Blog

Posted on

Navigating the Waters: The U.S. Navy’s Divest-to-Invest Strategy and Its Implications

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

As we continue charting the course of the U.S. Navy’s future, we set sail into a sea of critical decisions. Well, today we focus on – the contentious debated divest-to-invest strategy. The Navy proposes to decommission certain vessels to free up resources for advanced capabilities, but Congress has its own course to chart. Let’s navigate these turbulent waters and explore the implications for the Navy, potential challenges, and the long-term impact on U.S. naval power.

What You Need to Know

At the heart of the debate is the Navy’s proposal to decommission 19 ships, including 10 before reaching their expected service lives. These ships may include cruisers, dock landing ships, and littoral combat ships (specific details are still being verified with Navy contacts). The Navy argues that divesting from older vessels will free up resources for investments in newer technologies and capabilities, better positioning the Navy to address evolving global threats. This divest-to-invest strategy, however, has faced opposition from some members of Congress.

Several lawmakers have voiced concerns about specific aspects of the plan. For instance, Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT) expressed worries about reducing the number of Virginia-class attack submarines, emphasizing the need for a larger submarine fleet in the face of a growing Chinese navy. Sen. Angus King (I-ME) highlighted the importance of icebreakers for operating in the Arctic Ocean.

Lawmakers have also been critical of the proposed decommissioning of cruisers and other vessels, citing their combat capabilities and missile power. These concerns have sparked debates between Navy officials and Congress, highlighting the complexities of balancing fiscal constraints with the need for a modern and effective fleet.

We are reaching out to Navy contacts to verify the complete list of proposed decommissionings and will update this post with any further information.

Why This Matters

The divest-to-invest strategy is not merely a budgetary concern; it’s a reflection of the Navy’s vision for future warfare readiness. The Navy argues that investing in newer, more capable vessels is essential to address evolving global threats, particularly a rising China, effectively. While the Navy’s proposal is part of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget plan, Congress has yet to decide on its implementation.

Implications for the Navy

For the Navy, the proposed decommissioning represents a shift towards a leaner, more technologically advanced fleet. It’s a move that could enhance the Navy’s combat power and operational agility but also requires careful consideration of the costs associated with maintaining older ships versus investing in new ones. Additionally, recent reports indicate delays in the construction of new ships, which could further complicate the implementation of the divest-to-invest strategy.

Implications for Congress

Congress faces the challenge of balancing the strategic needs of a larger fleet with the economic impact of decommissioning on shipyards and communities. Lawmakers must weigh the Navy’s arguments against the potential loss of jobs and the broader economic repercussions.

Challenges in Implementing the Divest-to-Invest Strategy

While the divest-to-invest strategy offers a potential path towards a modernized fleet, challenges remain in its implementation. A recent article from Breaking Defense highlights concerns from Congress about the divestment of ships exceeding the number of new ships being built. This raises questions about the Navy’s ability to maintain a sufficiently sized fleet in the short term.

The article also mentions the Navy’s request for only one Virginia-class submarine in FY25, despite previously planned purchases of two. This points to broader challenges in shipbuilding, potentially impacting the Navy’s ability to deliver on its long-term goals.

Conclusion

The debate over the Navy’s divest-to-invest strategy is more than a fiscal discussion; it’s a strategic deliberation that will shape the future of U.S. naval power. As the Navy and Congress navigate these turbulent waters, the decisions made today will have long-lasting implications for national security, economic stability, and the Navy’s ability to fulfill its mission in an ever-changing global landscape.

Call to Action

We encourage our readers to stay informed about this important issue. Follow along for updates on the budget proposal and Congressional hearings as continue . We also invite you to share your thoughts and questions about the divest-to-invest strategy by joining the discussion on our social channels by clicking here for Facebook.

Posted on

Empowering the Future of America’s Navy through Science and Technology

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

In an era where technological innovation underpins maritime dominance, the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps are charting a course towards a future where scientific prowess and technological superiority define their operational capabilities. The unveiling of the 2024 Naval Science and Technology Strategy by the Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy, presents a visionary framework aimed at propelling the naval forces into a new era of technological advancements and strategic superiority.

