’s waging a long-term strategic contest to control global trade, technology, and resources.
If we don’t educate and rally support for a stronger Navy now, we risk falling behind when it matters most.
Final Thought: A Call to Action
Australia is waking up to the reality that it must invest in naval power to protect its interests. America should take this moment to do the same.
We don’t need alarmism. We need action.
The choice is simple: Invest in a stronger Navy today, or risk facing a crisis tomorrow.
The Royal Navy’s execution of Admiral Byng in 1757 reminds us: indecision in war is deadly.
Introduction: The Reality We Face Today
The U.S. Navy is undergoing major leadership changes. Reports indicate that the incoming administration’s new Secretary of Defense, Pete Hedgeseth, is making sweeping moves by dismissing top admirals. Whether this signals a strategic reset or a political maneuver, one thing is clear: leadership in the military is under a microscope.
Bill Cullifer, Founder
In the private sector, where I have spent much of my career, leadership changes are routine—CEOs get fired, boards demand accountability, and shareholders expect results. But in the military, leadership turnover carries far greater consequences—it affects national security, operational readiness, and the morale of those who serve. In a time of rising threats from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, America cannot afford indecision or mismanagement at the highest levels of command.
To understand the stakes, we need to examine a historical case of military accountability—one that was as brutal as it was instructive. The execution of Royal Navy Admiral John Byng in 1757 sent a chilling message: failure to act decisively in war could cost you everything. The question for us today is: Are we ensuring accountability, or are we risking unnecessary instability in our naval leadership?
A Harsh Lesson from History: The Execution of Admiral Byng
In 1757, Admiral John Byng faced one of the most severe forms of accountability in British naval history. Tasked with defending British interests during the Seven Years’ War, Byng was sent to relieve a besieged British garrison at Minorca. But he was set up for failure—his fleet was under-resourced, and his enemy was well-prepared.
Byng engaged the French in battle, but when his fleet suffered heavy damage, he chose to withdraw rather than risk total destruction. His decision, while arguably pragmatic, was viewed as a failure to act decisively in war.
The British government, eager to shift blame away from its own missteps, made an example of Byng. He was court-martialed, found guilty under the strict new Articles of War, and sentenced to death by firing squad. His execution was meant to send a message: indecision in battle would not be tolerated.
Voltaire, an 18th-century French writer, philosopher, and satirist, famously wrote, “In this country, it is wise to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.” Byng’s fate, while tragic, reinforced a culture of accountability and decisive action in the Royal Navy that lasted for decades.
Why This Matters Today: The Cost of Indecision
Today, the world is entering a new era of great power competition. The challenges we face are different from those of Admiral Byng’s time, but the stakes are even higher:
China is rapidly expanding its navy, militarizing the South China Sea, and challenging U.S. dominance in the Pacific.
Russia is testing Western resolve, using hybrid warfare and maritime brinkmanship to threaten U.S. and allied interests.
Iran continues to harass U.S. forces in the Middle East, while North Korea remains an unpredictable nuclear threat.
In this environment, the U.S. Navy must embody decisive leadership at every level—on the bridge, in the boardroom, and in Washington. Hesitation, bureaucratic missteps, or weak decision-making will embolden our adversaries and put American lives at risk.
Implications for Americans
National Security: A Navy that acts with precision and decisiveness ensures the safety of our nation, our allies, and global trade routes.
Confidence in Leadership: When naval leaders are empowered to act boldly, it strengthens trust between the military and the American public.
Economic Stability: A strong Navy deters conflict, reducing the likelihood of costly, prolonged engagements that drain our national resources.
Implications for the U.S. Navy
Operational Readiness: Future conflicts will be won by those who can think and act quickly. Our Navy must train, equip, and empower its officers to make bold, effective decisions in real time.
Balanced Accountability: Leadership should be held accountable, but not used as political scapegoats or subject to constant upheaval that weakens continuity and strategy.
Better Strategic Execution: We need faster decision-making at the highest levels to ensure that shipbuilding, force readiness, and modernization efforts align with the evolving threats we face.
Message to Our Adversaries: Peace Through Strength—But Make No Mistake
Let there be no misunderstanding: Americans for a Stronger Navy is committed to peace through strength.
We believe in deterrence, in maintaining stability through overwhelming force, and in ensuring that war remains the last resort, not the first option. But make no mistake—if conflict comes, we do not hesitate.
