Admiral Gilday’s Visit to Manila Highlights the Importance of the U.S. Navy’s Presence in the Philippines

MANILA, Philippines (Feb. 22, 2023) – Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Mike Gilday meets with Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff Gen. Andres Centino during his visit to Manila, Philippines, Feb. 22. Gilday visited the Philippines to engage with government officials and military leadership to discuss interoperability and further advance regional maritime security. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist MC1 Michael B. Zingaro/released)

In February 2023, Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Mike Gilday, accompanied by his wife Linda, traveled to Manila, Philippines, to meet with military and government officials. The visit focused on U.S. and Philippine maritime domain awareness and naval capabilities, and the importance of the U.S.-Philippine alliance to peace and stability in the region. Gilday’s visit highlights the continued importance of the U.S. Navy’s presence in the Philippines to America’s national security interests and the close relationship between the U.S. and the Philippines.

Why is the U.S. Navy’s Presence in the Philippines Important for America?

The United States Navy has a long history in the Philippines, and its presence in the region is critical for America’s national security interests, both economically and militarily. The Indo-Pacific region is home to some of the world’s busiest sea lanes, which are critical for trade and commerce. The U.S. Navy helps to ensure the free and open navigation of these sea lanes and the unimpeded flow of goods and services. In addition, the Navy’s presence in the region serves as a deterrent to potential adversaries, maintaining the balance of power and stability in the region.

Why is the U.S.-Philippine Alliance Important for Americans?

The U.S.-Philippine alliance is essential for Americans as it promotes stability and security in the region, prevents conflict, and protects American interests. The United States has a deep and long-standing relationship with the Philippines that dates back to the early 20th century. The alliance allows for close cooperation between the two countries in areas such as counterterrorism, maritime security, and disaster response. The two countries share a commitment to promoting democracy and human rights, and the U.S. Navy’s presence in the Philippines reinforces this commitment.

CNO Gilday’s Visit to Manila Highlights Importance of U.S.-Philippine Alliance

During his visit, CNO Gilday met with senior officials, including U.S. Ambassador to the Philippines MaryKay Carlson, Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff Gen. Andres Centino, and Philippine Navy Flag Officer in Command Vice Adm. Toribio Adaci Jr. The engagements focused on U.S. and Philippine maritime domain awareness and naval capabilities, and the importance of the U.S.-Philippine alliance to peace and stability in the region. The visit also served as a reminder of the deep bonds of friendship and camaraderie that exist between the U.S. Navy and the Philippine Navy. Gilday’s trip to Manila was part of a regional tour that also included a visit to Australia. It was Gilday’s first visit to the Philippines as CNO.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the U.S. Navy’s presence in the Philippines is a vital part of America’s national security strategy, and the U.S.-Philippine alliance is critical to promoting stability and security in the region.

CNO Gilday’s visit to Manila serves as a reminder of the important work that Navy sailors do in promoting regional security and stability. The United States and the Philippines share a deep and abiding friendship, and the two countries will continue to work closely together in the future to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific

Contractors Lead the Way in Navy’s $1.2 Billion Investment to Boost ‘Fleet Forward’ Readiness and Modernize for Future Challenges

The Navy plays a vital role in ensuring the country’s security, protecting its interests around the world, and supporting humanitarian efforts.

We recognize that the Navy’s ongoing efforts to modernize and adapt to new challenges require innovative solutions. That’s why we launched the Fleet Forward Initiative, which aims to shine a spotlight on and support cutting-edge technologies, support services and ideas that will help the Navy maintain its strength and readiness for decades to come.

We also applaud the great work being done by the contractors who have been awarded these contracts, whose support services, innovative ideas and technologies will play a critical role in ensuring that the Navy remains the most powerful maritime force in the world.

