Peace Through Strength – Community Driven – Membership Supported
Category: China News Watch
China News Watch matters because it creates awareness, promotes understanding, highlights important issues, provides context, and facilitates the potential for international cooperation. It helps people to be informed, engaged, and aware of what is happening in the world, and could also lead to positive change.
By Bill Cullifer Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy Former U.S. Navy Destroyer Sailor (1970s)
There’s been a lively debate online between economic giants Larry Summers and David Sacks about tariffs, trade policy, and the consequences of decades of globalization. But while they spar over markets and presidential strategies, a bigger question goes largely unspoken:
Who picks up the pieces when economic policy becomes a national vulnerability?
As someone who served in the U.S. Navy in the 1970s and now leads Americans for a Stronger Navy, I’ve watched closely as the Navy quietly shoulders the consequences of decisions made far from the sea. While economists argue over the stock market’s reaction to tariffs, the Navy secures global trade routes, deters adversaries, and absorbs the burden of an offshored industrial base.
But the Navy isn’t alone. Entire sectors of American life—logistics, agriculture, energy, pharmaceuticals, entertainment, finance, and technology—depend on the smooth flow of global trade. From major ports and retailers to family farms and Fortune 500 companies, virtually every modern American business benefits from the stability the Navy helps provide.
The American economy is global because the U.S. Navy keeps it that way.
Yet in the recent debate, while Summers described trillions lost in market volatility and economic fallout, no one mentioned the ripple effects on military readiness, deterrence, or strategic capability. That absence reflects a dangerous blind spot.
When Wall Street stumbles, the Navy sails. When diplomacy falters or trade routes are threatened, the Navy deploys. But today it’s doing so with fewer ships, aging platforms, and underinvested shipyards—while our adversaries build, modernize, and maneuver.
This isn’t just a Navy issue. It’s a business issue. A national issue.
If your industry touches global trade—if you depend on international logistics, rare earth minerals, undersea cables, satellite access, shipping lanes, or simply consumer confidence—then you depend on a ready and capable Navy.
This is a message to American industry: You benefit. You must engage. You must contribute.
We need your voice—and your leadership—in support of:
Rebuilding our shipbuilding and repair base
Investing in drones, AI, and technologies that give our fleet an edge
Modernizing infrastructure and dry docks that sustain readiness
Funding advocacy and education to spark public awareness
The economic world order your industry thrives in exists because American sea power has kept the global commons safe for decades. That foundation is eroding—and silence is no longer an option.
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we’re connecting the dots between civic awareness, economic strategy, and maritime strength. We’ve launched a 24-part educational initiative to help Americans understand what’s at stake and how to act.
Explore the series: Charting the Course – For Country. For Unity. For a Stronger Navy.
Whether you’re a CEO, policymaker, investor, teacher, or neighbor—this affects you. Now is the time to link economic resilience with strategic defense. To give the Navy the tools—not just praise—before the next storm arrives.
This is your moment to lead. Not from the sidelines—but from the front.
Use your platform. Leverage your influence. Show the next generation that prosperity is earned—and defended.
Because a secure economy doesn’t start with policy. It starts with power. And power starts at sea.
Learn more at StrongerNavy.org and join the movement to educate, equip, and engage.
A stronger Navy requires a stronger America behind it. Let’s get to work.
For the first time in history, Taiwan has charged a Chinese ship captain with intentionally damaging undersea communication cables, signaling an alarming escalation in maritime tensions across the Taiwan Strait. The Hong Tai 58, registered in Togo but manned by a Chinese crew, was detained in February 2025 after allegedly anchoring over a key undersea cable near southern Taiwan.
The Incident
According to Taiwanese prosecutors, the captain—identified only by his surname Wang—damaged a vital communication cable while operating near the island’s southwestern coast. Despite claiming innocence, Wang reportedly refused to identify the vessel’s owner and displayed “a bad attitude,” according to prosecutors. Seven other Chinese nationals were detained but not charged and will be repatriated to China.
This is the first prosecution of its kind in Taiwan’s history, setting a precedent amid increasing concerns over gray zone warfare tactics used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Why Americans Should Care
Submarine cables carry 95% of global internet traffic. Sabotaging these links disrupts everything from communications and commerce to national security systems.
Taiwan is a strategic democratic partner and a flashpoint in U.S.–China tensions. Attacks on Taiwan’s infrastructure test the international community’s resolve.
The incident mirrors Russian sabotage tactics in the Baltic Sea—raising concerns that China may adopt similar covert disruption strategies.
This signals the increasing militarization of civilian maritime assets, blurring the line between merchant shipping and state-directed activities.
Implications for the U.S. Navy
This event reinforces the need for enhanced undersea surveillance, cooperation with Pacific allies, and investment in resilient infrastructure.
It highlights vulnerabilities in gray zone warfare, where actions fall below the threshold of military conflict but still pose national security risks.