To China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, we send this message:
* We do not hesitate. Our forces are trained to act with aggression and clarity when the situation demands it.
* We hold our leaders accountable—but we stand behind them when they make tough calls. Our commanders must have the authority to act decisively, without fear of political scapegoating or bureaucratic hand-wringing.
* We are prepared. We recognize that war is a dirty business, and we are willing to fight and win on our terms. We do not seek conflict, but we will never back down from defending our nation, our allies, and our interests.
Strength is what ensures peace. Weakness invites aggression. The U.S. Navy has been, and will remain, the ultimate deterrent to those who wish to challenge American resolve.
Final Thought: The Future of American Naval Power
The U.S. Navy is at a crossroads. We face real threats, and we cannot afford indecisiveness or internal instability.
History teaches us that leaders must be both decisive and supported. Americans for a Stronger Navy will continue advocating for policies that keep our fleet at peak readiness, hold leaders accountable without undermining stability, and ensure that we project strength at sea and beyond.
The time for hand-wringing is over. The time for banging on the table and demanding decisive action is now.
We either lead the seas—or someone else will.
Join us in this fight. Share this message, support a stronger Navy, and ensure that America’s maritime power remains second to none.
Editor’s Note: The status quo isn’t cutting it, and the Navy can’t afford to operate on autopilot. From both an Americans for a Stronger Navy perspective and my personal stance, I want leaders who demand action—admirals who bang on tables, challenge complacency, and push for real solutions. Right now, the Navy is stretched thin, threats are mounting, and bureaucracy is slowing us down. We don’t have the luxury of time. We need decisive leadership, real investment, and a serious commitment to strengthening the fleet—not just rhetoric or incremental tweaks. America’s naval power isn’t guaranteed unless we fight for it. That means confronting tough truths, challenging leadership where necessary, and making it impossible for decision-makers to ignore the urgency of the situation. No more waiting, no more excuses—we need action.
The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America has sparked discussions, but names aside, this region has long been one of the most strategic waterways in the world. The U.S. Navy has played a critical role in securing these waters, ensuring trade routes remain open, energy supplies are protected, and national security is upheld.
Renaming bodies of water is nothing new. According to the Associated Press (AP), in 2015, President Barack Obama renamed Mount McKinley to Denali, recognizing its indigenous heritage. In 2013, Hillary Clinton remarked that if China could claim nearly the entire South China Sea, the U.S. could have labeled the Pacific Ocean the ‘American Sea’ after World War II. Even earlier, Mississippi legislators proposed renaming their portion of the Gulf as the “Gulf of America” in 2012, though it was largely symbolic.
While names may change, the Gulf’s importance remains the same—it is a lifeline for trade, military operations, and energy security. This article focuses on the facts—why the Gulf matters to America’s security, economy, and the strength of the U.S. Navy.
The Gulf’s Strategic History and Naval Legacy
The Gulf has been a key maritime battlefield in U.S. history, from the War of 1812 to World War II. The U.S. Navy has played a central role in defending American interests and maintaining stability in these waters.
The Battle of Mobile Bay (1864) – A defining moment in the Civil War.
The Gulf Blockade in WWII – Preventing German U-boats from disrupting supply chains.
The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) – A tense naval standoff that highlighted the Gulf’s strategic importance.
Today, the Navy remains the dominant force in the Gulf, ensuring stability and security in the region.
The U.S. Navy’s Role in the Gulf of America
The Navy conducts daily operations to protect trade, energy, and national security. Key missions include:
Patrolling shipping lanes to ensure free trade.
Securing oil and gas infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks.
Countering drug smuggling and trafficking networks.
Responding to hurricanes and natural disasters.
Key U.S. Naval Bases in the Gulf
Naval Air Station Pensacola (FL) – Aviation training.
Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (TX) – Aircraft support.
Naval Station Mayport (FL) – Destroyer and amphibious fleet.
Naval Air Station Key West (FL) – Counter-drug operations.
As threats increase globally, is the U.S. Navy stretched too thin to secure the Gulf effectively?
Is the U.S. Navy Strong Enough to Secure the Gulf?
With rising global tensions, cyber vulnerabilities, and shipbuilding challenges, the Navy’s presence in the Gulf faces new pressures.
The Navy is spread across the Pacific, Arctic, and Middle East, requiring more ships and personnel.
Shipbuilding delays mean the U.S. Navy is shrinking rather than growing.
