Category: Analysis

The Analysis category will feature publicly available content published by the U.S. Navy. The Americans for a Stronger Navy will review and proviide to its members and subscribers, in-depth analysis, commentary, and insights on the latest developments and issues related to the United States Navy’s strategic direction. The category will cover a wide range of topics, including warfighting, operating forward, readiness, modernization, and people, as well as other issues related to the Navy’s mission and goals. The aim is to provide members and subscribers with valuable information and perspectives that can help them better understand the challenges and opportunities facing the Navy and how Americans for a Stronger Navy is working to support its strategic direction.

Posted on

Navy’s Project 33: A Bold Push for Modernization and Preparedness by 2027

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

The U.S. Navy is at a critical juncture. Faced with increasing global threats and a rapidly modernizing Chinese military, the Navy’s leadership is taking bold steps to ensure it is ready for future challenges. Central to these efforts is Project 33, an ambitious initiative spearheaded by Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti. With a clear deadline of 2027, Project 33 aims to equip the Navy with cutting-edge robotic systems, ensure readiness through ship and submarine maintenance, and boost recruitment and retention, all while addressing budgetary constraints.

A Strategic Focus on China

The Chinese military, under President Xi Jinping, has been directed to be ready for conflict by 2027—potentially over Taiwan or other strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific. As the world’s second-largest Navy, China’s growing fleet and multi-domain capabilities present a significant challenge for the U.S. Navy. However, as Adm. Franchetti’s recently released Navigation Plan outlines, it’s not just about fleet size anymore.

Gone are the days when naval power was measured simply by the number of ships. Instead, the threat posed by China is more complex, spanning multiple domains, including cyber warfare, economic strategies, and the development of dual-use infrastructure like airfields and civilian vessels repurposed for military use. In response, the Navy is evolving to counter this diverse array of threats by incorporating advanced technologies, such as unmanned systems and artificial intelligence (AI), into its operations.

Project 33: Preparing for the Future

At the heart of Franchetti’s strategy is Project 33, a forward-looking plan that seeks to ensure the Navy is ready for any potential conflict by 2027. This initiative centers on several key goals:

  • Scaling Robotic and Autonomous Systems: The Navy recognizes that it cannot quickly build enough traditional ships to match China’s growing fleet. Instead, it’s turning to robotic and autonomous platforms that can expand its warfighting capacity at a lower cost. These systems not only keep sailors out of harm’s way but also create a more agile and flexible force. By 2027, Franchetti plans to integrate these capabilities into all deploying Carrier and Expeditionary Strike Groups.
  • Combat-Ready by 2027: Franchetti’s Navigation Plan calls for the Navy to be prepared for war, particularly focusing on countering China’s growing naval presence. Through Project 33, the Navy aims to have a hybrid fleet of both manned and unmanned systems fully operational in key mission areas, including surveillance, fires, logistics, and networking.
  • Information Dominance: As modern warfare increasingly revolves around data, the Navy is prioritizing the ability to collect, analyze, and share critical information across fleets. With the development of new Maritime Operations Centers (MOCs) and integration into the broader U.S. military’s Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) system, the Navy will be better positioned to make real-time, data-driven decisions that can turn the tide of battle.

Facing Financial Constraints

Adm. Franchetti has been clear about the financial challenges the Navy faces. While these modernization efforts are essential, the Navy’s ability to meet its goals depends on securing the necessary budget to maintain both its current operations and future development. Without this support, the Navy will face “deep strategic constraints,” limiting its ability to defend U.S. interests and protect allies in key regions like the Indo-Pacific.

But Franchetti’s Navigation Plan doesn’t shy away from these realities. Instead, it sets clear, achievable goals, such as reducing maintenance delays for ships, submarines, and aircraft, while advocating for the resources needed to build a future-ready Navy.

The Broader Threat Landscape

While much of the focus is on China, the Navigation Plan also acknowledges other growing threats. From a “wounded and isolated” but still dangerous Russia, to Iranian-backed forces like the Houthis, to ongoing instability in the Middle East, the Navy must be prepared to address multiple challenges across the globe. The threats extend below the surface, with recent attacks on undersea pipelines and cables highlighting the vulnerabilities of seabed infrastructure.

These threats underscore the importance of Project 33’s goals: a fleet that’s ready for war, equipped with the latest technologies, and capable of responding to diverse threats across multiple domains.

A Call to Action

As the Navy accelerates its efforts to meet the demands of a complex global landscape, Americans must rally behind the men and women who serve. Adm. Franchetti’s Navigation Plan is a clear-eyed assessment of the challenges we face and a roadmap for ensuring the Navy is ready to meet them head-on. But the Navy can’t do it alone. It requires not only adequate funding and resources but also the full support of the American public.

Through Project 33, the Navy is poised to lead in the fight for peace and security, leveraging cutting-edge technologies and operational innovations. As we look to the future, it’s essential that we, as a nation, understand the importance of these efforts and stand behind our Navy as it prepares for the challenges ahead.

Together, we can ensure that the U.S. Navy remains a powerful force for good, ready to respond to crises and defend freedom on the world’s oceans.

Posted on

U.S. Naval News Weekly Roundup: September 4–11, 2024

MQ-25 Stingray drone
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

This week’s U.S. Navy news brings a blend of operational updates, collaborations with allies, and internal disciplinary actions, showcasing the Navy’s relentless focus on readiness, accountability, and international cooperation. From critical exercises in the Indo-Pacific to high-stakes rescues in the Pacific, the Navy’s efforts are making waves both at home and abroad.

