Category: China News Watch

China News Watch matters because it creates awareness, promotes understanding, highlights important issues, provides context, and facilitates the potential for international cooperation. It helps people to be informed, engaged, and aware of what is happening in the world, and could also lead to positive change.

Posted on

Australia’s Naval Reality Check—America Should Take Notes

If Australia is vulnerable, what does that mean for America?

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

In a recent article for The Australian, Jennifer Parker—an expert associate at the National Security College, Australian National University, and an adjunct fellow in naval studies at the University of New South Wales Canberra—examined China’s latest naval maneuvers near Australia. Her analysis sheds light on vulnerabilities that should concern not just Australia, but the United States as well.

A stark reality: China’s naval task force is actively testing Australia’s response—militarily, politically, and diplomatically. A Chinese fleet operating near Australia’s waters isn’t just a message to Canberra; it’s a signal to the world that Beijing is expanding its reach.

For Americans, this should be a wake-up call. Australia, a key U.S. ally, has long enjoyed security from major conflicts. Yet, China’s maneuvers off its coast expose vulnerabilities in a way that should concern every nation reliant on maritime security, global trade, and naval power.

If China can challenge Australia’s sovereignty at sea today, what stops it from doing the same to America and its allies tomorrow?

China’s Strategy: Testing and Expanding

The deployment of a Chinese naval task group so close to Australia is no accident. It follows a pattern:

  • Probing reactions. Just as it has done in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and Latin American ports, China is assessing how the world will respond to its growing military presence.
  • Disrupting global security norms. Conducting live-fire drills near civilian air routes, refusing to issue proper warnings, and testing defense response times all serve a greater goal—normalizing an expanded Chinese naval footprint.
  • Challenging the free world. This is about more than Australia. China is signaling that it has the capability—and the intent—to pressure democratic nations and reshape global power structures in its favor.

This matters to the United States because we rely on the same global shipping lanes, trade networks, and security partnerships that China is testing right now.

Lessons for the U.S. Navy and America

Jennifer Parker’s article points out an uncomfortable truth: Australia’s navy is struggling to meet growing demands. Its limited number of warships, outdated replenishment capabilities, and defense spending shortfalls are now under the spotlight.

But let’s not pretend this problem is unique to Australia.

  • The U.S. Navy is stretched thin. With growing commitments in the Indo-Pacific, Middle East, and beyond, America is already balancing a smaller fleet against greater global threats.
  • Shipbuilding capacity is a bottleneck. While China launches warships at record speed, the U.S. struggles to maintain its current fleet.
  • Defense funding debates mirror Australia’s. At just 2% of GDP, U.S. defense spending is below Cold War levels, and ship procurement continues to face budgetary and political hurdles.

Australia’s vulnerabilities should be a case study for the United States. If a key U.S. ally is struggling to keep pace with China’s naval expansion, America cannot afford to take its own naval dominance for granted.

What Needs to Happen Next?

The right response is not panic—it’s preparation. America must learn from Australia’s situation and take the following steps:

  1. Increase Naval Readiness
    • The U.S. must expand and modernize its fleet, ensuring it has the ships, submarines, and logistical support needed to deter threats.
    • Fleet maintenance and shipyard infrastructure must be prioritized so that existing assets remain operational.
  2. Strengthen Strategic Alliances
    • The U.S.-Australia partnership is critical—joint naval exercises, intelligence sharing, and strategic basing agreements must be expanded.
    • Coordination with Japan, the Philippines, India, and other Indo-Pacific allies must also be reinforced.
  3. Engage the American Public
    • Most Americans aren’t aware of how dependent the U.S. economy and security are on naval power.
    • China isn’t just flexing its military strength—it’s waging a long-term strategic contest to control global trade, technology, and resources.
    • If we don’t educate and rally support for a stronger Navy now, we risk falling behind when it matters most.

Final Thought: A Call to Action

Australia is waking up to the reality that it must invest in naval power to protect its interests. America should take this moment to do the same.

We don’t need alarmism. We need action.

The choice is simple: Invest in a stronger Navy today, or risk facing a crisis tomorrow.

Posted on

Silent Warfare: How China’s Undersea Cable Sabotage Threatens Global Security—and Why America Must Act

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

In an increasingly interconnected world, the security of undersea communication cables is paramount. These cables are the backbone of global internet infrastructure, facilitating everything from personal communications to critical financial transactions. Recent incidents, such as the detention of a Chinese-crewed cargo ship by Taiwan’s coast guard on suspicion of severing an undersea cable, underscore the vulnerabilities inherent in this infrastructure. This event not only highlights regional tensions but also serves as a stark reminder of the potential global repercussions of compromised communication networks.

