Tag: Opinion Piece

Posted on

Open Letter to Dov S. Zakheim: Addressing the U.S. Navy’s Submarine Shortage

USS Idaho (SSN-799)

From the desk of Bill Cullifer, Founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy

Dear Mr. Zakheim,

I recently read your opinion piece in The Hill on October 18, 2024, titled “How the Navy Can Solve Its Submarine Shortage,” with great interest. Dov S. Zakheim, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and vice chairman of the board for the Foreign Policy Research Institute, brings unparalleled expertise to this discussion. As a former undersecretary of Defense (comptroller) and chief financial officer for the Department of Defense from 2001 to 2004, as well as deputy undersecretary of Defense from 1985 to 1987, your insights on defense spending, strategic planning, and military capabilities are invaluable in understanding the complexities of the U.S. Navy’s submarine deficit. 

The challenges the Navy faces in maintaining and expanding its submarine force are central to the security and operational effectiveness of the United States and its allies. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we have long advocated for solutions to bolster our naval capabilities in light of growing global threats.

Your analysis of the potential for non-nuclear alternatives, including unmanned submarines and diesel-electric options, highlights viable paths for supplementing our fleet. However, after discussing these ideas with Captain Brent Sadler, U.S. Navy (Retired), Senior Fellow for Naval Warfare and Advanced Technology at The Heritage Foundation, a 26-year Navy veteran with extensive operational experience on nuclear-powered submarines and author of U.S. Naval Power in the 21st Century: A New Strategy for Facing the Chinese and Russian Threat, we are convinced that while these alternatives may fill certain gaps, they fall short of meeting the United States’ broader strategic needs. As Captain Sadler pointed out, “only nuclear-powered submarines possess the range, endurance, and strategic capabilities necessary to project power and safeguard the distant maritime choke points critical to both American and Australian interests.” This reality remains just as pertinent today as it was when Australia evaluated its own submarine needs decades ago.

The U.S. Navy’s dependence on nuclear-powered submarines stems not just from their superior endurance but from their ability to maintain forward presence in vital regions like the Indo-Pacific, where distances and operational demands far exceed the capabilities of diesel-electric subs. While unmanned systems like the Manta Ray and smaller ISR variants may enhance the fleet’s flexibility, they cannot replace the strategic depth provided by manned, nuclear-powered vessels.

Moreover, the capital infusion from Australia under the AUKUS agreement is a critical step toward increasing the production rates of Virginia-class submarines. Yet, as you astutely noted, even with this funding, workforce and industrial base shortages present formidable hurdles. The U.S. Navy must prioritize workforce development and shipyard modernization to accelerate production timelines and meet both our own force requirements and our commitments to allies like Australia.

At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe in advocating for a multifaceted approach—one that includes continued investments in nuclear-powered submarines, increased collaboration with our allies, and targeted support for the U.S. industrial base to reduce delays in production. This will allow us to respond effectively to the twin challenges posed by China and Russia, while also maintaining readiness in other volatile regions like the Middle East.

In conclusion, while unmanned and non-nuclear options can and should play a role in the future of undersea warfare, nuclear submarines remain the backbone of our strategy. We must remain steadfast in building and maintaining a fleet capable of meeting the global challenges of the 21st century.

Thank you again for your insightful analysis, and I look forward to further discussions on this critical topic.

Sincerely,
Bill Cullifer
Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

Note: I am not a paid spokesperson for any organization. My statements reflect my personal commitment to strengthening the U.S. Navy and advocating on behalf of those who serve.

Posted on

Reinforcing America’s Pacific Defense through Strategic Partnerships

The First Island Chain, extending from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines and Borneo.
NOTE TO READER: The blue line should go between Taiwan and China because Taiwan is an integral component of the First Island Chain.

Introduction

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In an era where global dynamics are rapidly evolving, the strategic importance of the Pacific region in maintaining America’s defense capabilities cannot be overstressed. A key element, often overlooked even by the well-informed, is the mid-Pacific chain of islands. These islands are not just dots on the map but pivotal assets in the geopolitical chessboard, ensuring America’s military and strategic superiority in the Asia-Pacific.

Strategic Significance of the Compacts of Free Association

The First Island Chain’s Defense Backbone

The First Island Chain, extending from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines and Borneo, forms a natural barrier crucial for regional stability and security. However, its defense is untenable without a secure base of operations in the central Pacific, provided by the Compacts of Free Association (COFA) states: Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Marshall Islands.

Guardians of the Central Pacific

These nations, through COFA agreements with the U.S., offer more than just strategic locations; they ensure American military mobility and operational freedom across a vast east-west corridor. This not only deters potential adversaries but also fortifies America’s defense posture across the Pacific.

Financial and Diplomatic Dimensions

A Cost-Effective Investment

At a glance, the financial commitment to the COFA states—$2.3 billion over 20 years—may seem substantial. However, when contextualized within the broader U.S. defense budget and the strategic value it brings, this investment is not only prudent but also cost-effective. The COFA agreements represent a fraction of America’s defense expenditure but play a critical role in maintaining peace and stability in the region.