U.S. Navy Global Engagement and Readiness

1. U.S. Navy Rescues Two Ahead of Hurricane Gilma

In a daring operation, the USS William P. Lawrence (DDG-110) rescued a woman and her seven-year-old daughter from a disabled yacht, Albroc, in the Pacific Ocean just hours ahead of Hurricane Gilma. Coordinating with the U.S. Coast Guard, the destroyer’s small-boat team braved worsening weather to retrieve the survivors, their pet cat, and a tortoise. Unfortunately, the yacht’s skipper, reported deceased, could not be recovered due to the incoming storm.

2. South Korean Shipyard Delivers Maintenance Services for U.S. Navy Vessel

On September 2, a U.S. Navy vessel underwent maintenance, repair, and overhaul at a South Korean shipyard, marking the first time such services have been provided by a foreign facility. This step emphasizes growing collaboration between the U.S. and its global partners to strengthen naval capabilities.

Operations and Exercises

3. USS Bataan Amphibious Readiness Group Conducts Exercises in the Mediterranean

The USS Bataan Amphibious Readiness Group, alongside the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, recently carried out exercises in the Mediterranean Sea. These operations are key to ensuring combat readiness and enhancing interoperability with NATO allies, reinforcing regional stability.

4. U.S. Forces Participate in Exercise Ssang Yong 2024

The U.S. Navy and Marine Corps joined forces with the Republic of Korea and the United Kingdom for the biennial Exercise Ssang Yong 2024. Taking place from August 26 to September 7 in South Korea, the exercise featured large-scale amphibious and airborne operations aimed at enhancing the combined defensive posture on the Korean Peninsula. This year’s exercise was notable for the deployment of the U.S. Marine Corps’ Amphibious Combat Vehicle in Korean waters for the first time.

5. USS Hawaii Completes Historic Submarine Maintenance in Australia

The USS Hawaii (SSN-776) made history this week, departing from HMAS Stirling in Western Australia after completing the first-ever joint American-Australian submarine maintenance operation in Australian waters. This major milestone is part of the AUKUS Pillar 1 initiative to establish a sovereign nuclear-powered submarine force for Australia by the 2030s.

Innovation and Technology

6. Navy Tests New MQ-25 Stingray Drone with Carrier Operations

The U.S. Navy has continued testing its cutting-edge MQ-25 Stingray drone on aircraft carriers, aiming to revolutionize naval aviation. The uncrewed aerial refueling drone is set to extend the operational range of U.S. Navy fighter jets, opening new capabilities for long-range missions.

7. U.S. Navy Chiefs Caught Operating Unauthorized Starlink Network

In a shocking revelation, 17 members of the chief’s mess aboard the USS Manchester (LCS-14) were caught operating an unauthorized Starlink Wifi network on the ship, breaking Navy communication regulations. This secret network, installed for personal use, posed a significant security risk. The chiefs involved, led by Command Senior Chief Grisel Marrero, were demoted and faced administrative punishment.

International Partnerships

8. Argentina Joins Combined Maritime Forces

Argentina officially became the 46th member of the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), the world’s largest maritime security partnership. This historic move strengthens Argentina’s role in global maritime security, particularly in anti-piracy and counterterrorism efforts across critical shipping lanes.

9. Exercise Kakadu 2024 Begins in Australia

The Royal Australian Navy, U.S. Navy, and forces from nine other nations kicked off Exercise Kakadu 2024 in Darwin, Australia. This multinational maritime and air exercise, running from September 9-20, enhances regional cooperation and maritime security while offering valuable training for participating forces.

Security and Deterrence

10. USS Georgia Arrives in Middle East to Deter Iran

The guided-missile submarine USS Georgia (SSGN-729) has arrived in the Middle East as part of a show of force directed at Iran. Armed with over 150 Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles, the Ohio-class submarine brings substantial firepower to the region amid heightened tensions with Iran and ongoing military support for U.S. allies, including Israel.

11. U.S. Navy Medical Teams Conduct Critical Research in Australia

U.S. Navy medical personnel, alongside Marines from MRF-D 24.3, collected air and soil samples across Australian military bases and Papua New Guinea. This research, aimed at identifying dangerous bacteria like Burkholderia pseudomallei, is part of ongoing efforts to ensure the health and safety of military personnel operating in tropical environments. The data will contribute to long-term studies to reduce health risks in the Indo-Pacific region.

China Watch

China remained focused on strengthening its naval presence in the South China Sea. Reports suggest ongoing activity near disputed areas, with China reinforcing its maritime militia and increasing military patrols. The continued fortification of artificial islands and military installations underscores Beijing’s strategic goals to assert control over vital sea lanes.

Russia Watch

Russia conducted naval exercises in the Arctic this week, highlighting the increasing militarization of the region. The Kremlin also announced new partnerships with other nations to develop its navy further, despite facing economic constraints from ongoing sanctions. These moves are seen as part of Russia’s broader effort to project power across multiple theaters, including the Black Sea and Mediterranean.

Iran Watch

Tensions with Iran remain high following the arrival of the USS Georgia in the Middle East. Iran has responded with increased rhetoric, warning against U.S. military actions in the region. Meanwhile, Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen have continued their missile and drone attacks on shipping lanes in the Red Sea, prompting further U.S. naval action to secure these critical maritime routes.