The Incident: A Closer Look

On February 25, 2025, Taiwan’s coast guard detained the Hong Tai 168, a Togolese-registered cargo ship with a crew of eight Chinese nationals. The vessel was suspected of intentionally cutting an undersea cable connecting Taiwan to the Penghu Islands. This action disrupted internet services and raised alarms about possible “gray zone” tactics—covert operations that fall below the threshold of open warfare. Taiwanese authorities are investigating the incident to determine whether it was an act of deliberate sabotage or an accident.

Why This Matters to Americans

While this incident occurred thousands of miles from U.S. shores, its implications are far-reaching:

  • Global Economic Stability: Undersea cables carry approximately 95% of international internet traffic, underpinning global financial systems and commerce. Disruptions can lead to significant economic losses and market instability. citeturn0search7
  • National Security: The U.S. relies on these cables for secure military and governmental communications. Vulnerabilities in this infrastructure could be exploited for espionage or to disrupt critical operations.
  • Precedent for Hostile Actions: If such incidents go unchecked, they may embolden adversaries to target undersea infrastructure elsewhere, including cables directly connecting to the United States.

The Need for a Robust American Naval Presence

To safeguard these vital interests, a strong U.S. naval presence is essential:

  • Deterrence: A capable and visible naval force can deter potential adversaries from attempting similar acts of sabotage.
  • Rapid Response: In the event of an incident, naval assets can quickly respond to protect and repair critical infrastructure.
  • International Collaboration: The U.S. Navy can work alongside allies to monitor and secure undersea cables, sharing intelligence and resources to address threats collectively.

Broader Context

This incident is not isolated. Similar events have been reported in other regions, such as the Baltic Sea, where undersea cables have been damaged under suspicious circumstances. NATO has responded by launching operations like Baltic Sentry to counteract potential sabotage by Russian and Chinese entities.

In the Indo-Pacific, China’s maritime strategy has increasingly involved the use of civilian vessels for military and intelligence purposes, blurring the lines between commercial and military activities. This tactic complicates the enforcement of international laws and norms, posing challenges to regional stability.

Conclusion

The security of undersea communication cables is a matter of global concern, with significant implications for economic stability and national security. The recent incident involving the Hong Tai 168 serves as a critical reminder of the vulnerabilities in our interconnected world. It underscores the necessity for a robust American naval presence to deter potential threats, respond swiftly to incidents, and collaborate with international partners to protect this indispensable infrastructure.

Posted on

An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is

An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is

To the Editors of War on the Rocks and Dr. Jonathan Panter,

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Your recent commentary argues that naval forward presence is to blame for the U.S. Navy’s inability to deter China and sustain high-end warfighting capacity. While your article correctly identifies the exhaustion and strain imposed by relentless deployments, it misdiagnoses the cause and proposes a dangerous solution.

The problem is not forward presence—it’s fleet size, maintenance shortfalls, and a lack of leadership advocacy for real change.

“It is both realistic and very necessary to maintain forward presence while preparing for high-end conflict.”
— Captain Brent D. Sadler, USN (Ret.), Senior Fellow, Heritage Foundation

“The U.S. fleet size to support that deployment has significantly decreased since 1990.”
— Captain Steven Wills, USN (Ret.), Senior Advisor, Center for Maritime Strategy

A Shrinking Navy, An Expanding Mission

The numbers tell the real story:

  • ✅ In 1991: The U.S. Navy had 550 ships. Today, it has fewer than 290—a nearly 50% decline.
  • ✅ During the Cold War: Only one-fifth of the fleet was forward deployed. Today, it’s one-third, meaning fewer ships are doing more work.
  • ✅ Maintenance Shortfalls: The Navy has lost critical shore-based infrastructure, making it difficult to sustain current commitments—let alone expand.

Meanwhile, China’s threat has grown, not receded:

  • ✅ China’s Navy: Surpassed 340 ships in 2023 and continues expanding.
  • ✅ Indo-Pacific: Now the primary theater of strategic competition—where U.S. presence is more critical than ever.

The Wrong Solution: Scaling Back Presence

The argument that pulling back from forward deployment would somehow strengthen the Navy by reducing strain is not just wrong—it’s dangerous.

A reduced forward presence does not deter China—it emboldens it.