Department of Defense Contracts

Professional Contract Services Inc., Austin, Texas, is awarded a $34,997,838 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity modification for contract N40085-20-D-0040. This modification provides for the exercise of Option Number Three for base operating support services at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, and its outlying support sites. After award of this option, the total cumulative contract value will be $134,741,490. Work will be performed in Portsmouth, Virginia. This option period is from March 31, 2023, to March 29, 2024. No funds will be obligated at time of award. Fiscal 2023 operation and maintenance, (Navy) funds in the amount of $32,545,920 for recurring work will be obligated on an individual task orders issued during the option period. The Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Mid-Atlantic, Norfolk, Virginia, is the contracting activity.

U.S. Marine Management Inc., Norfolk, Virginia (N3220523C4007), is awarded a $27,372,005 firm-fixed-price contract for the operation and maintenance of three government-owned large, medium-speed roll-on/roll-off (LMSR) vessels. The vessels under this award include USNS Seay (T-AKR 302), USNS Pililaau (T-AKR 304), and USNS Brittin (T-AKR 305). Work will be performed worldwide, with an expected completion date of Sept. 30, 2024. The maximum dollar value, including the base period and six month option, is $40,977,737. Working capital funds (Navy) in the amount of $13,739,119 are obligated for fiscal 2023. Contract funds in the amount of $27,372,005 will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured. The contract was prepared under the authority of 41 U.S. Code 3304(a)(2), as implemented by Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1 only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. The Navy’s Military Sealift Command, Norfolk, Virginia, is the contracting activity (N6238723C4007).

Lockheed Martin Space, Titusville, Florida, is awarded a $20,941,008 cost-plus-fixed-fee, level-of-effort and completion type contract modification (P00002) to previously awarded contract N0003022C2023 for engineering, technical support services, operational support hardware and consumable spares for the Fleet Ballistic Missile Program. Work will be performed in Denver, Colorado (24.64%); Valley Forge, Pennsylvania (23.30%); Cape Canaveral, Florida (23.21%); Titusville, Florida (9.75%); Sunnyvale, California (7.77%); Coulport, Scotland (4.19%); Kings Bay, Georgia (1.83%); and various locations below one percent (5.31%). Work is expected to be completed by March 31, 2025. No year non-appropriated funds in the amount of $20,941,008 will be obligated on this award and no funds will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was awarded as a sole source acquisition pursuant to 10 U.S. Code 2304(c)(4). Strategic Systems Programs, Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity.

Viasat Inc., Carlsbad, California, is awarded a $12,242,291 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to provide software maintenance and technical support for the Viasat LinkWay and Enhanced Broadband Efficient Modem waveforms and associated hardware platforms. This contract will provide support for the Very Small Aperture Terminal Small/Medium/Large, Master Reference Terminal, Hub Modem Package, and Marine Corps Wideband Satellite Communications family of systems. Work will be performed in Carlsbad, California, and is expected to be completed by March 2028. The maximum dollar value, including the base period and four additional ordering periods, is $12,242,291. No funds will be obligated at the time of award. Funds will be obligated on individual delivery orders as they are issued. Fiscal 2023 procurement (Marine Corps) funds in the amount of $4,134,166; and fiscal 2023 operations and maintenance (Marine Corps) funds in the amount of $1,539,460 for a total of $5,673,626 will be obligated on the first delivery order immediately following contract award. This contract was a sole source acquisition pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1(a) and 10 U.S. Code § 3204(a)(1). The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Virginia, is the contracting activity (M67854-23-D-2031).

Vigor Marine LLC, Portland, Oregon, is awarded a $10,309,313 firm-fixed-price modification to previously awarded contract N4523A22C0552 for the procurement of 14 out of scope work specifications for repair, maintenance and modernization in support of the USS John Paul Jones 2C1 docking selected restricted availability. This is a sole source modification in accordance with 10 U.S. Code 3204(a)(1), only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements on the basis of industrial mobilization. Work will be performed in Seattle, Washington, and is expected to be completed by April 2024. Fiscal 2023 operations and maintenance (Navy) funds in the amount of $10,309,313 will be obligated at time of award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility/Northwest Regional Maintenance Center, Everett, Washington, is the contracting activity.