That’s all for this week’s Navy news. Stay tuned for more updates next week, and as always, support the men and women who serve in the U.S. Navy.

Posted on

Confronting the Constellation Class Frigate Delays

Rendering of USS Constellation (FFG-62). Fincantieri Image

Guest Commentary by Captain David Lennon, USNR (Ret.)

The recent directive from the Senate Armed Services Committee, calling for the U.S. Navy to explore alternative missile-armed ship options, highlights a significant issue: the persistent delays and design challenges with the Constellation class frigate program. As a retired Navy captain, I have witnessed firsthand the impact of such delays on our fleet’s readiness and capability. The committee’s concern is not unfounded, and their call for a “highly producible small surface combatant study” is a necessary step to address the near-term gaps in our naval capabilities.

The Constellation class frigates, envisioned as a modern and versatile addition to the Navy’s fleet, have been plagued by extensive changes to their core design. These modifications have resulted in a projected three-year delay for the delivery of the first ship, the USS Constellation, and similar delays for subsequent ships in the class. Such setbacks not only strain the Navy’s resources but also undermine our strategic readiness, especially in light of the ongoing naval buildup by the People’s Republic of China.

In response to these challenges, the committee has proposed exploring the feasibility of arming other types of ships with missile systems, including large uncrewed surface vessels (LUSVs), amphibious warfare ships, and auxiliary support vessels. This approach could provide a more immediate solution to increase our fleet’s missile-launching capacity. Additionally, the idea of adapting commercial hulls or existing Navy ships with bolt-on or containerized missile launchers presents a practical and cost-effective alternative to waiting for the delayed frigates.

The committee’s report also highlights a broader concern: the projected decline in the number of Navy battle force ships and fleet-wide vertical launch system (VLS) capacity between now and 2027. With the retirement of Ticonderoga class cruisers and Ohio class guided missile submarines, the Navy is facing a significant reduction in its missile-launching platforms. The planned acquisition of new destroyers and uncrewed surface vessels aims to fill this gap, but these solutions are not without their own challenges and timelines.

To address the immediate needs, the committee has outlined specific points for the Navy to study, including the feasibility of a crewed variant of the LUSV and the adaptation of foreign, commercial, or U.S. Government ship designs for missile deployment. This pragmatic approach acknowledges the constraints of the current supply chain and industrial base, while also emphasizing the need for rapid fielding and cost-effective solutions.

The Constellation class frigate program’s delays underscore the complexity and risks associated with modern naval shipbuilding. However, the proactive steps proposed by the Senate Armed Services Committee offer a path forward to mitigate these issues. By exploring alternative platforms and leveraging existing technologies, the Navy can enhance its missile-launching capacity and maintain its strategic advantage.

In conclusion, the committee’s directive represents a critical intervention at a time when our naval capabilities are being closely scrutinized. As we navigate these challenges, it is imperative that the Navy remains adaptable and innovative, ensuring that we continue to meet the demands of an increasingly complex maritime environment.

Captain David Lennon, USNR (Ret.) served in the U.S. Navy for over 30 years, with extensive experience in surface warfare and naval operations.

Posted on

Ocean Shipping Disruptions and Their Economic Impact on Americans

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I have encountered a few pushback from those who believe that the need for a stronger Navy is overstated and that current global situations are someone else’s problem. This perspective overlooks the critical role that a robust Navy plays in safeguarding our economic interests and national security. In light of recent disruptions in ocean shipping, it is crucial to understand why the vast majority of Americans support a stronger Navy and how it impacts our daily lives.

Why This Matters

Global supply chains are intricately connected, and disruptions in one part of the world can have far-reaching impacts. The Red Sea, a critical maritime route, has recently seen increased attacks, forcing vessels to divert and causing gridlock at key ports such as Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea, China, and parts of Europe. This congestion is reminiscent of the chaos experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the repercussions are already being felt across the logistics and shipping industries.

Key Takeaways

  1. Rising Shipping Costs: The diversions and delays are leading to increased shipping costs. With vessels stuck waiting for berths and navigating longer routes, the cost of transporting goods is climbing rapidly.
  2. Port Congestion: Ports are struggling to manage the influx of containers, leading to long wait times and operational inefficiencies. This congestion exacerbates delays and adds to the overall costs of shipping goods.
  3. Supply Chain Delays: As ports become bottlenecks, the timely delivery of goods is compromised. This affects the availability of products on store shelves, especially as we head into the holiday season, traditionally a peak period for consumer spending.Implications for the U.S. Navy

Implications for the U. S. Navy

Drawing from Alfred Mahan’s principles of sea power, the current instability in the Red Sea underscores the importance of maintaining control over critical maritime routes. The U.S. Navy’s presence in these regions ensures the security of trade routes, thereby safeguarding the global economy and national interests. Mahan emphasized that control of the seas, especially through a formidable navy, is crucial not only for wartime dominance but also for peacetime economic influence.