The Navy’s role in protecting undersea infrastructure may need to evolve to include closer coordination with civilian entities and new mission sets.
Implications for Our Allies
Allied nations must reassess how they monitor and secure commercial vessels operating near sensitive areas.
There’s an urgent need for multinational maritime domain awareness and coordinated responses to cable disruptions.
Taiwan’s move to press charges sets a precedent others can follow, applying legal pressure alongside naval deterrence.
Conclusion
This case is a shot across the bow in the information age. As tensions rise in the Indo-Pacific, Americans must pay closer attention to the vulnerabilities beneath the waves. A resilient Navy—and public awareness—will be essential to deter further acts of sabotage.
210728-N-FO714-1033 TAIWAN STRAIT (July 28, 2021) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold (DDG 65) transits the Taiwan Strait while conducting routine underway operations. Benfold is forward-deployed to the U.S. 7th Fleet area of operations in support of a free and open Indo-Pacific. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Deanna C. Gonzales)
Introduction
In a recent Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Senator Tom Cotton posed a sobering question to Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command: What would happen to the global economy if China attacked or invaded Taiwan?
The answer, echoed by both military and civilian experts, is nothing short of catastrophic.
Investor Ken Griffin warned that a rupture over Taiwan could send the world into “great depression circumstances.” Ian Easton of the Naval War College has long warned of China’s ability to disrupt global trade and exploit vulnerabilities in the Indo-Pacific. The U.S. Navy and our allies cannot afford to treat these concerns as hypothetical.
Why Taiwan Matters to the Global Economy
Taiwan is not only a leading global manufacturer of semiconductors—it is also a key node in international shipping. Roughly one-third of the world’s trade passes through the South China Sea. Any disruption caused by Chinese military action—especially a blockade or invasion of Taiwan—would choke critical sea lanes and sever the supply chains that power everything from cars to smartphones to critical defense systems.
What Ken Griffin Got Right
In January 2024, Griffin put it bluntly:
“If there were a rupture around Taiwan, it would be catastrophic to both the Chinese and to the American economy.”
Griffin wasn’t talking about market jitters—he was warning about supply chain collapse, capital flight, manufacturing shutdowns, and global financial panic. These effects wouldn’t just hit Wall Street—they would impact farmers, truckers, teachers, and service members alike.
Sea Power Is Economic Poweruh
This is why Americans for a Stronger Navy continues to sound the alarm. The U.S. Navy isn’t just a military force—it’s a shield for global commerce. Sea power ensures stability in the Indo-Pacific and protects the economic lifelines that Americans depend on.
Today’s tools of deterrence extend beyond warships. Ships, drones, AI—they all play a critical role in keeping trade flowing and conflict at bay. Without continued investment in these technologies and the people who operate them, our economy and our alliances remain vulnerable.
Blockade drills and military posturing by China are not symbolic—they are preparation. And we must respond with strategic clarity, industrial readiness, and unwavering public support for naval strength.
Conclusion: Americans Deserve to Know
This isn’t just a military issue—it’s an economic one. The American people deserve to understand what’s at stake, and what it means to be unprepared.
If we fail to invest in our fleet, fortify our alliances, and educate the public, we risk more than just ships—we risk our prosperity.
A Review of Heritage Foundation Report BG3902 by Americans for a Stronger Navy
Introduction
The Heritage Foundation’s latest report, “Arming for Peace: Expanding the Defense Industrial Base and Arming Taiwan Faster” (BG3902), echoes what Americans for a Stronger Navy has been sounding the alarm on: The threats facing the United States are real, escalating, and dangerously close to overwhelming our current naval capabilities. As Brent Sadler writes, the time for talk has passed. Action is overdue. If we don’t mobilize now, America risks losing the ability to deter war and defend freedom in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.
As Sadler states: “As Americans go about their daily lives unmolested, the world is accelerating in its change—much of it perilous to U.S. national survival.” He warns that “on the back of a decades-long sustained military build-up, China’s military is increasingly confident and willing to directly challenge the U.S.”
His call to action is clear: “The U.S. must restore ebbing national deterrence and prevent a war in Asia—while not ceding its democratic way of life and prosperity for the next generations.”
Key Findings That Should Wake America Up
China is preparing for war. Admiral Davidson’s 2021 warning that China could strike Taiwan by 2027 has not only proven prescient, it’s now backed by an unprecedented military buildup. China has conducted massive joint-force invasion rehearsals and increased provocations around Taiwan. As Brent Sadler put it, “Aggressive maneuvers around Taiwan right now are not exercises, as they call them. They are rehearsals.”
That warning was underscored this week when the Chinese military launched large-scale joint drills around Taiwan, including its Shandong aircraft carrier battle group. According to China’s own Eastern Theater Command, these drills are a “severe warning and forceful containment against Taiwan independence.” With missile forces, air strikes, and blockade rehearsals now unfolding, many in Taiwan — and around the world — are rightfully concerned. Sadler’s insights about China’s evolving risk tolerance add important context to these real-time developments.
