Tag: U.S. Navy

Posted on

Leadership in the U.S. Navy: Lessons from History and the Stakes Today

The Royal Navy’s execution of Admiral Byng in 1757 reminds us: indecision in war is deadly.
Introduction: The Reality We Face Today
 
The U.S. Navy is undergoing major leadership changes. Reports indicate that the incoming administration’s new Secretary of Defense, Pete Hedgeseth, is making sweeping moves by dismissing top admirals. Whether this signals a strategic reset or a political maneuver, one thing is clear: leadership in the military is under a microscope.
Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

In the private sector, where I have spent much of my career, leadership changes are routine—CEOs get fired, boards demand accountability, and shareholders expect results. But in the military, leadership turnover carries far greater consequences—it affects national security, operational readiness, and the morale of those who serve. In a time of rising threats from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, America cannot afford indecision or mismanagement at the highest levels of command.

To understand the stakes, we need to examine a historical case of military accountability—one that was as brutal as it was instructive. The execution of Royal Navy Admiral John Byng in 1757 sent a chilling message: failure to act decisively in war could cost you everything. The question for us today is: Are we ensuring accountability, or are we risking unnecessary instability in our naval leadership?

A Harsh Lesson from History: The Execution of Admiral Byng
 
In 1757, Admiral John Byng faced one of the most severe forms of accountability in British naval history. Tasked with defending British interests during the Seven Years’ War, Byng was sent to relieve a besieged British garrison at Minorca. But he was set up for failure—his fleet was under-resourced, and his enemy was well-prepared.
 
Byng engaged the French in battle, but when his fleet suffered heavy damage, he chose to withdraw rather than risk total destruction. His decision, while arguably pragmatic, was viewed as a failure to act decisively in war.
 
The British government, eager to shift blame away from its own missteps, made an example of Byng. He was court-martialed, found guilty under the strict new Articles of War, and sentenced to death by firing squad. His execution was meant to send a message: indecision in battle would not be tolerated.
 
Voltaire, an 18th-century French writer, philosopher, and satirist, famously wrote, “In this country, it is wise to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.” Byng’s fate, while tragic, reinforced a culture of accountability and decisive action in the Royal Navy that lasted for decades.
 
Why This Matters Today: The Cost of Indecision
 
Today, the world is entering a new era of great power competition. The challenges we face are different from those of Admiral Byng’s time, but the stakes are even higher:
 
China is rapidly expanding its navy, militarizing the South China Sea, and challenging U.S. dominance in the Pacific.
Russia is testing Western resolve, using hybrid warfare and maritime brinkmanship to threaten U.S. and allied interests.
Iran continues to harass U.S. forces in the Middle East, while North Korea remains an unpredictable nuclear threat.
 
In this environment, the U.S. Navy must embody decisive leadership at every level—on the bridge, in the boardroom, and in Washington. Hesitation, bureaucratic missteps, or weak decision-making will embolden our adversaries and put American lives at risk.
 
Implications for Americans
 
National Security: A Navy that acts with precision and decisiveness ensures the safety of our nation, our allies, and global trade routes.
Confidence in Leadership: When naval leaders are empowered to act boldly, it strengthens trust between the military and the American public.
Economic Stability: A strong Navy deters conflict, reducing the likelihood of costly, prolonged engagements that drain our national resources.
 
Implications for the U.S. Navy
 
Operational Readiness: Future conflicts will be won by those who can think and act quickly. Our Navy must train, equip, and empower its officers to make bold, effective decisions in real time.
Balanced Accountability: Leadership should be held accountable, but not used as political scapegoats or subject to constant upheaval that weakens continuity and strategy.
Better Strategic Execution: We need faster decision-making at the highest levels to ensure that shipbuilding, force readiness, and modernization efforts align with the evolving threats we face.
 
Message to Our Adversaries: Peace Through Strength—But Make No Mistake
 
Let there be no misunderstanding: Americans for a Stronger Navy is committed to peace through strength.
 
We believe in deterrence, in maintaining stability through overwhelming force, and in ensuring that war remains the last resort, not the first option. But make no mistake—if conflict comes, we do not hesitate.
 
To China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, we send this message:
 
* We do not hesitate. Our forces are trained to act with aggression and clarity when the situation demands it.
* We hold our leaders accountable—but we stand behind them when they make tough calls. Our commanders must have the authority to act decisively, without fear of political scapegoating or bureaucratic hand-wringing.
* We are prepared. We recognize that war is a dirty business, and we are willing to fight and win on our terms. We do not seek conflict, but we will never back down from defending our nation, our allies, and our interests.
 
Strength is what ensures peace. Weakness invites aggression. The U.S. Navy has been, and will remain, the ultimate deterrent to those who wish to challenge American resolve.
 
Final Thought: The Future of American Naval Power
 
The U.S. Navy is at a crossroads. We face real threats, and we cannot afford indecisiveness or internal instability.
 
History teaches us that leaders must be both decisive and supported. Americans for a Stronger Navy will continue advocating for policies that keep our fleet at peak readiness, hold leaders accountable without undermining stability, and ensure that we project strength at sea and beyond.
 
The time for hand-wringing is over. The time for banging on the table and demanding decisive action is now.
 
We either lead the seas—or someone else will.
 
Join us in this fight. Share this message, support a stronger Navy, and ensure that America’s maritime power remains second to none.
 
Editor’s Note: The status quo isn’t cutting it, and the Navy can’t afford to operate on autopilot. From both an Americans for a Stronger Navy perspective and my personal stance, I want leaders who demand action—admirals who bang on tables, challenge complacency, and push for real solutions. Right now, the Navy is stretched thin, threats are mounting, and bureaucracy is slowing us down. We don’t have the luxury of time. We need decisive leadership, real investment, and a serious commitment to strengthening the fleet—not just rhetoric or incremental tweaks. America’s naval power isn’t guaranteed unless we fight for it. That means confronting tough truths, challenging leadership where necessary, and making it impossible for decision-makers to ignore the urgency of the situation. No more waiting, no more excuses—we need action.
Posted on

Why Blue Water Matters—And Why a Strong Navy Is Essential

Introduction

The oceans—often called “blue water”—provide more than just scenery and a place for recreation. They are essential to global commerce, climate regulation, and geopolitical stability. For an organization like Americans for a Stronger Navy, the value of these waters extends beyond the environment; it includes national security, economic prosperity, and humanitarian efforts. Here’s how #bluewater matters ties directly to the need for a robust naval presence.