Beijing is already testing U.S. resolve in the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and beyond. A withdrawal would send a clear signal:

America is retreating.

That is not a path to deterrence—it’s a path to ceding maritime dominance to an adversary actively working to reshape the global order.

The Right Solution: A Bigger, More Sustainable Navy

Rather than abandoning forward presence, we must fix the real problem: our shrinking, overstretched fleet.

That means:

  • ✅ Growing the Fleet: Expand to at least 355 ships—endorsed repeatedly by military leaders.
  • ✅ Rebuilding Shore Support: Reinvest in shipyards, dry docks, and logistics infrastructure.
  • ✅ Leadership Advocacy: Navy leaders must demand either more ships or fewer assignments, not accept the status quo.
  • ✅ Congressional Action: Congress must prioritize fleet expansion over short-term cuts.

Conclusion: We Need More Ships, Not Fewer Commitments

Your commentary correctly highlights that the U.S. Navy is stretched thin and struggling to sustain global operations. But forward presence is not the problem. The real issue is that we are trying to maintain it with a fleet too small to sustain the mission.

For more than 75 years, forward-deployed U.S. naval forces have prevented conflict, reassured allies, and ensured maritime security. Scaling back presence does not fix the strain—it accelerates decline and weakens deterrence at the worst possible moment.

“If the United States is serious about deterring China, protecting global stability, and upholding its commitments, the answer is clear: Build a larger, more capable, and better-supported Navy.”

Educating the Public: Our Responsibility

The problem is not just military—it’s political and public awareness.

Too many Americans don’t realize how naval power secures our national and economic security. Without public pressure, there will be no political will to rebuild the fleet.

That’s why we at Americans for a Stronger Navy are launching:

“China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges”

In our upcoming educational series, we will tackle the most pressing issues facing U.S. naval power, including:

  • ✅ The Role of Naval Power in Preventing Global Conflict
  • ✅ Economic & Strategic Impact of a Shrinking Fleet
  • ✅ China & Russia’s Naval Expansion and the Strategic Threat
  • ✅ U.S. Shipbuilding Crisis: Causes and Solutions
  • ✅ Congressional Accountability: Who’s Responsible for the Shrinking Fleet?

This isn’t just a discussion—it’s a call to action.

To naval leadership, policymakers, and media: Stop pretending all is well. Demand action before the Navy reaches a breaking point.

To the American public: Get informed. Get involved. A strong Navy is not just for the military—it’s for every American who benefits from global stability.

The U.S. Navy’s forward presence is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.

The problem is not the strategy—it’s the lack of resources to sustain it.

If the U.S. wants to deter China, protect its interests, and maintain global stability, the answer is clear: Build a stronger, larger, better-supported, and more capable Navy.

We urge the administration, Congress, and military leadership to acknowledge reality:

Our commitments are not too big—our Navy is too small.

Sincerely,  Bill Cullifer
Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

Posted on

Is DeepSeek, Deep Trouble? The U.S. Navy Thinks So.

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

The U.S. Navy has issued a firm directive banning the use of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence platform, citing serious security and ethical concerns. This move highlights growing apprehensions over foreign AI technology, particularly when developed in adversarial nations like China.

What’s the Issue with DeepSeek?

On January 28, 2025, the Navy sent out an “all hands” email warning all personnel to avoid using DeepSeek “in any capacity.” The directive explicitly prohibits service members from downloading, installing, or using the AI for work-related or personal tasks.

The concerns are rooted in the platform’s Chinese origins and its potential ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Like TikTok, DeepSeek is suspected of being subject to Chinese laws that compel companies to share data with the government upon request. Cybersecurity experts warn that the AI may be capable of tracking user keystrokes and collecting sensitive data.

Why Now?

DeepSeek has recently made headlines for surpassing OpenAI’s ChatGPT in popularity on Apple’s App Store. The app’s sudden rise, its free access model, and its reportedly advanced reasoning capabilities have made it an instant disruptor in the AI space. But its low-cost development and unclear data security policies have set off alarm bells.

Government and Industry Reaction

  • President Donald Trump called DeepSeek’s success “a wake-up call” for American tech companies, urging greater innovation in AI.
  • Marc Andreessen, a billionaire tech investor, likened the rise of DeepSeek to a “Sputnik moment”, referring to the Soviet Union’s early lead in the space race.
  • Cybersecurity analysts warn that if DeepSeek gains widespread adoption, it could become a national security risk due to potential espionage capabilities.

