Fleet Forward News Watch Archives - Americans for a Stronger Navy

April 9, 2025April 9, 2025

Trump Signs Executive Order to Revitalize U.S. Shipbuilding

A Turning Point for America’s Maritime Strength

In a bold move aimed at restoring America’s maritime edge, President Donald Trump signed an executive order today (April 9, 2025) designed to revitalize the U.S. shipbuilding industry and reduce China’s growing control over the global shipping supply chain. The order calls for sweeping changes across trade, industry investment, and national security infrastructure—setting the stage for long-term renewal of America’s commercial and naval shipping capabilities.

What the Executive Order Includes

The new executive order establishes:

Maritime Security Trust Fund
A dedicated fund to provide stable, long-term investment in shipbuilding, shipyards, dry docks, and repair facilities. Potential funding sources include tariffs, fines, port fees, and other federal revenue streams.

Port Fees on Chinese-Linked Ships
Ships flagged by China or built in Chinese shipyards may soon face significant docking fees at U.S. ports. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is expected to finalize this remedy by mid-April. Allies will also be encouraged to implement similar restrictions.

Tariffs on Chinese-Made Cargo Equipment
The order directs the USTR to consider imposing tariffs on ship-to-shore cranes and cargo handling gear manufactured or assembled in China—or made with Chinese-controlled components anywhere in the world.

Enforcement of Harbor Maintenance Fees
To prevent workarounds, Homeland Security will crack down on companies trying to avoid U.S. fees by routing shipments through Mexico and Canada before transporting them across land borders.

Incentives for U.S. Shipyard Investment
The executive order includes provisions for incentivizing private sector investment in new or revitalized U.S. shipyards, commercial ship components, and critical maritime infrastructure.

Why Americans Should Care

The United States currently produces less than 1% of the world’s commercial ships—while China builds about 50%. In 1999, China’s share was just 5%. This trend has massive implications not just for economic competitiveness, but for national security and maritime logistics.

As President Trump put it:
“We used to build a ship a day, and now we don’t build a ship a year, practically. We have the capacity to do it.”

This executive order is more than policy—it’s a call to action.

Implications for the Navy

While the executive order does not explicitly mention the U.S. Navy, its impact on naval readiness and strategic capability is unmistakable. Revitalizing America’s commercial shipbuilding infrastructure strengthens the industrial base the Navy relies on for new construction, maintenance, and repairs. Investments in dry docks, skilled labor, and cargo handling capabilities bolster our ability to support fleet operations—especially in times of crisis.

Moreover, reducing reliance on Chinese-built shipping equipment and infrastructure directly supports U.S. naval strategy. It limits vulnerabilities in ports and logistics chains, while reinforcing America’s control over critical maritime assets. A stronger shipbuilding sector means a stronger Navy, even if it’s not named in the order.

Implications for Our Allies

The executive order sends a message to America’s allies: We are serious about maritime strength and expect partners to do the same. With Chinese-built vessels operating across global supply chains, coordinated action could limit strategic vulnerabilities and encourage diversified, allied-aligned shipping infrastructure.

A Statement from Americans for a Stronger Navy

“This executive order is a long-overdue step toward restoring our nation’s ability to build and maintain the ships we depend on for both commerce and defense. The Navy does not operate in a vacuum—it needs a healthy, resilient industrial base. America must lead again on the seas, not just militarily, but commercially. This is how we secure freedom of navigation, economic stability, and peace through strength.”
— Bill Cullifer, founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

Your Voice Matters

This is our moment. Let’s celebrate the executive order—but keep pushing until America leads on the seas again. Congress must act, industry must respond, and Americans must stay engaged.

March 26, 2025March 26, 2025

Aegis Combat System Proves It Can Counter Hypersonic Threats

Introduction.

On March 24, 2025, the USS Pinckney (DDG 91) made history. Off the coast of Kauai, Hawaii, the Navy successfully completed Flight Test Other-40 (FTX-40)—also known as Stellar Banshee—using the Aegis Combat System to detect and simulate engagement with a hypersonic missile threat. This test is a major milestone in the United States’ ability to defend against rapidly emerging threats from near-peer adversaries like China and Russia, both of whom are investing heavily in hypersonic technology.

Test Details: Simulating the Future of Warfare

A Medium Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM) equipped with a Hypersonic Target Vehicle (HTV-1) was air-launched from a C-17 aircraft. The USS Pinckney used a simulated SM-6 Block IAU interceptor and Lockheed Martin’s latest Aegis Baseline 9 software to detect, track, and engage the target. While no live intercept occurred, the simulated engagement offered critical insights and data collection, validating the system’s ability to counter maneuvering hypersonic threats.

This test also previewed the system’s scalability. Aegis can be deployed at sea or on land—key flexibility in a complex global security environment. The test utilized a virtualized Aegis software configuration, a leap forward in adapting the system for next-generation warfare.

Building on Momentum: Past Successes and What’s Next

FTX-40 follows the success of FTM-32, known as Stellar Sisyphus, in which the USS Preble (DDG 88) intercepted a MRBM with an upgraded SM-6 Dual II missile in a live-fire test. These continued advancements will pave the way for FTM-43, which will aim to perform a live intercept against an HTV-1 target.

The collaboration between the U.S. Navy, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), Lockheed Martin, and other defense partners signals a renewed commitment to innovation and integrated missile defense.