As someone who served in the Navy during the 70s, this announcement resonates with me on a deeply personal level. I recall the thrill of working with Loran-C, a navigation system that, despite its limitations compared to today’s satellite technologies, was pretty cool for the time. It was a fascinating piece of technology that could triangulate radio signals from towers across the globe to provide a general location. Although it wasn’t perect, it was an aid in navigation and a marvel for a young man fascinated by gadgets. This early exposure to naval technology not only sparked my lifelong interest in innovation but also paved the way for my subsequent career in communications and technology.

Key Takeaways

The strategy emphasizes an accelerated path towards technological innovations, focusing on leveraging cutting-edge fields such as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and Biotechnology. It underscores the importance of maintaining maritime technological dominance, fostering a culture of S&T excellence, and enhancing naval scientific diplomacy.

Why This Matters

The ever-evolving global security dynamics demand a Navy and Marine Corps equipped for both traditional and modern conflicts. This strategy is pivotal in ensuring that the United States retains its edge in maritime competition by making technological advancement a core pillar of its maritime strategy.

Implications for the Navy

Adopting this strategy signifies a transformative shift towards a more integrated and innovative approach to technology within the Navy. It calls for enhanced collaboration with the scientific and engineering communities, industry, and academia to create an ecosystem where technological breakthroughs rapidly transition into operational capabilities.

Why America Should Care

America’s prosperity and security are deeply intertwined with its maritime supremacy. This strategy extends beyond equipping the Navy and Marine Corps with advanced technologies; it’s about securing America’s ability to maintain its global leadership and strategic advantages.

Conclusions

The 2024 Naval Science and Technology Strategy sets forth a bold vision for a future where the fusion of science, technology, and naval warfare forms an unbeatable force. It’s a call to action for all stakeholders to contribute towards a future where technological superiority is a reality that secures national interests and maintains America’s global standing.

Reflecting on my own naval experience, it’s clear that the most powerful and successful navies have always been those at the forefront of technological innovation. This strategy not only honors that tradition but also points towards an exciting future of endless possibilities. For young individuals considering a career in the Navy, this is a testament to the myriad opportunities that lie in military service – opportunities that not only serve the nation but also lay the groundwork for a fulfilling career. My time with the Loran-C system was just the beginning of a journey enriched by technological exploration, and I firmly believe this strategy will inspire many more to embark on similar paths.

 

 

Posted on

Marching Through Memory: Honoring the Legacy of the Bataan Death March

Introduction

As we momentarily set aside our analysis on the U.S. Navy’s fiscal year 2025 budget, it’s crucial to turn our attention to a matter of profound respect and remembrance. The recent participation of hundreds in retracing the harrowing steps of the Bataan Death March is not just important news; it’s a heartfelt tribute that honors both the fallen and the living who carry forward the legacy of bravery and sacrifice. This act of commemorati serves as a powerful reminder of the resilience and spirit of those who served, connecting past valor with present-day reverence. 

In a poignant act of remembrance and homage, hundreds of volunteers have come together to retrace the harrowing steps of the Bataan Death March, a grim episode from World War II where thousands of Filipino and American soldiers, including numerous U.S. Navy sailors, suffered severe hardships. This commemorative march not only honors the past but also serves as a profound reflection on service and sacrifice.

Why This Matters

The Bataan Death March stands as a somber symbol of the extreme adversities faced by soldiers during wartime. The participation of hundreds in this reenactment underscores a collective commitment to remembering and honoring the sacrifices made by those who have served in the military, ensuring their stories continue to resonate in our collective memory.

Key Takeaways

  1. The original Bataan Death March was a forced march of 76,000 prisoners of war (66,000 Filipinos and 10,000 Americans) by the Japanese military in April 1942, resulting in significant loss of life.
  2. Modern participants, including civilians and service members, voluntarily undertake a 26.2-mile trek through White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, to honor the victims of the original march.
  3. The event has grown over the years, symbolizing a broader tribute to all veterans and serving as a tangible connection to the past.
  4. The Bataan Memorial Death March serves as a poignant act of physical remembrance, connecting participants with the harrowing experiences of the soldiers and sailors in 1942.
  5. The story of the USS Bataan (LHD 5) and its dedication of the flight deck to “Bull” Benini, a survivor of the Death March, underscores the enduring legacy of the march and its impact on military and naval heritage.
  6. The annual event and the USS Bataan’s tribute highlight the importance of service before self, a principle deeply rooted in the hearts of those who serve and remember.
  • Backdrop of Bravery

The Bataan Death March originated during the early stages of World War II, following the fall of the Bataan Peninsula in the Philippines to Japanese forces. Among the defenders were thousands of ill-prepared American troops, including U.S. Navy sailors, and Filipino soldiers, who faced not only the enemy but also disease, starvation, and eventual capture.