The Bigger Picture

The U.S. has a history of banning or restricting Chinese tech over security concerns, with TikTok being the most high-profile example. The DeepSeek ban aligns with a broader generative AI policy shift within the Department of Defense, which prioritizes domestic and trusted AI sources for operational use.

Final Thoughts

The Navy’s ban raises critical questions about how foreign AI might be used for surveillance, data gathering, and influence operations. While DeepSeek might be an impressive technological achievement, the potential risks far outweigh the benefits—at least in the eyes of U.S. military leadership.

For Americans concerned about national security, this move should serve as a reminder: Who controls the technology, controls the information..

Stay updated on U.S. Navy news at StrongerNavy.org.

Posted on

Strengthening America’s Maritime Future: A Wake-Up Call for Action

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we have long advocated for a robust maritime strategy that includes both a stronger U.S. Navy and a revitalized civilian maritime industry. Our commitment to this cause is rooted in a belief that America’s strength at sea is indispensable to its national security, economic stability, and global leadership.

Recently, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) released findings from an investigation into China’s dominance in the shipbuilding, maritime, and logistics sectors, revealing practices that undermine fair competition and threaten American interests. This news reaffirms the urgency of revitalizing our shipbuilding industry—a call echoed by U.S. legislators like Senator John Garamendi and others who are leading efforts to rebuild our maritime capabilities.

What the Investigation Found

The USTR investigation, launched in response to petitions by five unions, highlights how China’s aggressive industrial policies have positioned it as a global leader in shipbuilding. According to USTR Katherine Tai, China builds over 1,700 ships annually—dwarfing the fewer than five built by the United States. The report emphasizes that Beijing’s practices displace foreign firms, foster dependencies, and create significant economic and security risks for the U.S.

Quoting Katherine Tai:
“Beijing’s targeted dominance of these sectors undermines fair, market-oriented competition, increases economic security risks, and is the greatest barrier to revitalization of U.S. industries.”

Why This Matters

America’s maritime industry was once the backbone of our global influence and security. Today, it is a shadow of its former self, leaving us vulnerable to external dependencies. The decline of U.S. shipbuilding not only erodes our military readiness but also jeopardizes our economic security, particularly in the face of escalating geopolitical tensions with China.

The implications extend beyond shipbuilding. Logistics, supply chains, and the broader maritime ecosystem are critical to ensuring that America can sustain its global commitments and respond to crises effectively. As Alliance for American Manufacturing President Scott Paul aptly noted:
“Failing to take decisive action will leave our shipbuilding capabilities at the mercy of Beijing’s persistent predatory market distortions.”

Legislative Efforts to Revitalize U.S. Shipbuilding

Amid these challenges, leaders like Senator John Garamendi are working to reverse the tide. Garamendi, alongside Senators Mark Kelly and Todd Young, recently introduced the SHIPS for America Act—a comprehensive, bipartisan effort to rebuild the U.S. shipbuilding industry and expand the U.S.-flagged fleet. Key provisions of this legislation include:

  • Establishing a national maritime strategy and a White House Maritime Security Advisor.
  • Expanding the U.S.-flagged fleet by 250 ships over the next decade.
  • Rebuilding the shipyard industrial base with tax credits, financial incentives, and funding for workforce development.
  • Strengthening regulations to ensure government-funded cargo is transported on U.S.-flagged vessels.

These efforts align closely with our own calls for a balanced strategy that integrates the needs of both the Navy and civilian maritime industries.

What Needs to Be Done

The USTR’s findings, combined with the SHIPS for America Act and related initiatives, offer a roadmap to reclaim America’s maritime leadership. However, this will require decisive action from policymakers, industry leaders, and the American public. We need to:

  • Invest in shipbuilding infrastructure and workforce development.
  • Expand the U.S.-flagged fleet to reduce dependence on foreign shipping.
  • Foster innovation in shipbuilding technologies to compete globally.
  • Unite bipartisan support for maritime legislation that prioritizes national security and economic resilience.

A Call to Action: Wake Up, America!

The stakes have never been higher. As we outlined in our recent open letter, the decline of America’s maritime capabilities is not just an industry problem—it’s a national security crisis. For too long, we have allowed complacency to erode our standing as a maritime power. It’s time to wake up.

We urge you to contact your representatives and demand support for legislation like the SHIPS for America Act. Share this message with your community, and join us in advocating for a stronger Navy and a revitalized civilian maritime industry.

America’s future at sea depends on it. Let’s make it happen.

Credit to AFP for their reporting on the USTR investigation and to the Alliance for American Manufacturing for their continued advocacy.