Why Americans Should Care

Hypersonic missiles travel at speeds greater than Mach 5, can maneuver mid-flight, and are extremely hard to detect and counter with traditional systems. Adversaries like China and Russia are rapidly developing and testing these weapons. If successful, these weapons could bypass our current defenses and strike critical infrastructure, fleets, or even the homeland.

This test shows that the United States is not standing still. Our Navy is preparing for tomorrow’s battles—today. The Aegis Combat System’s evolving capabilities directly protect American service members at sea, allies abroad, and Americans at home. It’s another reason why investment in a stronger Navy isn’t optional—it’s essential.

Implications for the Navy

This test reinforces the Aegis system as the backbone of the Navy’s integrated air and missile defense strategy. With its growing flexibility, the system can support both forward-deployed naval units and U.S.-based missile defense installations. It also helps the Navy operate in contested environments—areas where hypersonic threats are expected to become commonplace.

Implications for Our Allies

Many of our closest allies—Japan, South Korea, Australia—also rely on Aegis-equipped ships or similar missile defense systems. Demonstrating this capability strengthens not only U.S. deterrence but also our credibility with partners. In a world where multilateral defense cooperation is key, proof of performance matters.

Closing Thought

FTX-40 didn’t just simulate a hypersonic intercept—it sent a clear message: The United States Navy is adapting and preparing to meet new challenges head-on. For Americans watching the headlines, this is a win worth knowing—and a mission worth supporting.

March 7, 2025March 7, 2025

People Powering Progress: The U.S. Navy’s Smart Approach to Modernization

For years, America’s Navy has been a punching bag for criticism, often seen as slow to modernize or inefficient in spending. While scrutiny is necessary, it’s time to tell the other side of the story—the one about the thousands of dedicated Navy personnel and industry professionals working relentlessly to ensure the fleet remains strong, cost-effective, and mission-ready.

One of the best examples of this commitment is the Navy’s rapid deployment of Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (C-UAS) capabilities aboard USS Indianapolis (LCS 17). Instead of developing an entirely new system at great expense, the Navy and its partners took a smarter approach—upgrading the existing Surface-to-Surface Missile Module (SSMM) to counter drone threats in contested environments.

Real People, Real Impact

This isn’t just about technology—it’s about people.

Navy officers and sailors who are actively testing and deploying these systems in real-world operations.
Engineers and defense contractors working behind the scenes to ensure the technology is reliable, cost-effective, and adaptable.
Strategists and policymakers balancing modernization with budget efficiency, ensuring that America’s Navy is both powerful and financially responsible.

Capt. Matthew Lehmann, program manager for LCS Mission Modules, highlighted this teamwork:
“By leveraging the adaptability of proven technologies in partnership with the Integrated Warfare Systems 80 program office, we were able to deliver on a critical need to the Fleet. This accomplishment showcases the ingenuity and resourcefulness of the Littoral Combat Ship Mission Module Program.”

Smart Spending in a Scrutinized Budget

At a time when leaders like former President Trump and business mogul Elon Musk are calling for greater accountability in defense spending, the Navy is proving that modernization doesn’t have to mean runaway costs.

The SSMM upgrade shows that the Navy is reusing and improving existing systems rather than building from scratch.
By integrating AI-driven detection, modular sensors, and open-architecture systems, upgrades remain adaptable and cost-efficient.
Industry partnerships with Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and General Atomics ensure that new technology is integrated without unnecessary government overhead.

Rear Adm. Kevin Smith summed it up best:
“This rapid integration of C-UAS capabilities enhances our ability to project power and maintain freedom of maneuver in contested environments. We are not only addressing immediate threats but also strengthening the Navy’s overall strategy for operational agility, deterrence, and sustained dominance.”

Industry & Navy Partnership Driving Innovation

Modernizing the U.S. Navy isn’t just a military effort—it’s a collaborative mission between dedicated sailors and some of the most advanced technology companies in the country. Industry leaders like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and General Atomics are bringing cutting-edge AI, automation, and drone defense solutions to the fleet. These partnerships ensure that modernization is not just about spending money—it’s about getting the best value for every dollar spent while equipping our Navy with the tools needed to stay ahead of emerging threats.

Key industry players include:

Lockheed Martin – Developing scalable counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) with AI-driven detection, modular sensors, and command-and-control systems.
Northrop Grumman – Contracted to develop C-UAS solutions for the Navy.
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI) – Testing government-provided autonomy software aboard the MQ-20 Avenger, demonstrating potential advances in Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (UCAVs).
uAvionix – Developed Casia G, enabling 24/7 Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) drone operations.
Volatus Aerospace & Draganfly – Enhancing geospatial and automation capabilities.
Pierce Aerospace – Working on Remote ID detection technology to identify unauthorized drones.

A Message from Americans for a Stronger Navy

“This isn’t just about hardware—it’s about the people who believe in a stronger, more cost-effective Navy. From the sailors aboard the USS Indianapolis to the engineers at Lockheed Martin, thousands of Americans are working every day to ensure the Navy remains a force to be reckoned with—without wasting taxpayer dollars.

We at Americans for a Stronger Navy believe this is the kind of smart, strategic modernization that deserves recognition. Our Navy isn’t just adapting to today’s threats—it’s building a foundation for a stronger, smarter future. This is what peace through strength looks like.”

Final Call to Action: Join the Conversation

At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we believe in supporting the hardworking sailors, engineers, and industry partners who are ensuring the Navy remains strong, modern, and cost-effective. But we can’t do it alone.