Enduring Legacy

Today, the Bataan Memorial Death March reenacts this pivotal moment in history, bringing together participants from various backgrounds to endure a grueling 26.2-mile journey through challenging terrain, mirroring the hardships faced by the original marchers. This event serves both as a physical and emotional tribute to the endurance, sacrifice, and spirit of those who suffered during the original march.

In a deeply resonant act of homage, the amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) held a ceremony that further bridged the gap between past and present. On May 20, the ship’s flight deck was dedicated to Alcide ‘Bull’ Benini, a World War II combat veteran and a resilient survivor of the Bataan Death March. This tribute, presided over by Bataan’s Commanding Officer Capt. John ‘J.C.’ Carter, not only honored Benini’s indomitable spirit but also symbolized the collective memory and ongoing respect for all who have faced such trials. Naming the 844-foot flight deck ‘Bull Benini Field’ stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of service and sacrifice, ensuring that the valor and perseverance of those like Benini are forever etched into the annals of naval history.

Personal Reflections

Participants carry the weight of history, both literally and figuratively, as they traverse the New Mexico desert. Many bear personal mementos or photographs, like Marine Corps Cpl. Christopher Sanders, who carries a photo of his late father, or Katherine Schneider, who honors her grandfather’s service in World War II. These personal tributes add a poignant layer to the march, bridging generations and individual stories of service and sacrifice.

Conclusion

The reenactment of the Bataan Death March is more than a physical challenge; it’s a profound act of remembrance that connects the present to a pivotal moment in the past. Through the sweat, tears, and determination of the participants, the spirit and sacrifice of those who endured the original march are honored and remembered, ensuring that their legacy continues to inspire future generations.

Posted on

At the Helm of Uncertainty: Charting a Course Through the Navy’s Budgetary and Operational Storms

Introduction

In the vast and often tumultuous sea that is national defense, the US Navy stands as a beacon of strength and resilience. Yet, even the mightiest fleets face storms that test their mettle and resolve. Recent revelations about significant delays in critical shipbuilding programs amidst the rising tide of strategic competition underscore the challenges at the helm of America’s naval future.

The Heart of the Matter

As the Navy’s largest trade show, the Sea-Air-Space Exposition, unfolded without the customary briefings on marquee shipbuilding programs, the waves of concern grew taller. A damning internal report unveiled sweeping delays across four pivotal shipbuilding endeavors, casting shadows over our naval preparedness against the backdrop of an expanding Chinese fleet.

The Delays Unpacked:

The cascading delays, stretching from one to three years across various programs, reveal a complex web of supply chain disruptions, exacerbated by the global pandemic, and a pattern of changing designs mid-construction. At the core of this storm is not just a battle against time and resources, but a struggle to adapt and realign with the relentless pace of technological and geopolitical shifts.

Implications for Strategic Readiness:

The ripples of these delays extend far beyond the shipyards. They touch upon the very essence of our strategic readiness and our ability to project power across the globe. As we navigate through these troubled waters, the need for a resilient and adaptable naval force has never been more pronounced.

Charting a Course Forward

In the face of these challenges, the path forward demands more than just steadfast resolve; it requires a comprehensive reevaluation of our shipbuilding and procurement strategies. This involves not only addressing the immediate hurdles of supply chain and workforce shortages but also fostering a more agile and responsive industrial base that can weather the storms of uncertainty.

A Call to Action

As we stand at this critical juncture, the call to action resonates louder than ever. It is a call for collaboration between the Navy, Congress, and industry partners to forge innovative solutions that ensure the timely delivery of our future fleet. It is a call for vigilance and adaptability in the face of evolving threats and opportunities.