Further validating the urgency, the U.S. Naval War College’s China Maritime Report No. 14 found that Chinese analysts themselves believe the PLA has narrowed the gap with the U.S. military, especially in its immediate region. “There is consensus in China that the PLA has narrowed the gap in overall military capabilities with the United States over the last two decades,” the report notes.
Russia and China are approaching U.S. shores. Testimony from U.S. Northern Command chief Gen. Gregory Guillot before Congress confirmed that joint Russian-Chinese military patrols have entered the U.S. Air Defense Identification Zone near Alaska — levels not seen since before the Ukraine war began. One coordinated flight last July saw Russian TU-95 and Chinese H-6 bombers test U.S. response time. This should serve as a wake-up call: our adversaries are not just projecting power near Taiwan, they’re probing U.S. airspace and waters closer to home. As Politico reported, Chinese “dual-use” vessels under scientific pretenses are mapping the Arctic for future military operations.
U.S. deterrence is fading. Years of underinvestment in shipbuilding and naval readiness have created dangerous gaps. Delays in weapons deliveries, inadequate port infrastructure, and a depleted missile defense stockpile are symptoms of a nation unprepared for a prolonged maritime conflict. As Sadler warns, “Failing to act… could result in the most destructive and consequential war the U.S. has ever had to fight.”
The Navy is stretched thin. The U.S. Navy has sustained an aggressive forward presence, but at great cost. Ship wear, sailor fatigue, and insufficient repair capacity are taking their toll. The grounding of the USNS Big Horn disrupted combat ops in the Red Sea, highlighting our logistical fragility. Sadler notes, “This comes at a cost in added wear on the ships and sailors reliant on a logistics infrastructure of ports, support ships, and dry docks too few to assure contested forward naval operations.”
The world is on fire. From Ukraine to the Red Sea to the Arctic, our adversaries are watching and testing U.S. resolve. China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea now operate more boldly, confident in America’s disunity and domestic distraction.
Taiwan is not a distant concern. More than 80,000 Americans live, work, or travel there. A war over Taiwan would drag us into conflict, devastate global supply chains, and send shockwaves through the U.S. economy. As Sadler puts it plainly, “Taiwan is where over 80,000 Americans live, work, or travel on any given day.”
China’s geographic advantage cannot be ignored. According to the CMSI report, Chinese military capabilities are particularly potent within the First Island Chain, which includes Taiwan. “Chinese capabilities may…contest U.S. supremacy in scenarios close to home,” the report warns. That’s where deterrence matters most—and where readiness is most urgently needed.
Why Americans Should Care
This is not just a Navy problem. It’s an American problem. Delays in defense production, weak infrastructure, and an uninformed public are national vulnerabilities. If Americans fail to understand what is at stake, we will fail to hold our leaders accountable. And if we fail to act, we will be forced to react under far worse circumstances.
A strong Navy protects freedom of navigation, global trade, energy security, and the American way of life. Without it, our adversaries will decide what happens in the Taiwan Strait, the Red Sea, the South China Sea — and now, even the Arctic.
What the Navy Needs Now
A modern Naval Act. We need a 21st-century version of the pre-WWII Naval Act to rapidly rebuild shipyards, expand production, and modernize our fleet. Sadler calls this “a promising first step to regain the ability to sustain a wartime economy in a prolonged war with China.”
Real investment in maritime infrastructure. Ports, dry docks, and logistics support are vital national security assets that must be revitalized now.
Faster arms deliveries to Taiwan. The delays in Harpoon, Javelin, and Stinger deliveries must be resolved. Taiwan’s ability to defend itself is our first line of deterrence. Sadler emphasizes that “how the new Administration responds and accelerates the arming of Taiwan will be key in sustaining the military balance and peace in the near term.”
A unified national strategy. We must operate differently — with diplomatic, economic, and military efforts aligned. Naval statecraft must be at the heart of this new Cold War strategy. Sadler emphasizes, “Naval statecraft is the recommended way forward; that is, a maritime strategic framework for using American power.”
The CMSI report reminds us that training, human capital, and logistics remain U.S. advantages. While China may be catching up in hardware, “Chinese training still lags. The gap in the software [human resources and development] is even bigger,” the report notes. But these gaps can close — unless we act now to protect and reinforce our edge.
An Engaged and Educated Public
At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe in peace through strength. But strength requires public awareness, buy-in, and civic action. That’s why we launched the Americans for a Stronger Navy Educational Series — to help Americans understand the stakes, the history, and the path forward.
We invite every reader to check out and sign up for the Educational Series on StrongerNavy.org. Learn what makes our Navy vital to our security and prosperity. Share it with others. Talk about it. Get involved.