“`

Posted on

Global Risks to Undersea Infrastructure and the Growing Need for Defense

All Hands on Deck by StrongerNavy.org

Undersea cables are the unseen arteries of modern communication, carrying 99% of the world’s internet and telecommunications traffic. Yet, as geopolitical tensions rise, these vital systems are becoming frequent targets of sabotage and hybrid warfare. Incidents from the Baltic Sea to the Taiwan Strait highlight both their strategic importance and vulnerabilities.

The Stakes: Why Undersea Cables Matter

  • Global Communication: These cables carry 99% of international data, enabling everything from financial transactions to government communications.
  • Economic Lifeline: Damaging these cables can disrupt trillions of dollars in daily transactions, impacting economies and businesses globally.
  • Military and Security Concerns: Undersea cables are vital for military communication, making them high-value targets in hybrid warfare strategies.

Recent Incidents and Their Implications
Baltic Sea

  • October 2023: The Hong Kong-registered containership Newnew Polar Bear dragged its anchor across the seabed, damaging the Balticconnector natural gas pipeline and data cables in the Gulf of Finland. The ship fled toward Russia, evading investigation.
  • December 2024: A power cable between Finland and Estonia was severed, and suspicion fell on a Russian “shadow fleet” tanker, the Eagle S. Finnish authorities found specialized surveillance equipment on board, allegedly used to monitor naval activity.

Taiwan Strait

  • February 2023: Two undersea cables connecting Taiwan to the Matsu Islands were severed by a Chinese fishing boat and cargo vessel, leaving the island without internet for weeks.
  • January 2025: The freighter Shunxin-39 severed a cable off Taiwan’s northern coast. Although the ship escaped investigation, Taiwan suspects deliberate sabotage. Herming Chiueh, Deputy Head of Taiwan’s Digital Ministry, said the cable-cutting was likely intentional: “You need to accidentally [drop your] anchor on the cable, and then you need to accidentally turn on your engine with the anchor down, and even [if] you realize your anchor is down, you need to keep the engine moving until you cut the cable.”

Red Sea

  • Houthi rebels were suspected of damaging cables belonging to four major telecom networks, though the group denied involvement.

The Strategic Significance of Undersea Infrastructure

  • Economic Importance: These cables carry trillions of dollars in financial transactions daily. Disruptions can cripple economies, hinder communication, and destabilize global markets.
  • Military Implications: Reliable undersea communications are vital for military operations and coordination. Sabotage could cripple responses during crises, delaying information flow and strategic decisions.
  • Geopolitical Pressures: Russia and China employ unorthodox tactics to assert dominance and destabilize their adversaries.

U.S. Navy and Allied Responses

  • Enhanced Patrols: NATO and allied nations are increasing naval presence in the Baltic and other regions to monitor suspicious activity.
  • Technological Investments: AI-driven systems and underwater sensors are being deployed to detect and deter sabotage.
  • Policy and Collaboration: Strengthened international legal frameworks and collaborative efforts among allies are essential for defending undersea infrastructure.

The Way Forward

  • Mitigating Risks: Building redundant systems, deploying advanced monitoring technologies, and fostering public-private partnerships are key steps to reduce vulnerabilities.
  • A Call for Action: Safeguarding undersea cables requires prioritization at the highest levels of government and international collaboration to counter hybrid threats.

Undersea cables, often taken for granted, are critical to the global economy, security, and military operations. The recent spate of incidents underscores the need for vigilance, innovation, and collaboration. For the U.S. and its allies, safeguarding these invisible lifelines is not just a technical challenge—it’s a strategic imperative.

Posted on

U.S. Navy News – December 11-19, 2024

Global News

NATO Aircraft Carrier to Visit West Pacific
France’s Charles de Gaulle Carrier Strike Group is scheduled to visit Japan in early 2025 during its Indo-Pacific deployment, with stops in Okinawa. This reflects NATO’s growing strategic focus on the region.

USS Savannah Makes Historic Cambodian Port Call
The Littoral Combat Ship USS Savannah docked in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, from December 16–20, marking the first U.S. Navy port call in Cambodia in eight years.

USS Harry S. Truman Enters Middle East Waters
The USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group transited the Suez Canal on December 15, bringing U.S. carrier presence back to the region after a month-long absence.

Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 151 Returns for Holidays
The “Vigilantes” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 151 returned to Naval Air Station Lemoore on December 14 after a 5-month deployment in U.S. 7th and 5th Fleet areas.