Update:

Raytheon Co., Tucson, Arizona, was awarded a $12,140,030 cost-plus-fixed-fee modification to previously awarded contract N00024-18-C-5407 to exercise options and incrementally fund existing contract line items for Standard Missile (SM) depot and intermediate level repair and maintenance. Work will be performed in Tucson, Arizona, and is expected to be completed by February 2024. Fiscal 2023 operations and maintenance (Navy) funds in the amount of $12,140,030 (100%) will be obligated at time of award and will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity. (Awarded March 31, 2023)

US Navy Ramps Up Chaplain Deployment to Tackle Escalating Mental Health Crisis Among Sailors

The US Navy is deploying more chaplains aboard ships to address the growing mental health concerns among its sailors, including an increase in suicides.

Chaplains are being deployed to connect with sailors, regardless of their religious affiliation, and provide them with confidential counseling.

Navy officials hope to have 47 chaplains on ships based in Norfolk, Virginia, up from 37 today, and to enhance access to mental health care without stigma or retaliation.

Suicide and mental health concerns among enlisted men under 29 are rising, with more than 500 service members taking their own lives in 2021.

US Navy Chaplain Responsibilities

According to the official website of the Navy Chaplain Corps, the daily responsibilities of a US Navy Chaplain include:

Providing religious ministry: The chaplain conducts religious services and sacraments, such as Mass, Communion, and Baptism, to meet the religious needs of sailors and their families.

Counseling and pastoral care: Chaplains provide confidential counseling to sailors and their families on a variety of issues, including marital problems, financial difficulties, and personal stress.

Advising the command: The chaplain advises the command on the religious and spiritual needs of the crew and provides guidance on ethical and moral issues.

Crisis response: Chaplains are trained to provide crisis response and emotional support during natural disasters, accidents, and combat situations.

Training and development: The chaplain also provides training and development programs to sailors and their families on religious and spiritual topics.

Source: United States Navy Chaplain Corps, “Roles and Responsibilities,” accessed March 30, 2023, https://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/support/chaplain/Pages/Roles-and-Responsibilities.aspx.

US Navy won’t be “bullied” says Rear Adm. Christopher Sweeney

The commander of a US Navy aircraft carrier in Northeast Asia, Rear Adm. Christopher Sweeney, has said that American forces will not be deterred by China’s warnings of conflict.

On Board the USS Nimitz courtesy of Sky News

“We’re resolute in that we’re not going to be bullied, we’re not going to be coerced, and we are going to stay here and fly and operate in international norms,” said Rear Adm. Christopher Sweeney, who heads up Carrier Strike Group 11, a flotilla of warships led by the “supercarrier” USS Nimitz.The USS Nimitz and its escorts have arrived in South Korea after back-to-back war games with Japan and South Korea.

China is challenging America’s right to operate in the region, but Sweeney stated that the Navy will sail, operate and fly wherever international law allows, and they do not seek conflict with China.

About Rear Admiral Christopher Sweeney

Rear Admiral Christopher Sweeney
Commander, Carrier Strike Group ELEVEN

Rear Adm. Christopher Sweeney is a native of the Eastern Shore of Maryland, a 1991 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and also a graduate of the Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, with a master’s degree in International Policy and Practice.

Sweeney has served in a diverse range of sea and shore assignments. As a surface warfare officer, he commanded Destroyer Squadron 15 (CDS 15) from 2015 to 2016 in the Western Pacific and the Destroyer USS Decatur (DDG 73) from 2009 to 2010, deploying twice to the Arabian Gulf in support of U.S. and Coalition Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

His service at sea since 1992 includes assignments aboard USS Russell (DDG 59), USS Port Royal (CG 73), USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60), USS Cyclone (PC 1) and USS San Jacinto (CG 56) deployed to the Middle East, Western Pacific, Mediterranean and South America.