Implications for America

The economic implications of these disruptions are multifaceted:

  1. Increased Consumer Prices: The rising costs of shipping are often passed down to consumers. Whether it’s electronics, clothing, or everyday household items, Americans will likely see higher prices at the checkout counter.
  2. Inflationary Pressures: As transportation costs rise, so do the prices of goods. This can contribute to broader inflationary pressures, impacting the overall cost of living.
  3. Business Costs: Companies that rely on imported goods face higher operational costs. These businesses may need to increase prices to maintain margins, further affecting consumer prices.
  4. Supply Chain Reliability: The reliability of supply chains is crucial for economic stability. Persistent delays and disruptions can lead to stock shortages, affecting businesses’ ability to meet consumer demand and potentially leading to lost sales and revenue.

Lessons from Alfred Mahan

Nicholas Lambert’s book, “The Neptune Factor,” reexamines Mahan’s theories, arguing that sea power is not just about military might but also economic influence. Alfred Thayer Mahan, a prominent American naval officer and historian, is best known for his influential book, “The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783.” Mahan’s groundbreaking ideas emphasized the strategic importance of a formidable naval presence to deter potential adversaries and ensure economic prosperity through control of maritime trade routes. Lambert emphasizes the need to integrate new technologies, such as cybersecurity and unmanned vehicles, and address environmental threats to maintain maritime dominance and economic security.

What Can Be Done?

To mitigate these impacts, several measures can be taken:

  1. Diversifying Supply Chains: Companies can explore alternative routes and suppliers to reduce dependency on any single shipping lane.
  2. Investing in Infrastructure: Enhancing port infrastructure and technology can improve efficiency and reduce congestion.
  3. Policy Measures: Governments can play a role in ensuring maritime security and supporting international efforts to stabilize regions like the Red Sea.

Conclusion

Current disruptions in ocean shipping underscore the vulnerability of global supply chains to geopolitical events. As Americans, understanding these connections is crucial. The economic ripple effects—from increased consumer prices to broader inflationary pressures—highlight the importance of resilient and adaptive strategies in both business and policy.

By addressing these challenges proactively, we can better navigate the complexities of a globalized economy and ensure stability and prosperity for all.

Drawing from Mahan’s insights, we must recognize that sea power encompasses both military strength and economic influence. Maintaining a robust naval presence and addressing modern challenges is essential for safeguarding our economic security and way of life.

Posted on

Defending Allies: USS Ronald Reagan’s Mission to Secure the Philippine Sea Amid Rising Tensions


USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76)

Defending Allies: USS Ronald Reagan’s Mission to Secure the Philippine Sea Amid Rising Tensions

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Recent injuries inflicted on Filipino fishermen by Chinese forces in the shoals underscore the increasing tensions in the Philippine Sea. As these events unfold, the U.S. Navy’s forward-deployed carrier, the USS Ronald Reagan, plays a crucial role in maintaining regional stability and providing a deterrent against potential Chinese aggression.

The Strategic Importance of the USS Ronald Reagan

The USS Ronald Reagan, stationed in the Pacific, is undergoing resupply and refueling to extend its deterrence missions in the Philippine Sea. This action highlights the Pentagon’s commitment to a continued forward presence amid the escalating U.S.-China tensions. The strategic placement of the Reagan ensures that the U.S. can project significant air attack power throughout the region, protecting allies like the Philippines from potential threats.

The Threat of a “Fait Accompli” Scenario

A significant concern is the possibility of a “fait accompli” scenario, where China might quickly annex the Philippines or Taiwan before an allied response can be mobilized. This scenario is particularly worrying given China’s ongoing military maneuvers and blockades of small Philippine fishing boats. Kris Osborn noted, “Operating as a floating city with thousands of sailors and hundreds of attack planes and helicopters, the USS Ronald Reagan is likely having its deployment extended to ensure critical ‘proximity’.”

U.S. Support for the Philippines

The United States stands with its ally the Philippines and condemns the escalatory and irresponsible actions by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to deny the Philippines from lawfully delivering humanitarian supplies to service members stationed at the BRP Sierra Madre. Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller stated, “PRC vessels’ dangerous and deliberate use of water cannons, ramming, blocking maneuvers, and towing damaged Philippine vessels endangered the lives of Philippine service members, is reckless, and threatens regional peace and stability.”

The U.S. reaffirms that Article IV of the 1951 United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea. Miller reiterated, “The United States reaffirms that Article IV of the 1951 United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty extends to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft – including those of its Coast Guard – anywhere in the South China Sea.”

The Role of Carrier Strike Groups

The Reagan’s ability to deploy 5th-generation aircraft within striking distance of Chinese forces is a key element of the U.S. defense strategy. These aircraft can achieve air supremacy, significantly reducing the effectiveness of any Chinese military operation. The presence of the Reagan also ensures that the U.S. can quickly respond to any sudden moves by China, maintaining a balance of power in the region. Derek Grossman emphasized, “Manila is pressing forward with three other efforts… deepening its alliance with Washington, forging ahead on security drills and agreements with other countries in the region, and adopting a strategy of ‘assertive transparency’ toward Chinese encroachments.”

Commentary

As the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I believe in peace and peace through strength. Diplomacy is essential, but there comes a time when we must draw a line in the sand and take action. I firmly believe that China will continue its aggression and other nefarious deeds until it is stopped. If they want war, then they better be prepared for one. It is crucial for the American public to engage and support the Navy. Internal conflict among ourselves only plays into the hands of our adversaries, which is a tactic straight out of the communist handbook.