✅ Engage with us—Share your thoughts on what a stronger, smarter Navy looks like.
✅ Spread the word—Help shift the narrative to recognize the real efforts behind modernization.
✅ Stay informed—Follow us for updates on how the Navy is adapting to new challenges.

💬 What do you think? Let us know in the comments or visit StrongerNavy.org to learn more. Join the discussion on X.

Join the movement.

March 4, 2025March 4, 2025

An Open Letter to America: The Future of U.S. Shipbuilding and Naval Strength

Dear Fellow Americans,

We stand at a crossroads in our nation’s history—one that will determine the future of our Navy, our national security, and the very strength of our industrial base. The question before us is clear: Should we rebuild our naval shipbuilding capabilities here at home, seek foreign assistance, or attempt a hybrid approach?

This is not just a debate about policy. It’s a decision that affects every American—from those who serve at sea to the workers who build our ships, to the families and businesses that rely on safe and open trade routes secured by the U.S. Navy.

A Crisis Decades in the Making

The United States Navy, once unrivaled, now finds itself struggling to maintain a fleet large enough to meet global threats. At the same time, our domestic shipbuilding industry has shrunk to a fraction of its former strength.

Fewer Shipyards: During World War II, the U.S. built a ship a day. Now, we are lucky to produce a handful of warships per year due to limited shipyard capacity.
Aging Repair Facilities: The few remaining naval repair yards are overburdened and outdated, leading to costly maintenance delays.
Worker Shortages: The skilled workforce needed to build and maintain ships has dwindled, leaving shipyards struggling to meet demand.
Rising Threats: China now produces more naval tonnage every year than the U.S. does in a decade. Russia and other adversaries are also modernizing their fleets.

The urgency is real. The Navy’s shipbuilding plan is behind schedule, over budget, and falling short of strategic needs. Simply put, we need more ships, more shipyards, and more skilled workers to build and sustain them.

The Debate: Build Here, Look Abroad, or Both?

President-elect Donald Trump recently suggested leaning on allies to help build U.S. Navy ships. His words have sparked a debate with far-reaching consequences.

There are three paths forward:

1. Fully Rebuild U.S. Shipbuilding Capacity (America First Approach)

Invest in more shipyards and repair facilities to increase production.
Expand apprenticeship and workforce training programs to address skilled labor shortages.
Modernize naval infrastructure to improve efficiency and speed of delivery.

✅ Pros: Strengthens U.S. industry, creates jobs, ensures security.
❌ Cons: Takes time, requires significant investment.

2. Use Allied Shipyards for Basic Infrastructure (Hybrid Approach)

Partner with allies (e.g., Japan, South Korea, Italy) to build less complex vessels while reserving warship production for U.S. yards.
Temporarily relieve the burden on U.S. shipyards while domestic capacity is rebuilt.

✅ Pros: Speeds up production, allows time for U.S. shipbuilding expansion.
❌ Cons: Security risks, reliance on foreign suppliers, potential job losses.

3. Fully Outsource Basic Infrastructure (Foreign Assistance Approach)

Contract allied nations to build support ships and basic naval infrastructure abroad.
Focus U.S. shipyards solely on high-end warship production.

✅ Pros: Short-term boost in fleet numbers, cost savings.
❌ Cons: Weakens U.S. shipbuilding industry, risks foreign dependency.

What’s at Stake?

No matter which path we take, one fact remains: The U.S. Navy needs more ships—and we need them faster. The growing threats on the world stage do not wait for political debates or bureaucratic delays.

America must decide:

Do we commit to fully restoring our shipbuilding industry, investing in shipyards, repair facilities, and workforce training?
Do we pursue a temporary partnership with allies to fill immediate gaps?
Do we accept foreign-built support ships, potentially at the cost of domestic industry?

This is not just a decision for policymakers—it is a choice for every American. The strength of our Navy is the strength of our nation.

A Call to Action

We need a national shipbuilding strategy that prioritizes American security, economic resilience, and industrial strength.

Expand our domestic shipbuilding capacity.
Modernize and build more repair facilities.
Train and recruit more American workers to sustain naval readiness.
Ensure the Navy has the fleet it needs to protect global commerce and national security.

History shows us that when America builds, America wins. The decision before us will shape the Navy for generations to come. Let’s make sure it’s a future built on strength.
Americans for a Stronger Navy
StrongerNavy.org. Join the discussion on X.com/strongernavy

February 15, 2025February 15, 2025

An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is

An Open Letter: Forward Presence is Not the Problem—Fleet Size Is

To the Editors of War on the Rocks and Dr. Jonathan Panter,

Your recent commentary argues that naval forward presence is to blame for the U.S. Navy’s inability to deter China and sustain high-end warfighting capacity. While your article correctly identifies the exhaustion and strain imposed by relentless deployments, it misdiagnoses the cause and proposes a dangerous solution.

The problem is not forward presence—it’s fleet size, maintenance shortfalls, and a lack of leadership advocacy for real change.

“It is both realistic and very necessary to maintain forward presence while preparing for high-end conflict.”
— Captain Brent D. Sadler, USN (Ret.), Senior Fellow, Heritage Foundation

“The U.S. fleet size to support that deployment has significantly decreased since 1990.”
— Captain Steven Wills, USN (Ret.), Senior Advisor, Center for Maritime Strategy

A Shrinking Navy, An Expanding Mission

The numbers tell the real story:

✅ In 1991: The U.S. Navy had 550 ships. Today, it has fewer than 290—a nearly 50% decline.
✅ During the Cold War: Only one-fifth of the fleet was forward deployed. Today, it’s one-third, meaning fewer ships are doing more work.
✅ Maintenance Shortfalls: The Navy has lost critical shore-based infrastructure, making it difficult to sustain current commitments—let alone expand.