Conclusion

The journey ahead is fraught with challenges, yet it is within the tempest that the true strength of our Navy and our nation is forged. As we chart a course through these budgetary and operational storms with foresight, innovation, and unwavering commitment, we face a critical examination of our shipbuilding practices and the evolving demands we place upon them. Bryan Clark, a seasoned voice from the Hudson Institute, articulates this sentiment, noting, ‘The Navy just keeps larding new requirements on the ships. And each new generation is so much more sophisticated than the predecessor that inevitably you’re going to get to the point where you’re just asking too much of the shipbuilding industry to punch out the ships on quick timeliness.’ This reflection serves as a poignant reminder of the delicate balance between ambition and feasibility, urging us to navigate these waters with a keen eye on both the horizon and the depths beneath..

In the ever-evolving narrative of our Navy’s strength and readiness, each challenge we encounter is an opportunity to reaffirm our resolve and adaptability. Let’s engage in this crucial conversation, not as mere observers, but as active participants in shaping the future of American naval power. Together, we can navigate through the noise and chart a course towards a stronger, more resilient Navy.

Posted on

Navigating the Waves: A Realistic Approach to Strengthening Our Navy

Bill Cullifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I’ve always believed in the power of informed dialogue and unbiased facts to guide our advocacy.

With each post, we peel back another layer of the complexities surrounding our Navy’s readiness and capabilities. Today, more than ever, we stand at a critical juncture where our collective understanding and action can significantly impact the future of American naval power.

I’m committed to this journey and invite you to join me in this crucial dialogue for our nation’s security and prosperity.

In our ongoing exploration of the U.S. Navy’s budgetary landscape, a recent development has surfaced that underscores the intricate balance between strategic imperatives and fiscal realities. The decision to request funding for only one Virginia-class submarine in the fiscal 2025 budget is a stark reminder of the challenges we face in maintaining a formidable and ready fleet.

Understanding the Budgetary Landscape

Reflecting on our previous discussions, we recognize the imperative of clear requirements and strategic foresight in navigating the Navy’s budget allocations. The geopolitical landscape is ever-evolving, and with it, the demands on our naval forces. This backdrop sets the stage for our analysis of the latest budgetary decision and its implications for the future of American naval power.

The Virginia-Class Submarine Decision: A Case Study

Russell Rumbaugh, the Navy’s senior civilian overseeing financial management, emphasizes that the budget cut was not a political maneuver but a decision grounded in operational realities. This move is not about playing budgetary games but about facing the hard truths of our current capabilities and industrial limitations.

The implications of such decisions ripple through our defense ecosystem, affecting suppliers, manufacturers, and the broader defense industrial base. It highlights the perennial challenge of planning and scaling in an environment of fiscal uncertainty—a theme we’ve touched upon and that resonates deeply within the defense community.

Evaluating Strengthening Plans in Light of New Developments

Our commitment to evaluating the Navy’s strengthening plans through a multi-faceted lens remains unwavering. The recent submarine budget decision brings to light the critical balance between innovation and fiscal discipline. How does this decision impact fleet capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with our strategic objectives? These are questions we must ponder and debate.

Moreover, this decision must be contextualized within the broader tapestry of naval modernization efforts, including the DDG(X) program and the advent of unmanned systems. Each initiative, each program carries its weight in shaping the contours of our future fleet.

Seeking Balanced Perspectives and Moving Forward

In keeping with our ethos, we strive for a balanced and comprehensive discourse, drawing from a wide spectrum of perspectives. The dialogue around the Navy’s force structure and shipbuilding cadence is complex, with varying viewpoints on the path forward. As we dissect these decisions and their broader implications, we remain anchored in our mission to foster an informed and engaged community.

Conclusion and Call to Action

The journey toward a stronger Navy is fraught with challenges, but it is a journey we must undertake with resolve and insight. The decisions we scrutinize today will shape the maritime landscape of tomorrow. Let us continue this conversation with openness and a commitment to understanding the depth of these strategic decisions.

I encourage you to share your thoughts, feedback, and insights on this topic. Engage with us on our social media platforms and become an active voice in this vital dialogue. Together, we can navigate through the complexities and champion a stronger, more resilient Navy for our future.