U.S. Navy Tests Hypersonic Missile
A successful test of the Common Hypersonic Glide Body showcased advancements in the Navy and Army’s hypersonic strike capabilities, achieving speeds at extended ranges.

U.S. Navy Awards Textron $106M for Mine Sweeping Technology
A new contract for the Mine Sweeping Payload Delivery System aims to expand semi-autonomous mine-clearing operations, ensuring maritime security.

U.S. Navy’s Next-Gen Jammer Completes First Deployment
Advanced electronic warfare systems, capable of disrupting enemy air defenses, completed their inaugural deployment with notable success.

New Constellation-Class Frigate Honors Female Naval Pioneer
The USS Joy Bright Hancock (FFG 69) will commemorate one of the first female Navy officers and her trailblazing contributions to military gender integration.

U.S. Navy Intercepts Houthi Attacks in Gulf of Aden
For the second time this month, destroyers USS Stockdale and USS O’Kane intercepted missiles and drones from Houthi forces in the Gulf of Aden.

Quantum Computing for Naval Applications
The Navy explores quantum computing for tasks such as simulating war games, enabling secure communications, and solving maintenance challenges, aiming for transformative operational impacts.

Congress Allocates $5.7 Billion for Virginia-Class Submarines
A stopgap funding bill includes significant investments for the Virginia-class program, emphasizing the importance of submarine force expansion.

U.S. Navy to Expand Constellation-Class Frigate Production
To mitigate delays, the Navy considers adding a second shipyard to accelerate the production of these versatile surface combatants.

China Watch
China Releases ‘Hit List’ Targeting U.S. Navy Systems
The PLA published plans to target U.S. Navy carrier groups, including AEGIS vessels and E-2C Hawkeyes, by overwhelming electronic warfare systems.

Pentagon Warns of China’s Growing Naval Power. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) of China has significantly expanded its global reach over the past year, moving more frequently and in greater force beyond its regional waters. This growth is attributed to the ongoing development and deployment of advanced warships and logistics support vessels, which enable the PLAN to operate at greater distances from its home waters

Report: Despite Corruption Problems, China Progresses Toward Modernization
The Defense Department today released the annual “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China” report, a congressionally mandated annual report that offers insight into the capabilities, strategies and goals of China and its military.

China Conducts Largest Naval Drill in Decades Near Taiwan
A massive PLA naval exercise, involving 100 ships, heightened regional tensions as unannounced drills continued close to Taiwan.

Satellite Image Shows Chinese Aircraft Carrier Near Vietnam’s Shores. A satellite image captured on Tuesday reveals a Chinese aircraft carrier operating in the contested South China Sea, close to Vietnam’s coastline.

Russia Watch
Russia Disrupts Baltic Communications
Russian forces have interfered with mobile and maritime communication in the Baltic Sea, testing NATO’s response and posing risks to shipping and energy supplies.

Russia’s Investment in Underwater Drones Increases
Russia and other global powers advance unmanned undersea capabilities, focusing on drones capable of long-range and deep-sea operations.

Iran Watch
Iran’s New Drone Corvette Operates Undetected
The Shahid Bagheri drone corvette patrolled the Persian Gulf for weeks, showcasing Iran’s increasing maritime stealth capabilities.

U.S. Strikes Houthi Command Hub in Yemen
Retaliatory strikes on a Houthi hub responsible for launching attacks in the Gulf of Aden emphasized the Navy’s commitment to regional security.

Upcoming Developments
French Carrier Strike Group Deployment to Japan
France’s Charles de Gaulle Carrier Strike Group will reinforce Indo-Pacific partnerships in early 2025 with planned stops in Okinawa.

U.S. Navy’s E-130J Aircraft Contract Announced
A $3.5 billion contract for the E-130J “Doomsday Plane” will enhance nuclear command and control capabilities.

Posted on

U.S. Navy News – December 5-11, 2024

Introduction
This week’s U.S. Navy news showcases advancements in naval technology, significant operational updates, homecomings, and key milestones. From cutting-edge contracts to strategic operations, the Navy continues to push boundaries in safeguarding global security and maintaining maritime superiority.

Advancing Naval Technology

CNO Visits Orca XLUUV Facility
Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Chief of Naval Operations, toured Boeing’s Orca Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV) facility, highlighting the critical role of unmanned systems in expanding multi-mission naval capabilities.

Raytheon Awarded Contract for Next Generation Jammer
Raytheon secured a $590 million contract to develop the Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) system in partnership with the Royal Australian Air Force, boosting electronic warfare capabilities.