Meanwhile, China’s threat has grown, not receded:

✅ China’s Navy: Surpassed 340 ships in 2023 and continues expanding.
✅ Indo-Pacific: Now the primary theater of strategic competition—where U.S. presence is more critical than ever.

The Wrong Solution: Scaling Back Presence

The argument that pulling back from forward deployment would somehow strengthen the Navy by reducing strain is not just wrong—it’s dangerous.

A reduced forward presence does not deter China—it emboldens it.

Beijing is already testing U.S. resolve in the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and beyond. A withdrawal would send a clear signal:

America is retreating.

That is not a path to deterrence—it’s a path to ceding maritime dominance to an adversary actively working to reshape the global order.

The Right Solution: A Bigger, More Sustainable Navy

Rather than abandoning forward presence, we must fix the real problem: our shrinking, overstretched fleet.

That means:

✅ Growing the Fleet: Expand to at least 355 ships—endorsed repeatedly by military leaders.
✅ Rebuilding Shore Support: Reinvest in shipyards, dry docks, and logistics infrastructure.
✅ Leadership Advocacy: Navy leaders must demand either more ships or fewer assignments, not accept the status quo.
✅ Congressional Action: Congress must prioritize fleet expansion over short-term cuts.

Conclusion: We Need More Ships, Not Fewer Commitments

Your commentary correctly highlights that the U.S. Navy is stretched thin and struggling to sustain global operations. But forward presence is not the problem. The real issue is that we are trying to maintain it with a fleet too small to sustain the mission.

For more than 75 years, forward-deployed U.S. naval forces have prevented conflict, reassured allies, and ensured maritime security. Scaling back presence does not fix the strain—it accelerates decline and weakens deterrence at the worst possible moment.

“If the United States is serious about deterring China, protecting global stability, and upholding its commitments, the answer is clear: Build a larger, more capable, and better-supported Navy.”

Educating the Public: Our Responsibility

The problem is not just military—it’s political and public awareness.

Too many Americans don’t realize how naval power secures our national and economic security. Without public pressure, there will be no political will to rebuild the fleet.

That’s why we at Americans for a Stronger Navy are launching:

“China, Russia, and America: Navigating Global Rivalries and Naval Challenges”

In our upcoming educational series, we will tackle the most pressing issues facing U.S. naval power, including:

✅ The Role of Naval Power in Preventing Global Conflict
✅ Economic & Strategic Impact of a Shrinking Fleet
✅ China & Russia’s Naval Expansion and the Strategic Threat
✅ U.S. Shipbuilding Crisis: Causes and Solutions
✅ Congressional Accountability: Who’s Responsible for the Shrinking Fleet?

This isn’t just a discussion—it’s a call to action.

To naval leadership, policymakers, and media: Stop pretending all is well. Demand action before the Navy reaches a breaking point.

To the American public: Get informed. Get involved. A strong Navy is not just for the military—it’s for every American who benefits from global stability.

The U.S. Navy’s forward presence is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.

The problem is not the strategy—it’s the lack of resources to sustain it.

If the U.S. wants to deter China, protect its interests, and maintain global stability, the answer is clear: Build a stronger, larger, better-supported, and more capable Navy.

We urge the administration, Congress, and military leadership to acknowledge reality:

Our commitments are not too big—our Navy is too small.

Sincerely, Bill Cullifer
Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

December 19, 2024December 19, 2024

U.S. Navy News – December 11-19, 2024

Global News

NATO Aircraft Carrier to Visit West Pacific
France’s Charles de Gaulle Carrier Strike Group is scheduled to visit Japan in early 2025 during its Indo-Pacific deployment, with stops in Okinawa. This reflects NATO’s growing strategic focus on the region.

USS Savannah Makes Historic Cambodian Port Call
The Littoral Combat Ship USS Savannah docked in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, from December 16–20, marking the first U.S. Navy port call in Cambodia in eight years.

USS Harry S. Truman Enters Middle East Waters
The USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group transited the Suez Canal on December 15, bringing U.S. carrier presence back to the region after a month-long absence.

Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 151 Returns for Holidays
The “Vigilantes” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 151 returned to Naval Air Station Lemoore on December 14 after a 5-month deployment in U.S. 7th and 5th Fleet areas.

U.S. Navy Tests Hypersonic Missile
A successful test of the Common Hypersonic Glide Body showcased advancements in the Navy and Army’s hypersonic strike capabilities, achieving speeds at extended ranges.

U.S. Navy Awards Textron $106M for Mine Sweeping Technology
A new contract for the Mine Sweeping Payload Delivery System aims to expand semi-autonomous mine-clearing operations, ensuring maritime security.

U.S. Navy’s Next-Gen Jammer Completes First Deployment
Advanced electronic warfare systems, capable of disrupting enemy air defenses, completed their inaugural deployment with notable success.

New Constellation-Class Frigate Honors Female Naval Pioneer
The USS Joy Bright Hancock (FFG 69) will commemorate one of the first female Navy officers and her trailblazing contributions to military gender integration.

U.S. Navy Intercepts Houthi Attacks in Gulf of Aden
For the second time this month, destroyers USS Stockdale and USS O’Kane intercepted missiles and drones from Houthi forces in the Gulf of Aden.