Posted on

Reinforcing the U.S. Navy Fleet: The MQ-4C Triton Arrives at NAS Sigonella, Italy

The first MQ-4C Triton arrived to Naval Air Station (NAS) Sigonella, March 30, 2024.

Introduction

Key Takeaways

The MQ-4C Triton enhances maritime intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and targeting (MISR-T) capabilities.
This deployment signifies the growth of unmanned aerial systems within naval operations.
The Triton’s advanced technology augments the capabilities of manned aircraft like the P-8 Poseidon.
The strategic positioning in Sigonella expands the U.S. Navy’s operational reach in critical regions.

Advanced Capabilities on the Horizon

The MQ-4C Triton, based on the U.S. Air Force’s RQ-4B Global Hawk, is tailored for maritime missions. Its deployment to NAS Sigonella, a key hub for U.S. and NATO forces, significantly enhances the Navy’s ISR capabilities in the Mediterranean and beyond.

The Triton’s advanced sensor technologies allow for broad-area maritime surveillance, crucial for monitoring sea lanes, tracking potential threats, and supporting fleet operations.

Expanding the Fleet’s Eyes and Ears

The integration of the MQ-4C Triton into the Navy’s fleet operations is a game-changer. With its long endurance and high-altitude capabilities, the Triton can cover vast oceanic areas, providing real-time intelligence and enhancing situational awareness. This deployment not only extends the reach of the Navy’s ISR capabilities but also ensures a persistent presence in strategic maritime areas.

A Synergistic Approach to Maritime Surveillance

The Triton complements the P-8 Poseidon’s capabilities, creating a more comprehensive maritime surveillance strategy. This synergy between manned and unmanned systems allows for a more efficient allocation of resources and a continuous flow of intelligence, enhancing the Navy’s ability to respond to emerging threats and maintain a strategic advantage in global waters.

Implications for the Navy

The deployment of the MQ-4C Triton to NAS Sigonella is more than just an addition of a new asset; it represents a shift towards a more integrated, technologically advanced naval force. The implications of this are far-reaching, affecting operational tactics, fleet management, and strategic planning. The enhanced ISR capabilities provided by the Triton enable the Navy to operate more effectively in contested environments, ensure maritime security, and support global peacekeeping efforts.

Looking Ahead

The arrival of the MQ-4C Triton at NAS Sigonella is a testament to the U.S. Navy’s commitment to maintaining maritime superiority through innovation and technological advancement.

As the fleet continues to integrate more advanced unmanned systems, the strategic implications for global maritime operations are profound.

The MQ-4C Triton’s deployment is not just a step forward for the U.S. Navy but a leap towards a more secure and technologically advanced maritime future.

In conclusion, the deployment of the MQ-4C Triton to NAS Sigonella signifies a pivotal moment in naval warfare and reconnaissance.

This state-of-the-art unmanned system enhances the U.S. Navy’s ability to monitor and secure vast maritime areas, ensuring America remains at the forefront of global maritime security.

As advocates for a stronger navy, it’s crucial to recognize and support the integration of such advanced technologies into the fleet, bolstering our national defense and maintaining our strategic advantage on the world’s oceans.

Posted on

Celebrating the Backbone of the U.S. Navy – The Chief Petty Officers

U.S.Navy Chiefs in Dress Whites
Bill Cullifer, Founder

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I am filled with immense respect and admiration for the steadfast pillars of our maritime force—the U.S. Navy Chiefs. Today, we don’t just celebrate a rank; we honor a legacy of leadership that has steadfastly weathered the storms and sailed through the tides of change.

The Navy Chief is more than a rank; it’s a symbol of trust, a badge of honor, and a beacon of wisdom amidst the gales of the high seas. They are the seasoned navigators who guide our ships with an invisible compass, one that points to ‘North’ as surely as it does to ‘Right.’

Let’s raise our glasses—or our crusty old coffee mugs for those early morning watches—to the Chiefs. They’ve mastered the art of speaking in acronyms, a language so complex it could confound even the most seasoned cryptologists. In their world, “CPO” stands not just for Chief Petty Officer but also for “Chief of Problem-Solving Operations.”