  1. Vital Trade Routes and Economic Security
  • Over 90% of international trade travels by sea, making reliable maritime routes the backbone of the global economy.
  • A well-equipped navy safeguards shipping lanes from piracy, terrorism, and other disruptions—ensuring that essential goods, including food, energy, and raw materials, reach the United States and allied nations safely.
  • When shipping lanes remain secure, American businesses and consumers benefit from stability and minimized costs.
  1. National Security and Global Partnerships
  • A strong naval force deters potential adversaries and helps uphold international law by patrolling the world’s oceans.
  • Through joint exercises and collaborative maritime security initiatives, the Navy fosters global partnerships that enhance collective security.
  • Whether it’s countering piracy or responding to terrorist threats, a capable navy provides rapid response in critical situations—protecting lives and strengthening America’s role on the world stage.
  1. Environmental Stewardship with Strategic Importance
  • Oceans help regulate the Earth’s climate by absorbing carbon dioxide and heat. Shifts in ocean conditions—like rising sea levels—can lead to conflicts over resources and displaced communities.
  • An active navy can work with environmental agencies and research institutions to monitor marine ecosystems, support scientific research, and enforce regulations against illegal fishing and dumping.
  • The Navy often leads the way in developing cleaner energy technologies for its vessels, which can benefit commercial industries and the environment alike.
  1. Technological Innovation and Workforce Development
  • Naval forces drive research in shipbuilding, propulsion, cybersecurity, and communications—innovations that can also enhance commercial maritime operations.
  • A strong navy means investment in personnel training. Many service members acquire valuable skills (engineering, navigation, operations) that support America’s industrial and technological base upon returning to civilian life.
  1. Humanitarian and Disaster Relief
  • Aircraft carriers, hospital ships, and naval vessels frequently deliver aid after hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters.
  • These missions save lives and foster goodwill, showcasing America’s commitment to global stability and compassion.
  • Ensuring the Navy is well-resourced allows it to continue providing this vital humanitarian assistance around the world.
  1. Upholding International Law and Freedom of Navigation
  • A strong navy enforces maritime law and maintains freedom of navigation, helping to resolve territorial disputes peacefully.
  • Advocating for freedom of navigation and respecting legitimate sovereignty claims keeps the world’s oceans open and accessible.
  • Americans for a Stronger Navy believes a balanced, determined naval presence supports global trade and diplomacy.
  1. Bringing It All Together: #bluewater Matters and National Strength When we say #bluewater matters, we’re highlighting the connection between healthy oceans, global trade, and national security. Our seas are crucial, not only for environmental reasons but also for peace, commerce, and humanitarian operations. By championing a robust, well-funded Navy, Americans for a Stronger Navy seeks to protect this critical resource and, in turn, safeguard our nation’s future.

What You Can Do

  • Stay informed by following reputable sources on defense, maritime security, and environmental matters.
  • Engage your elected officials about the importance of naval preparedness and responsible ocean stewardship.
  • Support military families through volunteer work or donations, recognizing that people are the Navy’s greatest asset.
  • Spread awareness using the hashtag #bluewater matters to emphasize the interconnected importance of strong naval forces and thriving oceans.

Conclusion A thriving maritime domain underpins America’s security, economy, and standing in the world. By uniting under the message #bluewater matters, we remind everyone that the ocean’s well-being and a strong Navy go hand in hand. Whether it’s safeguarding sea lanes, championing sustainable practices, or providing swift humanitarian aid, our seas deserve our attention—and our Navy must be equipped to protect them for generations to come.

Posted on

Why the Gulf (of America) Matters: A Maritime Powerhouse & Naval Stronghold

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America has sparked discussions, but names aside, this region has long been one of the most strategic waterways in the world. The U.S. Navy has played a critical role in securing these waters, ensuring trade routes remain open, energy supplies are protected, and national security is upheld.

Renaming bodies of water is nothing new. According to the Associated Press (AP), in 2015, President Barack Obama renamed Mount McKinley to Denali, recognizing its indigenous heritage. In 2013, Hillary Clinton remarked that if China could claim nearly the entire South China Sea, the U.S. could have labeled the Pacific Ocean the ‘American Sea’ after World War II. Even earlier, Mississippi legislators proposed renaming their portion of the Gulf as the “Gulf of America” in 2012, though it was largely symbolic.

While names may change, the Gulf’s importance remains the same—it is a lifeline for trade, military operations, and energy security. This article focuses on the facts—why the Gulf matters to America’s security, economy, and the strength of the U.S. Navy.

The Gulf’s Strategic History and Naval Legacy

The Gulf has been a key maritime battlefield in U.S. history, from the War of 1812 to World War II. The U.S. Navy has played a central role in defending American interests and maintaining stability in these waters.

  • The Battle of Mobile Bay (1864) – A defining moment in the Civil War.
  • The Gulf Blockade in WWII – Preventing German U-boats from disrupting supply chains.
  • The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) – A tense naval standoff that highlighted the Gulf’s strategic importance.

Today, the Navy remains the dominant force in the Gulf, ensuring stability and security in the region.

The U.S. Navy’s Role in the Gulf of America

The Navy conducts daily operations to protect trade, energy, and national security. Key missions include:

  • Patrolling shipping lanes to ensure free trade.
  • Securing oil and gas infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks.
  • Countering drug smuggling and trafficking networks.
  • Responding to hurricanes and natural disasters.

Key U.S. Naval Bases in the Gulf

  • Naval Air Station Pensacola (FL) – Aviation training.
  • Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (TX) – Aircraft support.
  • Naval Station Mayport (FL) – Destroyer and amphibious fleet.
  • Naval Air Station Key West (FL) – Counter-drug operations.

As threats increase globally, is the U.S. Navy stretched too thin to secure the Gulf effectively?

Is the U.S. Navy Strong Enough to Secure the Gulf?