His shore tours included deputy for Combat Systems and Warfighting Integration, responsible for future surface combatant force requirements and integration of warfighting investments for the Director of Surface Warfare (N-96). He has also served as the branch head for Integrated Air & Missile Defense for the Director of Surface Warfare (N-96) and as a strategic and political-military planner on the staffs of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (J-5) and the Chief of Naval Operations.

His first flag tour was as the deputy director for Policy, Plans, Strategy, Capabilities and Resources (J-5/8), U.S. European Command in Stuttgart, Germany. He is currently serving as commander, Carrier Strike Group Eleven.

His awards include the Defense Superior Service Medal, Legion of Merit, Joint Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Meritorious Service Medal and various personal, unit, service and campaign awards.

USS Nimitz carrier strike group docks in South Korea amid heightened regional tensions

USS Nimitz (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class John Philip Wagner, Jr/Released)

Kyodo News, a nonprofit cooperative organization and the leading news agency in Japan, reports that the US aircraft carrier Nimitz has entered the South Korean port of Busan for a scheduled port visit amidst recent North Korean missile tests and military posturing.

The port visit is part of the ongoing partnership and security alliance between the US and South Korea. The USS Nimitz’s presence in the region is seen as a show of force and a signal to North Korea of the US commitment to its allies in the region. North Korea has recently conducted several missile tests, including a test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile, which has raised concerns about its military capabilities and intentions.

The US and South Korea have been conducting joint military exercises in the region, which North Korea has criticized as a provocation.

The situation on the Korean peninsula remains tense, with North Korea continuing to pursue its nuclear and missile programs, and the US and its allies monitoring the situation closely.

The US Navy’s aircraft carrier, USS Nimitz, has arrived in the South Korean port of Busan for a scheduled port visit. The campaign aims to ensure that the US Navy remains the world’s most powerful maritime force, capable of maintaining peace, protecting US interests, and deterring potential adversaries. The USS Nimitz’s presence in the region is seen as a demonstration of the US Navy’s commitment to supporting its allies in the region and maintaining stability in the Indo-Pacific. Despite recent North Korean missile tests and military posturing, the US and its allies remain vigilant and committed to ensuring the security of the Korean peninsula and the broader region.

Key takeaways from the article “US aircraft carrier enters S. Korea port amid N. Korean posturing” are:

  • The US Navy’s aircraft carrier, USS Nimitz, has arrived in the South Korean port of Busan for a scheduled port visit amid recent North Korean missile tests and military posturing.
  • The port visit is part of the ongoing partnership and security alliance between the US and South Korea.
  • The USS Nimitz presence in the region is seen as a show of force and a signal to North Korea of the US commitment to its allies in the region.
  • North Korea has recently conducted several missile tests, including a test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile, which has raised concerns about its military capabilities and intentions.
  • The US and South Korea have been conducting joint military exercises in the region, which North Korea has criticized as a provocation.
  • The situation on the Korean peninsula remains tense, with North Korea continuing to pursue its nuclear and missile programs, and the US and its allies monitoring the situation closely.

U.S. Navy Monitors North Korea

Introduction:

The United States Navy has long been a symbol of strength and security around the world. As tensions rise in various regions, the importance of maintaining a strong Navy is more critical than ever. In recent news, North Korea test-fired two missiles into the sea of Japan while the US conducted military exercises with South Korea. The situation highlights the importance of a strong navy and the need for the US to continue to support and strengthen its naval capabilities. As members or subscribers of Americans for a Stronger Navy, let’s dive deeper into this issue and why it is crucial to support our naval forces.

North Korea’s Missile Tests:

North Korea’s recent missile tests have raised tensions in the region. The tests were conducted while the US and South Korea were conducting joint military exercises. The missiles are believed to be short-range ballistic missiles, and while they do not pose an immediate threat to the US, they do show that North Korea continues to develop its missile capabilities.