Conclusion
We are not powerless. But we must not be silent. The Heritage Foundation, the U.S. Naval War College, and recent military testimony to Congress all point to the same reality: America is in the early stages of a long contest with near-peer adversaries, and we must prepare now.
It’s time for Americans to wake up, stand up, and demand a Navy that is ready not just for today’s threats, but tomorrow’s challenges.
America needs a stronger Navy. And the Navy needs a stronger America behind it.
The 2025 Annual Threat Assessment (ATA) from the U.S. Intelligence Community delivers a direct message to America: our adversaries are preparing, adapting, and collaborating in ways that threaten our security and way of life. For the U.S. Navy, this report underscores the urgent need to evolve—faster, smarter, and with the full backing of the American public. As a former destroyer sailor and founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy, I’ve never seen a clearer call to action.
Understanding the Threat Environment
The ATA outlines a world where state adversaries are growing more aggressive, not just militarily, but across cyberspace, space, and information warfare. These threats are not abstract—they are aimed at U.S. systems, infrastructure, supply chains, and naval dominance.
Key Takeaways
China China is modernizing the world’s largest navy, expanding its presence in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, and using cyber capabilities like Volt Typhoon and Salt Typhoon to pre-position attacks on U.S. infrastructure. Its military posture is aimed at deterring U.S. intervention and achieving dominance by 2049.
Russia Despite its losses in Ukraine, Russia remains dangerous, with a formidable submarine fleet, long-range missile systems, and anti-satellite weapons. Its activity in the Arctic and collaboration with China create new strategic complications for the Navy.
Iran Iran is deploying proxy forces such as the Houthis to strike commercial shipping and challenge U.S. regional interests. Its growing cyber and missile arsenal pose immediate operational risks, particularly in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf.
North Korea North Korea continues to expand its nuclear and missile programs while deepening ties with Russia. It remains an unpredictable and volatile threat with expanding long-range strike capability.
Adversarial Cooperation China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are now actively collaborating. The coordination of military, cyber, and intelligence resources among these nations raises the stakes for U.S. naval strategy and global readiness.
Why Americans Should Care
Our economy depends on maritime security. Ninety percent of global trade—including food, medicine, and fuel—moves by sea. Disruption of those supply lines affects every American household.
A strong Navy deters war. The Navy maintains peace through presence. Without adequate ships, infrastructure, and support, our deterrence fails—and the risk of conflict rises.
Cyber and space threats can paralyze daily life. Adversaries are preparing to disable communications, GPS, power, and defense networks. Many of these systems are protected or enabled by the U.S. Navy.
Our enemies are coordinating. No longer isolated, these states are combining their strengths to challenge U.S. global presence—and potentially to stretch our forces thin across multiple theaters.
National support is a strategic weapon. A Navy without public backing is vulnerable. Understanding the threat landscape empowers voters, lawmakers, and communities to support smart, decisive investments in naval readiness.
Implications for the Navy
Fleet Modernization The Navy must deploy hypersonic weapons, uncrewed platforms, AI-driven systems, and advanced missile defenses to compete in contested domains.
Forward Logistics and Pre-Positioned Assets The Navy must expand its footprint in the Indo-Pacific, Arctic, and Middle East by investing in mobile logistics, fuel depots, and strategic alliances.
Cyber and Infrastructure Hardening Cyber hardening is now a frontline requirement. Naval systems and civilian infrastructure that support operations—like ports and shipyards—must be resilient.
Space and Arctic Readiness With increasing threats to space assets and the Arctic opening as a strategic corridor, the Navy must build capabilities for multi-domain and under-ice operations.
Industrial Base and Workforce Development America must revitalize its shipbuilding industry and train the next generation of naval engineers and builders. We cannot deter tomorrow’s threats with yesterday’s tools.
Closing Thought
The ATA is not just an intelligence document. It’s a warning flare. Americans for a Stronger Navy exists to ensure the public understands these threats and responds with urgency. The Navy can’t do it alone. It needs your voice.
To Learn More
If you found this post informative, we invite you to explore and sign up for the Americans for a Stronger Navy Educational Series. This free, ongoing program dives deeper into the threats, challenges, and opportunities facing the U.S. Navy today—and why it matters to every American. Click here to subscribe to the conversation and become part of the solution.
On March 24, 2025, the USS Pinckney (DDG 91) made history. Off the coast of Kauai, Hawaii, the Navy successfully completed Flight Test Other-40 (FTX-40)—also known as Stellar Banshee—using the Aegis Combat System to detect and simulate engagement with a hypersonic missile threat. This test is a major milestone in the United States’ ability to defend against rapidly emerging threats from near-peer adversaries like China and Russia, both of whom are investing heavily in hypersonic technology.