With rising global tensions, cyber vulnerabilities, and shipbuilding challenges, the Navy’s presence in the Gulf faces new pressures.

  • The Navy is spread across the Pacific, Arctic, and Middle East, requiring more ships and personnel.
  • Shipbuilding delays mean the U.S. Navy is shrinking rather than growing.
  • Older ships are being retired faster than new ones are being built, creating fleet gaps.

Cybersecurity Threats in the Gulf

The biggest future threats may not come from warships—but from cyberattacks.

  • Hackers have already targeted U.S. energy infrastructure, shutting down pipelines and refineries.
  • China, Russia, and Iran have cyber units capable of disrupting U.S. ports and energy grids.
  • The Gulf’s 4,000+ offshore oil platforms and refineries are vulnerable to hacking.

A successful cyberattack on a major port like Houston or New Orleans could cripple U.S. exports, disrupt global trade, and weaken naval operations.

U.S. Response: Strengthening Cyber Defense

  • The Navy and U.S. Cyber Command are expanding maritime cybersecurity operations.
  • AI-driven threat detection is being tested for oil rigs and naval vessels.
  • Private industries are working with the military to protect infrastructure.

Military-Commercial Overlap: The Jones Act & Shipbuilding

The Jones Act (1920) requires that only U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed ships can transport goods between U.S. ports. This protects American shipbuilders and maritime workers, but there’s a problem:

  • American shipbuilding is lagging behind China, South Korea, and Japan.
  • The U.S. fleet of commercial ships has shrunk, making supply chains vulnerable in wartime.

A weaker shipbuilding industry means a weaker Navy. If war broke out, the U.S. would rely on foreign-built commercial ships for logistics.

Revitalizing U.S. shipbuilding would strengthen both military and commercial fleets, ensuring the U.S. remains competitive and secure.

Economic & Strategic Impact of the Gulf of America

The Gulf isn’t just a naval stronghold—it’s an economic powerhouse.

  • 15% of U.S. crude oil production comes from the Gulf.
  • Over 50% of all U.S. maritime commerce moves through the Gulf.
  • 40% of U.S. seafood (shrimp, oysters) is sourced from the Gulf.

Economic Vulnerabilities

  • A hurricane, cyberattack, or naval conflict could cripple energy exports and supply chains.
  • A strong U.S. Navy presence ensures stability, preventing disruptions that could impact millions of Americans.

The Gulf of America Needs a Strong Navy

The renaming of the Gulf is symbolic, but the real issue is whether the U.S. has the naval power to secure it.

  • The Navy must remain strong in the Gulf to protect trade, energy, and security.
  • Cyber defense is as important as naval defense.
  • Revitalizing U.S. shipbuilding would strengthen both the Navy and the economy.

A Call to Action

Supporting a Stronger Navy means:

✔ More investment in fleet modernization.
✔ Better cybersecurity for ports and oil infrastructure.
✔ Reviving American shipbuilding to ensure a strong commercial-military fleet.

Posted on

When America Ships, America Wins

Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it.

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

Introduction

In our ongoing pursuit to strengthen America’s sea power, we must confront the challenges facing both our Navy and the broader maritime domain. Over the weekend, I immersed myself in key publications—from Captain Brent D. Sadler’s impassioned article, The Nation Needs a Shipbuilding Revolution (February 2025 Proceedings), to insightful analyses on platforms like War on the Rocks and legislative presentations regarding the SHIPS for America Act. In addition, I revisited the history and nuance of Naval versus Maritime Statecraft.

The conclusion is clear: our nation’s strength at sea relies on a transformative, integrated approach. In short, When America Ships, America Wins.

Why This Matters

For too long, the U.S. Navy has operated under a narrow warfighting mandate—a legacy of policies from the 1950s that prioritized combat readiness above all else. Yet history teaches us that true American sea power has always depended on two interlinked capabilities: a modern, formidable fleet and an engaged maritime domain that underpins commerce, diplomacy, and humanitarian efforts.

As Rep. Garamendi recently stated,
“Today, less than 200 oceangoing ships fly the American flag; the SHIPS for America Act will empower our shipyards and marine merchants to uphold our country’s status as a leader in the maritime industry.”

Meanwhile, Senator Mark Kelly emphasized,
“Strengthening America’s shipbuilding capacity and revitalizing our commercial maritime industry is critical to both our national security and economic resilience.”

These words capture the urgent need to reinvest in our naval statecraft while simultaneously enhancing our broader maritime strength.

Our Journey to Clarity
Throughout my review, several key insights emerged:

Dissecting the Sources: Captain Sadler’s article calls for a revolution in U.S. naval shipbuilding. He writes, “For too long, needed investment in and action to bolster our nation’s maritime industrial base have been elusive. That luxury is no longer feasible given the threat from a revanchist and massively invested Chinese military.” His words, combined with insights from War on the Rocks and historical reflections, remind us that our Navy must once again balance combat readiness with essential peacetime missions.

Clarifying Terminology: We now clearly distinguish between “naval statecraft”—focused on rebuilding our fleet and shipbuilding capacity—and “maritime statecraft,” which encompasses the broader economic, diplomatic, and logistical roles at sea. Recognizing that these two concepts are mutually reinforcing helps create a coherent strategic message.

Refining Our Message: After extensive review and discussion, our distilled, bold message is: When America Ships, America Wins. Coupled with the rallying cry, Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it, this encapsulates the urgent need to invest in our naval statecraft to secure our maritime future.

Key Takeaways and Implications

Integrated Mission for a Modern Era: A strong Navy is not just about preparing for war—it is the foundation of national security, economic prosperity, and global maritime influence. When America builds its ships, it reinforces its entire maritime domain.

Economic and Security Benefits: Investment in our shipbuilding industry creates high-quality jobs, revitalizes our manufacturing base, and ensures our fleet is capable of sustaining military operations and global trade. Without sufficient modern vessels, our ability to maintain critical supply chains is at risk.

Historical Lessons for Today: The interwar period showed that the U.S. Navy once balanced readiness for war with vital peacetime missions like humanitarian aid and diplomatic engagement. Recalling these lessons provides a blueprint for integrating naval and maritime statecraft in today’s complex environment.