US Commitment to Defending Its Allies:

The US has reaffirmed its commitment to defending its allies in the region. The joint military exercises with South Korea demonstrate the US’s commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the region. As a member or subscriber of Americans for a Stronger Navy, it is important to understand that a strong Navy is necessary to support this commitment. A strong Navy ensures that the US can respond to any potential threat quickly and effectively.

The Importance of a Strong Navy:

A strong Navy is essential to US national security. A strong Navy can deter potential adversaries, ensure the safety of US citizens, and project US power around the world. As the US faces growing challenges from various regions, it is critical to continue to support and strengthen the Navy. This includes investing in new ships, submarines, and aircraft carriers, as well as modernizing existing assets. The US Navy must remain a technologically advanced and highly trained force to maintain its global presence.

Conclusion:

The recent missile tests by North Korea and joint military exercises by the US and South Korea highlight the importance of a strong Navy. As a member or subscriber of Americans for a Stronger Navy, it is essential to support and advocate for a strong Navy to ensure US national security. The US Navy must continue to be a symbol of strength and security around the globe.

USS Porter (DDG 78) Arrives in Tallinn, Estonia

USS Porter (DDG 78)

The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) arrived in Tallinn, Estonia, March 20, 2023 for a scheduled port visit to enhance U.S.-Estonia relations as the two nations work together for a stable, secure, and prosperous Europe.

The ship’s presence in the Baltic Sea is a demonstration of the U.S. Navy’s continued commitment to collective defense of the European region and reinforces the strong bond between the United States and Estonia.

While inport Tallinn, the ship and her crew will have the opportunity to partake in several Morale, Welfare and Recreation tours and see many historical sights and experience the rich culture of Estonia and its citizens.

“We’re grateful for the chance to see Estonia and to enhance our relationship with a key NATO ally,” said Cmdr. Joe Hamilton, Porter’s commanding officer. “This is a great opportunity for our crew to experience Estonian culture and meet the people of Tallinn.”

The ship has conducted previous port stops in Funchal, Portugal and Rostock, Germany while on its current deployment.

Porter’s deployment to the NAVEUR-NAVAF area of operations comes months after a homeport shift from Naval Station Rota, Spain to Naval Station Norfolk in October 2022. Porter spent seven years in Spain as part of the Forward Deployed Naval Forces-Europe force, conducting eleven patrols in that time period. The patrols took Porter throughout the U.S. Sixth Fleet area of operations, including the Baltic, North, Norwegian, and Mediterranean Seas, as well as the Eastern Atlantic Ocean, in support of U.S., allied, and partner interests.

“Porter’s crew has performed superbly since our return to the region for this deployment,” said Hamilton. “We’ve learned and enjoyed our training with our allied and partner Navies. We are looking forward to this interoperability training with the Estonian Navy.”

The ship’s visit to Tallinn follows multiple port calls from U.S. Navy ships in recent years, including the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) in May 2022 and guided-missile destroyers on deployment from the United States East Coast and on patrol from the Forward Deployed Naval Forces-Europe (FDNF-E) force stationed at Naval Station Rota, Spain.

The U.S. and Estonia are committed to working together and improving interoperability through port visits, operations, and exercises like Siil and Baltic Operations (BALTOPS).

For over 80 years, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-U.S. Naval Forces Africa (NAVEUR-NAVAF) has forged strategic relationships with our allies and partners, leveraging a foundation of shared values to preserve security and stability.

Headquartered in Naples, Italy, NAVEUR-NAVAF operates U.S. naval forces in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) areas of responsibility. U.S. Sixth Fleet is permanently assigned to NAVEUR-NAVAF, and employs maritime forces through the full spectrum of joint and naval operations.

History

lUSS Porter is the fifth ship to bear the name of two naval legends: Commodore David Porter (1780-1843) and his son, Admiral David Dixon Porter (1813-1891). Their legendary naval exploits earned them a place of honor iNaval History.