Trellix Enhances Cybersecurity for Navy Enterprise Grid
The Navy has partnered with Trellix to implement AI-driven intrusion prevention systems, enhancing defenses against cyber threats across critical networks.

General Atomics Advances Long Range Maneuvering Projectile
General Atomics received funding to advance the Long Range Maneuvering Projectile, enabling precision strike and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities at ranges over 120 km.

Operational Updates

US Navy defeats Houthi attacks in Gulf of Aden for second time in weeks. The attacks took place while destroyers USS Stockdale and USS O’Kane were transiting the Gulf of Aden from Dec. 9 to Dec. 10

Freedom of Navigation Operation in South China Sea
USS Preble (DDG 88) asserted navigational rights near the Spratley Islands during a FONOP, challenging excessive maritime claims in the region.

USS Green Bay Homeport Shift
After 10 years stationed in Japan, USS Green Bay (LPD 20) returned to San Diego, marking a strategic realignment to enhance fleet readiness.

Sling Stone Exercise in Guam
The Indo-Pacific Command’s Sling Stone exercise validated Guam’s Defense System and bolstered multi-domain operational readiness.

USS Stockdale and USS O’Kane Defeat Houthi Attacks
The destroyers intercepted Houthi missiles and drones targeting U.S.-flagged ships in the Gulf of Aden, successfully defending maritime trade routes.

Ceremonial and Cultural Milestones

USS Arkansas Christened
Virginia-class submarine USS Arkansas was christened by civil rights pioneer Carlotta Walls LaNier, honoring its legacy and future mission readiness.

Pearl Harbor Day Commemorations
The 83rd anniversary of Pearl Harbor Day featured ceremonies such as the Blackened Canteen Ceremony and interment of a survivor on the USS Utah, connecting generations in remembrance.

Key Partnerships and Agreements

U.S.-Japan MOU on Electronic Attack Capabilities
The U.S. Navy and JMSDF signed a memorandum enhancing bilateral electronic attack operations, strengthening interoperability between the two forces.

University of Hawaiʻi-Navy Partnership
A 10-year agreement was signed to support natural and cultural resource conservation on Navy installations in Hawaiʻi, emphasizing climate resilience.

Homecomings and Logistics

USNS Patuxent Returns for the Holidays
After a 10-month deployment, USNS Patuxent (T-AO 201) returned to Norfolk in time for the crew to celebrate Christmas with their families.

USS Arleigh Burke Returns to Rota
USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) completed a successful patrol in Europe, reaffirming NATO partnerships and operational readiness.

Industry Updates

Shipbuilders Address Questionable Welds
Newport News Shipbuilding identified issues with preheating steps in some welds and is implementing corrective measures to ensure quality standards.

Keel Laid for USNS Thurgood Marshall
The keel-laying ceremony for the USNS Thurgood Marshall, the seventh John Lewis-class replenishment oiler, marked another milestone for General Dynamics NASSCO.

U.S. Public Policy Watch

Federal Judge Upholds Naval Academy Admissions Policy
A federal judge upheld the Naval Academy’s race-conscious admissions policy, emphasizing the importance of diversity in strengthening national security.

Congress Discusses Expanding Overseas Naval Repairs
Discussions in Congress advocated for utilizing Japanese and South Korean shipyards to address repair needs and counter the growing capabilities of China’s navy.

China Watch

  • U.S. National Security Memorandum on China: President Joe Biden has approved a national security memorandum addressing the growing cooperation between China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. The document recommends enhancing interagency cooperation, expediting information sharing with allies, and preparing for simultaneous crises involving these nations.
  • Satellite Photos Show China’s Warships in Naval Standoff. Chinese and Taiwanese warships were spotted in a standoff in the contested waters near Taiwan on Tuesday as China continued its “extremely rare” large-scale exercises at sea. Photographs captured by the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-2 satellites. The five blue dots are the Taiwanese naval vessels, while the five red dots are the Chinese.

Russia Watch

  • Russian Military Presence in Syria: Despite the recent overthrow of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Russian forces continue to control key military installations in Syria, including the Tartus naval base and Hmeimim air base. These bases are vital for Russia’s operations in the Mediterranean and Africa.
  • Calls for Ceasefire in Ukraine: Following the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, President-elect Donald Trump has urged Russia to enact a ceasefire in Ukraine, citing Russia’s weakened state due to ongoing conflicts and economic challenges.