Test Details: Simulating the Future of Warfare
A Medium Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) equipped with a Hypersonic Target Vehicle (HTV-1) was air-launched from a C-17 aircraft. The USS Pinckney used a simulated SM-6 Block IAU interceptor and Lockheed Martin’s latest Aegis Baseline 9 software to detect, track, and engage the target. While no live intercept occurred, the simulated engagement offered critical insights and data collection, validating the system’s ability to counter maneuvering hypersonic threats.
This test also previewed the system’s scalability. Aegis can be deployed at sea or on land—key flexibility in a complex global security environment. The test utilized a virtualized Aegis software configuration, a leap forward in adapting the system for next-generation warfare.
Building on Momentum: Past Successes and What’s Next
FTX-40 follows the success of FTM-32, known as Stellar Sisyphus, in which the USS Preble (DDG 88) intercepted a MRBM with an upgraded SM-6 Dual II missile in a live-fire test. These continued advancements will pave the way for FTM-43, which will aim to perform a live intercept against an HTV-1 target.
The collaboration between the U.S. Navy, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), Lockheed Martin, and other defense partners signals a renewed commitment to innovation and integrated missile defense.
Why Americans Should Care
Hypersonic missiles travel at speeds greater than Mach 5, can maneuver mid-flight, and are extremely hard to detect and counter with traditional systems. Adversaries like China and Russia are rapidly developing and testing these weapons. If successful, these weapons could bypass our current defenses and strike critical infrastructure, fleets, or even the homeland.
This test shows that the United States is not standing still. Our Navy is preparing for tomorrow’s battles—today. The Aegis Combat System’s evolving capabilities directly protect American service members at sea, allies abroad, and Americans at home. It’s another reason why investment in a stronger Navy isn’t optional—it’s essential.
Implications for the Navy
This test reinforces the Aegis system as the backbone of the Navy’s integrated air and missile defense strategy. With its growing flexibility, the system can support both forward-deployed naval units and U.S.-based missile defense installations. It also helps the Navy operate in contested environments—areas where hypersonic threats are expected to become commonplace.
Implications for Our Allies
Many of our closest allies—Japan, South Korea, Australia—also rely on Aegis-equipped ships or similar missile defense systems. Demonstrating this capability strengthens not only U.S. deterrence but also our credibility with partners. In a world where multilateral defense cooperation is key, proof of performance matters.
Closing Thought
FTX-40 didn’t just simulate a hypersonic intercept—it sent a clear message: The United States Navy is adapting and preparing to meet new challenges head-on. For Americans watching the headlines, this is a win worth knowing—and a mission worth supporting.
Welcome to the launch of our 24-episode educational series at StrongerNavy.org! We’re building on our core mission to support a strong and capable U.S. Navy—one that safeguards American interests at home and abroad—by adding a central focus on civic engagement and personal responsibility. Our goal isn’t just to spread knowledge about naval history or current threats, but to inspire action among citizens who share our commitment to a resilient and unified nation.
Why This Matters Now
China and Russia are testing American economic, military, and technological leadership. The U.S. Navy, historically a guardian of global stability, now defends not only sea lanes but also digital infrastructure, space-based assets, and critical supply chains—all of which touch Americans’ everyday lives. From gas prices to grocery shelves, a strong Navy underpins the economic stability we often take for granted.
Captain Charlie Plumb’s Call to Action
Today, we are honored to feature insights from Captain Charlie Plumb, a retired U.S. Naval Aviator, combat veteran, and former prisoner of war. His message about “packing each other’s parachutes” highlights the team effort required for any crucial mission—underscoring that every American can (and should) contribute to a stronger nation, whether in uniform or as a supportive citizen at home.
Special Video Feature with Captain Charlie Plumb
We invite you to watch this short, inspiring video where Captain Plumb shares his personal story and the significance of “packing each other’s parachutes.”
“How are you contributing to the resilience, teamwork, and unity of our nation? How’s your parachute packing coming along?” – Captain Charlie Plumb
For Captain Plumb, “parachute packing” is both literal and metaphorical—a reminder that we all rely on each other, whether flying fighter jets, maintaining ships, or simply watching out for our neighbors. In the context of Americans for a Stronger Navy, it means stepping up to learn, engage, and take an active part in defending our freedoms.
A Call for National Unity and Civic Engagement
Captain Plumb’s central question—“How are you contributing to resilience, teamwork, and unity?”—is especially relevant in a time of domestic polarization. Our greatest victories, from WWII to the Cold War, depended on national unity. As Captain Plumb discovered, everyone’s role matters: the pilot in the cockpit, the sailor on the deck, the rigger in the parachute loft—and the citizen at home who advocates, volunteers, or serves in the community.
Civic Engagement Matters
A strong Navy is more than just ships and sailors. It depends on:
Public Awareness – Understanding the strategic challenges worldwide, from Cold War legacies to renewed tensions with Russia and China.
Community Support – Standing behind those who serve, including families and veterans, and ensuring our elected representatives stay informed and accountable.