Older ships are being retired faster than new ones are being built, creating fleet gaps.
Cybersecurity Threats in the Gulf
The biggest future threats may not come from warships—but from cyberattacks.
Hackers have already targeted U.S. energy infrastructure, shutting down pipelines and refineries.
China, Russia, and Iran have cyber units capable of disrupting U.S. ports and energy grids.
The Gulf’s 4,000+ offshore oil platforms and refineries are vulnerable to hacking.
A successful cyberattack on a major port like Houston or New Orleans could cripple U.S. exports, disrupt global trade, and weaken naval operations.
U.S. Response: Strengthening Cyber Defense
The Navy and U.S. Cyber Command are expanding maritime cybersecurity operations.
AI-driven threat detection is being tested for oil rigs and naval vessels.
Private industries are working with the military to protect infrastructure.
Military-Commercial Overlap: The Jones Act & Shipbuilding
The Jones Act (1920) requires that only U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed ships can transport goods between U.S. ports. This protects American shipbuilders and maritime workers, but there’s a problem:
American shipbuilding is lagging behind China, South Korea, and Japan.
The U.S. fleet of commercial ships has shrunk, making supply chains vulnerable in wartime.
A weaker shipbuilding industry means a weaker Navy. If war broke out, the U.S. would rely on foreign-built commercial ships for logistics.
Revitalizing U.S. shipbuilding would strengthen both military and commercial fleets, ensuring the U.S. remains competitive and secure.
Economic & Strategic Impact of the Gulf of America
The Gulf isn’t just a naval stronghold—it’s an economic powerhouse.
15% of U.S. crude oil production comes from the Gulf.
Over 50% of all U.S. maritime commerce moves through the Gulf.
40% of U.S. seafood (shrimp, oysters) is sourced from the Gulf.
Economic Vulnerabilities
A hurricane, cyberattack, or naval conflict could cripple energy exports and supply chains.
A strong U.S. Navy presence ensures stability, preventing disruptions that could impact millions of Americans.
The Gulf of America Needs a Strong Navy
The renaming of the Gulf is symbolic, but the real issue is whether the U.S. has the naval power to secure it.
The Navy must remain strong in the Gulf to protect trade, energy, and security.
Cyber defense is as important as naval defense.
Revitalizing U.S. shipbuilding would strengthen both the Navy and the economy.
A Call to Action
Supporting a Stronger Navy means:
✔ More investment in fleet modernization. ✔ Better cybersecurity for ports and oil infrastructure. ✔ Reviving American shipbuilding to ensure a strong commercial-military fleet.
The conclusion is clear: our nation’s strength at sea relies on a transformative, integrated approach. In short, WhenAmerica Ships, America Wins.
Why This Matters
For too long, the U.S. Navy has operated under a narrow warfighting mandate—a legacy of policies from the 1950s that prioritized combat readiness above all else. Yet history teaches us that true American sea power has always depended on two interlinked capabilities: a modern, formidable fleet and an engaged maritime domain that underpins commerce, diplomacy, and humanitarian efforts.
As Rep. Garamendi recently stated, “Today, less than 200 oceangoing ships fly the American flag; the SHIPS for America Act will empower our shipyards and marine merchants to uphold our country’s status as a leader in the maritime industry.”
Meanwhile, Senator Mark Kelly emphasized, “Strengthening America’s shipbuilding capacity and revitalizing our commercial maritime industry is critical to both our national security and economic resilience.”
These words capture the urgent need to reinvest in our naval statecraft while simultaneously enhancing our broader maritime strength.
Our Journey to Clarity Throughout my review, several key insights emerged:
Dissecting the Sources:Captain Sadler’s articlecalls for a revolution in U.S. naval shipbuilding. He writes, “For too long, needed investment in and action to bolster our nation’s maritime industrial base have been elusive. That luxury is no longer feasible given the threat from a revanchist and massively invested Chinese military.” His words, combined with insights from War on the Rocks and historical reflections, remind us that our Navy must once again balance combat readiness with essential peacetime missions.
Clarifying Terminology: We now clearly distinguish between “naval statecraft”—focused on rebuilding our fleet and shipbuilding capacity—and “maritime statecraft,” which encompasses the broader economic, diplomatic, and logistical roles at sea. Recognizing that these two concepts are mutually reinforcing helps create a coherent strategic message.