Today, we recognize the Chiefs for their unwavering commitment, ensuring that ‘shipshape’ isn’t just a condition, but a way of life. Their humor is as dry as the paperwork they shuffle, and their hearts as vast as the oceans they defend.

The Chief’s Mess, encompassing all Chief Petty Officers within the Navy, is not merely a group of senior non-commissioned officers; it’s a collective of mentors, technical experts, and the vital link between enlisted ranks and Navy leadership.

What is a Navy Chief?

Achieving the rank of CPO, whether as a Chief, Senior Chief, or Master Chief, signifies the first step in a journey epitomizing the pinnacle of enlisted leadership. It’s a title earned through unwavering dedication, expertise, and leadership.

Why Chiefs Matter

Chiefs bridge the gap between junior enlisted personnel and the officer corps, ensuring the Navy’s rich traditions are upheld while fostering the next generation of sailors and leaders.

The Navy’s Chief Season

The Chief’s Season, a time-honored rite of passage, solidifies a sailor’s transition into the Chief’s Mess. This tradition, steeped in history, has evolved from simple rites to a structured period of professional development and mentorship, shaping sailors into leaders ready to guide their fellow sailors through the challenges of naval service.

With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility

The journey to becoming a Chief is arduous and competitive, demanding not only technical expertise but leadership, accountability, and prioritization under pressure. It’s a transformative experience, designed to inculcate the values, responsibilities, and the ethos of what it means to be a Chief Petty Officer in the Navy.

Evolving Traditions

The Chief’s Season has adapted to align with modern professional standards, focusing on constructive training and leadership development. The goal is to integrate new Chiefs into the close-knit community of the Chief’s Mess, ensuring they are welcomed as equals and respected leaders.

A Tradition of Excellence

The tradition of the Chief Petty Officer is a testament to the enduring strength and character of naval service, bridging the past with the present and guiding the future.

As we toast to the Keepers of Tradition, the Guardians of Discipline, and the Jesters of the Mess, may your anchors be steady, your coffee strong, and your birthdays happy. Thank you for being the backbone of our blue-water fleet, the “Protector of The Seas,” and for every “aye aye” that has kept our Navy strong and free.

Looking Ahead

As we chart the course for the future, Americans for a Stronger Navy is proud to welcome Eryck P. Stamper, ITCS(SW/AW/EXW) USN ret., as the Senior Advisor for Navy Recruitment Initiatives. His extensive experience and dedication to naval service make him an invaluable asset in our mission to navigate the currents of recruitment challenges and strengthen the future of our Navy.

Happy Birthday, Chiefs! Your wisdom and humor are the guiding lights that will continue to lead us forward. Fair winds and following seas.

As we honor the legacy of our Chiefs, let’s also embrace the journey ahead, inspired by leaders like Eryck Stamper and fueled by the promise of a stronger Navy for tomorrow’s seas. What steps can we all take to support this mission and ensure the enduring strength and vitality of our naval forces?

Posted on

Securing Tomorrow: The Critical Role of Hypersonic Capabilities in U.S. Naval Supremacy

Introduction

In an era of unprecedented global challenges and technological advancements, the United States Navy’s pursuit of hypersonic capabilities emerges as a cornerstone of national defense and a testament to American ingenuity.

This blog post delves into the groundbreaking collaboration between the U.S. Navy and industry giants like Lockheed Martin, underscoring the pivotal role of hypersonic weapons in maintaining naval dominance and why every American should be invested in this endeavor.

The Vanguard of Defense: Hypersonic Weaponry

The significance of hypersonic technology in bolstering the Navy’s arsenal cannot be overstated. Capable of exceeding speeds of Mach 5, these weapons offer unmatched velocity and maneuverability, making them nearly invulnerable to existing defense systems.

This leap in military technology is not merely an upgrade; it’s a transformational shift in how power is projected on the world stage, ensuring that the U.S. remains ahead in the ongoing race for technological superiority against global adversaries.

A Landmark Partnership: Lockheed Martin and U.S. Navy

At the heart of this technological leap is the collaboration between the U.S. Navy and Lockheed Martin, a partnership that exemplifies the fusion of military strategy and private sector innovation.

The awarding of a contract to Lockheed Martin to integrate the Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) system onto the Navy’s ZUMWALT-class destroyers marks a significant milestone. This endeavor not only enhances the Navy’s capabilities but also showcases the pivotal role of American industry in shaping the future of defense technology.