Commissioned on February 20, 1897 in Newport, RI, USS Porter (TB-6) was a torpedo patrol boat that helped enforce the blockade of Cuba during the Spanish-American War. When the United States declared war on Spain, Porter was ready patrolling the waters of Key West. She soon made contact with the enemy by capturing two Spanish schooners. TB-6 resumed blockade duty off Cape Haiteien, Haiti, keeping a watchful eye out for the Spanish squadron. She participated in the three-hour bombardment of San Juan in May 1898 with the 9 ships of Rear Admiral W. T. Sampson’s fleet. During the attack, Porter maintained a close position under the batteries but was not hit. Later, she supported the Marine beachhead landing at Guantanamo Bay. The first USS Porter (TB-6) was struck from the Navy List on November 6, 1912.

USS Porter (DD-59) was commissioned April 17, 1916 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. After shakedown in the Caribbean, USS Porter (DD-59) sailed in convoy duty escorting the first USS troops to Europe during WWI. She arrived at Queenstown, Ireland, where she was based during World War I, meeting and escorting convoys from the U.S. as they transited from Ireland to France. Kept busy as a convoy escort, she severely damaged U-108 on April 28, 1918. The second USS Porter (DD-59) was struck from the Navy List July 5, 1934.

The third USS Porter (DD-356) was also commissioned in Philadelphia on August 25, 1936. After shakedown in waters off northern Europe, DD-356 visited St. Johns, Newfoundland for coronation with the Pacific Fleet. On December 5, 1941, Porter got underway from Pearl Harbor, escaping the Japanese attack by two days. She vigorously patrolled with cruisers and destroyers in Hawaiian waters. In late October 1942 Task Force 16 exchanged air attacks with strong Japanese forces northeast of Guadalcanal in the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands. During the ensuing action, Porter was torpedoed by a submarine and her crew was forced to abandoned ship. Her name was struck from the Navy List November 2, 1942. For her valiant service in WWII, USS Porter (DD-356) earned on battle star for World War II service which is represented by a star on the DDG 78 crest.

The fourth Porter (DD-800) was commissioned June 24, 1944 in Seattle, Washington. After shakedown off San Diego, Porter trained with Task Force 92 and made an offensive sweep against the Japanese naval base at Suribachi Wan, Paramushiru. Porter participated in the first extensive sweep by surface vessels into the Japanese-controlled Sea of Okhotsk. In doing so, DD-800 encountered a small convoy and sank a 2,000-ton Japanese merchantman with gunfire. During the Korean conflict, USS Porter (DD-800) served in Korean waters with Task Force 95 and joined the ranks of the “Trainbusters Club,” destroying one North Korean train and damaging 2. She was placed out of commission on August 10, 1953. Porter earned one battle star for World War II service and one battle star for Korean War service. These are represented on the DDG 78 crest

US Navy challenges China’s maritime claims in South China Sea with freedom of navigation operation

USS Milius (DDG-69). Navy photo

The US Navy conducted a freedom of navigation operation in the disputed waters around the Paracel Islands, which are claimed by both China and Vietnam. The operation was carried out by the guided-missile destroyer USS Milius, which sailed within 12 nautical miles of the islands to challenge China’s maritime claims in the region according to press reports.

AP reported that China threatened “serious consequences” Friday after the United States Navy sailed a destroyer around the disputed Paracel Islands in the South China Sea for the second day in a row, in a move Beijing claimed was a violation of its sovereignty and security.

In response to the operation, US Navy spokesperson Lt. j.g. Luka Bakic stated, “The United States conducts routine and regular freedom of navigation operations, as we have done in the past and will continue to do so in the future. These operations are designed to uphold the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea and airspace guaranteed to all nations under international law.”

China has claimed almost the entire South China Sea as its own, a claim that is disputed by other countries, including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan. The US has been conducting freedom of navigation operations in the region to challenge China’s excessive claims and assert its right to sail through what it sees as international waters.

The operation comes amid tensions between the US and China over a range of issues, including trade, human rights, and the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic. China has accused the US of “provocation” and “interference” in the region, while the US has said it will continue to challenge what it sees as China’s excessive claims in the South China Sea.