Iran Watch

  • Alleged Iranian Drone Activity Near U.S. Coast: Representative Jeff Van Drew has raised concerns about unidentified drones spotted over New Jersey, suggesting they may be launched from an Iranian “mothership” off the East Coast. The Pentagon, however, has found no evidence supporting this claim.
  • Potential Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Program: Analysts are debating the implications of a preemptive strike on Iran to halt its advancing nuclear program, noting the acceleration of uranium enrichment and the potential for significant geopolitical shifts in the Middle East.

Conclusion
The U.S. Navy’s efforts this week demonstrate resilience, innovation, and commitment to defending national and global interests. From technological advances to operational triumphs, the Navy continues to meet the challenges of a complex maritime environment.

Stay tuned for more updates and analysis next week at StrongerNavy.org/blog.

#NavyNews #USNavy #MilitaryUpdates #NavalOperations #MaritimeSecurity #Innovation

Posted on

Implications of the Chinese Telecom Hack: A Call for Awareness and Action

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

For over 20 years, I’ve worked in the telecommunications and tech industries. During that time, I’ve witnessed and studied the evolving landscape of cybersecurity threats. Recent news that Chinese hackers infiltrated at least eight U.S. telecommunications providers is alarming but not surprising. This incident is just the tip of the iceberg—a glimpse into vulnerabilities that have far-reaching implications for national security, economic stability, and our armed forces, particularly the U.S. Navy. Let me be clear: this isn’t about fearmongering or hoping for conflict; it’s about preventing one.

The Scope of the Threat

According to reports, the Chinese hacking campaign—referred to as “Salt Typhoon”—targeted major telecom companies such as Verizon and AT&T. These hackers accessed bulk phone records, call metadata, and, in some cases, intercepted communications involving senior U.S. political figures. What’s more chilling is the continued presence of these hackers within the networks, raising concerns about ongoing compromises.

While the theft of data may seem abstract, the potential ramifications are concrete and sobering. The ability to track communication patterns, intercept sensitive calls, and manipulate network infrastructure gives adversaries a significant intelligence advantage. Imagine this capability wielded during a military crisis or against the Navy’s own communication networks—the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Implications for the U.S. Navy

The Navy relies heavily on secure communications, whether coordinating fleet movements, managing logistics, or conducting intelligence operations. A breach in telecom networks jeopardizes:

  1. Operational Security: The Navy’s operations—from carrier strike group deployments to undersea warfare—require secure, untraceable communication. If adversaries gain access to telecom data, they could anticipate and counter U.S. naval movements.
  2. Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: The Navy’s vast supply chain is interconnected with civilian infrastructure, including telecommunications. Disruptions or breaches in these systems could delay critical resupplies or expose sensitive information.
  3. Cyber Warfare Readiness: The Salt Typhoon hack underscores the urgent need for the Navy to invest in robust cybersecurity measures. As cyber and kinetic warfare increasingly intertwine, protecting digital assets is as vital as safeguarding physical ones.
  4. Strategic Deterrence: The perception of vulnerability can be as damaging as the reality. If adversaries believe they can compromise our communications, it may embolden their aggression, undermining the Navy’s role as a deterrent force.

A Call for Collaboration

This crisis isn’t just a Navy problem; it’s an American problem. It’s a reminder that the Navy’s effectiveness is deeply tied to the resilience of civilian infrastructure. Here’s how we can respond:

  • Public Awareness: Americans need to understand the connection between cybersecurity and national defense. This isn’t just about protecting data; it’s about safeguarding our way of life.
  • Strengthening Partnerships: The Navy must collaborate with telecom providers, federal agencies, and cybersecurity firms to address vulnerabilities and share intelligence.
  • Advocating for Encryption: Encrypted communications are a vital defense against cyber espionage. Encouraging the use of secure messaging apps and encrypted calls among military personnel and the general public can mitigate risks.
  • Investing in Cyber Defense: Congress and the Department of Defense must prioritize funding for cyber capabilities, not as an auxiliary effort but as a central pillar of national defense.

Join the Conversation

I’ve been raising concerns about these issues for years, and this moment feels like a culmination of warnings that went unheeded. But there’s still time to act. We can prevent future breaches and strengthen our defenses, but it requires collaboration across all sectors—government, military, industry, and citizens.

I invite you to be part of this conversation. What are your thoughts on the implications for the Navy? How can we better prepare and respond to these threats? Let’s work together to ensure that the “tip of the iceberg” doesn’t sink the ship.

Share your ideas and insights at Facebook or on Twitter. Together, we can make a difference.