Why This Matters: Beyond Military Might

The integration of hypersonic capabilities into the Navy’s arsenal transcends military implications; it’s a matter of national pride and a reflection of the United States’ commitment to peace through strength.

These advancements ensure the Navy’s ability to protect American interests in every corner of the globe, reinforcing the U.S.’s position as a stabilizing force in an increasingly volatile world.

Moreover, the development and deployment of these technologies bolster the defense industry, a vital sector of the American economy, and a source of high-skilled jobs.

Why Americans Should Care: The Ripple Effect

Every American has a stake in the development of hypersonic capabilities, as these technologies play a crucial role in shaping the nation’s future security landscape.

The enhanced defensive and offensive capabilities provided by hypersonic weapons are instrumental in deterring aggression, ensuring that threats to peace and democracy are kept at bay.

Furthermore, the success of such high-stakes technological endeavors reinforces the U.S.’s reputation as a leader in innovation, inspiring the next generation of scientists, engineers, and military leaders.

Navigating the Future

As we look to the horizon, the importance of hypersonic capabilities and strategic partnerships like that of the U.S. Navy and Lockheed Martin cannot be understated.

These advancements are not just about maintaining a technological edge; they’re about securing a future where American values and interests are protected and promoted on the global stage.

As citizens of a nation that leads through innovation and strength, understanding and supporting these endeavors is paramount for ensuring a secure and prosperous tomorrow.

In conclusion, the pursuit of hypersonic capabilities is a clear indicator of the U.S. Navy’s commitment to advancing national defense in the 21st century.

This initiative, bolstered by partnerships with industry leaders, is essential for maintaining the U.S.’s strategic advantage and ensuring the safety and security of Americans at home and abroad. As such, it is an endeavor that deserves the attention and support of every American.

Posted on

Charting the Course: The Future of American Naval Power – An Evaluation of US Navy Strengthening Plans FY25

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In our previous blog post, we acknowledged the importance of defining requirements before diving into the intricacies of Navy budget analysis.

We appreciate the insightful feedback received from a reader who highlighted this point, and we recognize the valuable insights it brings to our exploration of the Navy’s budget.

The US Navy plays a vital role in global security and national defense. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, it’s crucial to assess current plans for strengthening the Navy’s capabilities. This analysis will delve into various proposals and strategies, aiming to foster a well-rounded understanding.

To gain further insights into the Navy’s FY25 budget request, let’s take a moment to view a C-SPAN video featuring a press briefing by Navy officials. This briefing delves into the details of the proposed budget and its implications for strengthening the Navy.

Building a Stronger Navy

Building a stronger Navy requires a comprehensive understanding of its present and future needs. We explored critical areas like artificial intelligence (AI) and unmanned systems in our “Charting the Course – The Future of Naval Power” series.

We also delved into the DDG(X) program, the next-generation guided-missile destroyer envisioned as the backbone of the future surface fleet. You can find a more detailed analysis of the DDG(X) program within the series and by clicking here the summary of the series.

Evaluating Strengthening Plans

This framework focuses on several key criteria:

  • Cost-effectiveness: We will analyze the financial feasibility of each plan, considering both upfront costs and long-term maintenance expenses. While we may not have in-house accounting expertise to conduct an in-depth line-by-line budget analysis of each plan, we are committed to evaluating the broader financial feasibility based on credible data sources such as official Navy reports and analyses from respected think tanks.
  • Impact on Fleet Capabilities: The effectiveness of each plan in enhancing the Navy’s operational capabilities will be a critical evaluation point. This includes factors like firepower, survivability, and mission versatility.
  • Alignment with Strategic Objectives: We will assess how well each plan aligns with the Navy’s long-term strategic goals and national defense priorities.
  • Technological Considerations: The evaluation will take into account the technological feasibility and adaptability of each plan in light of evolving defense technology.

To conduct this analysis, we will rely on a variety of data sources. These include official Navy reports, independent analyses from think tanks, and insights from experienced naval experts.

By considering diverse perspectives and utilizing credible data, we aim to present a balanced and informative evaluation.

Examining Existing Programs

The DDG(X) program, among others, is a significant initiative aimed at modernizing the Navy’s fleet. A dedicated section within this analysis can detail the specific features and potential impact of the DDG(X) program in light of the established evaluation criteria. (Here, you can delve deeper into the DDG(X) program) [Refer to previous outline for details on how to approach the DDG(X) analysis]

Other Strengthening Plans: While the DDG(X) program represents a significant initiative, it’s important to acknowledge the existence of other proposals for strengthening the Navy. We are committed to analyzing these plans as well, utilizing the established evaluation framework.

Seeking Balanced Perspectives

Engaging with experienced analysts and experts from diverse backgrounds is vital for a comprehensive evaluation. We will actively seek out a range of viewpoints to ensure a balanced and informative discussion. This includes considering the perspectives expressed by stakeholders like Rep. Rob Wittman.

The quote from Rep. Wittman (March 11 statement) exemplifies the ongoing debate surrounding Navy force structure and shipbuilding cadence. By incorporating a variety of voices, we strive to present a nuanced picture of the challenges and opportunities facing the US Navy.

Moving Forward

Through this evaluation, we hope to contribute to a well-informed conversation regarding the future of the US Navy. By analyzing existing plans and fostering a dialogue with experts, we can help chart a course towards a stronger and more effective maritime force. We will continue this discussion in future blog posts, delving deeper into specific plans and the findings of our analysis.

Call to Action

We encourage our readers to share their feedback and suggestions for additional resources, especially regarding the financial aspects of these plans. Your input is valuable in ensuring a well-rounded analysis. We also invite you to engage on our social media Facebook page by following the links beloe to share your thoughts on strengthening the US Navy.

Posted on

Honoring the Memory of Aviation Machinist Mate 2nd Class Oriola Michael Aregbesola

Bill Cullifer, Founder

In the strategic waterways of the Red Sea, where the confluence of global trade routes, geopolitical interests, and maritime security challenges converge, the presence of the United States Navy stands as a testament to our nation’s commitment to ensuring freedom of navigation and regional stability. It is within this vital arena that we remember and honor the service of Aviation Machinist Mate 2nd Class Oriola Michael Aregbesola, who tragically lost his life while serving aboard the USS Mason (DDG 87).

Petty Officer Aregbesola joined the Navy in July 2020, bringing his talents and dedication to the “Swamp Foxes” of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 74. His service on the USS Mason, as part of the Norfolk-based Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations, was instrumental in supporting the Navy’s mission to maintain maritime security and stability in the region. This mission is critical in deterring threats to international shipping lanes, combating piracy, and fostering cooperation with regional partners to ensure a safe and prosperous maritime environment.

USS Mason

The significance of the Navy’s presence in the Red Sea cannot be overstated. As a crucial link between the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean, this region is a vital artery for global commerce and energy supplies. The Navy’s role in ensuring the security of these waters supports not only U.S. national interests but also the global economy and international community at large.

Petty Officer Aregbesola’s dedication to his duties on the USS Mason exemplified the selfless character and warrior spirit of the United States Navy Sailor. His contributions went beyond the scope of his technical role; he was a valued member of a team committed to a mission larger than any individual—the collective security and prosperity of nations bound by the shared use of the world’s oceans.

Cmdr. Eric Kohut, commanding officer of HSM-74, praised Petty Officer Aregbesola’s spirit, noting, “He fully embodied the thoughtful warrior spirit of the United States Navy Sailor… His legacy will live on in the hearts of every Swamp Fox and our brothers and sisters in the IKE Carrier Strike Group.”

As we mourn his loss, we also recognize Petty Officer Aregbesola’s role in the larger cause of maintaining peace and stability in a region pivotal to the world’s interconnected economy and security. His service reminds us of the critical importance of the Navy’s mission in the Red Sea and the sacrifice of those who serve on the front lines of freedom.

At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we extend our deepest sympathies to Petty Officer Aregbesola’s family, friends, and shipmates. We honor his service and sacrifice, reaffirming our commitment to support the brave men and women who continue this essential mission. Let us remember Petty Officer Aregbesola not only for how he died but for the noble cause he served—a cause that ensures a safer world for us all.

Bill, Americans for a Stronger Navy