In my efforts to understand the challenges facing the U.S. Navy and our maritime infrastructure, I have spent a fair amount of time reviewing the Jones Act and the range of views surrounding it. While there are differing opinions on how best to strengthen our domestic shipping industry, one thing is clear—America needs more ships, a stronger supporting infrastructure, and a Navy that is fully equipped to protect our national security. Regardless of where one stands on the specifics of maritime policy, we can all agree that a Stronger Navy is critical to American security and economic resilience. My focus remains on ensuring that we have the industrial capacity, shipbuilding capabilities, and logistics networks necessary to maintain U.S. maritime strength in an increasingly contested world.

Why Americans Should Care

For over two centuries, American maritime strength has been a cornerstone of our global leadership. Yet today, our domestic shipbuilding industry has shrunk from over 300 shipyards in the 1980s to just 20, and our U.S.-flagged commercial fleet has dwindled to fewer than 80 vessels. With China dominating global shipbuilding and maritime trade, the equation is simple: When America Ships, America Wins. Our shipyards are the engines powering our Navy, safeguarding our commerce, and securing our freedom.

Implications for the Navy and the Maritime Domain

For the Navy: Modernizing our fleet enhances operational readiness, supports a skilled and sustainable workforce, and allows the Navy to execute both war and peacetime missions. A modernized Navy is essential to deter adversaries and defend our national interests.

For the Maritime Domain: A thriving shipbuilding industry is vital for protecting American commerce, ensuring free navigation, and fostering economic resilience. Strengthening our maritime statecraft reinforces strategic partnerships and maintains our global influence.

The Legislative Response: SHIPS for America Act

Bipartisan efforts led by figures such as Senator Mark Kelly, Congressman Mike Waltz, Rep. Trent Kelly, and Rep. John Garamendi have culminated in the introduction of the Shipbuilding and Harbor Infrastructure for Prosperity and Security (SHIPS) for America Act. This comprehensive legislation proposes to:

  • Revive U.S. Shipbuilding: Offer tax incentives and targeted investments to rebuild our shipyards and attract private-sector growth.
  • Expand the U.S.-Flagged Merchant Fleet: Implement cargo preference laws to ensure more goods travel on American ships.
  • Strengthen National Security: Increase the supply of ships available for military logistics and rapid response.
  • Develop a New Maritime Workforce: Establish apprenticeships, trade school incentives, and recruiting programs to restore critical skills in ship maintenance and marine operations.
  • Forge Strategic Partnerships with Allies: Collaborate with trusted nations like Japan, South Korea, Finland, and Canada to enhance our shipbuilding capacity while ensuring American oversight.

This legislation is not about partisan politics—it’s about survival. With global supply chains vulnerable to disruption, the urgency to rebuild our maritime strength has never been greater.

Conclusion & Call to Action

History teaches us that nations fall when they lose control of the seas. Today, as our adversaries grow stronger and our industrial base shrinks, we cannot afford to dawdle. It’s not war we desire, but peace achieved through strength—and our enemies must know that America will not stand idly by.

Join us in this crucial mission. We call on policymakers, industry leaders, and every American who values freedom and prosperity to support transformative initiatives that invest in our naval statecraft. By strengthening our shipbuilding industry and modernizing our Navy, we secure a robust maritime future that benefits us all.

When American Ships, America Wins.
Wake up, America—our destiny depends on it.

Visit StrongerNavy.org to learn more, get involved, and help ensure that our nation’s shipbuilding efforts pave the way for a secure and prosperous future.

In service to a stronger America,
Bill

Posted on

Is DeepSeek, Deep Trouble? The U.S. Navy Thinks So.

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

The U.S. Navy has issued a firm directive banning the use of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence platform, citing serious security and ethical concerns. This move highlights growing apprehensions over foreign AI technology, particularly when developed in adversarial nations like China.

What’s the Issue with DeepSeek?

On January 28, 2025, the Navy sent out an “all hands” email warning all personnel to avoid using DeepSeek “in any capacity.” The directive explicitly prohibits service members from downloading, installing, or using the AI for work-related or personal tasks.

The concerns are rooted in the platform’s Chinese origins and its potential ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Like TikTok, DeepSeek is suspected of being subject to Chinese laws that compel companies to share data with the government upon request. Cybersecurity experts warn that the AI may be capable of tracking user keystrokes and collecting sensitive data.

Why Now?

DeepSeek has recently made headlines for surpassing OpenAI’s ChatGPT in popularity on Apple’s App Store. The app’s sudden rise, its free access model, and its reportedly advanced reasoning capabilities have made it an instant disruptor in the AI space. But its low-cost development and unclear data security policies have set off alarm bells.

Government and Industry Reaction

  • President Donald Trump called DeepSeek’s success “a wake-up call” for American tech companies, urging greater innovation in AI.
  • Marc Andreessen, a billionaire tech investor, likened the rise of DeepSeek to a “Sputnik moment”, referring to the Soviet Union’s early lead in the space race.
  • Cybersecurity analysts warn that if DeepSeek gains widespread adoption, it could become a national security risk due to potential espionage capabilities.

The Bigger Picture

The U.S. has a history of banning or restricting Chinese tech over security concerns, with TikTok being the most high-profile example. The DeepSeek ban aligns with a broader generative AI policy shift within the Department of Defense, which prioritizes domestic and trusted AI sources for operational use.

Final Thoughts

The Navy’s ban raises critical questions about how foreign AI might be used for surveillance, data gathering, and influence operations. While DeepSeek might be an impressive technological achievement, the potential risks far outweigh the benefits—at least in the eyes of U.S. military leadership.

For Americans concerned about national security, this move should serve as a reminder: Who controls the technology, controls the information..

Stay updated on U.S. Navy news at StrongerNavy.org.

Posted on

Strengthening America’s Maritime Future: A Wake-Up Call for Action

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

At Americans for a Stronger Navy, we have long advocated for a robust maritime strategy that includes both a stronger U.S. Navy and a revitalized civilian maritime industry. Our commitment to this cause is rooted in a belief that America’s strength at sea is indispensable to its national security, economic stability, and global leadership.