Quantum Computing for Naval Applications
The Navy explores quantum computing for tasks such as simulating war games, enabling secure communications, and solving maintenance challenges, aiming for transformative operational impacts.

Congress Allocates $5.7 Billion for Virginia-Class Submarines
A stopgap funding bill includes significant investments for the Virginia-class program, emphasizing the importance of submarine force expansion.

U.S. Navy to Expand Constellation-Class Frigate Production
To mitigate delays, the Navy considers adding a second shipyard to accelerate the production of these versatile surface combatants.

China Watch
China Releases ‘Hit List’ Targeting U.S. Navy Systems
The PLA published plans to target U.S. Navy carrier groups, including AEGIS vessels and E-2C Hawkeyes, by overwhelming electronic warfare systems.

Pentagon Warns of China’s Growing Naval Power. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) of China has significantly expanded its global reach over the past year, moving more frequently and in greater force beyond its regional waters. This growth is attributed to the ongoing development and deployment of advanced warships and logistics support vessels, which enable the PLAN to operate at greater distances from its home waters

Report: Despite Corruption Problems, China Progresses Toward Modernization
The Defense Department today released the annual “Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China” report, a congressionally mandated annual report that offers insight into the capabilities, strategies and goals of China and its military.

China Conducts Largest Naval Drill in Decades Near Taiwan
A massive PLA naval exercise, involving 100 ships, heightened regional tensions as unannounced drills continued close to Taiwan.

Satellite Image Shows Chinese Aircraft Carrier Near Vietnam’s Shores. A satellite image captured on Tuesday reveals a Chinese aircraft carrier operating in the contested South China Sea, close to Vietnam’s coastline.

Russia Watch
Russia Disrupts Baltic Communications
Russian forces have interfered with mobile and maritime communication in the Baltic Sea, testing NATO’s response and posing risks to shipping and energy supplies.

Russia’s Investment in Underwater Drones Increases
Russia and other global powers advance unmanned undersea capabilities, focusing on drones capable of long-range and deep-sea operations.

Iran Watch
Iran’s New Drone Corvette Operates Undetected
The Shahid Bagheri drone corvette patrolled the Persian Gulf for weeks, showcasing Iran’s increasing maritime stealth capabilities.

U.S. Strikes Houthi Command Hub in Yemen
Retaliatory strikes on a Houthi hub responsible for launching attacks in the Gulf of Aden emphasized the Navy’s commitment to regional security.

Upcoming Developments
French Carrier Strike Group Deployment to Japan
France’s Charles de Gaulle Carrier Strike Group will reinforce Indo-Pacific partnerships in early 2025 with planned stops in Okinawa.

U.S. Navy’s E-130J Aircraft Contract Announced
A $3.5 billion contract for the E-130J “Doomsday Plane” will enhance nuclear command and control capabilities.

December 1, 2024December 1, 2024

Hypersonics on the Horizon: Why the USS Zumwalt’s Transformation Matters to America

The U.S. Navy is embarking on a transformative journey to equip the USS Zumwalt with hypersonic weaponry, turning a troubled project into a potential game-changer. This is more than just a story of technical innovation—it’s about maintaining America’s strategic edge in a rapidly shifting global landscape. At a time when adversaries like China and Russia are making strides in advanced military capabilities, the development of the Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) system aboard the Zumwalt marks a pivotal step in ensuring the U.S. remains a dominant maritime power.

But why should Americans care about a program like this? The answer lies in understanding the implications for national security, technological leadership, and the broader goal of global stability.

Implications of the CPS System

Strategic Deterrence:
Hypersonic weapons like the CPS system offer unmatched speed and precision, capable of striking targets thousands of kilometers away. In an era of escalating tensions, this capability serves as a deterrent, sending a clear message to adversaries: the U.S. Navy is prepared to act decisively when provoked.
Closing the Hypersonic Gap:
Recent tests by China and Russia have demonstrated their progress in hypersonic technologies, challenging U.S. supremacy. The integration of CPS aboard the Zumwalt ensures that the Navy doesn’t just keep pace but reclaims its leadership in this critical domain.
Leveraging Innovation:
Transforming the Zumwalt—a ship initially criticized as a financial misstep—into a platform for cutting-edge weaponry showcases the Navy’s ability to adapt and innovate. This is a powerful reminder of American ingenuity and resilience in the face of challenges.
Operational Superiority:
With the capability to engage from beyond the range of most enemy defenses, hypersonic weapons provide a tactical advantage that could prove decisive in future conflicts. This isn’t just about having better tools; it’s about ensuring the safety and effectiveness of U.S. service members.
Economic and Industrial Impacts:
Programs like CPS drive innovation across the defense industry, involving companies like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. This not only enhances military readiness but also bolsters the economy by creating jobs and fostering technological advancements.

Why America Should Care

America’s naval power has long been a cornerstone of global stability. The deployment of hypersonic weapons aboard the Zumwalt is not just about countering current threats; it’s about preparing for the challenges of tomorrow. These advancements:

Protect American Interests: Whether it’s safeguarding shipping lanes or deterring aggression, a strong Navy ensures that the U.S. remains a global leader.
Support Allies: Hypersonic capabilities strengthen the U.S.’s ability to assist allies and uphold international commitments.
Promote Peace Through Strength: By maintaining technological superiority, the Navy can deter conflicts before they escalate, reinforcing the principle that a well-prepared military is the best guarantor of peace.