Conclusion

The extended deployment of the USS Ronald Reagan in the Philippine Sea is a clear signal of the U.S. commitment to defending its allies and maintaining stability in the region. As tensions continue to rise, the Reagan’s presence is more critical than ever in preventing a potential crisis and ensuring the security of the Philippines.

By reinforcing our naval capabilities and maintaining a robust presence, we can deter aggression and protect the freedoms and security of our allies in the Indo-Pacific region. The injuries sustained by Filipino fishermen and the aggressive actions against the BRP Sierra Madre remind us of the real and present threats posed by Chinese expansionism, and underscore the necessity of a strong and ready U.S. Navy.

Sources:

  1. Osborn, K. (2024, June 17). Defending the Philippines? USS Ronald Reagan Re-Supplied & Extended in Philippine Sea. Warrior Maven.
  2. Miller, M. (2024, June 17). U.S. Support for the Philippines in the South China Sea. U.S. State Department.
  3. Grossman, D. (2024, May 29). How to Respond to China’s Tactics in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy.

Posted on

Debunking the USS Eisenhower Damage Claims After Houthi Strike Allegations

Introduction

In the realm of modern conflict, misinformation spreads almost as rapidly as the events themselves. A recent case involves claims by Yemeni Houthi rebels that they successfully struck the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Red Sea. These assertions were quickly debunked by multiple sources, yet they highlight the challenge of distinguishing fact from fiction in real-time.

The Allegations

Last Friday, Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree announced that missile strikes had targeted the USS Eisenhower. This announcement was followed by a second claim the next day, suggesting a “second targeting operation against the carrier during the past 24 hours” according to Reuters.

Thek Spread of Misinformation

Following these announcements, images began circulating online purporting to show the damage inflicted on the Eisenhower. A notable post on X (formerly Twitter) by user @iAmTheWarax claimed, “CONFIRMED: uss eisenhower (pictured docked for repairs in souda bay) hit and severely damaged by multiple houthi ballistic missiles.” This post included a satellite picture of a docked ship. Another post by @Alhussaini21S, viewed over 2.6 million times, showed what appeared to be an aircraft carrier with a large black mark on its runway.

The Reality

A thorough fact-check by Newsweek dismantled these claims. The images shared were not of the Eisenhower in the Red Sea. One image was of the Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov docked in Murmansk, Russia. The other was a doctored image of the Eisenhower docked in Norfolk, Virginia. The Pentagon confirmed there had been no strikes on the Eisenhower or the Norfolk port.

Further, Chinese satellite images dated June 4 showed the USS Eisenhower moving southward in the Red Sea without any visible damage, reinforcing the Pentagon’s position.

The Broader Context

The conflict between the Houthis and the Saudi-led coalition, supported by the U.S. and the U.K., has been ongoing since 2015. The recent Houthi claims emerged as part of retaliatory actions against strikes conducted by U.S. and U.K. forces on Houthi positions in Yemen.

Despite the assertions of direct hits on the Eisenhower and its escorts, U.S. Central Command reported that all Houthi munitions had been intercepted. No damage or injuries were reported on any U.S. vessel, further debunking the Houthi’s claims.

Conclusion

In an age where misinformation can easily overshadow reality, it is crucial to rely on verified sources and official statements. The false claims regarding the USS Eisenhower underscore the importance of critical evaluation of news, especially during conflicts. The Eisenhower remains operational, continuing its mission in the Red Sea, undeterred by the baseless allegations of damage.

By staying informed through credible sources, we can better navigate the complexities of modern-day conflicts and the accompanying flood of information, both true and false.

Posted on

A Call for Unity and Urgency: Addressing America’s Security Challenges

In his recent piece, “America Hits the Global Snooze Button” in The Wall Street Journal, Walter Russell Mead, the James Clarke Chace Professor of Foreign Affairs and Humanities at Bard College and a scholar at the Hudson Institute underscores the critical nature of current global threats, echoing a sentiment that I wholeheartedly share. The urgency cannot be overstated: China’s aggressive expansion, Russia’s advances in Ukraine, and Iran’s destabilizing actions in the Middle East constitute a significant and multifaceted threat to global stability. This demands stronger U.S. armed forces to counter these threats effectively.

The situation around Taiwan, the South China Sea and the Philippines exemplifies the complexities we face. China’s assertive territorial claims and militarization of the region threaten not only our allies but also global trade routes. It necessitates a stronger U.S. naval presence and support for regional partners. The Middle East is increasingly volatile and involves contested waters of the eastern Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.  The U.S. Navy is the only effective naval force to counter the threats there and it is stretched thin.

Moreover, it is alarming to consider that our defense systems have potentially been compromised, which could be construed as an act of war. Yet, many Americans remain oblivious to these dangers, and who can blame them? After decades of conflict with little to show for it, the American public feels disillusioned, cheated, and exhausted. They see corruption and self-interest within the military-industrial complex and feel that politicians are complicit in perpetuating these issues.

The prevailing sentiment of mistrust extends to the government itself. Some argue for a more isolationist approach, focusing solely on defending our shores, while others, particularly younger generations, feel disenfranchised and disconnected from these geopolitical issues. This disconnect is further exacerbated by a widespread lack of historical knowledge, a consequence of its declining emphasis in our education system.