Recently, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) released findings from an investigation into China’s dominance in the shipbuilding, maritime, and logistics sectors, revealing practices that undermine fair competition and threaten American interests. This news reaffirms the urgency of revitalizing our shipbuilding industry—a call echoed by U.S. legislators like Senator John Garamendi and others who are leading efforts to rebuild our maritime capabilities.

What the Investigation Found

The USTR investigation, launched in response to petitions by five unions, highlights how China’s aggressive industrial policies have positioned it as a global leader in shipbuilding. According to USTR Katherine Tai, China builds over 1,700 ships annually—dwarfing the fewer than five built by the United States. The report emphasizes that Beijing’s practices displace foreign firms, foster dependencies, and create significant economic and security risks for the U.S.

Quoting Katherine Tai:
“Beijing’s targeted dominance of these sectors undermines fair, market-oriented competition, increases economic security risks, and is the greatest barrier to revitalization of U.S. industries.”

Why This Matters

America’s maritime industry was once the backbone of our global influence and security. Today, it is a shadow of its former self, leaving us vulnerable to external dependencies. The decline of U.S. shipbuilding not only erodes our military readiness but also jeopardizes our economic security, particularly in the face of escalating geopolitical tensions with China.

The implications extend beyond shipbuilding. Logistics, supply chains, and the broader maritime ecosystem are critical to ensuring that America can sustain its global commitments and respond to crises effectively. As Alliance for American Manufacturing President Scott Paul aptly noted:
“Failing to take decisive action will leave our shipbuilding capabilities at the mercy of Beijing’s persistent predatory market distortions.”

Legislative Efforts to Revitalize U.S. Shipbuilding

Amid these challenges, leaders like Senator John Garamendi are working to reverse the tide. Garamendi, alongside Senators Mark Kelly and Todd Young, recently introduced the SHIPS for America Act—a comprehensive, bipartisan effort to rebuild the U.S. shipbuilding industry and expand the U.S.-flagged fleet. Key provisions of this legislation include:

  • Establishing a national maritime strategy and a White House Maritime Security Advisor.
  • Expanding the U.S.-flagged fleet by 250 ships over the next decade.
  • Rebuilding the shipyard industrial base with tax credits, financial incentives, and funding for workforce development.
  • Strengthening regulations to ensure government-funded cargo is transported on U.S.-flagged vessels.

These efforts align closely with our own calls for a balanced strategy that integrates the needs of both the Navy and civilian maritime industries.

What Needs to Be Done

The USTR’s findings, combined with the SHIPS for America Act and related initiatives, offer a roadmap to reclaim America’s maritime leadership. However, this will require decisive action from policymakers, industry leaders, and the American public. We need to:

  • Invest in shipbuilding infrastructure and workforce development.
  • Expand the U.S.-flagged fleet to reduce dependence on foreign shipping.
  • Foster innovation in shipbuilding technologies to compete globally.
  • Unite bipartisan support for maritime legislation that prioritizes national security and economic resilience.

A Call to Action: Wake Up, America!

The stakes have never been higher. As we outlined in our recent open letter, the decline of America’s maritime capabilities is not just an industry problem—it’s a national security crisis. For too long, we have allowed complacency to erode our standing as a maritime power. It’s time to wake up.

We urge you to contact your representatives and demand support for legislation like the SHIPS for America Act. Share this message with your community, and join us in advocating for a stronger Navy and a revitalized civilian maritime industry.

America’s future at sea depends on it. Let’s make it happen.

Credit to AFP for their reporting on the USTR investigation and to the Alliance for American Manufacturing for their continued advocacy.

“`

Posted on

Global Risks to Undersea Infrastructure and the Growing Need for Defense

All Hands on Deck by StrongerNavy.org

Undersea cables are the unseen arteries of modern communication, carrying 99% of the world’s internet and telecommunications traffic. Yet, as geopolitical tensions rise, these vital systems are becoming frequent targets of sabotage and hybrid warfare. Incidents from the Baltic Sea to the Taiwan Strait highlight both their strategic importance and vulnerabilities.

The Stakes: Why Undersea Cables Matter

  • Global Communication: These cables carry 99% of international data, enabling everything from financial transactions to government communications.
  • Economic Lifeline: Damaging these cables can disrupt trillions of dollars in daily transactions, impacting economies and businesses globally.
  • Military and Security Concerns: Undersea cables are vital for military communication, making them high-value targets in hybrid warfare strategies.

Recent Incidents and Their Implications
Baltic Sea

  • October 2023: The Hong Kong-registered containership Newnew Polar Bear dragged its anchor across the seabed, damaging the Balticconnector natural gas pipeline and data cables in the Gulf of Finland. The ship fled toward Russia, evading investigation.
  • December 2024: A power cable between Finland and Estonia was severed, and suspicion fell on a Russian “shadow fleet” tanker, the Eagle S. Finnish authorities found specialized surveillance equipment on board, allegedly used to monitor naval activity.

Taiwan Strait

  • February 2023: Two undersea cables connecting Taiwan to the Matsu Islands were severed by a Chinese fishing boat and cargo vessel, leaving the island without internet for weeks.
  • January 2025: The freighter Shunxin-39 severed a cable off Taiwan’s northern coast. Although the ship escaped investigation, Taiwan suspects deliberate sabotage. Herming Chiueh, Deputy Head of Taiwan’s Digital Ministry, said the cable-cutting was likely intentional: “You need to accidentally [drop your] anchor on the cable, and then you need to accidentally turn on your engine with the anchor down, and even [if] you realize your anchor is down, you need to keep the engine moving until you cut the cable.”

Red Sea

  • Houthi rebels were suspected of damaging cables belonging to four major telecom networks, though the group denied involvement.

The Strategic Significance of Undersea Infrastructure

  • Economic Importance: These cables carry trillions of dollars in financial transactions daily. Disruptions can cripple economies, hinder communication, and destabilize global markets.
  • Military Implications: Reliable undersea communications are vital for military operations and coordination. Sabotage could cripple responses during crises, delaying information flow and strategic decisions.
  • Geopolitical Pressures: Russia and China employ unorthodox tactics to assert dominance and destabilize their adversaries.