In a report from PBS, the U.S. has no South China Sea claims itself, but has deployed Naval and Air Force assets for decades to patrol the strategic waterway, through which around $5 trillion in global trade transits each year and which holds highly valuable fish stocks and undersea mineral resources.

A United Nations-backed arbitration tribunal ruled in 2016 that the historical claim from China on the waters had no legal basis under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas, and Washington maintains that freedom of navigation and overflight of the waterway are in the American national interest.

U.S. forces currently operate daily in the South China Sea, and have been present for more than a century. China regularly responds angrily, accusing the U.S. of meddling in Asian affairs and impinging upon its sovereignty.

China’s claims have frequently brought it into conflict with other nations in the region as well. Filipino diplomats unleashed a slew of protests Friday over China’s recent targeting of a Philippine coast guard ship with a powerful military laser and other aggressive behavior.

.In 2018, CNN also reported on the Paracel Islands, a group of islands in the South China Sea that are claimed by both China and Vietnam. The islands have long been a source of tension between the two countries, with China asserting its sovereignty over the region and Vietnam claiming that the islands are part of its territory. This conflict has escalated in recent years, with China building military facilities on some of the islands and Vietnam protesting these actions.

The Paracel Islands are a group of around 130 small islands, reefs, and atolls that are located in the South China Sea, approximately equidistant from the coasts of Vietnam and China. The islands are located in an area that is rich in natural resources, including oil, gas, and fish, which has made them a source of contention between the two countries. Both China and Vietnam claim historical rights to the islands, with China pointing to records dating back to the Han Dynasty and Vietnam citing evidence of its control of the islands during the 18th and 19th centuries.

Despite the competing claims, China has taken steps to assert its sovereignty over the Paracel Islands in recent years. China has built military installations on several of the islands, including airstrips, radar systems, and naval bases. This has led to concerns among Vietnam and other countries in the region that China is seeking to establish de facto control over the South China Sea.

Vietnam has responded to China’s actions by protesting its sovereignty over the islands and conducting its own military exercises in the region. In 2016, Vietnam’s prime minister called for a peaceful resolution to the dispute, stating that “Vietnam will resolutely and persistently protect its sovereignty and legitimate rights and interests in the East Sea [South China Sea].”

The Paracel Islands dispute is just one of several territorial disputes in the South China Sea, which has become a key flashpoint in the region. China’s claims to the islands are part of a larger effort to assert its dominance over the region, which has led to tensions with other countries in the region, including the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei.

The dispute over the Paracel Islands is likely to continue in the coming years, as both China and Vietnam remain committed to their competing claims to the region. The United States and other countries in the region have called for a peaceful resolution to the dispute, but it remains to be seen whether this will be possible given the complex geopolitical factors at play.

In conclusion, the Paracel Islands dispute is a complex and contentious issue that has significant implications for the region. While China has taken steps to assert its sovereignty over the islands, Vietnam and other countries in the region have expressed concern over China’s actions. The dispute is likely to continue for the foreseeable future, as both China and Vietnam remain committed to their claims to the region

US and Philippines Condemn China’s “Gray Zone” Activities in the South China Sea

The United States and the Philippines have issued a joint statement condemning China’s “gray zone” activities in the South China Sea. These activities include the deployment of maritime militia and the harassment of Philippine vessels and fishermen. The two countries also reaffirmed their commitment to upholding international law and called for a peaceful resolution to the disputes in the region. The statement was issued after the conclusion of the annual joint military exercises between the US and the Philippines.

Key takeaways:

The US and the Philippines have condemned China’s “gray zone” activities in the South China Sea.

China’s activities include the deployment of maritime militia and the harassment of Philippine vessels and fishermen.

The two countries reaffirmed their commitment to upholding international law and called for a peaceful resolution to the disputes in the region.