Conclusion

The USS Zumwalt’s transformation into a hypersonic platform is a critical milestone in America’s defense strategy. It’s a testament to the Navy’s ability to adapt, innovate, and lead in an increasingly competitive world. For Americans, this is more than a military achievement—it’s a reflection of the nation’s commitment to security, stability, and technological leadership.

In a time of uncertainty, investments like these are not just necessary; they are essential. By supporting these efforts, Americans are ensuring that their Navy remains a beacon of strength and resilience, ready to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

November 13, 2024November 13, 2024

U.S. Naval News Wednesday: November 7 – November 13, 2024

This past week, the U.S. Navy has been actively engaged in diverse operations and has been vigilant in monitoring developments related to international security and technological advancements. Here’s the latest:

Global Operations and Exercises

Red Sea Engagements: On November 11, 2024, the USS Stockdale and USS Spruance successfully intercepted multiple drones and missiles launched by Yemen’s Houthi rebels in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a vital maritime chokepoint. The attacks were thwarted without any damage or injuries, underscoring the Navy’s commitment to securing international shipping lanes.
Pacific Deployments: The U.S. Navy has forward-deployed F-35C Lightning II aircraft and CMV-22B Osprey to Japan, enhancing capabilities and strengthening maritime partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region.

Technological Advancements

Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs): The U.S. Navy is advancing its procurement of Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicles (MUSVs), with plans to acquire seven units over the next two years. This initiative reflects a shift toward integrating unmanned platforms into naval operations.
Missile Reloading at Sea: In a significant milestone, the Navy conducted successful tests of reloading missiles and rearming warships at sea, enhancing operational readiness and extending the endurance of naval vessels during deployments.

Leadership and Personnel Updates

Command Changes: The Navy relieved the commanding officer of the Naval Information Warfare Training Group in San Diego on November 7, 2024, due to a loss of confidence in her ability to command. This decision underscores the Navy’s commitment to maintaining high leadership standards.
NCIS Special Agents Graduation: On November 8, 2024, Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro welcomed 18 new NCIS special agents during a graduation ceremony at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Georgia. This event highlights the Navy’s dedication to strengthening its investigative capabilities.

Historical Discoveries

WWII Shipwreck Found: The wreckage of the USS Edsall, a World War II warship nicknamed the “Dancing Mouse,” was discovered in the Indian Ocean 81 years after it sank with 200 sailors aboard. The discovery serves as a poignant reminder of the sacrifices made during the war.

Legal and Disciplinary Actions

‘Fat Leonard’ Sentencing: Leonard Glenn Francis, known as “Fat Leonard,” was sentenced to 15 years in prison for orchestrating a massive bribery scandal involving high-ranking U.S. military officials. He was also ordered to pay $20 million in restitution and forfeit $35 million in illicit gains.

International Collaborations

AUKUS Submarine Program: Admiral William Houston, head of the U.S. Navy’s nuclear propulsion program, acknowledged the challenges in meeting production targets for supplying Australia with Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines by 2032 under the AUKUS agreement. However, he expressed confidence in achieving this goal, emphasizing the importance of international defense partnerships.

Infrastructure and Maintenance

Shipyard Visits: Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jim Kilby visited shipyards and Navy leadership in the Northeast from October 29 to November 1, 2024, focusing on readiness and maintenance. These visits are part of ongoing efforts to ensure the Navy’s operational capabilities remain robust.

Community Engagement

Veterans Day Observance: The Navy participated in various events and ceremonies across the nation to honor veterans on November 11, 2024. These activities reflect the Navy’s commitment to recognizing the service and sacrifices of military personnel.

China Watch

New Hypersonic Weapon Unveiled: China revealed a new hypersonic boost-glide weapon, the GDF-600, capable of launching sub-payloads mid-flight. These sub-payloads, designed for multiple functions like electronic warfare and reconnaissance, represent a significant leap in China’s military capabilities.
Nuclear-Powered Aircraft Carrier Development: Analysts have confirmed that China is developing a prototype nuclear reactor intended for a large warship, potentially marking a significant advancement for the country’s naval capabilities and putting the U.S. Navy on alert.
Tensions with the Philippines: China’s embassy in Beijing warned the Philippines against “unilateral actions” following Manila’s new maritime laws designed to define territory, sea lanes, and air routes. China has vowed to take necessary measures to safeguard its claimed territorial rights.
China’s New Hypersonic Weapon Concept: China has unveiled a model of its GDF-600 hypersonic boost-glide weapon at the Zhuhai Airshow. This advanced weapon, developed by the Guangdong Aerodynamic Research Academy (GARA), carries sub-payloads that can be launched mid-flight to strike multiple targets. These sub-payloads are versatile, with capabilities for electronic warfare and reconnaissance operations, representing a significant advancement in China’s military technology.
Nuclear Reactor for Chinese Aircraft Carrier: U.S. researchers have confirmed China’s progress on a nuclear-powered propulsion system for an aircraft carrier. Satellite imagery and documents reveal a land-based prototype nuclear reactor capable of powering large surface warships, which marks a potential shift in Chinese naval power.

Russia Watch

Missile Defense Site Inauguration: On November 13, 2024, U.S. and Polish officials inaugurated a NATO missile defense base in northern Poland, equipped with the U.S. Navy’s Aegis Ashore system. Russia has protested the base, viewing it as a threat, and has vowed to take countermeasures.
Naval Movements in the English Channel: Russia claimed its warship Admiral Golovko conducted drills in the English Channel, which the British Royal Navy contested, asserting the ship was merely transiting under surveillance by HMS Iron Duke. This movement reflects ongoing tensions over the conflict in Ukraine.