U.S. Navy and Allied Responses

  • Enhanced Patrols: NATO and allied nations are increasing naval presence in the Baltic and other regions to monitor suspicious activity.
  • Technological Investments: AI-driven systems and underwater sensors are being deployed to detect and deter sabotage.
  • Policy and Collaboration: Strengthened international legal frameworks and collaborative efforts among allies are essential for defending undersea infrastructure.

The Way Forward

  • Mitigating Risks: Building redundant systems, deploying advanced monitoring technologies, and fostering public-private partnerships are key steps to reduce vulnerabilities.
  • A Call for Action: Safeguarding undersea cables requires prioritization at the highest levels of government and international collaboration to counter hybrid threats.

Undersea cables, often taken for granted, are critical to the global economy, security, and military operations. The recent spate of incidents underscores the need for vigilance, innovation, and collaboration. For the U.S. and its allies, safeguarding these invisible lifelines is not just a technical challenge—it’s a strategic imperative.

Posted on

U.S. Navy News – December 5-11, 2024

Introduction
This week’s U.S. Navy news showcases advancements in naval technology, significant operational updates, homecomings, and key milestones. From cutting-edge contracts to strategic operations, the Navy continues to push boundaries in safeguarding global security and maintaining maritime superiority.

Advancing Naval Technology

CNO Visits Orca XLUUV Facility
Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Chief of Naval Operations, toured Boeing’s Orca Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV) facility, highlighting the critical role of unmanned systems in expanding multi-mission naval capabilities.

Raytheon Awarded Contract for Next Generation Jammer
Raytheon secured a $590 million contract to develop the Next Generation Jammer Mid-Band (NGJ-MB) system in partnership with the Royal Australian Air Force, boosting electronic warfare capabilities.

Trellix Enhances Cybersecurity for Navy Enterprise Grid
The Navy has partnered with Trellix to implement AI-driven intrusion prevention systems, enhancing defenses against cyber threats across critical networks.

General Atomics Advances Long Range Maneuvering Projectile
General Atomics received funding to advance the Long Range Maneuvering Projectile, enabling precision strike and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities at ranges over 120 km.

Operational Updates

US Navy defeats Houthi attacks in Gulf of Aden for second time in weeks. The attacks took place while destroyers USS Stockdale and USS O’Kane were transiting the Gulf of Aden from Dec. 9 to Dec. 10

Freedom of Navigation Operation in South China Sea
USS Preble (DDG 88) asserted navigational rights near the Spratley Islands during a FONOP, challenging excessive maritime claims in the region.

USS Green Bay Homeport Shift
After 10 years stationed in Japan, USS Green Bay (LPD 20) returned to San Diego, marking a strategic realignment to enhance fleet readiness.

Sling Stone Exercise in Guam
The Indo-Pacific Command’s Sling Stone exercise validated Guam’s Defense System and bolstered multi-domain operational readiness.

USS Stockdale and USS O’Kane Defeat Houthi Attacks
The destroyers intercepted Houthi missiles and drones targeting U.S.-flagged ships in the Gulf of Aden, successfully defending maritime trade routes.

Ceremonial and Cultural Milestones

USS Arkansas Christened
Virginia-class submarine USS Arkansas was christened by civil rights pioneer Carlotta Walls LaNier, honoring its legacy and future mission readiness.

Pearl Harbor Day Commemorations
The 83rd anniversary of Pearl Harbor Day featured ceremonies such as the Blackened Canteen Ceremony and interment of a survivor on the USS Utah, connecting generations in remembrance.

Key Partnerships and Agreements

U.S.-Japan MOU on Electronic Attack Capabilities
The U.S. Navy and JMSDF signed a memorandum enhancing bilateral electronic attack operations, strengthening interoperability between the two forces.

University of Hawaiʻi-Navy Partnership
A 10-year agreement was signed to support natural and cultural resource conservation on Navy installations in Hawaiʻi, emphasizing climate resilience.

Homecomings and Logistics

USNS Patuxent Returns for the Holidays
After a 10-month deployment, USNS Patuxent (T-AO 201) returned to Norfolk in time for the crew to celebrate Christmas with their families.

USS Arleigh Burke Returns to Rota
USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) completed a successful patrol in Europe, reaffirming NATO partnerships and operational readiness.

Industry Updates

Shipbuilders Address Questionable Welds
Newport News Shipbuilding identified issues with preheating steps in some welds and is implementing corrective measures to ensure quality standards.

Keel Laid for USNS Thurgood Marshall
The keel-laying ceremony for the USNS Thurgood Marshall, the seventh John Lewis-class replenishment oiler, marked another milestone for General Dynamics NASSCO.

U.S. Public Policy Watch

Federal Judge Upholds Naval Academy Admissions Policy
A federal judge upheld the Naval Academy’s race-conscious admissions policy, emphasizing the importance of diversity in strengthening national security.

Congress Discusses Expanding Overseas Naval Repairs
Discussions in Congress advocated for utilizing Japanese and South Korean shipyards to address repair needs and counter the growing capabilities of China’s navy.

China Watch

  • U.S. National Security Memorandum on China: President Joe Biden has approved a national security memorandum addressing the growing cooperation between China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. The document recommends enhancing interagency cooperation, expediting information sharing with allies, and preparing for simultaneous crises involving these nations.
  • Satellite Photos Show China’s Warships in Naval Standoff. Chinese and Taiwanese warships were spotted in a standoff in the contested waters near Taiwan on Tuesday as China continued its “extremely rare” large-scale exercises at sea. Photographs captured by the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-2 satellites. The five blue dots are the Taiwanese naval vessels, while the five red dots are the Chinese.

Russia Watch

  • Russian Military Presence in Syria: Despite the recent overthrow of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Russian forces continue to control key military installations in Syria, including the Tartus naval base and Hmeimim air base. These bases are vital for Russia’s operations in the Mediterranean and Africa.
  • Calls for Ceasefire in Ukraine: Following the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, President-elect Donald Trump has urged Russia to enact a ceasefire in Ukraine, citing Russia’s weakened state due to ongoing conflicts and economic challenges.