Reciprocal Benefits

Beyond financial aid, the COFA agreements encompass deeper ties, including the right for COFA citizens to work in the U.S., many of whom serve in the U.S. military at commendable rates. This reciprocal relationship strengthens cultural and economic bonds, enhancing the strategic partnership beyond mere financial transactions.

Why This Matters

In the current geopolitical climate, where the balance of power in the Pacific is increasingly contested, the role of the COFA states becomes even more critical. The strategic locations of these island nations offer unparalleled advantages for surveillance, rapid deployment, and logistical support, essential for deterring aggression and ensuring regional security. The renewal of the COFA agreements is not just a matter of policy but a cornerstone of America’s Pacific defense strategy.

Conclusion

“The strategic landscape of the Pacific is intricately defined by the mid-Pacific islands, which are essential for our defense strategy. Dale A Jenkins, a Senior Advisor to Americans for a Stronger Navy and the author of ‘Diplomats and Admirals,’ poignantly underscores the critical significance of these islands within our defense framework—a fact that often eludes even the well-informed.”

As we navigate the complexities of contemporary geopolitics, the renewal of our agreements with these islands transcends mere policy—it’s an essential investment in the bedrock of America’s security and its leadership stance in the Pacific.

For entities like the Americans for a Stronger Navy and all advocates for regional peace and stability, championing these agreements is not just strategic but an imperative.

These partnerships stand as a testament to our enduring commitment to our Pacific allies, underpinning the collective security that safeguards our nation’s interests and upholds the values we share with our friends across the vast expanse of the Pacific.

Posted on

Don’t Give Up the Ship”: A Legacy of Naval Resilience

Introduction

Bill Culifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I stand before you at the helm of our collective endeavor, navigating through the tempestuous seas of our times. In the spirit of the storied tradition of the U.S. Navy, I am reminded of the age-old battle cry, “Don’t Give Up the Ship.” This phrase, more than just a call to action, is a beacon of resilience that has guided our sailors through storms and skirmishes, embodying the unwavering spirit to persevere, no matter the odds.

We find ourselves in waters marked by significant challenges, yet it is crucial to remember that we have weathered fiercer storms. The annals of history are replete with tales of our forebearers who, with steadfast resolve and a firm grip on the wheel, steered through perils, undeterred by the howling winds of adversity.

Now, as we face the uncertainties of our era, it is time not just to batten down the hatches but to set our sails with purpose, to harness the gales of change, and to chart a course through these turbulent times with courage and determination. Our Navy, a testament to the enduring strength and valor of the human spirit, has for centuries stood as a bulwark against the tempests of history.

Let us draw inspiration from this legacy and rally together, for in unity there is strength. With the compass of our convictions and the anchor of our unity, we shall not only withstand the storms but emerge stronger, guided by the unwavering light of “Don’t Give Up the Ship.”

As we embark on this journey, I invite you to join me at the fore, where together, we will face these challenges head-on, with the resolve and tenacity that have defined our Navy and our nation for generations. The time is now, to stand shoulder to shoulder, as we navigate the choppy waters of our present, buoyed by the lessons of our past and the hope for a brighter tomorrow.

The History Behind the Motto

The story of “Don’t Give Up the Ship” dates back to the War of 1812, when Captain James Lawrence, commanding the USS Chesapeake, uttered these final words amidst a fierce battle with the HMS Shannon. Though Lawrence’s life was cut short, his command lived on, immortalized by Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry at the Battle of Lake Erie. This historic event not only marked a turning point in the war but also solidified the motto as a symbol of American naval fortitude.

Symbolism and Legacy

The phrase transcends its historical origins, embodying the principles of courage, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment that define the U.S. Navy. It serves as a rallying cry, inspiring generations of sailors and officers to uphold the highest standards of duty and honor in the defense of our nation.

Why This Matters Now

In an era of evolving threats and global challenges, the legacy of “Don’t Give Up the Ship” is more relevant than ever. It reminds us of the importance of maintaining a formidable, agile, and technologically advanced Navy to safeguard our freedoms and ensure peace and stability in international waters.

What Americans Need to Know

  • National Security: A strong Navy is vital for deterring aggression and protecting American interests both at home and abroad.
  • Economic Impact: The Navy ensures the safety of critical maritime routes, essential for the global economy and the United States’ economic prosperity.
  • Innovation and Technology: Naval research and development have led to significant technological advances, benefiting military and civilian sectors alike.
  • Global Presence: The U.S. Navy’s global reach supports humanitarian missions, aids in disaster relief, and reinforces America’s commitment to international alliances and partnerships.

Why We Advocate

Our advocacy for a robust Navy is driven by more than just historical reverence; it’s motivated by a clear understanding of the strategic and practical implications of naval power. In championing the principles symbolized by “Don’t Give Up the Ship,” we not only honor our naval heritage but also commit to a future where freedom, democracy, and peace can thrive, supported by the strength and vigilance of the United States Navy.

Together, let us pledge our support for this noble cause, understanding that a strong Navy is not just our shield but also our beacon of hope, guiding us toward a safer, more secure world.

Please sign up for our blog post and newsletter and show your support.