Iran Watch

Threats Against Israel: Iran has threatened a “strong and complex” attack against Israel in retaliation for recent strikes, raising concerns over escalating Middle East tensions.
Houthi Rebel Attacks: Yemen’s Houthi rebels launched a barrage of drones and missiles targeting U.S. Navy destroyers, including the USS Spruance, near the Red Sea. Though there were no damages or casualties, these attacks have disrupted shipping traffic and raised security concerns in the region.

Conclusion

This week’s developments highlight the U.S. Navy’s ongoing efforts to maintain global security, engage in technological advancements, and honor its personnel. From strategic partnerships to countering emerging threats, the Navy remains steadfast in its mission to ensure maritime security and readiness.

Stay updated with more in-depth stories on our blog: 👉 strongernavy.org/blog

#USNavy #NavalNews #StrongerNavy #GlobalSecurity #MilitaryNews #ChinaWatch #RussiaWatch #IranWatch

September 26, 2024September 26, 2024

Distributed Command and Control: Integrating Unmanned Systems for a Future-Ready Navy

Introduction

As we continue our deep dive into Project 33, we’ve seen how the Navy is actively investing in cutting-edge technologies like autonomous vehicles. We are fortunate to have insights from Dr. Steven Wills, Navalist at the Center for Maritime Strategy at the Navy League of the United States and Senior Advisor to Americans for a Stronger Navy. Dr. Wills, author of “Strategy Shelved: The Collapse of Cold War Naval Strategic Planning,” is an expert in U.S. Navy strategy and policy, particularly in surface warfare programs and platforms. Drawing from his extensive experience and research, Dr. Wills shared his thoughts on the progress and challenges of integrating unmanned systems into the Navy’s operations.

The Importance of Distributed Command and Control

At the heart of Project 33 is the concept of enabling our fleets to operate as a cohesive, yet dispersed, force capable of adapting to dynamic and complex threat environments. Command centers, such as Maritime Operations Centers (MOCs), play a crucial role in this distributed approach, serving as the nerve centers that link together various platforms, assets, and capabilities. To succeed in a high-end conflict, the Navy must have the ability to control and coordinate forces across vast distances, making use of both manned and unmanned systems.

Dr. Steven Wills’ Expert Insights on Unmanned Systems Integration

As Dr. Wills points out, “The MQ-25A is expected to be the basis for an unmanned strike aircraft to be fielded in the near future as the Navy seeks to make the carrier air wing 60% unmanned by 2035-2040.”

This development is a clear example of how the Navy is moving toward a more distributed, networked approach, where unmanned systems not only extend the reach of manned assets but also enhance their effectiveness.

Practical Impacts: The MQ-25A and Uncrewed Surface Ships

The introduction of the MQ-25A next year marks a pivotal step forward in Project 33’s implementation. This unmanned aerial refueling aircraft will eliminate the inefficient practice of “buddy tanking,” where F/A-18s are used as tankers, freeing them up for their primary combat missions. As Dr. Wills highlights, the MQ-25A’s deployment will significantly enhance the operational efficiency of carrier air wings, allowing for extended range and strike capabilities.

Similarly, the Navy’s uncrewed surface ship project is progressing, with plans to field uncrewed ships as additional missile magazines for our destroyers. This not only increases the fleet’s offensive and defensive capabilities but also reduces the risk to personnel, demonstrating how unmanned systems are seamlessly integrated into distributed operations.

The Human Element: Training and Maintenance

Dr. Steven Wills also offers an essential reminder that the adoption of unmanned systems doesn’t diminish the need for skilled sailors. Instead, it shifts the focus toward training personnel to maintain and repair these advanced systems. The Navy’s robotics initiative under Project 33 will require recruiting and training a new generation of sailors adept at operating and sustaining unmanned technologies, ensuring that we remain at the forefront of maritime innovation.

“The adoption of unmanned systems doesn’t diminish the need for skilled sailors. Instead, it shifts the focus toward training personnel to maintain and repair these advanced systems.” – Dr. Steven Wills

Why This Matters for Distributed Operations

The integration of unmanned systems is more than just adding new tools to the fleet—it’s about building a networked, adaptable force capable of responding to threats quickly and decisively. By incorporating autonomous vehicles into distributed command structures, the Navy gains flexibility, increased reach, and the ability to execute missions with greater precision and efficiency.

As Dr. Steven Wills rightly emphasizes, these advancements represent the future of naval warfare, where manned and unmanned assets work in concert to achieve strategic objectives.

Conclusion

Project 33’s emphasis on distributed command and control is a testament to the Navy’s commitment to preparing for future conflicts. By integrating unmanned systems like the MQ-25A and uncrewed surface ships, we’re not just enhancing the Navy’s capabilities—we’re fundamentally changing how we operate, ensuring that our fleets remain agile, adaptable, and ready for any challenge.

The road ahead will require continued investment, innovation, and the support of the American public. Together, we can ensure that the Navy remains a dominant force in an increasingly complex world. Please support the Navy and the Americans for Stronger Navy by following us on Facebook or by completing the contact us page by clicking here.

Dr. Wills, author of “Strategy Shelved: The Collapse of Cold War Naval Strategic Planning,” is available on Amazon. For details click here.