Iran Watch

  • Alleged Iranian Drone Activity Near U.S. Coast: Representative Jeff Van Drew has raised concerns about unidentified drones spotted over New Jersey, suggesting they may be launched from an Iranian “mothership” off the East Coast. The Pentagon, however, has found no evidence supporting this claim.
  • Potential Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Program: Analysts are debating the implications of a preemptive strike on Iran to halt its advancing nuclear program, noting the acceleration of uranium enrichment and the potential for significant geopolitical shifts in the Middle East.

Conclusion
The U.S. Navy’s efforts this week demonstrate resilience, innovation, and commitment to defending national and global interests. From technological advances to operational triumphs, the Navy continues to meet the challenges of a complex maritime environment.

Stay tuned for more updates and analysis next week at StrongerNavy.org/blog.

#NavyNews #USNavy #MilitaryUpdates #NavalOperations #MaritimeSecurity #Innovation

Posted on

Open Letter: Why America Needs a Stronger Navy Now More Than Ever

James Dimon
Chief Executive Officer
JP Morgan Chase Headquarters
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY

Dear Mr. Dimon,

A Call for Leadership in Addressing Modern Threats and Ensuring Economic Stability

Executive Summary

Bill Cullifer, Founder
Bill Cullifer, Founder

This open letter is addressed to James Dimon, following his recent article in Newsweek where he stated, “World War III has already begun.” My name is Bill Cullifer, a former U.S. Navy destroyer sailor and the founder of Americans for a Stronger Navy. I share your concerns and write to stress that these threats are not just looming—they are already here.

Drawing on over two decades of experience in private-sector telecommunications and web technologies, as well as firsthand knowledge of navigating global waterways, I have witnessed the vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure that adversaries are now actively exploiting.

This letter highlights the Navy’s indispensable role in countering cyber warfare, safeguarding trade routes, and protecting economic stability. To address these urgent challenges, we propose an opportunity to explore how your leadership can strengthen naval readiness through three key initiatives:

  • Advocacy: Leverage your platform to emphasize the Navy’s critical role in securing global supply chains and maintaining economic stability.
  • Coalition Building: Lead a private-sector alliance to support naval modernization, bolster cybersecurity, and enhance infrastructure resilience.
  • Public Awareness: Partner with Americans for a Stronger Navy to educate the public and business leaders about the Navy’s essential role in protecting national and economic security.

Your voice and influence can inspire the public, corporate stakeholders, and policymakers to take decisive action. Together, we can secure America’s strategic and economic future while ensuring the Navy remains a cornerstone of global stability.

The Time to Act Is Now: Addressing Unprecedented Global Threats

In a recent article in Newsweek, you remarked that “World War III has already begun.” You warned of escalating tensions and an “evil axis” involving Russia, North Korea, Iran, and China—and the extraordinary risks we face if we fail to act decisively. Your words resonate deeply—not just as a forecast of conflict, but as a stark reminder of the unprecedented threats we face. The “knock, knock” isn’t just at the door—we’re already here.

A New Kind of War: Threats We Face Today

Modern warfare is no longer limited to traditional military engagements. Cyberattacks, economic sabotage, and intellectual property theft are actively dismantling critical systems across key sectors:

  • Healthcare: Ransomware attacks have paralyzed hospitals, delaying surgeries and endangering lives.
  • Energy: Russian hackers infiltrated energy companies, including a Kansas nuclear power plant, exposing vulnerabilities in power grids.
  • Finance: Cybercriminals disrupt transactions, destabilize markets, and threaten global economic stability.
  • Military Networks: Defense logistics and operational security are increasingly compromised.
  • Technology: Intellectual property theft undermines U.S. innovation and competitiveness.

These attacks are part of a coordinated strategy to weaken America’s infrastructure, disrupt supply chains, and challenge national security. A detailed timeline of these cyber threats and additional context from the Wall Street Journal interview are included in the attached documents for your review.

The Navy’s Role: Defending America’s Economy and Freedom of Navigation

The U.S. Navy is uniquely positioned to counter these threats.

  1. Strategic Chokepoints: Safeguarding trade routes like the Strait of Hormuz and the South China Sea prevents adversaries from weaponizing these global lifelines.
  2. Amphibious Readiness: Ensuring threats can be contained at their source while protecting U.S. maritime borders from adversarial activities.
  3. Cybersecurity Leadership: Protecting critical infrastructure, such as undersea cables and port systems, that underpin global commerce.

Navy Statecraft: A Peace-Winning Approach

As Captain Brent Sadler, U.S. Navy (Retired), emphasizes, “Tomorrow’s wars cannot be fought with yesterday’s tools.” The Navy must leverage statecraft and strategic alliances to deter aggression and uphold global stability.

  • Next-Generation Technology: Incorporating artificial intelligence and advanced cyber defenses to counter evolving threats.
  • Global Alliances: Strengthening partnerships in the Indo-Pacific to counter China’s growing influence and protect trade routes.
  • Deterrence Through Presence: A visible, strong Navy projects stability, counters disinformation, and reinforces U.S. leadership.

The Navy’s readiness ensures that economic disruptions and geopolitical tensions do not spiral into broader conflict.

A Call to Action: Building a Stronger Navy Together

As you rightly stated, “We can’t take the chance this will resolve itself.” The Navy is America’s first line of defense against modern threats.

How You Can Help

  1. Advocate for corporate investment in cybersecurity and technological innovation to secure critical infrastructure.
  2. Support partnerships between private industry and the Navy to strengthen supply chains and bolster resilience.
  3. Raise public awareness about the Navy’s role in safeguarding economic and strategic interests.
  4. Lobby Congress for greater funding to modernize and equip the Navy for emerging threats.

Closing

StrongerNavy.org offers a platform for education, advocacy, and action. I urge citizens and corporate leaders alike to support the Navy—not just for national security but to protect the economy and way of life we all depend on. For further details, I invite you to review the attached summaries of notable cyber events and the Salt Typhoon hack, which illustrate the urgent need for immediate action.

Sincerely,
Bill Cullifer
Founder, Americans for a Stronger Navy

Attachment: Notable Cyber Events

This attachment will include details about specific notable cyber events like the Salt Typhoon hack, Triton malware, and ransomware campaigns to provide further context for the threats discussed.

Economic Sabotage, Cyber Warfare, and National Security

The FBI has sounded the alarm, urging public participation to combat these threats. FBI Director Christopher Wray stated:
“We view this as combat posture with respect to cyber activity.”