The statement was issued after the conclusion of the annual joint military exercises between the US and the Philippines.

Source: The Manila Times

What are the Gray Zones?

U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea:

In a 2020 U.S. Secretary of Defense the statement, the PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal, an entirely submerged feature only 50 nautical miles from Malaysia and some 1,000 nautical miles from China’s coast. James Shoal is often cited in PRC propaganda as the “southernmost territory of China.” International law is clear: An underwater feature like James Shoal cannot be claimed by any state and is incapable of generating maritime zones. James Shoal (roughly 20 meters below the surface) is not and never was PRC territory, nor can Beijing assert any lawful maritime rights from it.

The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire. America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources, consistent with their rights and obligations under international law. We stand with the international community in defense of freedom of the seas and respect for sovereignty and reject any push to impose “might makes right” in the South China Sea or the wider region.


Tomahawk Missiles for Australia

.

The crew of the Los Angeles-class fast-attack submarine USS Annapolis (SSN 760) successfully launches Tomahawk cruise missiles off the coast of southern California in 2018.

The US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) has announced a possible sale of Tomahawk cruise missile systems to Australia. The proposed deal is worth an estimated $1.5 billion and would involve the sale of 200 Tomahawk Block V All-Up-Round missiles, along with associated equipment, spare parts, and support services.

The Tomahawk missile system is a long-range, all-weather, subsonic cruise missile that is designed for precision strike missions against heavily defended targets. It is a proven weapon system that has been used extensively in combat operations, most recently in the strikes against Syrian chemical weapon facilities in 2018.

The proposed sale would enhance Australia’s capability to deter regional threats and strengthen its interoperability with the US. It would also support Australia’s maritime security and provide it with an enhanced ability to conduct naval operations independently or in coordination with other allies.

The sale of the Tomahawk missile system to Australia is part of a broader trend of increasing defense cooperation between the US and its allies in the Indo-Pacific region, as they seek to counterbalance China’s growing military power and assertiveness in the region.

The proposed sale is still subject to approval by the US Congress, and it remains to be seen how Australia’s neighbors, particularly China, will respond to the move. However, if approved, the sale could have significant implications for the balance of power in the region and could potentially escalate tensions between the US and China.

Overall, the proposed sale of the Tomahawk missile system to Australia highlights the increasing importance of the Indo-Pacific region in global affairs and the growing significance of defense cooperation among allies in the region. It also underscores the continued rivalry between the US and China, which is likely to shape the region’s security landscape in the years to come.

CNN reports that:

So far only the UK has bought Tomahawks from the US, but recently Japan announced its intention to buy hundreds of the missiles, which cover a distance of more than 1,000 kilometers (621 miles), to boost its defense capabilities.

About Tomahawks

First deployed in the Gulf War in 1991, Tomahawk missiles fly at extremely low altitudes at high subsonic speeds and are controlled by several mission-tailored guidance systems. According to the US Navy, they can be launched from submarines made by the US and the UK, as well as from US Navy ships.

  • The Tomahawk Land Attack Missile is a long-range, all-weather, jet-powered, subsonic cruise missile that is primarily used by the United States Navy and Royal Navy in ship and submarine-based land-attack operations. Source: Wikipedia
  • Maximum speed: Subsonic; ~Mach 0.74. about 567.7 mph (493.3 kn; 913.6 km/h)
  • Engine: Williams International F107-WR-402 turbofan; using TH-dimer fuel; and a solid-fuel rocket booster
  • Manufacturer: General Dynamics (initially); McDonnell Douglas; Hughes Aircraft Corporation; Raytheon Missiles & Defense
    Length: Without booster: 18 ft 3 in (5.56 m) With booster: 20 ft 6 in (6.25 m)
  • Diameter: 20.4 in (0.52 m)
    Mass: 2,900 lb (1,300 kg), 3,500 lb (1,600 kg) with booster
    Unit cost: : $1.87M (FY2017) (Block IV); $2M (FY2022) (Block V);