Personal Responsibility – As Captain Plumb emphasizes, each of us has a role. Through service, advocacy, volunteering, or simply spreading the word, we help “pack each other’s parachutes.”
By illuminating pivotal moments—such as Nixon’s visit to China, the evolution of foreign relations with Russia, and how global power shifts shaped today’s challenges—this series aims to equip you with the knowledge to engage confidently in national security discussions.
Sneak Peek: Our 24-Episode Series
Each episode is designed to educate, inspire, and equip you to take meaningful actions—whether that’s contacting your representatives, sharing important facts with your community, or even considering military service. Here’s a high-level look:
1. The Role of the U.S. Navy in American History 2. Lessons from Vietnam: Stories of Resilience and Unity 3. Technology at Sea: From WWII to the Digital Age 4. Nixon’s Visit to China: Turning Points in U.S. Foreign Policy 5. Naval Statecraft and Diplomacy: Building (and Rebuilding) Global Relationships 6. Facing the Soviet Threat: A Cold War Overview 7. Russia Today: How We Got Here and Where We’re Headed 8. China Rising: Economic Power, Global Dominance and Naval Ambitions – A Deep Dive 9. Key Global Hotspots: Straits, Seas, and Chokepoints 10. Life Aboard a Modern Naval Vessel: Voices from the Fleet 11. Women in the Navy: Progress, Challenges, and Future 12. Recruitment & Retention: Why Today’s Youth Matter 13. Veterans’ Perspectives: Transitioning from Service to Civilian Life 14. The Navy’s Humanitarian Missions: Beyond Combat 15. Cybersecurity on the High Seas: New Frontiers of Defense 16. Alliances and Partnerships: NATO, the Pacific, and Beyond 17. Marine Corps & Navy Integration: A Closer Look 18. Naval statecraft, Budget and Strategy: Funding a Future-Ready Navy 19. Emerging Technologies: Drones, AI, and Robotics 20. Civil-Military Relations: Keeping Democracy Strong 21. Environmental Stewardship: Conserving Our Oceans 22. Stories of Heroism: Unsung Sailors and Surprising Tales 23. Leadership 101: Character, Courage, and Command at Sea 24. The Call to Serve: Civic Engagement for a Stronger Nation
Connecting Policy to Practice
From the Jones Act to the Ships Act and the Fleet Act Proposal, policy and legislation play major roles in shaping naval capabilities. We’ll delve into these and other initiatives—like Anti-Lobbying Efforts—to illustrate how specific actions on Capitol Hill determine our Navy’s ability to stay well-funded, well-equipped, and technologically agile. Influencing these policies isn’t reserved for experts in Washington; every American has a voice in ensuring that the Navy remains a formidable force.
The Navy’s Evolving Mission: Sea, Space, and Cyberspace
Gone are the days when naval power was confined to the oceans. Today’s U.S. Navy must also protect undersea cables, fortify space-based assets, and counter cybersecurity threats—all while confronting China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Russia’s resurgent ambitions. In upcoming episodes, we’ll explore AI, autonomous systems, and cyber warfare, offering insight into how the Navy is adapting to 21st-century challenges.
Join Us for This Free Educational Event
Ready to jump in? Here’s how you can get involved:
Register for our FREE online series at StrongerNavy.org.
Share this blog post and Captain Plumb’s video with friends, family, and community groups.
Engage with us on social media using #StrongerNavy—post your own “parachute packing” stories to recognize mentors or teammates who’ve supported you.
Volunteer or Donate to local veterans’ organizations, or find ways to encourage future Navy recruits in your schools and communities.
Conclusion: Pack Each Other’s Parachutes
As Captain Plumb reminds us, every role matters in safeguarding our nation’s security. “Just doing my job, sir” may sound unassuming, but it speaks volumes about the power of teamwork. Whether you’re a sailor in uniform or a concerned citizen writing to your elected officials, your contribution is vital.
A stark reality: China’s naval task force is actively testing Australia’s response—militarily, politically, and diplomatically. A Chinese fleet operating near Australia’s waters isn’t just a message to Canberra; it’s a signal to the world that Beijing is expanding its reach.
For Americans, this should be a wake-up call. Australia, a key U.S. ally, has long enjoyed security from major conflicts. Yet, China’s maneuvers off its coast expose vulnerabilities in a way that should concern every nation reliant on maritime security, global trade, and naval power.
If China can challenge Australia’s sovereignty at sea today, what stops it from doing the same to America and its allies tomorrow?
China’s Strategy: Testing and Expanding
The deployment of a Chinese naval task group so close to Australia is no accident. It follows a pattern:
Probing reactions. Just as it has done in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and Latin American ports, China is assessing how the world will respond to its growing military presence.
Disrupting global security norms. Conducting live-fire drills near civilian air routes, refusing to issue proper warnings, and testing defense response times all serve a greater goal—normalizing an expanded Chinese naval footprint.