Timeline:

  • Attacks on Google and RSA Security
    • These breaches signaled the rise of China’s state-sponsored cyber warfare efforts, targeting high-profile companies to weaken technological defenses.
  • “Pacific Rim” Campaign
    • Conducted by Chinese Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, this campaign exploited vulnerabilities in devices like the Sophos XG Firewall over several years.
    • Impacted sectors include:
      • Healthcare
      • Technology
      • Finance
      • Military Networks
    • The campaign aimed to steal sensitive data and compromise critical infrastructure globally.
  • Ransomware Epidemic
    • Over the past year, ransomware attacks have paralyzed industries such as:
      • Healthcare: Hospitals disrupted, delaying patient care.
      • Technology: IT systems taken offline, halting operations.
      • Hospitality: Hotel chains forced to halt services, impacting guests and revenue.
  • Energy Infrastructure Breaches
    • Russian hackers infiltrated hundreds of energy companies, including a Kansas nuclear power plant, exposing vulnerabilities in critical energy systems.
  • Triton Malware by Russian Hackers
    • Triton malware was specifically designed to:
      • Cause explosions
      • Trigger toxic chemical releases
    • This attack revealed a lethal escalation in cyber capabilities aimed at industrial sabotage.
  • AI in Cyber Operations
    • Chinese entities have been leveraging AI tools to:
      • Conduct research on companies and intelligence agencies.
      • Create phishing campaigns and refactor malicious code.
      • Translate and interpret technical papers to enhance cyber operations.
  • China’s Escalating Cyber Threats
    • Recent incidents highlight the scale and sophistication of Chinese state-sponsored cyber campaigns that threaten both national security and global stability:
      • T-Mobile Hacked in Massive Chinese Breach of Telecom Networks
        • In a major spying operation tied to the Chinese government, T-Mobile joined a growing list of known victims, including AT&T and Verizon.
        • This cyberattack penetrated the networks of U.S. broadband providers, potentially accessing systems th ae federal government relies on for sensitive communications.
      • APT40
        • In July 2024, the NSA and CISA joined seven other nations in issuing a joint advisory on APT40, a Chinese hacking group targeting:
          • Maritime industries
          • Defense contractors
          • Academic institutions
        • This campaign demonstrates China’s strategic focus on destabilizing critical sectors.
      • Flax Typhoon Campaign
        • In September 2024, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced the disruption of Flax Typhoon, a Chinese state-backed hacking campaign targeting U.S. critical infrastructure.
        • The operation aimed to compromise systems essential to national security and economic stability.
      • Seven Hackers Charged for Targeting U.S. Critics
        • The Department of Justice charged seven individuals associated with the Chinese government for computer intrusions targeting:
          • Perceived critics of China
          • U.S. businesses
          • Politicians
        • This demonstrates a coordinated effort to suppress dissent and manipulate global narratives.
      • I-Soon/Auxun Operations
        • Leaked documents exposed efforts by I-Soon, a contractor linked to Chinese intelligence agencies, to harass:
          • Dissidents
          • Academics
          • Uyghur communities overseas
        • These campaigns reveal a broader strategy of global suppression and authoritarian projection.

Attachment
Salt Typhoon: A Summary of the Chinese Cyber Threat

Introduction

The Salt Typhoon hack, as revealed by The Wall Street Journal on October 8, 2024, represents one of the most alarming cyber-espionage campaigns in recent history. This Chinese state-sponsored cyberattack underscores the growing sophistication and persistence of nation-state hacking efforts aimed at undermining U.S. infrastructure, national security, and economic stability.

The attack infiltrated critical telecommunications systems, exposed sensitive surveillance operations, and targeted key infrastructure sectors, including power grids, transportation, and water systems. Salt Typhoon exemplifies how adversaries like China are shifting from loud, disruptive attacks to stealthy, long-term intrusions designed to cripple essential systems during potential future conflicts.

Key Takeaways

  • Unprecedented Network Intrusion
    • Hackers tied to the Chinese government infiltrated major U.S. broadband providers, including Verizon, AT&T, and Lumen.
    • These intrusions granted access to domestic wiretapping systems used by U.S. law enforcement for court-authorized surveillance.
    • Quote: FBI Director Christopher Wray warned, “The risk that PRC hackers pose to every American requires our attention now.”
  • National Security at Risk
    • The hack allowed Chinese spies to monitor what U.S. authorities were investigating, including counterintelligence efforts targeting Chinese operatives.
    • Sensitive data on criminal and national security investigations may have been compromised.
    • Quote: “The Chinese were essentially able to spy on what the U.S. government was spying on,” said Wall Street Journal cybersecurity reporter Dustin Volz.
  • Stealthy and Sophisticated Techniques
    • Salt Typhoon operated with extraordinary stealth, evading detection for months, if not years.
    • This marks a strategic shift from China’s previously “loud” cyberattacks to adopting Russian-style tactics for long-term access.
    • Quote: “They are embedding themselves in networks big and small, lying in wait,” said Volz.
  • Critical Infrastructure Targeting
    • Beyond surveillance systems, Chinese hackers targeted critical U.S. infrastructure, including:
      • Power grids
      • Oil and gas pipelines
      • Transportation networks
      • Water treatment plants
    • These attacks are designed to maintain access for potential disruption during future conflicts.
    • Quote: Volz described these efforts as “detonating the cyber equivalent of bombs in these networks to cripple them.”
  • A Broader Strategy
    • The Salt Typhoon hack is part of a wider campaign of Chinese cyber operations targeting U.S. infrastructure and private companies.
    • Quote: “We are probably only seeing the tip of the iceberg,” Volz warned, emphasizing the unknown extent of the breaches.

Implications

  • Economic and National Security
    • The breach highlights vulnerabilities in U.S. digital and physical infrastructure, emphasizing the urgent need for stronger cybersecurity measures.
  • Evolving Threats
    • Chinese hackers are refining their capabilities, moving beyond data theft to preparing for destructive, infrastructure-crippling attacks.
  • Private Sector Role
    • Much of the targeted infrastructure is privately owned, and insufficient cybersecurity requirements have created a “target-rich environment” for adversaries.