Refining Our Message: After extensive review and discussion, our distilled, bold message is: WhenAmerica Ships, America Wins. Coupled with the rallying cry, Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it, this encapsulates the urgent need to invest in our naval statecraft to secure our maritime future.
Key Takeaways and Implications
Integrated Mission for a Modern Era: A strong Navy is not just about preparing for war—it is the foundation of national security, economic prosperity, and global maritime influence. When America builds its ships, it reinforces its entire maritime domain.
Economic and Security Benefits: Investment in our shipbuilding industry creates high-quality jobs, revitalizes our manufacturing base, and ensures our fleet is capable of sustaining military operations and global trade. Without sufficient modern vessels, our ability to maintain critical supply chains is at risk.
Historical Lessons for Today: The interwar period showed that the U.S. Navy once balanced readiness for war with vital peacetime missions like humanitarian aid and diplomatic engagement. Recalling these lessons provides a blueprint for integrating naval and maritime statecraft in today’s complex environment.
In my efforts to understand the challenges facing the U.S. Navy and our maritime infrastructure, I have spent a fair amount of time reviewing the Jones Act and the range of views surrounding it. While there are differing opinions on how best to strengthen our domestic shipping industry, one thing is clear—America needs more ships, a stronger supporting infrastructure, and a Navy that is fully equipped to protect our national security. Regardless of where one stands on the specifics of maritime policy, we can all agree that a Stronger Navy is critical to American security and economic resilience. My focus remains on ensuring that we have the industrial capacity, shipbuilding capabilities, and logistics networks necessary to maintain U.S. maritime strength in an increasingly contested world.
Why Americans Should Care
For over two centuries, American maritime strength has been a cornerstone of our global leadership. Yet today, our domestic shipbuilding industry has shrunk from over 300 shipyards in the 1980s to just 20, and our U.S.-flagged commercial fleet has dwindled to fewer than 80 vessels. With China dominating global shipbuilding and maritime trade, the equation is simple: When America Ships, America Wins. Our shipyards are the engines powering our Navy, safeguarding our commerce, and securing our freedom.
Implications for the Navy and the Maritime Domain
For the Navy: Modernizing our fleet enhances operational readiness, supports a skilled and sustainable workforce, and allows the Navy to execute both war and peacetime missions. A modernized Navy is essential to deter adversaries and defend our national interests.
For the Maritime Domain: A thriving shipbuilding industry is vital for protecting American commerce, ensuring free navigation, and fostering economic resilience. Strengthening our maritime statecraft reinforces strategic partnerships and maintains our global influence.
The Legislative Response: SHIPS for America Act
Bipartisan efforts led by figures such as Senator Mark Kelly, Congressman Mike Waltz, Rep. Trent Kelly, and Rep. John Garamendi have culminated in the introduction of the Shipbuilding and Harbor Infrastructure for Prosperity and Security (SHIPS) for America Act. This comprehensive legislation proposes to:
Revive U.S. Shipbuilding: Offer tax incentives and targeted investments to rebuild our shipyards and attract private-sector growth.
Expand the U.S.-Flagged Merchant Fleet: Implement cargo preference laws to ensure more goods travel on American ships.
Strengthen National Security: Increase the supply of ships available for military logistics and rapid response.
Develop a New Maritime Workforce: Establish apprenticeships, trade school incentives, and recruiting programs to restore critical skills in ship maintenance and marine operations.
Forge Strategic Partnerships with Allies: Collaborate with trusted nations like Japan, South Korea, Finland, and Canada to enhance our shipbuilding capacity while ensuring American oversight.
This legislation is not about partisan politics—it’s about survival. With global supply chains vulnerable to disruption, the urgency to rebuild our maritime strength has never been greater.
Conclusion & Call to Action
History teaches us that nations fall when they lose control of the seas. Today, as our adversaries grow stronger and our industrial base shrinks, we cannot afford to dawdle. It’s not war we desire, but peace achieved through strength—and our enemies must know that America will not stand idly by.
Join us in this crucial mission. We call on policymakers, industry leaders, and every American who values freedom and prosperity to support transformative initiatives that invest in our naval statecraft. By strengthening our shipbuilding industry and modernizing our Navy, we secure a robust maritime future that benefits us all.
When American Ships, America Wins. Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it.
Visit StrongerNavy.org to learn more, get involved, and help ensure that our nation’s shipbuilding efforts pave the way for a secure and prosperous future.