Challenging the free world. This is about more than Australia. China is signaling that it has the capability—and the intent—to pressure democratic nations and reshape global power structures in its favor.
This matters to the United States because we rely on the same global shipping lanes, trade networks, and security partnerships that China is testing right now.
Lessons for the U.S. Navy and America
Jennifer Parker’s article points out an uncomfortable truth: Australia’s navy is struggling to meet growing demands. Its limited number of warships, outdated replenishment capabilities, and defense spending shortfalls are now under the spotlight.
But let’s not pretend this problem is unique to Australia.
The U.S. Navy is stretched thin. With growing commitments in the Indo-Pacific, Middle East, and beyond, America is already balancing a smaller fleet against greater global threats.
Shipbuilding capacity is a bottleneck. While China launches warships at record speed, the U.S. struggles to maintain its current fleet.
Defense funding debates mirror Australia’s. At just 2% of GDP, U.S. defense spending is below Cold War levels, and ship procurement continues to face budgetary and political hurdles.
Australia’s vulnerabilities should be a case study for the United States. If a key U.S. ally is struggling to keep pace with China’s naval expansion, America cannot afford to take its own naval dominance for granted.
What Needs to Happen Next?
The right response is not panic—it’s preparation. America must learn from Australia’s situation and take the following steps:
Increase Naval Readiness
The U.S. must expand and modernize its fleet, ensuring it has the ships, submarines, and logistical support needed to deter threats.
Fleet maintenance and shipyard infrastructure must be prioritized so that existing assets remain operational.
Strengthen Strategic Alliances
The U.S.-Australia partnership is critical—joint naval exercises, intelligence sharing, and strategic basing agreements must be expanded.
Coordination with Japan, the Philippines, India, and other Indo-Pacific allies must also be reinforced.
Engage the American Public
Most Americans aren’t aware of how dependent the U.S. economy and security are on naval power.
China isn’t just flexing its military strength—it’s waging a long-term strategic contest to control global trade, technology, and resources.
If we don’t educate and rally support for a stronger Navy now, we risk falling behind when it matters most.
Final Thought: A Call to Action
Australia is waking up to the reality that it must invest in naval power to protect its interests. America should take this moment to do the same.
We don’t need alarmism. We need action.
The choice is simple: Invest in a stronger Navy today, or risk facing a crisis tomorrow.
In an increasingly interconnected world, the security of undersea communication cables is paramount. These cables are the backbone of global internet infrastructure, facilitating everything from personal communications to critical financial transactions. Recent incidents, such as the detention of a Chinese-crewed cargo ship by Taiwan’s coast guard on suspicion of severing an undersea cable, underscore the vulnerabilities inherent in this infrastructure. This event not only highlights regional tensions but also serves as a stark reminder of the potential global repercussions of compromised communication networks.
The Incident: A Closer Look
On February 25, 2025, Taiwan’s coast guard detained the Hong Tai 168, a Togolese-registered cargo ship with a crew of eight Chinese nationals. The vessel was suspected of intentionally cutting an undersea cable connecting Taiwan to the Penghu Islands. This action disrupted internet services and raised alarms about possible “gray zone” tactics—covert operations that fall below the threshold of open warfare. Taiwanese authorities are investigating the incident to determine whether it was an act of deliberate sabotage or an accident.
Why This Matters to Americans
While this incident occurred thousands of miles from U.S. shores, its implications are far-reaching:
Global Economic Stability: Undersea cables carry approximately 95% of international internet traffic, underpinning global financial systems and commerce. Disruptions can lead to significant economic losses and market instability. citeturn0search7
National Security: The U.S. relies on these cables for secure military and governmental communications. Vulnerabilities in this infrastructure could be exploited for espionage or to disrupt critical operations.
Precedent for Hostile Actions: If such incidents go unchecked, they may embolden adversaries to target undersea infrastructure elsewhere, including cables directly connecting to the United States.
The Need for a Robust American Naval Presence
To safeguard these vital interests, a strong U.S. naval presence is essential:
Deterrence: A capable and visible naval force can deter potential adversaries from attempting similar acts of sabotage.
Rapid Response: In the event of an incident, naval assets can quickly respond to protect and repair critical infrastructure.
International Collaboration: The U.S. Navy can work alongside allies to monitor and secure undersea cables, sharing intelligence and resources to address threats collectively.
Broader Context
This incident is not isolated. Similar events have been reported in other regions, such as the Baltic Sea, where undersea cables have been damaged under suspicious circumstances. NATO has responded by launching operations like Baltic Sentry to counteract potential sabotage by Russian and Chinese entities.
In the Indo-Pacific, China’s maritime strategy has increasingly involved the use of civilian vessels for military and intelligence purposes, blurring the lines between commercial and military activities. This tactic complicates the enforcement of international laws and norms, posing challenges to regional stability.