September 4, 2024September 4, 2024

U.S. Naval News Wednesday – September 4, 2024: Operational Highlights & In-Depth Editorial on Shipyard Modernization

Welcome to this week’s edition of U.S. Naval News. At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we’re committed to keeping you informed about the latest developments from around the fleet. This week, we bring you key updates, including the USS Abraham Lincoln’s strategic deployment to the Gulf of Oman and cutting-edge advancements in drone operations aboard the USS George H.W. Bush.

But we’re not stopping there. In this edition, we’re introducing a new feature—an in-depth editorial commentary. Following the news, we’ll dive deeper into a critical issue affecting our Navy: the recent GAO report on the state of U.S. shipyards. This report raises alarms about the capacity and readiness of our shipyards to meet the demands of a modern Navy. We’ll explore why this matters, what needs to be done, and how you—our readers and supporters—can join us in advocating for change.

Your involvement is more important than ever. Together, we can make a difference.

Thank you for your continued support.

Operational Updates

USS Abraham Lincoln Deployment: The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) has positioned itself in the Gulf of Oman as part of a broader strategy to maintain a strong naval presence in the Middle East. This deployment comes amid increasing regional tensions, particularly related to Iran’s activities.
Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group Rescue: The USS Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group successfully rescued two distressed Iranian mariners in international waters. The rescue operation underscores the U.S. Navy’s readiness and commitment to maritime safety and humanitarian missions in the region.
Submarine Maintenance in Australia: The USS Hawaii (SSN 776) conducted scheduled maintenance at HMAS Stirling, Australia, under the AUKUS Pillar 1 initiative, which supports Australia’s development of a sovereign conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine capability.
Bilateral Operations with Italian Navy: The U.S. Navy and Italian Navy conducted joint operations in the Philippine Sea, focusing on enhancing maritime security and demonstrating a unified commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Technological and Strategic Developments

Drone Command Center on USS George H.W. Bush: A new drone command center has been installed on the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) to operate MQ-25 “Stingray” drones, marking a significant advancement in the Navy’s unmanned aerial capabilities.
FY24 NDAA Shipbuilding Boost: The U.S. Senate’s version of the FY24 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes authorization for the procurement of 10 new battle force ships, emphasizing the ongoing modernization of the Navy’s fleet.
China Watch: China recently claimed breakthroughs in autonomous vehicle technology, which could have significant military applications, including advanced driver-assistance systems and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These developments are closely tied to China’s broader strategy of integrating military and civilian technology efforts.
Russia Watch: Concerns continue to mount over the U.S. Navy’s readiness, particularly with regard to the availability of dry docks for essential ship repairs. U.S. lawmakers have voiced concerns about how this impacts naval operations, especially when compared to China’s rapid shipbuilding pace.

Community and Leadership News

Navy Shipyards Under Scrutiny: The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has raised concerns about the capacity and efficiency of U.S. shipyards, emphasizing the need for modernization to keep pace with global naval demands. The GAO report, released on September 2, 2024, highlights that delays in ship repairs and upgrades could severely impact fleet readiness. The report also notes that inadequate infrastructure and workforce shortages are critical challenges that need immediate attention.
Navy Wants Industry’s Help to Reduce Costs: Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro has called on the defense industry to partner with the Navy in reducing sustainment costs, particularly by securing better terms for technical data rights in acquisition contracts.

Editorial: The Imperative to Modernize U.S. Navy Shipyards

The recent GAO report underscores what we at Americans for a Stronger Navy have been emphasizing for the past two years: the state of our Navy’s shipyards is a national crisis. The threats we face are real and cannot be overstated. As the GAO has highlighted, the current state of our shipyards directly threatens our fleet’s readiness and, by extension, our national security.

This is not just a Navy issue—it’s a national imperative. We cannot expect the Navy to shoulder this burden alone. It’s time for Congress to act decisively, providing the necessary funding and legislative support to modernize our shipyards. The Navy’s ability to maintain a robust, ready fleet depends on it.

We propose a multi-faceted approach to solving this crisis. A private-public-community partnership is essential to drive the changes needed. Industry leaders, local communities, and government must come together to build the workforce, improve infrastructure, and streamline processes to ensure our Navy remains the most powerful maritime force in the world.

We can no longer afford to point fingers. It’s time to move forward with a united effort. The future of our national security depends on it.

Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY)
- Location: Portsmouth, Virginia
- Established: 1767
- Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of naval ships, particularly nuclear-powered vessels.
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard
- Location: Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
- Established: 1908
- Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of submarines and surface ships.
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
- Location: Bremerton, Washington
- Established: 1891
- Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and decommissioning of naval vessels, particularly nuclear-powered ships and submarines.
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
- Location: Kittery, Maine
- Established: 1800
- Specializes in: Overhaul, repair, and modernization of nuclear-powered submarines.
Huntington Ingalls Industries (Newport News Shipbuilding)
- Location: Newport News, Virginia
- Established: 1886
- Specializes in: Construction of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines, as well as ship repair.
Mare Island Naval Shipyard (Closed)
- Location: Vallejo, California
- Established: 1854, closed in 1996
- Specializes in: Ship construction and repair (historically).
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard (Closed)
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Established: 1801, ceased operations in 1995
- Specializes in: Ship construction and repair (historically).

These shipyards represent a mixture of active and decommissioned facilities, but the active ones remain critical to maintaining and modernizing the U.S. Navy fleet, particularly in nuclear-powered ships and submarines.