The threat of Chinese cyberattacks on global infrastructure is a significant concern. Chinese state-sponsored hacking has emerged as a critical global threat, targeting vital infrastructure across multiple nations. Recent reports reveal that Chinese military hackers have infiltrated Japan’s defense networks since 2020, accessing classified information about military capabilities and strategic plans. This breach, discovered by the U.S. National Security Agency, highlights the deep and persistent nature of Chinese cyber espionage. Despite efforts to secure these systems, the continued breaches underscore the sophistication and persistence of Chinese cyber capabilities. Additionally, China-based hackers have targeted U.S. government agencies, including the State and Commerce Departments, and critical sectors like transportation and utilities. These attacks are part of a broader strategy to gain access to sensitive information and disrupt vital infrastructure.

Additionally, recent reports indicate a troubling rise in cyberattacks against our critical infrastructure, including water supplies, by actors linked to China, Russia, and Iran. These cyberattacks do not just target water utilities but extend to other critical infrastructure, telecommunications networks, and security systems. They can disrupt access to essential services, steal intellectual property, and undermine our trade networks. The increasing frequency and sophistication of these attacks pose a significant threat to our national security and economic stability.

While Mead raises valid points about the severity of the threats we face, his politicization of the issue is counterproductive. The truth is, there is ample blame to go around, and what we need now more than ever is education and transparency. Americans deserve to understand the stakes and be assured of the integrity of those advocating for stronger defense measures. This is not a right versus left issue—it’s an American issue that requires a united, all-hands-on-deck approach.

A key mission of Americans for a Stronger Navy is to educate the public about these security challenges and the need for a stronger Navy. By fostering a national dialogue, we can bridge the gap between policymakers and the public, fostering mutual understanding and engagement. It is also crucial to emphasize the need for bipartisan cooperation in addressing these threats. A unified approach is necessary to effectively respond to the complex and evolving global security landscape.

In sum, the threats are indeed formidable, but trust is in short supply. Addressing this requires a commitment to honesty and clarity from our leaders, ensuring that the American public is both informed and engaged in the security decisions that will shape our future.

Thanks for listening.

Bill,
Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

AI in Naval Warfare – From Logistics to Combat Strategy

Introduction from Americans for a Stronger Navy:

Bill Cullifer

Hello, Bill Cullifer here with Americans for a Stronger Navy. Welcome to our inaugural episode of this enlightening series where we delve into transformative technologies reshaping naval operations. Throughout this series, we will explore various cutting-edge topics, including AI, unmanned systems, Directed Energy Weapons, cyber warfare, and more. Today, we begin with the crucial role of Artificial Intelligence in naval warfare.

Series Outline:

  1. AI in Naval Warfare – This episode.
  2. Uncrewed Systems – How drones and autonomous vehicles are changing naval tactics.
  3. Directed Energy Weapons – The future of combat with lasers and high-energy systems.
  4. Cyber and Electronic Warfare – Securing supremacy in digital battlefields.
  5. Future Naval Strategies – Integrating new tech into traditional naval doctrines.

Overview: The Strategic Importance of AI in Military Operations AI’s role in military operations extends from enhancing logistical support to refining combat strategies. Its integration into naval operations promises significant advancements in operational efficiency and tactical decision-making.

Interview Segment: Insights from Admiral James Stavridis

We feature key insights from Admiral Stavridis during his interview with Fareed Zakaria on GPS. His expertise illuminates AI’s potential in transforming naval capabilities.

  • Logistics and Maintenance: AI’s predictive capabilities ensure higher readiness and efficiency.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: AI’s ability to analyze historical data aids in crucial decision-making processes.
  • Advanced Threat Response: The evolving role of AI in managing drone swarms and other asymmetric threats.

Why It Matters: Understanding the integration of AI into naval operations is crucial for anticipating how future conflicts will be managed and fought. AI not only enhances current capabilities but also opens new avenues in warfare strategy.

Implications for the Navy: Admiral Stavridis’ insights lead into a broader discussion on:

  • The necessity for ongoing training and adaptation among naval personnel to leverage AI effectively.
  • The potential shifts in naval strategy as AI technologies mature, particularly in terms of autonomous decision-making and real-time strategy adjustments.
  • Ethical and security considerations as AI becomes a pivotal element in defense.

Interview: CNN ZAKARIA and ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER

  • CNN ZAKARIA: We humans have a lot to worry about these days, climate change and other pandemic, even the threat of World War Three. But the unregulated development of artificial intelligence might be as potent a threat as any, according to my next guest. He was NATO’s allied commander Eirope. And he’s now vice chair of global affairs at the Carlisle Group. His fascinating new book “2054 Novel,” which he co-wrote with Elliot Ackerman, very talented, is centered on the existential treat AI poses for the future of the world. Jim, pleasure to have you on. Fascinating how you’re writing these series of books. And this one is really about the A.I. race in military affairs. So first, I want to ask you, explain to us the power of A.I.
  • CNN ZAKARIA: So, you’re a — you’re a naval commander, what would A.I. allow you to do as a naval commander that you weren’t able to do when you were actually commanding ships?
  • ADM. JAMES STAVRIDIS (RET.), FORMER NATO SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER: Let me give you three very practical things. Number one — and it doesn’t sound sexy, but it’s logistics and maintenance. Artificial Intelligence has a capability to predict when a particular set of maintenance functions are needed, make sure that the spare parts are in train, all of that done in a way that is much more efficient, much more capable.
  • ZAKARIA: But that’s huge because it keeps the ships in permanent readiness.
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. We always say in the military, the amateurs are the ones talking about strategy. The professionals are focused on logistics. That’s what wins wars.
  • But number two, artificial intelligence will allow a commander — say I was the captain of a destroyer, which I was. If I had an A.I. advising me, plugged into my decision process, that A.I. will have access to every naval battle ever fought. It would be capable of scanning the horizon of history and whispering into the commander, you really ought to think about this.
  • And then third and finally, and we’re seeing the edges of this in Ukraine, drone, swarms, bringing them together in very lethal ways. We currently can’t quite do that. Artificial intelligence will make swarming drones the greatest threat by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: You talk a lot about the A.I. race and it’s really U.S. versus China.
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: Who’s ahead?
  • STAVRIDIS: U.S. marginally ahead. Our mutual friend, Eric Schmidt, did a marvelous set of research on this a couple of years ago, and he would have said then, we’re about a year ahead of China.
  • My sense from my sources, China is closing that gap. This is the foot race that will determine geopolitical superiority by mid-century.
  • ZAKARIA: Are we building the right kind of military for that kind of world?
  • STAVRIDIS: Absolutely. And let me add another example in terms of drones versus naval. Look what’s happening in the Black Sea. The Russian Black Sea fleet a third of it is on the bottom of the Black Sea, drinking seawater as we would say in the business.
  • Why? Not because Ukraine has a Navy, they don’t. It’s because the Ukrainians have used both air and surface drones. So, to your question
  • ZAKARIA: Drones are amazing. The minister showed them to me. They looked like toy boats —
  • STAVRIDIS: Yes.
  • ZAKARIA: — and they are really highly lethal drones that can sink these hundred — hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of warships.
  • STAVRIDIS: Correct. And so, the question then becomes, are the carriers still viable? I think they are for the moment, for the tenure future, 15-year future. Boy, you get much beyond that. And the capacity of massive swarms of drones accompanied by cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, all linked together by artificial intelligence, it will make those crown jewels of the fleet, our aircraft carriers vulnerable.
  • ZAKARIA: So, you’ve — you’ve held very, very high military office. And you know that there are some people who worry that Donald Trump, where he to be elected again, would politicize the military. Do you worry about that?
  • STAVRIDIS: I do. And I think that the greatest aspect of our national security isn’t a political military. And we would edge in to politics into that force at great peril to the republic. At the moment, all of my contacts in the active-duty military reassure me that the military continues to regard itself as apolitical, followers of the constitution. Let’s hope it stays that way.
  • ZAKARIA: And when you look at NATO, you were the former supreme allied commander, great, great title, by the way, there are people in Europe who worry a lot about Trump and NATO. And what I’ve heard people say is it’s — he doesn’t have to pull out of NATO. He just has to say, I’m not going to defend Latvia, Lithuania —
  • STAVRIDIS: Estonia.
  • ZAKARIA: Right. Because it’s a sort of — in some ways the whole — NATO is basically — it’s a psychological game. It’s the thread is psychological that the U.S. will get involved. That’s what Putin has to be calculating. And if the president says something like that — the NATO — the building can continue, the meetings can continue, but the heart of it is lost.
  • STAVRIDIS: We always say deterrence is the combination of capability and credibility.
  • NATO is incredibly capable. The defense budget of the United States and the Europeans together is well over 10 times that of Russia. The population is well over five times the size of Russia.
  • So, the capability is not the problem. You’ve put your finger on it, it’s the credibility. And yes, I would be very concerned about a Trump presidency that did not actively support and, indeed, lead within NATO. That’s a real concern.
  • ZAKARIA: From the former supreme allied commander of NATO.
  • STAVRIDIS: My pleasure, Fareed.
  • ZAKARIA: Thank you, sir.
  • STAVRIDIS: Thank you.

Further Viewing

Carrie Council interview with Elliot Ackerman and Admiral Stavridis:

Outro

Thank you for joining us for the first episode of our series. Don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast on your favorite platform to ensure you don’t miss any of our discussions on the future of naval warfare. Together, we aim to keep you informed and engaged with the latest in naval defense technology.

 

 

Posted on

Can America Reclaim Its Shipbuilding Might? A Deep Dive into Delays and the Road Ahead

Bill Cullifer
Bill Cullifer, Founder

The backbone of American naval power, the U.S. Navy’s shipbuilding industry, is facing a critical juncture. Years of delays in key programs have raised concerns about the Navy’s ability to maintain its edge and keep pace with potential adversaries. But the path forward is a complex one, fraught with economic considerations, national security implications, and the very real question of what price tag comes with rebuilding domestic shipbuilding capacity.

This investigative series will delve into the issue, giving voice to a range of stakeholders and exploring the potential solutions. We, the American people, ultimately foot the bill and rely on a strong Navy. This series aims to provide transparency and spark conversation about how to best move forward.

The Problem: Delays and Mounting Concerns

Recent reports paint a concerning picture. The Navy acknowledges delays of up to three years in major shipbuilding programs, impacting vessels like the Columbia-class submarine and the Constellation-class frigate. These delays raise serious questions about the Navy’s ability to meet its operational needs and deter potential threats.

Stakeholders: Who Has a Say?

Understanding the issue requires hearing from all sides. We’ll be speaking with:

  • Navy Leadership: What are the Navy’s specific concerns with delays? What solutions are they exploring?
  • Shipbuilders: What challenges are they facing that contribute to delays?
  • Policy Experts: How do these delays impact national security on a global scale?
  • Taxpayers: What are the economic implications of various solutions, including potential cost increases for domestically-built ships?

A New Twist: The Secretary of the Navy Visits South Korea

Adding another wrinkle to the story, in February 2024, U.S. Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro visited shipyards in South Korea, a world leader in shipbuilding. This visit sparked speculation about whether the Navy might be considering partnerships or outsourcing some shipbuilding efforts to alleviate domestic delays.

New Details Emerge: A Look at the Press Release

An official U.S. Navy press release sheds light on Secretary Del Toro’s visit and reveals some key details:

  • Focus on Collaboration: The primary goal of the visit was to attract Korean investment in U.S. shipbuilding facilities. This suggests the Navy is exploring partnerships with South Korean companies to bolster domestic capacity and efficiency.
  • Advanced Technology: The press release highlights Secretary Del Toro’s interest in the advanced technology used by Korean shipbuilders. Collaboration could potentially lead to improvements in U.S. shipbuilding techniques.
  • Long-Term Vision: The press release emphasizes Secretary Del Toro’s vision for a revitalized U.S. shipbuilding industry that encompasses both commercial and naval vessels. This broader perspective suggests a long-term strategy for strengthening the entire maritime sector.

Looking Ahead: Building Here vs. Outsourcing

The debate hinges on two central options:

  • Domestic Shipbuilding: Renewed investment in American shipyards could create jobs and bolster domestic manufacturing. But it might come at a cost in terms of time and expense.
  • Outsourcing: Turning to foreign shipyards could expedite production and potentially reduce costs. However, this raises concerns about national security and dependence on foreign entities.

A Complex Calculus: Speed, Cost, and Security

The ideal solution likely lies somewhere between these extremes. We’ll explore:

  • The “cost” of outsourcing: Is it solely financial? What are the potential security risks of relying on foreign shipbuilders for critical naval vessels?
  • Maximizing Efficiency: Can domestic shipyards improve efficiency to compete with foreign options?
  • The Long-Term View: What does a sustainable shipbuilding strategy look like for the U.S.?

We Need Your Voice: Join the Conversation

This investigation is for the American people. We encourage your questions, comments, and insights. As we delve deeper into the issue, let’s have an open dialogue about the future of American shipbuilding.

Posted on

At the Helm of Uncertainty: Charting a Course Through the Navy’s Budgetary and Operational Storms

Introduction

In the vast and often tumultuous sea that is national defense, the US Navy stands as a beacon of strength and resilience. Yet, even the mightiest fleets face storms that test their mettle and resolve. Recent revelations about significant delays in critical shipbuilding programs amidst the rising tide of strategic competition underscore the challenges at the helm of America’s naval future.

The Heart of the Matter

As the Navy’s largest trade show, the Sea-Air-Space Exposition, unfolded without the customary briefings on marquee shipbuilding programs, the waves of concern grew taller. A damning internal report unveiled sweeping delays across four pivotal shipbuilding endeavors, casting shadows over our naval preparedness against the backdrop of an expanding Chinese fleet.

The Delays Unpacked:

The cascading delays, stretching from one to three years across various programs, reveal a complex web of supply chain disruptions, exacerbated by the global pandemic, and a pattern of changing designs mid-construction. At the core of this storm is not just a battle against time and resources, but a struggle to adapt and realign with the relentless pace of technological and geopolitical shifts.

Implications for Strategic Readiness:

The ripples of these delays extend far beyond the shipyards. They touch upon the very essence of our strategic readiness and our ability to project power across the globe. As we navigate through these troubled waters, the need for a resilient and adaptable naval force has never been more pronounced.

Charting a Course Forward

In the face of these challenges, the path forward demands more than just steadfast resolve; it requires a comprehensive reevaluation of our shipbuilding and procurement strategies. This involves not only addressing the immediate hurdles of supply chain and workforce shortages but also fostering a more agile and responsive industrial base that can weather the storms of uncertainty.

A Call to Action

As we stand at this critical juncture, the call to action resonates louder than ever. It is a call for collaboration between the Navy, Congress, and industry partners to forge innovative solutions that ensure the timely delivery of our future fleet. It is a call for vigilance and adaptability in the face of evolving threats and opportunities.

Conclusion

The journey ahead is fraught with challenges, yet it is within the tempest that the true strength of our Navy and our nation is forged. As we chart a course through these budgetary and operational storms with foresight, innovation, and unwavering commitment, we face a critical examination of our shipbuilding practices and the evolving demands we place upon them. Bryan Clark, a seasoned voice from the Hudson Institute, articulates this sentiment, noting, ‘The Navy just keeps larding new requirements on the ships. And each new generation is so much more sophisticated than the predecessor that inevitably you’re going to get to the point where you’re just asking too much of the shipbuilding industry to punch out the ships on quick timeliness.’ This reflection serves as a poignant reminder of the delicate balance between ambition and feasibility, urging us to navigate these waters with a keen eye on both the horizon and the depths beneath..

In the ever-evolving narrative of our Navy’s strength and readiness, each challenge we encounter is an opportunity to reaffirm our resolve and adaptability. Let’s engage in this crucial conversation, not as mere observers, but as active participants in shaping the future of American naval power. Together, we can navigate through the noise and chart a course towards a stronger, more resilient Navy.