Conclusion
The security of undersea communication cables is a matter of global concern, with significant implications for economic stability and national security. The recent incident involving the Hong Tai 168 serves as a critical reminder of the vulnerabilities in our interconnected world. It underscores the necessity for a robust American naval presence to deter potential threats, respond swiftly to incidents, and collaborate with international partners to protect this indispensable infrastructure.
An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is
To the Editors of War on the Rocks and Dr. Jonathan Panter,
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Your recent commentary argues that naval forward presence is to blame for the U.S. Navy’s inability to deter China and sustain high-end warfighting capacity. While your article correctly identifies the exhaustion and strain imposed by relentless deployments, it misdiagnoses the cause and proposes a dangerous solution.
The problem is not forward presence—it’s fleet size, maintenance shortfalls, and a lack of leadership advocacy for real change.
“It is both realistic and very necessary to maintain forward presence while preparing for high-end conflict.” — Captain Brent D. Sadler, USN (Ret.), Senior Fellow, Heritage Foundation
“The U.S. fleet size to support that deployment has significantly decreased since 1990.” — Captain Steven Wills, USN (Ret.), Senior Advisor, Center for Maritime Strategy
A Shrinking Navy, An Expanding Mission
The numbers tell the real story:
✅ In 1991: The U.S. Navy had 550 ships. Today, it has fewer than 290—a nearly 50% decline.
✅ During the Cold War: Only one-fifth of the fleet was forward deployed. Today, it’s one-third, meaning fewer ships are doing more work.
✅ Maintenance Shortfalls: The Navy has lost critical shore-based infrastructure, making it difficult to sustain current commitments—let alone expand.
Meanwhile, China’s threat has grown, not receded:
✅ China’s Navy: Surpassed 340 ships in 2023 and continues expanding.
✅ Indo-Pacific: Now the primary theater of strategic competition—where U.S. presence is more critical than ever.
The Wrong Solution: Scaling Back Presence
The argument that pulling back from forward deployment would somehow strengthen the Navy by reducing strain is not just wrong—it’s dangerous.
A reduced forward presence does not deter China—it emboldens it.
Beijing is already testing U.S. resolve in the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and beyond. A withdrawal would send a clear signal:
America is retreating.
That is not a path to deterrence—it’s a path to ceding maritime dominance to an adversary actively working to reshape the global order.
The Right Solution: A Bigger, More Sustainable Navy
Rather than abandoning forward presence, we must fix the real problem: our shrinking, overstretched fleet.
That means:
✅ Growing the Fleet: Expand to at least 355 ships—endorsed repeatedly by military leaders.
✅ Rebuilding Shore Support: Reinvest in shipyards, dry docks, and logistics infrastructure.
✅ Leadership Advocacy: Navy leaders must demand either more ships or fewer assignments, not accept the status quo.
✅ Congressional Action: Congress must prioritize fleet expansion over short-term cuts.
Conclusion: We Need More Ships, Not Fewer Commitments
Your commentary correctly highlights that the U.S. Navy is stretched thin and struggling to sustain global operations. But forward presence is not the problem. The real issue is that we are trying to maintain it with a fleet too small to sustain the mission.
For more than 75 years, forward-deployed U.S. naval forces have prevented conflict, reassured allies, and ensured maritime security. Scaling back presence does not fix the strain—it accelerates decline and weakens deterrence at the worst possible moment.
“If the United States is serious about deterring China, protecting global stability, and upholding its commitments, the answer is clear: Build a larger, more capable, and better-supported Navy.”
Educating the Public: Our Responsibility
The problem is not just military—it’s political and public awareness.
Too many Americans don’t realize how naval power secures our national and economic security. Without public pressure, there will be no political will to rebuild the fleet.
That’s why we at Americans for a Stronger Navy are launching:
“China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges”
In our upcoming educational series, we will tackle the most pressing issues facing U.S. naval power, including:
✅ The Role of Naval Power in Preventing Global Conflict
✅ Economic & Strategic Impact of a Shrinking Fleet
✅ China & Russia’s Naval Expansion and the Strategic Threat
✅ U.S. Shipbuilding Crisis: Causes and Solutions
✅ Congressional Accountability: Who’s Responsible for the Shrinking Fleet?
This isn’t just a discussion—it’s a call to action.
To naval leadership, policymakers, and media: Stop pretending all is well. Demand action before the Navy reaches a breaking point.
To the American public: Get informed. Get involved. A strong Navy is not just for the military—it’s for every American who benefits from global stability.
The U.S. Navy’s forward presence is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.
The problem is not the strategy—it’s the lack of resources to sustain it.
If the U.S. wants to deter China, protect its interests, and maintain global stability, the answer is clear: Build a stronger, larger, better-supported, and more capable Navy.
We urge the administration, Congress, and military leadership to acknowledge reality:
Our commitments are not too big—our Navy is too small.
Sincerely, Bill Cullifer Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy
